Even if it true that trump the Most unpopular president in history

How and why? What the hell is going on?

Other urls found in this thread:

powforums.com/thread/772178778/miscellaneous/girls-you-want-to-see-blacked.html
dinsta.com
archive.is/BIfmP
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

butcher the right
butcher the right
butcher the right
kill their children

Because TV and print media depict a majority population that doesn't exist. It isn't real. What is so difficult about understanding this?

Seems too easy. Too good to be true.

You’re not on reddit. Go away.

People have decided they want to hear different lies to keep calm and go extinct quietly.

...

>>>/cuckchan/
Seriously read the rules before posting you stupid rapefugee.

Made me chuckle.

Attached: Untitled.png (647x419, 96.3K)

you just got killed, rightycuck soyboy

That doesn’t look like a big gap between Obama and trump

Defending Trump? You get the bullet.

Reported.

Go look up the decline of basically any society.

In fact, I'll do you one better than that. Go look up America during the Roaring Twenties. Compare the 20's and 30's to America in the 2000's and 2010's, and you'll see a disturbing number of similarities.

People that say that the economy is going to crash are not wrong. It will happen, but it's going to be a worldwide event. Follow the path that history has led us down before, and you will find that it all repeats.

This is offensive to real refugees, bro. Not cool.
t. Honduran

Between the "most popular president in history" according to the liberal kikes? Well, that's sure makes this nigger 2nd in place.


Save your bullet after the election. I'm sure you can have its usefulness.

I met my wife in Honduras… I obviously didn't bring her to the US because I don't want her to be (((americanize))).

You're already dead.
Anyone defending capitalism is dead.

...

A republican just won an election in a Texas border district that is over 60% Hispanic and has been democrat for 120 years.
If a republican wins there, where on Earth could a democrat win besides Chiraq/Baltimore/Cuckifornia.

Oh, what are you gonna do, implement socialism for the 159th time. But this time it will work, right? You won't get those hormone pills for free.

Attached: 7243199912.jpg (399x612, 37.51K)

Low quality threads or threads that should be on questions deserve their own threads other wise you are shitting up the board

Attached: 8a4d1d98da6ee25341d158aa8ab528e61c512ab10101f54869f5062153dd953b.jpg (498x441 122.15 KB, 201.05K)

Don't forget the commies

Attached: 85768567.jpg (908x552, 40.64K)

You have to go back.

...

...

...

kvetch more, Porky.

Attached: 04bd4448634832397064393a69d2bea9793bb1495aa4259a772a0098a725ef95.png (702x1048, 151.38K)

I wish I could go to America and find someone to marry…

Stay in your shithole.

kek

Attached: Oink Oink.png (959x707, 695.12K)

...

People can only deny objective reality for so long. No amount of brainwashing can overcome basic human cognition. When they see their country falling apart, they vote against those who caused it.

What's going on? Their media is fabricated bullshit. It's all an illusion. They use it to shape reality, not depict it.

Filtered. Don't post your faggot shit here.

Electoral politics will never improve the status of white people. Democracy gives the jews' the keys to your country.
even if true, that won't last longer than a few years 'cause whites won't be a high enough percent of the population

also there is no difference between democraps and republicucks. kys blumpftard

Attached: worst president.jpg (740x410 229.17 KB, 702.68K)

Can't wait until the elections are over so you sub-humans stop coming around with this shit-tier shilling. Filtered.

Attached: 35335394_148216309378253_7798375130119274496_n.jpg (1080x1350 185.61 KB, 110.01K)

It has been explained for over a year, the wall IS an esoteric metaphor regarding the unity and strength of the American people when they look deep inside

Classic jew
also
We're as fractured as ever and you know it. We have nigs pouring in from all over and whites are being shat on whenever possible even if you look at it in your jewish metaphor trump STILL dun goofed.

WOMP WOMP

Punish them for defying the Jewish order!

Trump's not the one doing it, retard, nor does he have the dictatorial powers to stop it. Nor did he ever claim to be a savior.. Holy shit you shills are fucking dumb. You're calling him a kike, meanwhile you're trying to build up this image of what we supposedly thought Trump was in 2015, which isn't even remotely accurate, so you can attack it and try to undermine our positions and motivation. Get fucked. Filtered.

It's simple, they refuse to acknowledge the reality of the situation that's brewing and keep pressing on with the same failing propaganda strategy. People are getting agitated by it and being the retards they are, they keep amplifying it.

Actual discussion on Zig Forums?

