The End

Fuck off pantifa. The Republic will be just fine. Did I mention we will give you a free helicopter ride to one of those 1 party Nations you love so much?

Lolwhut, yes if you could bring me to another dimension where national socialist Germany was never was "liberated", that would be great.

Libertarians are just leftists that talk tough and like guns. Why are you here? Are you like that one kid at school that hung around a group of "friends" that actively hated him and yet he digs his heels in demands to stick around. Lolbergs are deluded maniacs.

Twice (((somone))) posted about school kids in this thread.
Kinda makes me think.

Attached: ((())).png (473x299, 99.29K)

What the fuck are you talking about? You're literally delusional.

I too have read Adjustment Day.

So what do you fear more, that free plane trip back to the promised land? Or the possibility that the plane never actually goes anywhere, and just fills up with an inert gas.

Fuck off, lolberg.

Attached: quote-capitalism-and-bolshevism-are-the-two-sides-of-the-same-international-jewish-coin-adolf-hitler-113-84-74.jpg (850x400, 53.27K)

Edgy Hitler qoute. You get a free helicopter ride, compliments of the Republic.

It's not "edgy", Zig Forums is a national socialist board. Did you get fucking lost?

Zero effort thread.

Reminder that we own all the guns and will kill anyone who tries it.

Nothing in the rules says that. Nothing in the content of the board says that. The website owner explicitly said you are wrong.

Tough fucking titties. This isn't fucking Weimar, we have a Constitution that works just fine, and plenty of helicopters for dipshits such as yourself.

Many people don't get this, but you're right on the money, IMO.

fugitives leaving to Mexico and Caribbean in order to fly onto a non-expedited country?

non-Extradite

Zero effort post. Make an actual argument faggot. No one gives a shit about your red text.

The whole thing is a likely scenario in a global collapse. A return to the original Constitution, eliminating all the detritus and going forward from there with the lessons since learned.

Sure, if they can escape. Going to be pretty low tolerance for degeneracy at that point. Global collapse, people starving here because of criminals. You can expect a lot of vigilante justice.

he was just saying that shit to set the libs up for the killing fields

Who the fuck is "we"? Lefty shitbags?

Attached: Soyboy.jpg (600x600, 63.85K)

That sounds like it could easily fall into corruption and stagnation.

I've got work to do. I'll return in several hours to swat down all the shills and low i.q. faggots that hate America.

ROUND UP THE NPCs

What kinds of technology is "discouraged" and how?

Also, you can ban porn but that doesn't make it disappear. Maybe if you got rid of computers. But then it would go back to pictures.

You already have >>>/liberty/ why are you trying to shit up this place?

Modern day America is as bad or worse than the Weimar Republic. The problem is jews and libertarianism is literally jewish, so it has no way to respond.

Nice digits, but read Gaddafi's Green Book, democracy is much worse for a nation since:

1) Only the rich and powerful can be elected, and after they are in power, are mostly interested in staying in power by collecting political contributions and shoring up political power.
2) The political parties tear up the nation by having one side always shit on the accomplishments of the other and lionize what they do, as the parties in power shift back and forth, all they do is try to tear down what the other side accomplished and block the other side.
3) No long-term projects that take more than 3-6 years to see the effects can take place since it's outside the electoral window.
4) No way to stop the jews that manipulate the softness of democracy.

Sage and report for paid shilling with no content.

>>/reddit/
You're not even trying now.

Are you arguing liberals have all the guns? What?!

Reported. Go shitpost somewhere else. You're not even fun to mock.

Fair enough. However, how do you think it would be any different in a single party state? The party elites (who would also be rich) would just select their lackeys to "represent" the various states and provinces. These lackeys would have no loyalty to the states and people they should serve but instead only to the party bosses.
That'd be great if you were in charge, but what if it was Richard Spencer?

Fair enough. However my the opposite; stagnation, corruption, and nepotism led to the same thing in the USSR.

The kikes could simply pay off the very, very few men with any power and rule by proxy through them.

