Nietzsche a shit

Nietzsche a shit, change my mind.

I dont understand how a guy who promotes subjective individualist perceptions of morality is somehow a fascist/National Socialist hero. Might does not make right, if the communists exterminate whites they and Jews dont suddenly become the greatest thing ever. Morality is not subjective, its objective like everything else. Is raping kids bad? Of course it is. Is exterminating the best race on the planet who has contributed everything of value and demonstrates the most empathy towards others a good thing if you succeed? Of course not. Is it good to kill the people who would kill off that race? Of course it is, its objectively better for humanity and there is no counter argument, that doesnt stop wrong people from trying to argue that its okay to exterminate whites, they are just wrong, they are just bias. Whites are objectively superior and without them the world would objectively be at a loss.
So explain to me, since Im apparently uneducated on the man, why hes not a shit.

Hogwash.

Attached: nietzsche-with-gun.JPG (516x390, 37.25K)

Other urls found in this thread:

voltairenet.org/article203382.html
voltairenet.org/article203462.html
voltairenet.org/article203486.html
thediplomat.com/2018/03/russia-reveals-unstoppable-nuclear-powered-cruise-missile/
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

This isn't cuckchan faggot!
QTDDTOT

This isnt a question that doesnt deserve its own thread you newfaggot, its a discussion thread about one of the major ideological thought makers behind National Socialism and Fascist doctrine, its sort of a big deal. This is what Zig Forums exists for, its clear youre just a kike shill posting this trash in all the real threads that concern whites, like you did when we talked about making white run towns and taking over government with votes.

You're wrong you stupid nigger.
You must also be new here, lurk more, thanks.


it's not a question at all because you're wrong in assuming that anyone here would look at that pathetic whiny piece of shit as a hero… Let alone a hero of an *entire* ideology, that being NatSoc

Attached: 2afd69ee1a031db274495ef98a16611b76ad7440a0dd5c1d60ed3b5a0bcb03ed.jpg (570x570 21.52 KB, 47.04K)

I want to report you but I want to see how far your stupidity takes you :)

Attached: 365a3389c5a8164d159f0dd820c48ac3e8315042d34e57c5d7fb61ddaced32ba.jpg (772x696, 31.19K)

Nietzsche literally did nothing but moan and bitch about life not being easy, hes a middle school tier Philosopher.

Ive been here longer than you, thats for sure. Its also not wrong, thats what he pushes. The idea that might is right and that there is no objective morality.
A 5 second search on jewgle shows Hitler personally idolized him, sent flowers to his family, was gifted his walking cane, can be seen in a photograph looking deep into a statue of him's eyes. Youre just a lefty/pol/ shill clearly.

Reminder the old mods would have cleaned this thread up and already responded themselves with helpful information. An earlobe spamming sperge with cuckchan memes is about to derail this thread which could achieve a better understanding among all of us in regards to one of of the founders of the thought behind our ideology.

Then why can't you use apostrophes you negroid.
Former yes, latter no. No morality means falling into decadence… Just how it's happening right now everywhere. No morality in keeping you home secure and race protected means that you're going to see importing sandniggers into your home as a possible solution for (((declining population rate)))
Yes, believe what everyone tells you! Good Goy!
That Hitler sucked dick doesn't mean you're going to suck dick as well, that is unless you're a homo. That he adopted NatSoc and nearly succeeded in creating a kike-free space is incredible, truly a feat to be written in history and even admired despite your side. However, putting his image on the same level as God's is wrong, which is kind of what you're doing. Not because he did something, means (((we're))) going to do it.

Attached: 1537496559979.jpg (508x508 92.77 KB, 70.49K)

This is a Jew.
Jew.
Jew troll
Any time mods, file it under spam.

Attached: Goebbels-Morality-Moralism.png (658x2599, 220.71K)

The Italian and German fascist regimes were eager to lay claim to Nietzsche's ideas, and to position themselves as inspired by them. In 1932, Nietzsche's sister, Elisabeth Forster-Nietzsche, received a bouquet of roses from Adolf Hitler during a German premiere of Benito Mussolini's 100 Days, and in 1934 Hitler personally presented her with a wreath for Nietzsche's grave carrying the words "To A Great Fighter". Also in 1934, Elisabeth gave to Hitler Nietzsche's favorite walking stick, and Hitler was photographed gazing into the eyes of a white marble bust of Nietzsche.[23] Heinrich Hoffmann's popular biography Hitler as Nobody Knows Him (which sold nearly a half-million copies by 1938) featured this photo with the caption reading: "The Führer before the bust of the German philosopher whose ideas have fertilized two great popular movements: the national socialist of Germany and the fascist of Italy."[24]