Of course he's not the ONE doing it. He's one OF the ones doing it.
With the precedent Obama set abusing executive orders, he basically does.
He DID say he was going to "drain the swamp" and "make america great again" both of which he failed to do.
No, I'm comparing what we wanted trump to be to what he is, and you can't handle it.
I will give you that, trump isn't what we thought he was.
No, so I can free you from your gaslighting

Attached: my man sam.png (1600x900, 3.22M)

Pretty much the core of every Trump thread in the last month or so.
This is why leaders are both important and hazardous - when they betray you (and Trump HAS betrayed the White Americans who voted for him, there's no debate in this capacity), a lot of people can't bring themselves to acknowledge it.

Attached: MAGA in 2018 Expanded.jpg (1224x688, 218.99K)

...

k


You've definitely convinced me!

Another dumb-fuck shill. No, stupid, he didn't betray us, because he was never exclusively for us. Trump was never a white nationalist. He was never an ethno nationalist. He was never a nationalist. No one ever thought he was. This is pathetic demotivation tactics to get us to not even try. Trump was indisputably better than Hillary. We tried, within the realm of that election, and got the better outcome. You don't want us to try. If we keep getting the better outcome, we can make things overall better for us. If we do nothing, like you want, we fucking lose right now! Filtered.

What if?
No if.
Done.

You need to engage with reality.

Attached: doctor.jpg (8248x7832 34.74 KB, 10.73M)

Why are you spamming thots?

Hmmm…


Oh, LOOK WHAT I FOUND.
>powforums.com/thread/772178778/miscellaneous/girls-you-want-to-see-blacked.html

Are those all girls you would like to see blacked, user?

Attached: ClipboardImage.png (1063x200, 30.09K)

Funny, we were exclusively for him, and without us, he would have lost completely.
Pic related.
Then he was a waste of time.
???
Current Year +3 and you're still whining about Hillary.
Pic also related.
Final pic related: Your better outcome.

Attached: Demographic Replacement.gif (2200x4132 103.14 KB, 1.72M)

Oh my bad fella, I got you and this other faggot confused.


Feel free to respond to this though

as its basically the same thing I'd direct at you for your shitpost.

What?

...

Do you read?

Do you read?

He meant white people voting for trump made him win, are you having a stroke?

...

He got 30% of Latinos.. who he's supposedly racist against.

Not much different from Whites really.

What? You need to relax guy, you seem upset.

So you're saying Trump won because of Jews? I don't know man, I'm pretty sure it was the White vote like that graphic demonstrates.

White people.
Without White people.
He would have lost without White people. They were 88% of his vote, after all.
Me. And anybody else that is White who voted for him and isn't some kind of weird neocohen from reddit, or even tumblr.


Trump has never named White people to my knowledge. I'd love to see that proven wrong though.

White people =/= Zig Forums. What white people in general wanted is not what Zig Forums wanted, so when some dumb-fuck shill sits here trying to demotivate us from doing anything by talking about how Trump was a massive failure for us, it's absurdly stupid. Also what we wanted and expected are two different things. The average white person is not an ethno nationalist. They did not vote for an ethno nationalist. We knew he wasn't one. We knew he wasn't Hillary Clinton and he was a the best choice. That's pretty much why everyone voted for him. To sit here in late 2018, just before the mid-term elections (coincidence I'm sure…) and pretend like we were expecting Trump to be Hitler and deport all the non-whites and so on and so forth, and act like he was a total failure, is shill demotivation attempts to get us to not vote at all, and make zero effort at any change. I'm voting. If you shills don't like it, get fucked. I'm still fucking voting.

Romney and Bush got even more.
You civnats need to learn a basic principle, which this pasta will help edify:

I can't help but laugh at civic nationalism - its a self-defeating meme.

Look at the US.

We hear civic nationalists talking all about these Constitutional principles that they hold dear.
Freedom of speech. Right to bear arms. Limited government.
Yet these same civic nationalist principles, they claim, demand judgement on the basis of the individual only, not as collectives… Of course, their claims are somewhat suspect, given the men who derived those princples initially were slave owners and created the US as an explicit White ethnostate, but whatever.

The point is, this hyper-individualistic outlook forces them into a cognitive box, limiting the extent of their philosophical-willpower. It does so, in that it forces them to reject judgement in the context of racial groups as a collective, despite races acting as collectives.
For example: Hispanics support gun control (60%+ in favor, 30% against). And hate-speech laws (50%+ in favor, 25% against). And expanded government (70%+ in favor, 20% against). And Hispanics overwhelmingly identify with the left-wing political parties (60%+, increasingly from generation to generation after entry to the country to upwards of 70% by the 2nd generation). AND Hispanics demonstrate an elevated fertility rate relative to White populations in the US (still above replacement levels).

