I've often heard that Freudian psychology (I.e. the pathologization of white male behavior) is subversive and dehumanizing, but I've never read or heard a coherent articulation of why exactly this is so.
If anyone has information on this (links, articles, quotes etc…) please post them here.
Other urls found in this thread:
web.archive.org
youtube.com
renegadetribune.com
vanguardnewsnetwork.com
mega.nz
twitter.com
Freud tells you that playing tag with your child to playfully train predator evasion movement is actually you wanting to fuck your own kid.
also, he's a jew.
That guy doesnt know shit, he thinks all guys wanna sleep with their mothers and all daughters wanna bang their dads, also
Great read, thanks. Polite sage, I have nothing to contribute
It's projection of Jewish degeneracy. They are coprophiles, they obsess over genitalia and scat and depravity.
Freud harbored a (typical Jewish) animus for his host society in Vienna. In commonplace Jewish revolutionary spirit, he wanted to upend Viennese self-confidence by calling them out as a bunch of repressed fakes. Because of trauma caused by repressing desires prevented by taboos in place, according to Freud, our subsconsciences which desire those things, but are kept down, pop up in various neuroses which are what typically come out as mental illness in various forms. The most infamous of these is the "Oedipal Complex," in reference to Sophocles's "Oedipus Rex," about a king who was abandoned as a child, became king when he solved the sphinx's riddle, and had it slowly revealed to him that he had unknowingly married his own mother.
Although Freud didn't outright say we should just reject all taboos and give in to every desire, that was the gist of it that most people took from his writings. That, of course, is a very Jewish attitude, one that would not help to cohere the dual monarchy, but disintegrate, i.e. Jew, it.
Freud didn't use empirical data, he was just a dude with an opinion, and like later postmodernists Lacan or Derrida, he had a circle of influential followers that hung on his every word like a guru, or more accurately, a rabbi.
There's a reason Freud mused "well….we could always use a goy" when he was told that Carl Jung was becoming interested in psychoanalysis.
He also wrote that when he read of the 2nd Punic War as a young student, he imagined himself as Hannibal, the semitic conqueror come to destroy Rome. That tells you all you need to know about his motivations.
READ C.G.JUNG
freud was on to some things – subconscious is real and important – but everything's through the lens of a neurotic cokehead jew who grew up in 19th century austria. as a map of your mind, his is like a disneyworld tourist map: semi-accurate, enough to get around, leaves a lot out, and also for some reason everything is labelled 'incest mountain' and 'scatville' and such.
deconstructing animal drives doesn't have to be dehumanizing, freud just made it that way bc he couldn't see a way out (t. jew). for instance, pretty much every mammal uses its mother as a prototype for femininity, meaning how your mother treats you informs how you relate to women later. this is pretty straightforward and does not have to be 'omg infants wanna fuck mom' – it's just facts of life shit. ditto for 'learning to control your body is an important early challenge' -> 'everything about control is anus obsession'. freud says sensible things in fucking batshit language.
this faggot is right, jung is a less pozzed salvaging of freud's ideas (reich is even more pozzed, somehow). jung was deep into medieval christianity and esoterica, tried to salvage some of that using freud as a shovel. did pretty good. read the red book.
