How about this. At least in the West, Jews are among the people who have: And use their money/power to influence others (of any race and religion) to do their bidding, in obvious and nonobvious ways.
However, the problems caused by concentration of power still exists in Middle Eastern, African, South American, and Asian countries with little to no notable Jews.
So, it would be, in my opinion, the Universal Redpill to assert that since people in groups A, B, C can and have abused their influence (you can point out Jews and non subservient non Jews too) to the detriment of the common people, they should be kept in check by legal boundaries to prevent people in group B from becoming agents of groups A and C.
Citizens United was a major loss in the United States, since now money is more or less directly equitable to political power. Our founding fathers wanted a government by the people for the people, not for the rich. Likewise in European countries, when groups A and C crystallize their power structures (nepotism and bribes in general), they push policies that do not benefit the people.
The solution is to make group B more directly controllable by the common people government structure and law.
Even bluepilled normies should respond well to this, should you lay off the additional anti-Jewish redpills. You can slip in the Zionist Jews trying to keep aid flowing to Israel as an example, most of that money should be used domestically. If they resist just focus on the ultra rich and powerful in general and point out their nepotism and where their money goes. Their interests do not align with those of the common people.
Protecting from A, B, and C will also future proof your society from Jews and the like.
Eli Baker
user… What you're describing is called Marxism. The whole "the primary issue - its economic differences!" as opposed to "the primary issue - its biological differences" is the foundatiobal core of Marxism.
Thats why your plan is doomed to failure - because once they've internalized the first position, its actually HARDER to get them to accept the second position, not easier, as you suggest. Thats why lots of people get up to the point of calling out the Jews and never take a step further.
I will never stop cqlling out the Jews directly, because it is the most effective route for people to walk to reach the redpill, without taking a trip on the Marxism-express that they may never return from.
Marx's critiques are accurate, his solutions are abhorrent.
I've convinced two other people so far on this as well as Jewish overrepresentation in the media, particularly how they select their successors in companies. It might be harder for normies to learn about shabbos goyim in the short run because they still think they're the same as other Whites, but I think that, to prevent any sort of alienation and exploitation between the ultra wealthy and the gentiles in the future, hammering on the wealth = power and the wealth gap works. Especially since it's already a leftist idea being accepted by normies.
Ayden Watson
Your infographics are good, but the Rothschilds on their own aren't enough to convince some normies.
Elijah Reed
Checked.
Uh huh. Okay.
I've convinced half a dozen people by just pointing out Jewry when I see it, but okay. Which is not hard to disprove, or argue effectively against at the VERY least. Uh huh. Uh huh. Well, I appreciate that you feel that way, and I'm going to continue to engage you in good faith for the moment, but I will say this outright: You smell like a Marxist. You smell a Marxist who wants to get us to promote Marxism as a 'purple pill' which is ostensibly supposed to lead to the redpill… But never does. As such, I have to express my disagreement. I appreciate your concerns over the prospect of the wealthy coming to bear against gentiles in the future, it is a matter that requires care, however, what you're proposing could - in fact, seems designed to - lead to a MARXIST revolution of sorts… And we saw how that went last time, with the Bolsheviks. No thanks. But, I tell you what, help us get rid of the Jews, and then we'll be all about making sure the Capitalists and hyper-rich elites don't try to go full fuedalism/debt-slavery/whatevercyberpunknightmareyouprefer. Thusly…
Thusly, I think it'd be better to stick to the currently-proposed route (on my behalf, at least) of following in the National Socialists' footsteps. Get rid of the Jews, and once the gentiles are coalesced into a faction of self-interest and will, then you can work on cementing into place the inhibitors to keep the hyper-wealthy from becoming abusive overlords, that's my opinion. By all means, the abusive Capitalists SHOULD be called out, but that should be secondary in terms of naming the Jew, IMHO at least; for Jews are not merely subversive when in massive wealth, remember this - a few very-poor and very high verbal IQ Jews can be a serious problem through subversion. It is not merely wealth that makes the Jew a threat, IOW - it is that he is a Jew. You might compare it to a viper - a serpent is not a threat (merely) because it has sharp fangs in its maw to pierce you, it is the venom which seeps from those fangs that is the true threat. Even a viper without fangs can be dangerous, even once you cut the head from such a creature, that venom is toxic - you could get it on your finger, accidentally wipe it in your eye, and you're blind for the rest of your life.
Destroy the viper at your feet first, then you can worry about men with spears in the surrouding brush.
You need to pay more attention to that first one. Here, let me pontificate a bit. For the purposes of edification.
In conclusion: The Jew is the greatest threat. It is the viper at our feet. We must destroy it.
And once the viper is gone, then we can worry about any threat from abusive fellows of our tribe with stabby-bits. Pursuing the fellows with the stabby bits as a priority is likely to get us bit in the dick by a venomous serpent, and no thank you. Its dangerous and thus counter-productive.
The natural way to settle injustice is violence. Playing by the legal/financial/political rules set up by Jews is never going to work. How will Jews exploit us when there are no Jews left? When they are immediately targeted once outed? What will the international community do when millions of anonymous individual citizens around the world decide to simply fix the problem and then melt away back into the general population?
Samuel Perry
The problem with your idea is that it presupposes universal egalitarianism. That all human beings are on an even playing field and thus all of our problems are economic. i.e. it's just wealth and materialism that drive the corruption of humanity and it couldn't be something beyond that. This is a very leftist way of thinking which resulted in the destruction of Russia back in the early 1900's.
The truth, which might hurt, is that it's a biological issue. Other kingdoms, without jews, have risen and fallen because they are subhumans and cannot create, sustain, or direct civilization beyond a certain threshold like the Europeans can. European kingdoms have fallen due to continuous subversion and infiltration by foreign groups who have understood that if Europeans were to ever be unleashed, they would conquer the globe through force and power and rid it of all subhumans and degeneracy, followed by extraplanetary campaigns. We see China and other asian countries with technology because it is stolen from us and handed to them. China is essentially a big back up weapon if Europeans were to ever try to shake off the Jew again. Prepare the rain of immoral chinamen if our movement ever becomes successful.
