Democrates fail to hide semi-auto ban plans

Ripped from 8 Zig Forums

I don't normally take an interest in foreign politics, but this will interest any yanks here.

projectveritasaction.com/2018/10/15/mccaskill-1/

* Senator McCaskill on Tape: “Of course!” She Would Vote Yes on Gun Bans”

* Campaign Staff Says: McCaskill supports “a semi-automatic rifle ban“

* McCaskill is Quiet on Gun Views “because she has a bunch of Republican voters,” Secretly Supports Gun Control Group

* Staff: Wait Until After Election to Bring up Trump Impeachment; to Voters: “Get over it”

* “People just can’t know” McCaskill and Obama “essentially have the same views on everything.”

(St. Louis) Project Veritas Action Fund has released a third undercover video from campaigns during this 2018 election season. This report exposes how incumbent Senator McCaskill and individuals working on her campaign conceal their liberal views on issues in order to court moderate voters.

Said James O’Keefe, founder and president of Project Veritas Action:

“This undercover report shows just how broken our political system has become. Senator McCaskill hides her true views from voters because she knows they won’t like them.”

Senator McCaskill Talks Gun Bans on Tape

Senator McCaskill revealed her intention to vote on various gun control measures in undercover footage:

MCCASKILL: “Well if we elect enough Democrats we’ll get some gun safety stuff done. They won’t let us vote on it, we’ve got 60 votes for a number of measures that would help with gun safety, but McConnell won’t let ’em come to the floor.”

JOURNALIST: “Like bump stocks, ARs and high capacity mags…?”

MCCASKILL: “Universal background checks, all of that… But if we have the kind of year I think we might have I think we could actually be in a position to get votes on this stuff on the floor and we’d get 60 [votes]…”

JOURNALIST: “So you would be on board with the bump stocks and… high capacity mags.”

MCCASKILL: “Of course! Of course!”

Despite her strong views on gun control, Senator McCaskill does not tend to promote them on the campaign trail or on her website. Rob Mills, who works on Senator McCaskill’s campaign, says that is “…because she has a bunch of Republican voters.”

Another individual who works on Senator McCaskill campaign, Carson Pope, adds that “…a semi-automatic rifle ban is more so what she would support.”

“People just can’t know that.”

According to Mills, Senator McCaskill conceals her support of Moms Demand Action, a gun control group, and other similar organizations because they would “…hurt her ability to get elected.”

MILLS: “But she doesn’t openly go out and support groups like ‘Mom’s Demand Action’ or just like other groups that are related to that. Because that could hurt, her ability to get elected. Because people like see that and they’re like well I don’t want to support her even though they stand for the same policies…”

MILLS: “She’s worked out stuff with Mom’s Demand Action to make sure that she can support their goals without supporting the organization openly. And you know, Mom’s Demand Action does the exact same thing. Like a lot of our volunteers are actually from there. She’s really good about strategy and making sure she has a goal and can get there.”

Nicolas Starost, another individual who works on Senator McCaskill’s campaign, explains how President Obama won’t campaign for Senator McCaskill in Missouri despite their similar views on politics. Starost says this is because Senator McCaskill needs to distance herself from the Democratic party to appeal to more voters:

STAROST: “Because of how like, cause he’s a very liberal candidate. And like… Claire distancing herself from the party is gonna help her win more votes than it will saying like: “Oh here’s Obama, the former President of the United States, to now speak on my behalf.” Which is unfortunate because I love Obama to pieces, and I’d love to see him come here.”

JOURNALIST: “And they essentially have the same views on everything?”

STAROST: “Yeah. People just can’t know that.”

Impeachment

Another individual who works on Senator McCaskill’s campaign, Glen Winfrey, explains plans for the impeachment of President Trump:

JOURNALIST: “So, here’s the real question, Claire holds off on impeachment to get the moderate. What do we tell the moderates when we drop the impeachment hammer afterward?”

WINFREY: “Get over it. It was a national security question. That information was confidential, and she did her duty by not revealing the information until afterward.”

Attached: Image.png (556x317, 211.05K)

Damn, and here I thought Ancient Greece was pretty cool.

Attached: Democrates.jpg (220x311, 13.59K)

I don't understand how they think banning something is going to do a thing?
Nobody is giving up their guns.

I barely understand why american Zig Forumsacks insist it's a republic when it barely functions as one. But hey, I can atleast see the INTENTION and basic structure of a republic there.

