"If you kill them, they win!"

I hate that shabos goy. As a matter of fact, I just watched vid related a few weeks ago.

I shit you not, when Adam Green started to talk about Zionist control of America, Owen responded with "the pyramids". That guy has issues.

If Zig Forums is subverted, then the memes it creates are subverted and will eventually turn and consume that which created them. It can't not. It's built into everything.
Relax. Enjoy the show.

I believe shill operations began when the Ukraine, ISIS, and Syria gas baby psyops all failed in large part due to alternative media and Zig Forums. We picked this shit apart and then were able to spread redpills out through social media. At the point of the first Syria gas psyops, the military really began to feel that they had lost their power to spin fake narratives in mass media. This, more than anything, was the impetus behind increased shilling and attention paid to imageboards. I believe the election of Trump was even pushed by them. And the current ops to deradicalize the right and destroy white nationalism (which have been very successful for them). Now most of the "alternative media," like truepundit and so on are also zog psyops pushing a form of crypto-neocon propaganda.

Edwin Black is a kike propagandist, retard. His books are fake news

Kike3 is camping this shit. For fucks sake kill yourself kike. You know this is all the evidence we need to prove you're a kike cunt right?

My bad, #5

>faggot OP forgets to mention he harbored in (((ISIS))) terrorists on behalf of "refugees welcome" and Netanyahu himself

Also:

Oh golly, a (((crypto-Marxist))) talking shit about (((Zionism))), oh who I ever shall I choose? Seriously Zig Forums, you're not going to succeed on subverting the board into implying National Socialism is "capitalist". Now fuck off back to your containment board.

>>>Zig Forums
>>>/ovens/

I don't trust Adam Green either. They're putting on a puppet show here.

wtf I love the destruction of Canada now

Attached: israel-doesnt-want-isis-defeated.png (799x585, 315.49K)

There has been a lot of negro worship shilling lately.
I even saw some on Zig Forums.

you write like a kike

Not your blog faggot, stop formatting your OPS like a retarded faggot.

muslims and jews have no right to exist.

>(((ISIS)))
>(((zionism)))
Speak clearly

The meme has nothing to do with wars in the Middle East, actually. It started with immigration.

No it's not. Not as a response demanding a coherent explanation to defend a claim. Are you a consensus shill?
I'm only a few responses down and I'm feeling like this is some stupid fucking sill thread.

I remember seeing him while he was a nobody on youtube. I doubt he's a "controlled op," but I'm sure he avoids certain topics to keep his job.

It's already been debunked. Quit trying to scare people away from Zig Forums. It was a meme that he said it, it was known that he never really said it. No one used it in debates as factual, it was just a common joke. I don't believe Zig Forums has been subverted, and if it has, point out how.

Zig Forums definitely sucks these days. Too harshly judge chinks and expect a ban. The moderation on here these days is an absolute joke. If you break the chain of consensus shilling in some threads, you're gone. Banned.

Attached: banned.png (928x680, 37.28K)

The only way to destroy the false Jew is through Christianity. Nothing triggers them more than reminding them that they are destined to burn in Hell for being the children of Satan and the false Jew.

Attached: jewviolence.png (602x690, 75.37K)

These people are absolutely disgusting.

No, the only way to solve all of our problems is through ethno-nationalism, which is the natural center, or rather, the normal state of a society.

The real problem is that the mods don't follow their own rules at all, yet simultaneously hide behind the rules to justify their subpar moderation by claiming the rules inhibit them from carrying out quality moderation.
Feels like the people in charge of the site are trying to tank the board.

The meta thread is cancer. Its the same issues the metaboard had. Nobody but a few people read the meta thread, its full of evidence of bad moderation and mods mocking the userbase, and its cyclical so evidence of it drops off constantly resulting in an unclear history.

Attached: ClipboardImage.png (1303x539 137.67 KB, 86.94K)

Nope.