Thus, by upholding civic nationalist principles in judging Hispanics as individuals instead of as a group, many Hispanics would be (and have been) allowed into the country - for example in the amnesty of Ronald Reagan - despite the fact that collectively they do not believe in the principles upon which the nation was founded… Not that they would say as much if attempting to gain entry - deception exists, and civic nationalist arguments as-goes vetting procedures are underwhelming, nevermind the prospect of enforcement of civic values after entry (let alone over generations).

And this last point about enforcement is important, because evidence suggests that, like most ethnic/racial minorities in the US, Hispanics do not demonstrate a collective belief in the civic principles of the US (certainly not to the proportional degree seen in US Whites), but they DO behave as a collective, supporting left-wing political groups in overwhelming majority. Those promoting civic nationalist ideals do not demonstrate the philosophical-willpower to enforce these civic values, have offered no methodology to alter this condition, and all indications suggest they are bereft of such a method - if they were not, the populations which have been in the US for several generations, exposed to the values of the country and civic nationalists' arguments in that vein, would espouse those positions, but they do not.
this is the part you need to pay attention to
While on the subject… Why do Hispanics support left-wing groups? Are they actually more left-wing in political view? Yes, but that's not the whole story - they vote as a collective, and they do so to serve collective interests. Left-wing groups in the US are the groups in favor of serving the left-wing predispositions of Hispanics (hate-speech laws, gun control, expanding government with more programs) as well as increased immigration, which they promote loudly, and increased immigration leads to an increase in population for the respective ethnic/racial minority in question, which in turn leads to an increase in the political power, electorally at the very least, wielded by that ethnic/racial minority. Hence, regardless of their political stance, Hispanics support left-wing groups as a collective to serve collective interest. We see the same sort of behavior on behalf of Blacks and other non-Whites.
In fact, we see the same sort of behavior on behalf of Asians, who also primarily support left-wing groups in the US (50%+, increasing generationally), even though polling of their political views suggest they may not actually be left-wing politically - they're merely acting as a collective in serving their collective interest.

Left-wing groups are, for whatever reason (ideology, personal desire for power or wealth, etc), very happy to assist in this endeavor, and in fact, the left-wing political party of the modern US is an amalgam of minority groups acting collectively in their own interest despite an absence of shared political belief betwixt the tribes. They are, effectively, a collective composed of collectives, each acting to serve their own interests, and a great deal of their effort is maintained in securing each individual collective's support and avoiding conflict among those groups where their perceived collective interests conflict. Further, these left-wing groups - aided by left-wing political/social organizations (several particularly influential examples bearing an overt Jewish composition or philosophy) - explicitly advocate for, and support the explicit advocacy of, the respective non-White minority collectives, whilst simultaneously doing everything in their power to silence, slander, demonize and deplatform any and all explicit White advocacy groups through accusation of association with 'racism', 'White supremacy', 'Nazism' and/or 'anti-Semitism', amongst others.

That is to say, the left-wing in the US, particularly the influential Jewish wing, advocates against explicit White advocacy. Which is why no such explicit White advocacy organizations exist in the US today which are not so slandered, and certainly none which exhibit institutional power and perceived legitimacy as might be claimed on behalf of other ethnic/racial groups' equivalents (the latter of which often exhibiting a far more seedy character than the former).
Ironically, this seems to form a neat little circle for the left-wing (especially Jewish) actors: by advocating against White advocacy and White advocates using accusations such as 'racism' or 'White supremacy', Jewish left-wing organizations create anti-semitic sentiment in White advocates and White advocacy organizations, which those same left-wing Jewish organizations then utilize to further slander them through accusation of 'anti-semitism' or 'Nazism'!
Its important to note that the left-wing political factions and their accomplice political organizations in the US also employ such accusations in opposition to any efforts to inhibit left-wing political aims at increasing immigration into the US from non-White sources, promoting globalist multiculturalism and miscegenation, and degrading national borders, even national sovereignty.

The left-wing has been so successful in their efforts in this regard, that the US population demographics are beginning to disintegrate. The White population - the only population which demonstrates anything close to majority support for the ideals which civic nationalists claim to hold most dear - is being displaced.