Second thread I've seen with a new shill tactic. Confusion. Combine positives and negatives into one in an effort to reframe negatives as positive. Like so

This is the shittiest low effort raid by Zig Forums ever…

This is the kind of content that is allowed on codemonkey's new order.

National Service is mandatory for a term of 6 years; no exceptions
ZERO gibs or dem programz until after successful completion of MNS
National Service is not limited to military; but the requirement is the same, that service is to this soil
Every day a minimum amount of physical conditioning is required
Within these 6 years is a program for attaining training/education for specific disciplines(STEM preferred)
All unnecessary requirements for attaining a degree are removed
DNA testing is mandatory to isolate those genetic markers which cause one to be parasitic and leech-like as a purge-priority; other groups follow
Balkanization happens and individuals are allowed to migrate to one of 4 zones, which has a need for their specific discipline and is based upon merit
Each zone will be led by a single-leader tasked with "righting the ship now adrift" to stabilize the region
Individuals of African-descent are confined to Florida
Non-citizens from South of the US border are purged to Mexico
The Southern US border is moved several hundred miles further South and a no-go zone is established separating the two

Let me begin with the notion that no system is perfect. The idea behind third positionism is an effort to reach these absolute truths… for we do not know them yet.

In third positionist societies, the leaders always come from peasant class and military background, Hitler, Codreanu, etc. However, local positions are still elected though, just without the divisiveness of political parties, while there was some contention it was a lot less vicious.

William Dudley Pelley (the memoryholed American Nationalist in the 1930s/40s that support Hitler and Mussolini) argued that elections were inherently American and argued that the Chief (his version of führer) should still be held to a temporary modified constitution (called the "pact to rule") that would require regular plebiscites on certain issues.

Well, the good and bad of third positionism is that the leader only gains power through public approval but cannot hide behind "wait for the next elections" if he's a failure. There is a clear leader, and his head is both metaphorically and could literally be on the chopping block.

Unlike the USSR, national socialism and most third positionists aren't organized for indefinite rule, similar to the intention of the Caesars, it is a bridge government of 20 to 30 years max. Once society is cleansed based on a preset list of demands (of which shall not be extended), the fuhrer's government ends and the society passes on to a more democratic republic.

Kikes are to be eliminated, however possible. The nation CANNOT be multi-racial, for it is a race-nation… which means in America massive deportations and balkanizing the niggers.

you type like a goon

Uh huh, fuck off back to half, nigger.

This is a pissed off former vol kvetching because his attempt at taking over failed.

Implying we don't have the rifles and ideals to say fuck your Hebraic screeching
SHIT IT THE FUCK DOWN

That sounds like an election. Adolf Hitler himself participated in several multi-party elections. How would a leader be elevated to such a position if not through an election and if elections are permitted, multiple people will run. So how are leaders selected, in your opinion?

True. However, a good leader could also be assassinated. And honestly if I had a choice between Spencer and a cunning neo-con like John Ashcroft, I'd gladly support Spencer over a cunning, ruthless, amoral psychopath who has probably been waiting for the chance to create a police state where dissidents are v&, taken to a concentration camp, brutally tortured (probably by that puritanical little religious-bigot himself grinning and smirking the whole time) and then shot in the back of the head and dumped into a mass grave.
I understand that no system is perfect, but I'm sure you and I could imagine how such a man could use his position as party boss to remain in power.
Even worse an idea, what if the party boss is different than the leader? Then the leader would get all the blame but not be responsible for running the country.

In any case, I understand your point about Third Positionism being temporary. Military dictators tend to have the best interests in mind and tend not to want to rule indefinately. I was once in a country that was experiencing a military coup and though they have not returned power to the democratic government yet, it is expected that they will eventually by people in the know.
However, that said, I would shudder at the thought of today's crop of amoral psychopath neo-cons in the military seizing power. I don't fear the libshits seizing power at all. They'd fuck up so terribly that they'd trigger a real revolution. But the neo-cons scare me. They could callously slaughter opposition, create a police state, and begin rounding up "subversives" like us to "restore order and stability"
Leaving the actual (((subverters))) in total control.

