Would the Islamic hordes stand a chance? If A modern day Arthur can unite England?
Can we make this meme/theme happen, in the hopes that the pathetic, neo-liberal, "progressive" soy-filled, pathetic English populace can recognize the absolute peril they are in and rise to the challenge?
Other urls found in this thread:
gutenberg.org
twitter.com
Oi you cheeky cunt. You got a loicence for that sword? If not you're cummin wiv me guvna.
The English people are subhuman anti-White bastards who deserve nothing but pain and suffering until they finally pass from this world.
Lancelot will help cuck again.
I would like to think that, but friendly reminder that Arthur is also a cuck
Sir Lancelot is the Chad we need.
Naaa mate. In the original versions Arthur fucked all the bitches.
Sir Galachad
Not gonna happen. They'd imprison him almost immediately. The biggest problem is, the majority of white men are pathetic, self-hating losers. A nation of BLACKED viewers isn't sufficient to overthrow the rulers. Consider Britain gone.
t. Anglo-Australian
Most dire state
Checked absolute truth trips
Oh we do consider y'all gone , no worries there m88
Throw off the coats of red and have yourselves a good ol fashioned tea party
I'm sorry that your shitty thread turned into radioactive waste, OP.
U WOT M8? COM ERE N SAY THAT N ILL HOOK THAT CHEEKY GABBA OF YOURS, YA MUPPET!
haha
Reminder that Lancelot was added by the French writer of the mythos and not from the original.
You listen here, Aussie. You'd better wake your people up and get those anti-gun laws repealed and replaced with legal protection for those who arm themselves before it's too late. I'm talking American-style "Shall not be infringed" legal protection.
Okay, realistically, what could a resurrected/reborn Arthur do?
Within the realm of reality, not magic or meme magic.
Yeah, no.
Britbongistan would lock any 'nationalist populist' candidate up for hate speech or inciting violence, assuming the muzzies don't knife him first. Though, by that point, the bongs may have banned anything with a point or a sharp edge, so really they'll just stone him to death.
You have to buy in.
And I don't mean just with money.
These fucks only stand their own moving up through the ranks, and that means you've got to prove you're a sickfuck and provide them with blackmail material against you in order to join the club.
Okay, suppose you had the charisma of Uncle Adolph and the decisiveness and ruthless pragmatism of the uncucked Arthur of old–the one who burned his own villages in order to supply his armies.
Wouldn't
fucking
help.
Because we're right back to the kikes, the muds, or the bongs themselves either offing him directly or not wanting to listen.
I don't want to say Britain is lost, because it's not.
Has the country been invaded and taken over by a hostile foreign presence and subversive internal presence?
Hengist did nothing wrong at Stonehenge.
I think you're being very pessimistic, and it's not surprising given recent British history. However looking back further from WWII all the way back to the Roman incursions, there is evidence of a natural fighting spirit within the populace. All they need is a catalyst or a beacon of hope to get the ball rolling.
Arthur is the man. Lancelot was added later by jews to cuck Arthur. Not even a real character but a jew meme.
If you genuinely think that way about White people then you deserve a sledgehammer blow or two to the skull. Half-satanic trips proves your Judaism, kike.
Reported and filtered.
The country that proudly served kike needs in WW2 by attacking the German empire despite Hitler not wanting to kill them can definitely be classified as anti-white.
After their amazing victory allowing free reign of the kikes over Europe they turned even more anti-white and surrendered their fighting spirit along with all their weapons and allowed every shade of Shitskin in as an apology for actually being awesome at colonialism in the past. Block everyone telling you Britain is anti-white all you want but it's the truth. There is still a small window of opportunity left for the white world to escape the kike clutch of death but things are looking more bleak every day. The Muslim mayor of London or the paki rape gangs being left free should tell you all you need to know about modern Britain.
checking those quads of undeniable truth
Typical tricks to try and divide whites. Anglos are of the largest groups and so they want to separate them from the rest of whites. They do the same to Germans as they are also a large group. Same with Russians. Very little on other groups because they are comparatively small and thus less of a threat.
Arthur's good and all, but don't forget that we have a historical figure in King Alfred the Great who is directly relevant to what is happening today. Alfred was defeated by the Vikings and each of the nascent English kingdoms was destroyed, but he rallied his people, returned, and from his work England was forged together. Part of the reason for Alfred's enduring popularity is that he not only defeated the invaders, but he codified the laws and preserved Anglo-Saxon culture. His works were for the good of the people - as a small indication of this, compare the burh fortifications he constructed with the later stone castles. Burhs were designed to shelter the population from invaders and give them security; castles were all too often designed to overawe the surrounding area.
If you want media concerning him, Chesterton's poem The Ballad of the White Horse is a legendary re-telling - gutenberg.org
Agreed, jewish shills trying to DnC. Any threads attempting to help the cucked UK or Euro populace is plagued by them. Lucky they are so fucking obvious and retarded.