What conclusion do we reach from such analysis of circumstance?
We can discern that the civic nationalist position is philosophically-unequipped to combat this hazard, in that their civic nationalist ideals demand they make judgements on strictly individual grounds such as to ignore ethnic/racial behavioral trends. They will thus seek to argue in favor of judging a long line of individuals, as individuals, on principle, who can and will present themselves as sharing a belief in the principles civic nationalists claim to seek to uphold if such is required to gain entry to the country, and who will subsequently act collectively in their own interests once in the US such as to create new demographic conditions within the US that are no longer fertile substrate for the individual - and thereby societal - espousal of civic nationalists' proposed ideals.

tl;dr: Non-Whites don't care about civic duties or virtues, they act as collectives to serve collective interests, and civic nationalists do not have any mechanism at their disposal to change, nor combat, this state of affairs, even as they vehemently protest, on the basis of their civic nationalist principles, White advocates attempting such a feat. These civic nationalists are thus demonstrating that they are operating from an obsolete playbook, attempting to espouse civic nationalist ideals of individualism that were only able to be maintained in homogenous White nations bereft of competition from myriad non-White collectives (each serving their own interests), and yet, despite this failure, demonstrable throughout electoral politics in the US (and the West overall) over the last 30+ years, civic nationalists continue to suggest the old playbook is valid. The conclusion is thus that, if civic nationalists are allowed to attempt to carry out their proposed policies in the US, there will cease to exist a substrate for civic nationalists' beloved Constitutional principles and these principles will cease to exist in application in the US. Self-defeating meme.

Thinking Chans caused the worst upset in political history is like some silly Kekistan shit.

Funnily, I'm gonna use Clinton's famous quote:

"It's the economy, stupid."

Only this time, Trump and his voters knew that. Not Hillary.

Wtf is a civnat? Is that like a socnat?

Either way, I didn't vote for Trump. I'm not even White, for that matter.

Shhhhh now ethnocuck.
It is in many respects, actually. That's why Zig Forums promoted him, ethnocuck.

Okay ethnocuck.

Yeah but you also like Blacked porn apparently so who cares what you think?


Who are you talking to user?

Dumb shit-skin, it's civic nationalist. Now get off Zig Forums. You're not wanted here. Filtered.

That doesn't surprise me.

Tell us about the Blacked girls.
Why do you save the jpgs?
If I took away your BBC, would you die?

Attached: ProTrump in Current Year 3.jpg (3110x1448, 1.11M)

Yeah, retards like you are for fitlering

You guys filter people here? Really? Pussies.

How about the Magic Staff of Executive Orders? Or perhaps the Magic Rod of Military Forces?
No?
Okay. Yeah, it has to be magic to get this done and Trump doesn't have it. Just like when Obongo wanted DACA. You sure convinced me!
Lots of people are obstructing him, but that was a given. He's letting himself be obstructed. And you're shlling for him.
Alongside some weirdo talking to himself and some guy whose into Blacked. Good company you keep guy.

Why're you talking to yourself now?

>when you think you're smart but you don't realize that those titles came from downloading her instagram images through dinsta.com
So before you were shilling this demotivaiton, were you one of the ones shilling interracial porn? Probably. You're are a sub-human shit-skin.

Obviously not talking to myself. You replied.

Not sure what's "weird" about me either. Politics are about abstracts and principles. You aren't getting anywhere without allying with people on those either.

At least you're admiting he's beign obstructed. And then act that is nothing but a minor inconvenience that he can easily solve. Even though we know there are saboteurs that deliberately are trying everything to stop or SLOW DOWN things like the wall. Executive orders are not a magic wand and can be contested.

The country is still infested with traitors and Trump is walking a fine line. He can't even trust his own secret services.

Though I will agree he seems to be holding back for some reason. However, I won't presume to Know what that reason is.

Cool story bro. I'm sure someone will believe it. Its much better to be trolling thots on instajew than to be posting those instajew thots in a blacked thread. Not by much, but that's something.
Hard times out there these days. IP hopping faggots, shilling thots and awful neocons, urging you at every turn to stay invested in a system owned by jews that ensures you're destined to always lose even when you win, the world seemingly teetering on the edge of wide-spread conflict, but you know what user?
Sometimes you just need to laugh.

And when I need a laugh, I come to Trump shills who love Blacked porn and act like that fat kike looking for tentacle porn when he gets caught. Because it makes me laugh.

Are you having a stroke?
You keep talking to yourself, for one. If you want to talk to someone on Zig Forums, you cite their post. You break the link if you don't want to give them a (you).
Also you need to go back and re-read:

Make sure you really get it.