Attached: National Socialism and Christianity.jpg (1960x8280, 4.66M)

...

I bet your little head is going to implode upon reading this

My feelings as a Christian points me to my Lord and Savior as a fighter. It points me to the man who once in lonliness, surrounded by only a few followers, recognized these jews for what they were and summoned men to fight against them and who, God's truth! was greatest not as a sufferer but as a fighter. In boundless love as a Christian and as a man I read through the passage of which tells us how the Lord at last rose in his might and seized the scourge to drive out of the temple the brood of vipers and adders. How terrific was his fight for the world against the Jewish poison? Today, after two thousand years, with the deepest emotion I recognize more profoundly than ever before in the fact that it was for this that he had to shed his blood upon the cross. As a Christian I have no duty to allow myself to be cheated, but I have to be a fighter for the truth and justice… And if there is anything which could demonstrate that we are acting rightly it is the distress that daily grows. For asa Christian I have also a duty to my own people… When I go out in the morning and see these men standing in thir queues and look into their pinched faces, then I believe I would be no Christian, but a very devil if I felt no pity for them, if I did not, as did our Lord two thousand years ago, turn against those by whom today this poor people is plundered and exploited.
-Adolf Hitler, in his speech 12 April 1922

I don't think that's whats being done, necessarily.

I hate that maplecuck faggot, but let's be clear: This is more indication of Jews playing both sides.

Maplecuck is clearly a gay-interplanetary-communism Marxist drone, so it should not be surprising at all to find that he was/is attacked by world-jewish-hegemony Trots and their outlets.

Well, no shit. It's Talmudvision. Shit thread btw. Fuck cuckdeau and fuck kikes.

I don't hate Christianity like the kike on a stick posters, but when you try and use Hitler and NatSoc to back you up it comes off as incredibly disingenuous, almost Jew tier.

No that doesn't surprise me at all.

You should read that graphic though, as it contains blatant evidence of how stupid you are for posting a quote from 1922 in the face of evidence from the 1930s as to Hitler having abandoned the false jew.
Its not even a debate man, Hitler stopped being a Christian. Positive Christianity was entirely a ruse aimed at redpilling jew-worshippers.

You want a real head-burster?

Attached: ClipboardImage.png (1036x1386 174.57 KB, 237K)

Then I bet you really won't like this, huh?

National Socialism is not a cult movement or a movement for worship; it is exclusively a "volkic" political doctrine based upon racial principles. In its purpose there is no mystic cult, only the care and leadership of a people defined by a common blood-relationship… we will not allow mystically-minded occult folk with a passion for exploring secrets of the world beyond to steal into our movement. Such folk are not National Socialists, but something else— in any case something which has nothing to do with us. At the head of our programme there stands no secret surmisings but clear-cut perception and straightforward profession of belief. But since we set as a central point of this perception and of this profession of belief the maintenance and hence the security for the future of being formed by God, we thus serve the maintenance of a divine work and fulfill a divine will– not in the secret twilight of a new house of worship, but openly before the face of the Lord… Our worship is exclusively the cultivation of the natural, and for that reason, because natural, therefore God-willed. Our humility is unconditional submission before the divine laws of existence so far as they are known to us men.
-Adolf Hilter, in Nuremberg on 6 Sept. 1938

Also pretty much this.

...

...

That's still a public speech, and far less Christian than the 1922 speech you posted. You're proving my point.
And again, I don't hate Christianity, but you and your D&C shilling I'm not so sure about.
"We will have to deal with Christianity in a tougher way than hitherto. We must settle accounts with this Christianity, this greatest of plagues that could have happened to us in our history, which has weakened us in every conflict. If our generation does not do it then it would I think drag on for a long time. We must overcome it within ourselves. Today at Heydrich's funeral I intentionally expressed in my oration from my deepest conviction a belief in God, a belief in fate, in the ancient one as I called him - that is the old Germanic word: Wralda." -Himmler, in a private speech to the SS, 1942.

