Major uk political party adopts new jewish definition of antisemitsm

Labour’s ruling body has voted to adopt the full international definition of anti-Semitism following months of criticism. The International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance’s (IHRA) definition was incorporated into Labour’s code of conduct in July but not all its examples were included. Shadow chancellor John McDonnell became the most senior Labour figure to call for the party to fully adopt the IHRA definition of anti-Semitism.

Critics of the IHRA approach have claimed it could restrict their ability to criticise the Israeli government’s actions against Palestinians and protests are expected outside Labour’s London HQ urging the NEC to reject the examples. Speaking to BBC Radio Kent, Mr McDonnell said he wanted an acceptance of the IHRA definition and examples’ but also ‘freedom of speech so people are free to criticise Israel and its policies, free to advocate the rights of the Palestinians, but at the same time make sure it’s done in language that’s acceptable’.

archive.is/yixAP

Attached: sei_27955416-3f7b.jpg (540x359, 42.48K)

Other urls found in this thread:

archive.is/rVEPV
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Irving
odinia.org/never-mind-nfl-jews-end-run-around-u-s-constitution-use-false-flag-testimony-promote-jew-wars/
twitter.com/AnonBabble

Contemporary examples of antisemitism in public life, the media, schools, the workplace, and in the religious sphere could, taking into account the overall context, include, but are not limited to:
Calling for, aiding, or justifying the killing or harming of Jews in the name of a radical ideology or an extremist view of religion.

Making mendacious, dehumanizing, demonizing, or stereotypical allegations about Jews as such or the power of Jews as collective — such as, especially but not exclusively, the myth about a world Jewish conspiracy or of Jews controlling the media, economy, government or other societal institutions.

Accusing Jews as a people of being responsible for real or imagined wrongdoing committed by a single Jewish person or group, or even for acts committed by non-Jews.

Denying the fact, scope, mechanisms (e.g. gas chambers) or intentionality of the genocide of the Jewish people at the hands of National Socialist Germany and its supporters and accomplices during World War II (the Holocaust).

Accusing the Jews as a people, or Israel as a state, of inventing or exaggerating the Holocaust.

Accusing Jewish citizens of being more loyal to Israel, or to the alleged priorities of Jews worldwide, than to the interests of their own nations.

Denying the Jewish people their right to self-determination, e.g., by claiming that the existence of a State of Israel is a racist endeavor.

Applying double standards by requiring of it a behavior not expected or demanded of any other democratic nation.

Using the symbols and images associated with classic antisemitism (e.g., claims of Jews killing Jesus or blood libel) to characterize Israel or Israelis.

Drawing comparisons of contemporary Israeli policy to that of the Nazis.

Holding Jews collectively responsible for actions of the state of Israel.

archive.is/rVEPV

They never know when to take their foot off the gas. Nobody accuses the Sami, Mongolians, or Khoi San of controlling the media, banks, education, and government, because they aren't.

Literally, don't accuse us of any of the things we are doing.

lsn't this shit already the law in britbongstein?

But Jews did kill Jesus

I think the point is that they actually did/do everything on the list…
but you better not say they did or you will find out who exactly wields the power over you.

Attached: semites.jpg (560x392, 147.95K)

They just published basically everything you can legitimately criticise them for. Can't wait for this to blow up in their faces. This is of course only for white people, the muslims in Londonstan will be exempt for this. Would be great if they great charged, imagine the awakening. No libtard could play both "minorities"

Time to redpill the left

Attached: 6787456.jpg (780x970 50.32 KB, 203.79K)

kikey no likey = muh antiseptic

So who is going to call bullshit on this? Oh wait, it's (((Labour))).

That picture angered me, the land was completely stolen by those rat-faced bastards. Though, OP angers me just about as much, because they're literally telling us not to speak of any of the shit they're actually doing, telling the truth is a crime now. Tbh it's been a crime in many ways for a while now, and it's spreading, I hope something like this doesn't happen in the US. Goddammit it all.

ACT AS A GROUP, GET TREATED AS A GROUP

That is wrong, it implies they have any rule or sovereignty, they actually have none, they are suppressed and governed by Israel in these areas. And every several years, any small development they make is blown up by Israel.

soon, to this list will be added the following abject antisemitic acts:

I don't know if you did that by accident or I'm just late picking up on a quality meme, but that's an extremely apt alt-name for antisemitism

lel, I'm certainly not going to stop them from shooting themselves in the foot like this.

So all the rules prevent the goyim from exposing the truth.

This is actually great news.
The more the kikes are pushing for anti-semitism=anti-zionism, the more people that are just disgusted by the fact that Israel gets away with shit no other country on the planet would, will have to embrace the full label making it even less enforceable against people that are juden aware.

Threadly reminder that cunning ≠ smart.

Israel knows collective punishment - for Palestinians.

They’re getting ready to excuse themselves of actual genocide, Hahahaha

Press 'Z' for delousing

As long as no one falls for the BS Alex Jones nonsense that the Saudi's run shit. Everyone knows that banking, money control, Hollywood, every news rag, every digital news rag, every TelAvivision station, Western economies, the White House, Congress, the Senate, etc… is run by Russians based in the Dominican-Republic

Attached: Explainer Guy.jpg (302x321, 40.66K)

First Amendment

First Amendment

First Amendment

First Amendment

First Amendment

First Amendment

First Amendment

First Amendment

First Amendment

First Amendment

First Amendment

Fuck, I love being an American. The Jews who shill this board enjoy d&c with the 56% meme, but thoughts like this get me through. We're fat, we have tons of Jews sucking our blood, our government is run by some of the worst possible choices, our celebrities all deserve the rope, and we probably need to get our shit together on a hundred different things, but it does warm my heart to think about the antisemitic shitposting monopoly Ameribros will soon inherit when it becomes illegal for bongs not to love Uncle Shekelstein.