Then I guess your 2016_Election_-_Racial_Demographics_-_Jews.jpg was absolutely nothing

Attached: 2.png (594x745 2.34 MB, 31.19K)

I get it, but I don't think it applies to America. It was never an ethnostate to begin with. And it's founding ideas have a more broad allure than England/France/etc.. It's all in the Constitution and in Natural Rights. And "intangibles".. i.e. "The American Dream" and whatnot. Many different types of people can and do fight for those.

Just half? Democrats are even more jewish than the republicans. That’s saying something

Trump is being obstructed by who exactly? All he has to do is order the military to build it.
If a candidate turned president is being obstructed by the military/deepstate why should we waste our time voting at all then?

Are you saying the average white didn't want a wall, deportations and to lock hillary up? Because the average normie white ate that shit up by just looking at the year and a half of cheering during trump's rallies.
But I agree, by that standard of no deportations, no wall, and hillary free trump is a failure.

This. People don't realize Trump never said the wall will ever be a physical construction. It was always a clever plot to unite the right.

No, he wanted a wall. However the congress added a strict limitations of building the wall to the next budget plan or else the dems would threaten a shut down again. Then there's the judges that ordered not to build it. Then there's the Pentagon which refused to send its troops for "non-military" activity. And then there's the democrats supporters who made every possible ways to buy land at the border which they will refuse to allow construction workers building at their land.
It was a massive block at all sides.

So we take the DACA deal and build the wall then. No biggie. Trust the plan. Save the world.

Want to see something funny, as in weird funny? Here is Russel Brand explaining why Sweden and Brexit is happening. He's sort of figuring out why Nationalism exists.

The left is NOT going to lose in the US this November. It's going to be a republican bloodbath. Not looking forward to it.

Was there ever any question that Trump would be obstructed? I don't think so.
But lets say you're 6'4", 250 lb, and are holding an assault shotgun.
And you want to get into a building with one door.
And there's a small cat in the doorway, under 10 lbs, and it won't let you pass.
Trump is being obstructed like you are when you get to the door and the cat won't move out of the way. I mean sure, there might be a tiger in the building ready to jump out and try to savage you, but if you want to get in that fucking house then you're going to have to deal with that. That's what that user was trying to say.

Its not minor, and its not easy, but its well within his capacity.
You're doing that thing shills do when they exaggerate the claims of others, strawmanning. I don't think anyone suggested it would be easy or a minor inconvenience, but neither are you acknowledging that it IS legally within his right and power, and that he is allowing himself to be obstructed. That was what that user seemed to be suggesting.

Do we know that? How do we know that? Because the media tells us? Because politicians tell us?
What if they're all in on it, whether knowing or otherwise?

They are though.
Didn't stop Obongo, and Trump hasn't even tried that route. You can cry about 'contest' when he tries it and someone contests it.

That's "trust the plan" tier nonsense user. He's a multibillionaire, if he went into this without realizing that might be the case then he must be retarded and nothing more than a pawn of someone else, and if he doesn't trust the SS he no-doubt has security outlets that he trusts from past service.

Because he can.
Because people like you will jump on the narrative you're being fed by politicians and the media and proclaim that he's being "obstructed" left and right, but the reality is, he doesn't really seem to do anything of benefit.

Yet you presume to know that he's on your side.

...

My jaw dropped after watching this video

Jesus Christ, just stop it. You're an embarrassment to the human race

Not even a worth it.


Why the hell is this god complex faggot still thinking that he's significant.


archive.is/BIfmP
This always cracks me up.

Attached: Period.png (768x470 123.13 KB, 43.19K)

Saw it on Jewtube the other day, because Jewtube REALLY wanted me to watch it, but I didn't, because Brand is pure feces given human form.
You seem alright though - worth a watch?

(Why is everyone breaking links again?)

Whatever do you mean?

I concur.
Wow, that user really riled you up didn't he?

Also, are you a neocon like that other user suggested? You seem really invested in this midterm election.
You were memeing Reagan earlier, and he's truly awful, probably going to be looked back upon as the man who sealed the demographic fate of the United States.

How old is that 2nd image btw?
I could swear I saw it during the election.
The real redpill is realizing the elites played the populace like a fiddle, as described by the user who got banned for exposing pro-Trump Anons who are into degenerate pornography.

Its the 2nd image, in case you didn't know. You should probably check out the third image too, while you're at it.