I'm curious - why not?

Private speeches, of course!
Ever look at who authored that there private speech? I wonder who could be behind that post???

So what you're saying is, by your own admission, there is basically no way whatsoever to know what peoples personal views were with the German NatSoc regime unless we buy into the idea that publically presented speechs represent their genuine ideals?
Seems dubious.

Attached: ClipboardImage.png (1286x406, 64.27K)

…that is when I myself in 1933 endeavoured to unite the weak and divided Protestant Churches of different states into one great and powerful Evangelical Church of the Reich. That attempt failed through the opposition of the bishops of some states; it was therefore abandoned. For it is in the last resort not our task to defend or even to strengthen the Evangelical Church through violence against its own representatives… But on one point it is well that there should be no uncertainty; the German priest as servant of God we shall protect, the priest as political enemy of the Germany State we shall destroy.
-Adolf Hitler, a speech in the Reichstag on 30 Jan, 1939

I have 10 pages of confirmation of the 3rd Reich fully supporting a Christian Religion. Seems to me there is another group that have opposed Christianity in times past. Who could that possibly be? It's slipping my mind…

here is the issue with conservationism (Remember that it is the Germans that gave us the first nature reservations): If you ask a christian if they are in favor of preserving nature, for example; protecting redwood forests of the American west, they will all clamor in agreement. Of course Christians want to protect these trees, but why? Whether a tree or a salamander goes extinct doesn't REALLY effect a christian's salvation, and of course, if a salamander did in some way PREVENT salvation well, the christian might start singing a different tune. What the hell am I talking about? Well, science has learned a lot about early humans by observing primitive societies. Christians like to do things like go into these primitive societies and evangelize them, which has the negative affect of destroying native culture and beliefs. Christians justify this behavior because they are saving the souls of these savage people, but I see no difference between this behavior and kikes giving bombs and central banks to any country that dares oppose them. Christians cannot be true conservatives or nationalists, because their ideology is universal, and internationalist. Think also of how frequently in the last 100 years christianity has been used as an excuse to fight atheistic communism or repressive Islam, not in our own nation, but only abroad in nations that our (((leadership))) has determined needs to be freed. Christians cannot be nationalists, they can only be tools for Zionism.

It's done well for Europe in the past, it was the first pan European identity. It led to Poles riding to the defense of Vienna against the Turks, and in general promoted common feeling across Christendom. I'm also American, and strident anti Christianity would be a massive burden to support on the far right, for very little benefit. If I was an absolute dictator I'd probably engage in some of the same stuff the NSDAP did, trying to slowly sideline Christianity in favor of something better.

What the fuck are you doing fam? Your own quotes make my argument for me.

You don't though, you have a bunch of public speech citations, and you continue to ignore sources that show that, behind the scenes, that wasn't the reality.

Your ancestors? Pic related?
Just saying bro, most of your ancestors were not Christians. That's a fact.

Seems to me there is another group that brought Christianity in times past. Who could that possibly be? Its sli- Oh wait not its not: It was jews.
Jews brought Christianity to Europe, and it subsequently was used to wipe out the native cultures/religions (or assimilate them where they couldn't be entirely destroyed). Historical fact.

Of course, jews did subsequently express hostility to christianity - the majority of the jewish population viewed christ as a traitor and hated that the gentiles had created a faith around what the jews perceived to be a subversive traitor, but over time the nature of christianity became the boon of the European jews as much as the bane, as the same christian responses that would result in them being driven from one christian nation would result in other christian nations welcoming them.