What I don't understand is why these people insist it's a democracy. Unlike my previous point, there's actually no democracy in play here. Nothing. Voting ballots don't mean a democracy is in place.
A democracy is when the majority of people rule. It's when candidates propose different ideas, and the people divide their support between these ideas, with the most popular being implemented.
But crap like this is the EXACT OPPOSITE of democracy: the ideas are not being put forth, they're actively hidden from the voting populace, and you're instead expected to line yourself with one party to rally against another one.

One of the best jokes I heard from an Australian recently was precisely about this: for all the talk about preventing/fighting hate speech, the Americans don't seem to do much about Political campaigns that boil down to: "Get behind me, we all hate that guy!"

This also applies to Republicans, even if their stances mostly align with mine, I still think they use the same shitty methods democrats use.

Clever

Yeah, like how banning full autos didn't do a thing. Except that it did. And the Americans, being just as cowardy as the rest of this rotten civilization, will do nothing against it.

Must be what they ship NPC's in before assembly.

I'm not gonna say you're right or that you're wrong, but I'm gonna warn you that dropping a claim like that without at least an infographic or something to back it will get you laughed out of the board.

how many crimes are even commited with rifles…. not nearly as many as wit handguns.. gas yourself moshe

There is tech coming out of S. Africa that puts firearms to shame should the need arise to do gods work

do you mean necklacing?
the amount of tires and fuel we would need would be extremely expensive and polluting compared to firearms

Could you be even more obvious? This will be the end of her carrier as a senator if the info about this hideous cunt could be spread to enough of her voter basis.
Bumping because I know it annoys you.

mp4 2 pass encoded at 480p 16:00
Download | Watch | Share

Attached: ProjectVeritasExposesMissouriSenatorMcCaskill16Mb.mp4 (854x480, 15.71M)

wow what a shock

They aren't banned. You just need a license. In your language I think it's called a "loicense."

Please don't talk about things which you lack even a scintilla of information.

Please don't talk about things which you lack even a scintilla of information.

You got a license for that assault shitpost, civilian scum?

Most foreigners have a significantly skewed and fractured understanding of US gun laws, as their information is primarily gained second-hand at best, and from Hollywood at worst. Of course, given the OBSESSED value associated with "US + Guns" they'll trot out every time the subject comes up to repeat what they got from a movie: throwaway statistics, outdated knowledge, and (this is the worst one) Jew York/California specific firearms laws that are assumed to cover the entire nation. All this to prove some kind of point.

They think the NFA is a sports league, the 1986 Registry is a type of car, and the AWB banned all machine guns. God how I wish we had fucking flags here.

Please don't talk about things which you lack even a scintilla of information.

Because OP can't be assed to format his OP properly I can't be assed to give it a proper perusal. OP's a FAGGOT

Yet we still have full autos.

We've been waiting since 33.

Attached: hqdefault[1].jpg (1345x907 2.69 MB, 328.43K)

Check those dubs, citizen.

Attached: r78819c2sy301[1].jpg (565x633, 95.74K)

Have to agree. What an eyesore.

you are such a retard , these things take another level of resources (battries vs gunpowder , why do you think is easier to create) and dont even fucking stand up to any kind of manfactured assult rifles.

These things barely create enough power to out do bbs and are not automatic.

Compare your best handheld Gauss rifle to a glock and then go from there AK , desert eagle. The only thing that is a shame is your retarded sifi addiction. A fucking shot gun will out due this shit.

And this shit is not "coming out of SA" these things have been part of many science projects.

Oh snap I found the one in your pic, its fully auto. Look at the shitter firing it in his house. Would you do that with a conventional gun. This shit barely breaks cans. Ive made rubber band guns more dangerous.

Do some research faggot, they can punch holes in car doors and more.

...

That is effectively a ban.

oh wow holes in car doors … its almost like a gun. You have no argument. Show me a Gauss gun that will stand up to a gun. Nothing that will be sold to individuals it will be some military grade shit because of the power requirements. Your retarded ass is so but hurt cause you want to believe that ur gonna be so cool then you end up wasting your time arguing a completely wrong point.


Cool you have a gauss gun working, never said they didnt work but in terms of useful tech conventional guns are more productive. You still havent shown a gun that performs on nearly a good enough level. If you wanted to make a gun at home only an idiot would think that a gauss gun is better to make than a combustion gun. This is NPC tier thinking.

Enjoy your sifi adventure retard.

...

250 fucking lbs … and what guns does this put to shame???? Are you gonna just walk up to someone pull out your 250 lb gun and blast them. If someone runs at you with a hand gun and decides to take a step left will you be able to react?

why are you so retarded?

Do you think this is better to create than a conventional gun if guns are banned from sale?

protip: you are a fucking retard please keep commenting