Anyways, I'm here to talk about the phenotypes of humans; specifically that of the European kind. Now in the case that we win against (((them))), which phenotype would be theoretically the one we should be focusing on expanding in population? Now before some of you lazy bastards yell out "NORDID!" from the back of the room, let's take into account that to preserve some physical traits of the Nordic people - especially the fair eyes and hair - inbreeding would become inevitable if we were to focus on preserving those traits. Why? Because they're recessive.
In NaziLarpWorld; where all the "Impure People" (A.K.A. 90% of Europeans that live North of Germans, and all South) were killed off due to their Brown Hair and eyes, we'd be left with a very small pool to breed from. This would then lead to inbreeding. The moment anyone without the Blue eyes and Blonde hair gene walks into the room; the whole fucking conversation goes with it. So therefore, to continue the straw-man ideology of "Pure Aryan… ism" we'd need to inbreed.
However, unarguably, the German and South-Scandinavian facial structures are *very* well built. And as such, the Dalofaelid phenotype is something to note when it comes to the best facial structure. So then… is there a mix between the Nordic Dalofaelid and Mediterranean eyes and hair? Yes.
Let me introduce you to the Paleo-Atlantid. A fucking unit itself; probably a surviving Neanderthal. Seen in central Scandinavia (So more Northern then the Germans.) and West Scotland and Ireland; these bastards look like Dalofaelids but have the added benefits of dominant genes. Theoretically, these guys would be easier to expand in population. But hey, that's my (Biased.) opinion. So uh… what are your thoughts?
Recessive genes survive just as well as dominant ones. It just happens that the recessive genes are less likely to be visible.
Jace Myers
I’m not saying it should or shouldn’t be Nordid but yeah, what this user said. Inbreeding isn’t harmful if you arrange it carefully and spread it out to happen only periodically between distant relations. Also, the recessive nature of the genes is pretty irrelevant. This thread had so much potential but then OP had to be a LARPy autist.
Bentley Brooks
To clarify, that is, I'd like to have had some info dumps and stuff about European phenotypes. To that end, I’m negating my own sage and hoping we can just make this a general genetics thread to redeem it.
Logan Baker
Who knows if that's really you. Assuming you don't have the IQ of a nigger, you didn't post your own face. So claiming that it's obvious that you're not a jew just by looking at you is a silly claim. Also, you demonstrate that you're not from around here and didn't lurk. I'll point out how I know this later.
Anyway, Um… all of them? I love all Europeans. Each nation is beautiful in culture and facial features. Though I do have my favourites and I hope to weed out the Arabic features in Italians and Greeks.
That's not how genetics work. is correct.
Yeah, this is how I know you didn't lurk. No one actually believes this. This is a libshit meme.
Finally, I don't quite see where you're going with this. Are you implying that the Paleo-Atlantid is the desirable end goal for Europeans and that we should all mix together to form it? If so, then you are a faggot. Europeans are diverse and beautiful. We don't need to mix with anyone, not even each other. The kind of inbreeding you're talking about doesn't happen in large populations. If it did, then how do you explain away the tens of thousands of years of "inbreeding" within nations? It was not until recently that Germans could regularly mate with French.
Sage for you not lurking and for not understanding history and genetics.
When you obsess over minor traits you lose sight of what this movement should be about. This is the civilized vs the savage. I don't care what hair or eye color a person has, I don't care if his skin is pale white or golden bronze, if he is indo-european he is of the civilized. If we focus only on proliferating physical traits what good does that do us? We would be destroying the natural diversity of the civilized Aryan peoples native to Europe, parts of the mideast, and parts of Russia.
We need to spread the civilized, inventive genes, without regard to hair or eye color, or even stature. We're trying to achieve greatness here, not be shallow and end up with a race that's solely good looking. I want strength, knowledge, and colonization of space, this is what we should work towards. You want creepy pale blonde clones.
Daniel Nguyen
This thread is the perfect opportunity for D&C shilling.
Chase Evans
The characters of Knights of the Zodiac not only have Aryan features, but also Aryan ideals.
Jackson Robinson
...