Attached: Christianity - Quiet Down Jews.jpg (1068x1744, 487.06K)

The NPC meme also was rolled out in a suspicious manner. Very quick, didn't originate here and looks like shit (effective though). Not that I don't like the meme, but there is a possibility it has been pushed on us. Just saying.
sage for being slightly offtopic

Doesn't seem that its actually done well for Europe long term my man, but that's an argument for another day. The point I would raise, however, is that christianity did not become a pan-European identity - it was a faith-based identity, not ethnic/racially based. But, again, perhaps an argument for another day.
Not because they were Europeans, but because they were Christians. You can as-easily point to dozens of instances wherein Christianity led Europeans into conflicts they should not have engaged in on the basis of Christian participation.
We see this even today, where Christians will argue for conflict in the Middle East (ie for Israel) on the basis of the well-being of ME Christians in Muslim lands.
Now there I can't agree with you at all - Christianity has been a massive burden to support on the far right because of what it represents inherently ideologically. Reminder that the biggest supporters of Israel in the US are Evangelical Christians and that the most-cucked of cuckservatives are always hardline Christians.
The single greatest inhibitor to progress on the right as-goes racial awareness is, in the US at least, christianity.
I agree with that sentiment.

Conservationism is Christian in origin. You weak nancies need to get off the Chan’s and read that book before speaking about it.

It cleatstates that God have man (meaning humanity reign over earth and all it’s life). This makes us uniquely responsible for everything on the planet. Whether that means culling a population to prevent and extinction, or hunting an invasive species without limits, or rebuild populations that have been depleted.

We have that responsibility

Clearly states

>Christians like to do things like go into these primitive societies and evangelize them, which has the negative affect of destroying native culture and beliefs. Christians justify this behavior because they are saving the souls of these savage people, but I see no difference between this behavior and kikes giving bombs and central banks to any country that dares oppose them. Christians cannot be true conservatives or nationalists, because their ideology is universal, and internationalist. Think also of how frequently in the last 100 years christianity has been used as an excuse to fight atheistic communism or repressive Islam, not in our own nation, but only abroad in nations that our (((leadership))) has determined needs to be freed. Christians cannot be nationalists, they can only be tools for Zionism.
This is sentiment I can largely agree with as well.

Holy crap that post came out terrible. Thanks road construction

Unfortunately killing to you people means faggot shit. I will pass

Like fucking clockwork. Look at the jew shuffle!
You gents are going to love me after this.

Your lies are spilling out into the public scene. Can't be much of a deceiver with all your teachings out in the open for the goyim to explore now can you?

Fucking dirtbags

Attached: talmud-no-nice-things-said-to-christians.PNG (560x838 208.31 KB, 314.46K)

no, god gave that responsibility to jews. Everything belongs to them, everything is theirs to kill or use or toss aside. You won't win this argument because the Old testament is all about jews and it shows how horribly jews treated their pagan neighbors. They were not conservative at all. They were self-centered assholes.

This is obviously in response to the NPC meme that has kikes and their pets up in arms. A low energy post to get anons to distrust memes in hopes that they will, at the very least, reduce the number of those that will spread them. This is the kind of kikery that mods should be banning, a direct attempt to get us to drop the last remaining weapon we have in a war for information.

Alright so you've conceded national socialism was not a Christian movement and have moved on to quoting the Talmud? We're done here.

Your post amounts to completely empty rhetoric, responding to none of the points raised against you, while posting images that have no contextual relation beyond that which you've attempted to construct from whole-clothe to create a narrative around.

What happened to your 10 pages?
Were they are all public speechs that you realized were completely invalidated by the arguments raised against you, so you decided to just focus on accusing your opposition of being jews to cover for the fact that you no longer had any legs to stand on?

Also, just out of curiousity, when were those passages written?
Because, ya know, Christendom used to be a very European-focused thing.
Keyphrase: Used to be.

Attached: NatSoc - Removing the Christ Jew.JPG (1429x997 200.59 KB, 247.9K)

to those reading this, these are the two posts these kike fucks don't want you to see

the great deceiver never gives up!

Attached: girl ass sexy.jpg (1000x747, 97.64K)

You want a real head-basher?