Arguably 'B' might be more appropriate

Did you read the OP? It's not the United States.

The woman doth protest too much. This is essentially enforcement of "it's all just a coincidence, goyim"

The audacity of this jewish filth. "The Romans did it". Fuck right off with that horseshit. The fucking Pharisees stabbed him in the heart, and they're blaming the act upon the dagger.

I feel for the British people, I truly do. No amount of shitposting will change that. The Commonwealth people won't forget you guys. They just have to sort their own shit out first.

Attached: 1495564706443.png (960x864, 526.69K)

Also:


Did you read his post? He said he's glad he's American because of the First Amendment, which is something the brits don't have. This isn't the retard rodeo, so leave your spurs at the door, son.

Everything on that list is completely true.

They tried the same here user, it just died in Congress.

Really?
That's good to hear, and not surprising there was no mention in MSM.
I don't suppose you have a source for sharing?
TIA

Holocaust denial is legal in the UK. Otherwise David Irving would be rotting in jail in his home country.

…and this is why I hate Jews.

Even if it had passed unanimously – as much as I hate to praise the heebie-jeebie legal system – the courts do have an okay record on free speech, even when it's the Jews. The Bill of Rights really is one of those things you can still largely count on, at least when there's a huge public stink. The fiction of human rights still has pull as an idea in the United States, even if it's fading elsewhere.

If they want you badly enough, the flimsiest pretext will do fine.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Irving

contempt of court is a crime

Holocaust scepticism was legal in Bongolia, up until Jan 2017. Then pick related became law.


#127 in an open-ended series, by Zig Forums.

Attached: britain is occupied territory.jpg (1021x272, 82.88K)

oh shit wasn't that le based corbyns party?
and another one gone, and another one gone

To be fair threats, or calling for people to be killed isn't protected by the First Amendment. Everything else is fine

choose one and only one

A collective of jews has just forced a political party into promising that they will never accuse jews of operating as a collective.

Why don’t they just ban the use of the word Jew and words associated by anyone other than Jews?

lol, name a single one of these societal institutions that has no jews at the top, middle and bottom
sure, i won't question, i'll just question why is it illegal to question it, surelly there must be overwhelming evidence to these large scale crime, like 6 millon bodyes for example
we're not the ones who came up with the soap and lampshades meme, and lets not talk about the holocauster tycoon
kikes say this shit themselves, it amazes me sometimes how little self awarnes they have when they openly state they would gladly backstav their host nation in the name of Isrrael
Jews call themselves a race so a state just for them is an ethnostate, wich they themselves define as racist
topest of keks, netanyahu himself has claimed in social media that Isrrael speaks for all the jews in the world

Something something, "jews don't work as a hivemind" defense, something something.
You've already lost. Thanks for bowing to the kikes, retard.
Would you happen to have a link to that? It'll be extremely useful for my book.

still didn't answer my question
name a siungle one of these institutions that is not completly full of jews from top to bottom

What is brit/pol gonna talk about now? They’ll just have to go back to posting cuck porn

Corbs should just troll the kikes by adding in criticism or mistreatment of Palestinians, who are pure blooded semites unlike ashkenazi kikes, is antisemitism.

Ideas so untrue you have to make them illegal to discuss™

Attached: 40295203_10217422602343395_5665858798900740096_n.jpg (768x365, 42.06K)

Eternal commie cucked out.

Let me guess - antisemitism is defined as any criticism of jewry?

Doomed. lol.

>jewish men should be able to walk into any gentile house at any hour of the day or night and fuck any female or even male in the house no matter how young, on a whim. Any resistance or even verbal protest is to be treated as an act of the most evil terrorism and must be immediately suppressed by the SWAT team. After the parents have been eliminated the children are to be (((adopted))) by a (((charity))) in Israel to be self funded by its video production company.

there is no law against holocaust denial or hating kikes in britain

These fucking turbokikes again?

Attached: ihra.jpg (1607x789, 250.03K)

Such agent-deletion sets up whoever wrote that as non-rebutable arbiter (typical tyrannical tactic). Why does no other sovereign get such protection from criticism?

Imagine how much of a cunt you’ve to be to need laws to stop people calling you names.

Gee, it's almost like jews don't want to be held responsible for their collective crimes against humanity. How convenient for kikes.

Fuck me. It gets worse every day. Britain is practically Israel 2.0 now.

But it's proven from their own mouths they exaggerated the holocaust so their entire premise is invalid

One rule for (((me)))…

Jewish fragility.

The correct argument against this sort of bill in a multi-cult anything is that it treats kikes as a superior race. No other group of people will get SPECIAL legal protection–kikes only. They can't argue against that, either.

So you can't attack whites for slavery?

In the US, even though their faggy little bill died, the kikes are suppressing us through private companies fueled by their illegal federal reserve and trickle-down nepotism and general criminality. Even in cases where it's illegal, kikebook can discriminate against any religion, so long as said religion is White. odinia.org/never-mind-nfl-jews-end-run-around-u-s-constitution-use-false-flag-testimony-promote-jew-wars/

That's a feminine penis, goyim.

In Canada they frame it as "promoting hatred" but there is a large hole (thanks to Ernst Zundel legalizing fake news, freedom of association, and freedom of religion).

The Church of the Shoah Skeptic is totally legal, for instance.

Trips. Kind of like legislating the value of pi at 4, and more in the realm of reality, per se driving impairment laws.

kys

Fucking assholes.