Anglo-S*xons get out
King Arthur is proud Celto-Slavic
As far as I can remember Saxons did not leave Bongistan for good.
...
...
I think you mean Tommy Robinson?
Tony Robinson played baldrick in blackadder. Pic related.
Yeah, isn't Arthur welsh?
And didn't the English subjugate the welsh?
And didn't they only serve jewish interest since 1648?
Are the Anglos the jews best friend and kikes in the skin of white people?
Who knows, but I know that their actions have caused this situation.
This. Britain (and USA) has been the center of jewry for hundreds of years.
Arthorius Lucius was the leader of a Roman legion stationed in England leading a nomad mercenary legion of horseback riders of the Caucasus region. He never left back to Rome because his mission was to protect Britain and Vortigern (a Roman king in Britain) from a possible Hun invasion. His role as a protector of Britain was from that time. The legend tells of his fights against the Angles and Saxons, brought also by Vortigern to counteract his influence to the common Romano-Britons. However, these mercs were not loyal and instead demanded a huge sum.of money. As they got more lands, they brought more and more Anglo-Saxons (brothers Hengst and Horsa). It culminated with the fragmentation of Britain and the original romano-britons retreating to the more defensible western hills, modern Wales.
And i've not even mentioned the Norman invasions yet.
leadership is a myth. all movements throughout history have been spearheaded by a council of bureaucrats. to think that a group of people can be led by one man is absurd. you need a group to lead a group
Don't forget that time Arthur went to Rome and wrecked them.
Sell your soul to the devil and now the devil is here to collect, and you want divine intervention?
The Brits have been the willing whores to the Jews since Cromwell, and are the traitors to the white peoples. You still worship that demon Churchill.
God isn't going to save you unless you repent, and that's not happening.
So wait, hold up. Are you telling me that there's a good chance that King Arthur was a black guy?
Because I've seen the BBC and History channel documentaries that show there were a lot of people from northern Africa in the Roman legions.
the whole of Arthurian legends is just french bullshite. it's as English as escargot
It's originally 'Welsh' or Brythonic. There's a whole myth about how the Red Dragon would one day defeat the White Dragon. The Red Dragon is the original 'Celtic' Britons, the White Dragon is the Anglo-Saxons. Amusingly the story of Arthur is explicitly anti-Anglo-Saxon; and if Arthur did exist, people believe he was actually an Italian (Roman) noble who led a heroic (yet doomed) defense against the Anglo-Saxon invaders.
The imagery is great though. Personally I would love to see more nationalist propaganda that focuses on the unity of the white and red dragon purging the foreigners from the nation. We need to create our own myths.
Originally it was Northern British Brigantes/Rheged which then contracted into Gwynedd, the Sarmatian knights which were the basis for the legend had been given veteran settlements around Ribchester in Lancashire were the first 500 strong Ala had been based, these tribal lands then extending Northwards, there is genetic evidence of their descendants.
One of the main contenders as the basis for Camelot as having been important is Camulodunum named after the war God Camus, modern day Colchester, which had been the capital of the Roman province of Brittania, the main problem with that though is by tradition the battles Arthur fought were in establishing a Kingdom in Northern England so accordingly i want to consider the Camulodunum of the North.
Ptolemy then places this Camulodunum in the tribal region of the Setantii fairly close to the Portus Setantiorum, these were a sept or sub-tribe of the Brigantes, who ruled the entire north of England, this tribal settlement never appears to become Roman which has made actual identification of the place suggested difficult, but it is mentioned again in a more localized context;
In suggesting that Camuloduno lay between the Roman Forts at Lancaster and Watercrook the only possibility is connection with the Roman Fort at Galacum and the nearby Roman settlement of modern day Casterton, the stone Fort which could hold a 1,000 man garrison and remained in use throughout the Roman occupation was in association with the Setantii settlement of Camuloduno
.
The southernmost boundary of the Setantii tribal lands was Seteia, the Mersey River . Their territory is thought to have reached as far north as Borrow Beck, just south of Tebay, in southern Cumbria. A form of their Celtic tongue survived in this area until the twelfth century
The question then is what importance would the settlement at Camulodunum have had in the struggles of Post-Roman Britain, or more likely the nearby Roman Fort of Galacum, and the first thing that should be noted is that nobody had any interest in a united Britain, that was impossible, and the breakdown appears to have been according to the old tribal confederations, thus the concern here was in re-establishing the tribal region of the Brigantes;
Initially the Kingdom of Rheged then covered most of Northern England, but then was split with only the Western half retaining the name, Camulodunum was central within this Kingdom, with Carlisle as it's Northern capital under Carvetii control and Ribchester in the South under the Setantii
In essence then a Celtic Brigantes/Sarmatian alliance against the Saxons.