Hitler is directly responsible for the shitheap we are all dealing with in the Middle East by giving to the Children of Satan the gift of Palestine. Israel is for the Jews, not the false jews (the current occupiers of Palestine). You are all still fucking duped because the false jew has you still calling them the Jew. Why do you think they sweat when you call them that?

Romans 2:28-29 King James Version (KJV)

28 For he is NOT a Jew, which is one outwardly; neither is that circumcision, which is outward in the flesh:
29 But he is a Jew, which is one inwardly; and circumcision is that of the heart, in the spirit, and not in the letter; whose praise is not of men, but of God.

It should not be used as an invective because their true name is the Children of the Lie, the Children of their father Satan, False Jew. Judaism is nothing in essence. It is indistinguishable from Progressivism and Marxism. They rage at Jesus Christ because he destroyed their religion when they denied him, he drove them from the temple, called out their scheming ways, and condemned them.

The entire Bible is a treatise on the failure of the Israelite and the ultimate refusal of God.

Romans 3:13-18 KJV:

Their throat is an open sepulcher; with their tongues they have used deceit; the poison of asps is under their lips; whose mouth is full of cursing and bitterness: Their feet are swift to shed blood; Destruction and misery are in their ways: And the way of peace have they not known. There is no fear of God in their eyes.

NOTHING HAS FUCKING CHANGED.

STOP SUCKING HITLER'S COCK, FAGGOTS. HE FAILED TO GAS ANY FUCKING JEW, BUT HE GAVE THEM THAT WHICH WAS NEVER OWED TO THEM, THAT WHICH THEY DID NOT DESERVE ON A SILVER PLATTER.

Salvation is in Christ Jesus. Accept his gift, and buy into the Jewish subterfuge that has seduced you no longer.

knock yourself out

jew lad.

Attached: Kosher 'Beauties'.jpg (1490x990, 364.72K)

You’re an ignoramous, and I don’t get paid to post here.

Schofield Bible. It’s the first time the word Jew appears in print

...

Also, if I were Jesus I would have wiped the sub 110 IQ humans off the planet already

Lad lad lad

Attached: czeckd.jpg (300x168, 13.49K)

here ya go

But think of how many Christians would have died. Probably all of them.

Here you are sir

They would go to Heaven

So all Christians automatically go to Heaven?
That seems really stupid.
Like the sort of thing you'd make up to sell to stupid people to get them to give you things and treat you nicely due to association to the knowledge that would get them to magic skyland.

Read the Bible

I did and it was super jewish, and really a rather stupid and badly written text, particularly as that which would form the core of a religious ideology.
After reading the Bible, it became clear to me how christianity would have spread through appeal to the dregs of society.

The best part of it all is how ridiculous your argument is. You're quite literally using 3rd party information to convince people that National Socialist Germany was another political party that lied to it's citizens in public, then went and said something completely opposite in private quarters.
But no no no no….. Christianity bad even though we side with the jews on that one (talmud confirmed) National Socialist good, but not honest. So dishonesty is good.

Only a fucking jew would posit that logic.

Attached: blacksuicide.jpg (450x337, 26.85K)

So basically you’re a whiny bitch and just say anything you don’t care for is Jewish. Gotcha, nigger

Attached: 1432013732174.png (538x558, 123.97K)

Well, well, well, it didn't take very long for the Child of Satan to arrive.

This monkey doesn’t know the National Socialism wasn’t antisemetic, but it was pro German.

The Talmud also has a bunch of incitement to violence against the 'Pagans,' jews are a hateful people, you aren't proving anything to anyone with that line of argument.

And yes, Hitler preferred to avoid upsetting the Christian majority by insulting them, that makes him disingenuous. As another example he promised the British there would be no more territorial concessions after the Sudetenland. But your stupid extrapolation from that is far more disingenuous. You're blatantly straw manning everyone who disagrees with you, and everyone can see it.

I will Satan.

Clearly it is wrong then. I say let them kill us so we win.

So you're saying Hitler and Hillary Clinton shared the same ideals politically.

Yeah, totally NOT A JEW! Nope!

