I think he could be a shill, either that or he's a dishonest faggot, but what's the difference? I've written my explanation in the form of in infographic (image related).
The text pastebinned in below archive, it's TL;DR so you may want to put it into a text-to-speech reader if you're a lazy faggot. >archive.is/yj9FS
Sauces.
Some basic shit, but with all of the newfags around these days, I figured I may as well include them:
It's a sound argument and one I am inclined to agree with. He's another level of gatekeeping for people that can't be contained with Alex Jones/Bircher type shit.
Hunter Carter
Typical kike tactic: hold the enemy to higher moral standards so that they may not use the methods available to them to win. Fuck off. Honor exists between honorable opponents only. Kikes get no fucking honor from me.
Thomas Howard
I would like to say Henry Ford and Adolf Hitler were controlled opposition.
Ford used to praise the craftiness of jews a lot in his books and Hitler was funded by rothschilds and brainwashed by 19th century paranoid hymie racialist scholars.
Hitler absolutely was funded by the Rothschilds and Henry Ford helped out the Soviets with (look it up yourself) developing new tractors as part of a business deal. Both of these men were very much (((capitalists))) either by trade or by heart.
Josiah Hall
You believe both of these things, do you?
Now this is a crafty kike, here. Totally misrepresenting my point to project his filthiest qualities onto me.
