What an audacious hoax reveals about academia
Other urls found in this thread:
Great thread. Did you copy and paste it from Reddit, newfriend?
Suck my cock, faggot OP nigger
Feminism was redpilled until kikes took the movement.
Found the lefty plant.
Must be somewhat worried about collapsing loyalty to ZOG's illusions if they're running pieces like this in The Atlantic.
This isn't exactly a breaking news bulletin. Anybody who's paid a lick of attention over the past decade or so knows academia is full of utter faggotry. There does need to be a lot more effort put into fighting them though. Our grueling efforts at exposing the media for the frauds they are have proven successful beyond anything any of us could have imagined even just 2 or 3 years ago, but we have to finish the job. Academia is where this whole cancerous edifice of liberal cuckoldry originated from. Unless we take those bastards out of the game, all our accomplishments so far will be for nothing. Fortunately, this stands to have an even greater impact than the Sokal affair. Sokal's paper was a bunch of gibberish pretending to be intelligent, but this time the papers are outright attacking STEM fields.
Pretty much this, though more redpills aren't bad. Maybe folk will start stirring a bit more now.
Getaloadofthisgoycam.jpg
3/10 for getting a reply.
This shit was actually really funny. One of their papers that got accepted was literally a chapter from Mein Kampf with words search/replaced to sound like a feminist manifesto.
Giving women rights has ruined every nation in the history of mankind so far. Might not be what you wanted to hear but that's what the score's at.
Shouldn't the journals catch that with their plagiarism tools?
Truly ahead of his time.
Checked. Can't believe they don't run the papers through a search engine to see if they're plagiarized.
I suppose the marxists running these universities were too enamored by the dialectic mumbo jumbo to suspect trickery
That you blame white women over kikes and traitors (like Woodrow Wilson) shows what sides you really are on.
Incels gets the woodchipper.
Many normies don't know that, tho.
Incels, both male and females, gets..
1) The Woodchipper.
2) A stake with a blunt end, that then gets set on fire.
3) Fire ants.
How exactly does that help?
it's pointless, they won't reproduce and die on their own anyway
are you some sort of deviant sadistic semite mongrel, advocating for senseless violence?
Just ignore the glow in the dark.
This is just an anti-Hitler psyop. Use mein kampf to say feminists are the real nazis. Normies eat it up instead of getting redpilled that Hitler said nothing wrong.
I heard about this. It points out, with undeniable evidence, that the "academic" world has been outrageously politicized, and you can't get published without pushing a Jew agenda.
The kikes have even corroded science. Science is supposed to be based on factual evidence, and yet they have managed to infect and delegitimize supposed "truth."
You can never again base anything on what scientists claim they've found.
This is the epitome of rule by chaos.
PhD's mean utterly nothing now, as they have been compromised.
>The (((problems))) began when we tried to publish our findings
back to teh kitchen
Kill yourself, cocksucker.
Where do you put the stake and fire after the woodchipper? Just pile parts around it or what? Is it held aloft like a torch so you can see the ants eating the bits? First time killing degenerates?
The problem is this goes beyond just grievance studies. Look up studies done about falsified papers getting past peer review and being published in journals despite small and huge errors intentionally put in place. The failure rate is absolutely insane and shows how peer review itself, as a system, is ineffective trash that discredits good work that simply isn't peer reviewed or wouldn't pass peer review because wrongthink. One example of this is a study that found the acceptance rate for the same paper was much higher if you provided a positive rather than negative outcome (this proves X happens vs this does not prove X happens).
I love how those assumption don't outright say that family and social norms are bad but instead plant them into the mind of the goy.
Males, AND females. Good one. I believe you, master.
Academics with an agenda, who would have thunk?
"Academia, academia, you always know what's best…"
Facepalm.
not a bad topic, but under the circumstances…
HIDE SAGE REPORT REPORT REPORT
HIDE SAGE REPORT REPORT REPORT
HIDE SAGE REPORT REPORT REPORT
low effort op
i miss making news stations dance though
...
drudge
What if, now hear me out, what if women are more inclined to become traitors as a survival mechanism?
What if women have never been selected for loyalty in great numbers because of their inherent value?
What if their traitorous tendencies are passed not only to their daughters, but also their sons?
What if this tenancy to betray shows itself in women as whorish behavior?
What if this is the main reason women hate sex bots, and anything that devalues them as a whole?
Now since you placed women in a different group from traitorous men, you view traitor women as somehow different or possibly better than their man counterparts.
What if you treated all traitors the same?
Wouldn't you then see loyalty selected for in society?
Wouldn't you be making women better for every subsequent generation?
Nah, you're right, we should just let women off the hook because they're women.
Threadly reminder there is a shill campaign to discredit Terry and also at the same time spread the lie he is dead.
Threadly reminder ignore the disengenous and illogical.
Well if theres one trait that creates traitorous women is open mindedness.
And many of those cunts are choosing to not have children.
In a way theyre naturally selecting themselves out.
Holy fuck, please learn to post