Attached: autism.jpg (600x400, 54.28K)

Yes that's exactly what I'm saying, you got me. Please ignore the part where I gave you a direct example where he behaved disingenuously.

The hell are you people talking about? Why would he care about the majority? There was no other government other than the party once he took power. He had no reason to lie. Especially the the relatively calm and complacent Germanics.

Look how Germans are these days, it’s the same genetic stock. Germans have always been slow to rise to anything, and absolute monsters once they do.

Fuck read Tacitus, read the battle reports against the German tribes or the reports of the Crusades. Even Charlemagne’s battle reports.

The quality of posters here has seriously turned into nothing but beaner and nigger logic

You don't know how the NSDAP viewed their situation. One of the reasons they did not go to a total war economy until 1943 was that they feared civil unrest more than they feared their enemies. Remember that they believed the army had been defeated in WW1 by unrest on the homefront, not by enemy arms.

Why would Hitler even bother giving public speeches if he didn't care what the majority thought?

I am not Satan

Because that's the truth.
wat?
Yep.
Dishonesty is bad - like the jewish men who brought christianity into europe and sold it to people by telling them a bunch of lies - but sometimes necessary to do good - like NatSoc leaders using christianity to appeal to christian-indoctrinates as part of an effort to free them from jewish soul-slavery.

And all of that is still just empty rhetoric from someone who is positing that publically presented political speechs are 100% accurate as goes the genuinely-espoused ideals of those politicians given the public speechs (and that under no circumstances could the contents of those speeches be falsified) - but that any and all information on the private views of these individuals were 'third party' and thus were unquestionably falsified.
Very disingenuous, or else simply stupid; both very christian traits.

Someone was triggered.
The historical fact is that jesus christ was a jewish man, a rabbi. He was subversively trying to gain power for himself in a manner that threatened the regional jewish hegemony and so the regional jewish leaders had him killed by the European Romans who had conquered the area. The followers of jesus christ the jew - who were likewise jews - fled persecution at the hands of other jews, came into European lands, and made up a fairytale about the subversive jewish rabbi they had worked alongside, which allowed them to gain much socially and financially. The Europeans, under the thrall of this jewish cult (which grew through appeal to the dregs of society, especially slaves and plebs), eventually wiped out their own cultures and religions, replacing them with christianity. Millennia later you were raised christian by your indoctrinated family, or chose to self-indoctrinate in a misguided attempt to feel some sort of sense of rooted traditionalism, while aggressively ignoring that most of your ancestors were not christians, and denying the jewish origin of your cult.
This is all historical fact.

[*AIDS INTENSIFIES*]

Attached: Lovecraft - Racism.jpg (2428x2518 22.03 KB, 949.5K)

You could put any politician into that position and it would remain accurate, and you know that.

The Rabbinical order wasn’t even established when Jesus was alive.

So much for that theory of yours Schlomo.

Ho-Lee-Fuck! We got a live one!
Ummmmm, there is that part about his people, and blood and kinship. You know, the entire purpose to National Socialism?

You need to be fired! You're so bad at this.

You have no grasp on history my friend, only weird christian conspiracy nonsense that you have not provided any evidence to support.
Provide such evidence, then perhaps we can converse further.

If his people were under the control of a jewish soul-enslavement cult, and any attempt on his behalf to free them via direct attack upon such would be detrimental to his efforts to free them, by your own reasoning he would be fully justified in such falsehoods - he would be, after all, appealing to an indoctrinated population, his people, his blood and kin, who he desperately wished to free from such soul-servitude.

So then who were the Pharisees?

So he cared what the majority thought? You aren't being clear, and you need to go back to reddit, your typing style sticks out like a sore thumb.

Attached: cringe.jpg (262x192, 10.25K)

He didn’t give public speeches. He gave speeches to the party, which he also had broadcast over radio and television.

Those huge rallies you see with all those people and him in the center, that was the party.