And they could do it with cheering crowds of couch potatoes and Republicucks because they'd go after Nationalist and antifag alike. They simply don't care.

Neck yourself, reddit.

This is how delusional redditors actually are.

Yes, but he also never won. The government was just so fearing that if he were to do another Putsch, that nobody would stop him, so they preferred a bloodless transfer of power instead. While I can't defend the high ranking members of America's Armed Forces, I think the average White grunt's heart is in the right place, a lot more than Zig Forums gives them credit… even if he is fighting for Israel.

All valid points, you may not know it. But this seeming intention of yours to implement a mixed system that is best for your race-state, not radical idolatry of a specific form of government would make you more third positionist, than you'd like to admit. The American founding fathers created a wonderful system, but the tree of liberty was never watered with the blood that it was meant for and so many parts of it are diseased and/or rotting. We must operate now to save it… then afterwards we can return to our pre-WW1 days.

You'd think wrong, as they're all brainwashed to not see race.

Hatred goes a long way in battle, and you cannot begin to conceive of the hatred we carry in our hearts for you. The only ones more prepared for this are active military personnel, some war veterans and some law enforcement personnel, but they are mostly too concerned about their careers and benefits to nurture the requisite level of hate needed to push through these times, so they are going lose. No one matches us in intensity or preparation.

To think that the average pol/k/ autist with thousands of rounds for each of his dozen or so guns, with his seething hatred for leftists, jews, and shitskins, would somehow end up in a labor camp, just shows how fantastically inaccurate your understanding of the current political climate is.

Not the ones that I know, but I'm aware that's anecdotal.

You wouldn't even need to censor the internet.
I'm sure uncensored sites lean right.
Also it would allow leftist opinions to be openly mocked

Kikes will never allow a full out mad max style collapse, otherwise they would risk whites coming out on top.

I am a third positionist. I simply don't like labeling myself anything that ends in ism because once people recognize that your ism is different from their prefered wordism, their brain tends to shut off. Say I was chatting with a racially aware friend of mine who calls himself a libertarian still. If I mention that I am a national socialist, his brian may shut off and he'll say
>A socialist!?!?!
I'm not actually even sure what National Socialism is tbqh and I've been here for years. Everyone has a different definition. Some user from Atomwaffen devision may spin me a tale about how it's about taking land from weaker people and that's the natural order. Someone else may say it's about protecting your people and family. Some say it has nothing to do with economics and others insist that their particular economic theory being implemented is vital for a healthy race. I like your definition btw.
Me, I just want what is best for our race. if that makes me a third positionist, I am proud to be one.

Attached: WouldYouDieForIt.png (852x480, 987.38K)

Attached: 24174.png (446x716, 348.8K)

The entire initial premise is based on the idea of a total global financial meltdown. Setting the conditions for a complete reset.
Things would become very hardcore.
The globalist/commie fucks who have worked hard to see it happen would be working overtime to collapse what remained of the U.S., to break our spirits completely, so heavy censorship would be needed to counter the threat. Oddly enough forums like this wouldn't be a problem since this is easily one of the biggest redpillage site available (weaponized autism).
So we'd return to the original Constitution and walk it forward from there.
Complete intolerance for the factors and people that led us to that place. Hence, borders sealed, airports shut down and any unauthorized flights being shot out of the air no questions asked. Illegal entry punishable by death, illegals rounded up and fema'd. Socialists rounded up and fema'd.
A return to normal segregation, where blacks have their own communities, schools, businesses.
Jews expelled.

I think you underestimate just how perverse they are. I doubt it would go full Mad Max, but people watching all their life saving evaporate tends to produce a little aggression.

It might not happen, or it might be inevitable. Trump might be the last greatest attempt at salvaging the status quo before the inevitable.

Where do I vote for you OP?

Attached: 1413330094657.jpg (288x288, 21.06K)

Seriously, did you get lost on your way to The_Donald?