Brandon Long
Well I mean I wasn't focusing purely on the eyes and hair colour, I was focusing on the facial structure.
yeh, good points. Except that you seriously believe that on Zig Forums I'd post my own face. Also I usually don't lurk around here long enough to see racial shit; but I do see the side of you guys that are mildly vocal. However the vocal part - as far as I've seen - legitimately believes in Elisabeth Nietzsche's racial ideologies.
good points II: I agree with you Boogaloo
Joseph Jenkins
Reread what I wrote. I said, Do you have the IQ of a nigger? If not, then I'm sure that's not you.
It's rude to not lurk. That's part of our culture and if you had lurked, you'd know that almost no one wants to do what you think we do. Anyone who seriously wants to genocide Europeans for being brown or red haired is an anti-White kike here to start brother wars. Fuck em.
Can iberia be saved, lads? People are very racist there and i'm an atlantomed living in South BR. I'd fit pretty well there.
Brody Anderson
Unless we take out the Sand Niggers than EUROPE is fucked.
Dylan Williams
It can't be THAT bad demographically there, can it? Mauritanians were phoenicians, who were caucasians.
Jonathan Edwards
Again, if you had lurked, you'd know that most Zig Forumsacks do not subscribe to the jewish idea that "Aryan" means "Blond haired, blue eyed, nazis" We generally use the term interchangiably with "Indo-Europeans" though most Zig Forumsacks do not include Persians and North Indian groups with the term.
Maybe so. But I don't know what you mean by that because there is no such national group.
Carter Brooks
Did you even read that post?
Tyler Rivera
u fukin wot m8? tronder master race. kneel peasant
Whatever I needed to pull that fuckin image out I have no time to check the facts and see if they're 100% correct. Jesus Harold Christ.
Luis Adams
ALRIGHT IGNORE THAT LAST ONE
Christopher Parker
go back to where you game from you shitposting d/c kike
Anthony Lopez
Whatever this fucking half-assed markup-HTML formatting shit pisses me off.
Austin Young
inbreeding occurs in extremely small population sizes, as in 50 or so in number. not 50 million, you utter fucking ignorant cretinous retarded cunt. fucking read and lurk for 10 years before posting again. you certainly are not worth preserving in the slightest. fuckwit
Aaron Morales
maybe you should go back to cuckchan where the formatting is easier for retards like yourself
Nicholas Martinez
can't. my posts are too shit to not get archived
Lincoln Rodriguez
reported kikes are neanderthals double reported
Carter Carter
brainless fucking idiot
Isaiah Sanders
Please stop proving horseshoe theory is real. We don't want to be associated with (((them))) in any way.
Not sure what OP means here, either way OP puts it, OP's wrong. OP has confused phenotype with race. That said, the most genetically stable offspring come from unions of about the 4th cousin level of relation distance. So long as both members have not suffered dysgenics and are equally the same nation race of blood. A Nordic type is best off breeding with a Nordic type regardless of country borders. Look at Trump and his wife, one is German and the other is Balkan, a beautiful union of two Nordics. As Varg Vikernes says, marry someone that looks like you. This is the simplest way of viewing relations. Outbreeding is more deleterious than inbreeding, contrary to common belief, it's statistically and racially safer to inbreed rather than outbreeding. As I said the healthiest children come from a 'goldilocks' zone between in and outbreeding, between two members of the same race(racial type, nation).
OP fails to strive for Aryan idealism in their search of creating a dominant gene race to avoid 'inbreeding'. I hope OP isn't using this unfounded 'logic' of theirs to justifying nation mixing and the further ethnic displacement of less dominant gene races.
Jackson Hall
I like how this has devolved into people going "YOU'RE WRONG!" and not actually trying to add onto the conversation.
It makes no sense why we just don't leave the correcting part as-is because everything that needs to be said has been said.
Add to the damn conversation now. Answer my bleedin' question.
Noah Moore
Fucking jew. Surviving Neanderthals are semites Semites are Homo Sapiens + Homo Neanderthalensis hybrids. Semites has up to 20% Neanderthal admixture. You are nothing but a dirty jew. Fucking Neanderthal hybrid abomination.
Brandon Morales
can we just kill this fucking thread off nice tor node