Nietzsche was no less popular among French fascists, perhaps with more doctrinal truthfulness, as Robert S. Wistrich has pointed out

The "fascist" Nietzsche was above all considered to be a heroic opponent of necrotic Enlightenment "rationality" and a kind of spiritual vitalist, who had glorified war and violence in an age of herd-lemming shopkeepers, inspiring the anti-Marxist revolutions of the interwar period. According to the French fascist Pierre Drieu la Rochelle, it was the Nietzschean emphasis on the autotelic power of the Will that inspired the mystic voluntarism and political activism of his comrades. Such politicized readings were vehemently rejected by another French writer, the socialo-communist anarchist Georges Bataille, who in the 1930s sought to establish (in ambiguous success) the "radical incompatibility" between Nietzsche (as a thinker who abhorred mass politics) and "the fascist reactionaries." He argued that nothing was more alien to Nietzsche than the pan-Germanism, racism, militarism and anti-Semitism of the Nazis, into whose service the German philosopher had been pressed.[25] Bataille here was sharp-witted but combined half-truths without his customary dialectical finesse.

The German philosopher Martin Heidegger, who was (with great harm to his subsequent reputation) an active member of the Nazi Party, himself noted that everyone in his day was either 'for' or 'against' Nietzsche while claiming that this thinker heard a "command to reflect on the essence of a planetary domination." Alan D. Schrift cites this passage and writes, "That Heidegger sees Nietzsche heeding a command to reflect and prepare for earthly domination is of less interest to me than his noting that everyone thinks in terms of a position for or against Nietzsche. In particular, the gesture of setting up 'Nietzsche' as a battlefield on which to take one's stand against or to enter into competition with the ideas of one's intellectual predecessors or rivals has happened quite frequently in the twentieth century."

Marching in ideological warfare against the arrows from Bataille, Thomas Mann, the far more centrist Albert Camus and others, the Nazi movement, despite Nietzsche' virulent hatred of both volkist-populist socialist and nationalism ("national socialism"), did, in certain of its emphases, share an affinity with Nietzsche's ideas, including his ferocious attacks against democracy, egalitarianism, the communistic-socialistic social model, popular Christianity, parliamentary government, and a number of other things. In The Will to Power Nietzsche praised – sometimes metaphorically, other times both metaphorically and literally – the sublimity of war and warriors, and heralded an international ruling race that would become the "lords of the earth". Here Nietzsche was referring to pan-Europeanism of a Caesarist type, positively embracing Jews,[according to whom?] not a Germanic master race but a neo-imperial elite of culturally refined "redeemers" of humanity, otherwise wretched and plebeian and ugly in its mindless existence.

The Nazis appropriated, or rather received also inspiration in this case, from Nietzsche's extremely old-fashioned and semi-feudal views on women: Nietzsche despised modern feminism, along with democracy and socialism, as mere egalitarian leveling movements of nihilism. He forthrightly declared, "Man shall be trained for war and woman for the procreation of the warrior, anything else is folly"; and was indeed unified with the Nazi world-view at least in terms of the social role of women: "They belong in the kitchen and their chief role in life is to beget children for German warriors."[27] Here is one area where Nietzsche indeed did not contradict the Nazis in his politics of "aristocratic radicalism."

During the interbellum years, certain Nazis had employed a highly selective reading of Nietzsche's work to advance their ideology, notably Alfred Baeumler, who strikingly omitted the fact of Nietzsche's anti-socialism and anti-nationalism (for Nietzsche, both equally contemptible mass herd movements of modernity) in his reading of The Will to Power. The era of Nazi rule (1933–1945) saw Nietzsche's writings widely studied in German (and, after 1938, Austrian) schools and universities. Despite the fact that Nietzsche had expressed his disgust with plebeian-volkist anti-Semitism and supremacist German nationalism in the most forthright terms possible (e.g. he resolved "to have nothing to do with anyone involved in the perfidious race-fraud"), phrases like "the will to power" became common in Nazi circles. The wide popularity of Nietzsche among Nazis stemmed in part from the endeavors of his sister, Elisabeth Förster-Nietzsche, the editor of Nietzsche's work after his 1889 breakdown, and an eventual Nazi sympathizer. Mazzino Montinari, while editing Nietzsche's posthumous works in the 1960s, found that Förster-Nietzsche, while editing the posthumous fragments making up The Will to Power, had cut extracts, changed their order, quoted him out of context, etc.[28]

Nietzsche's reception among the more intellectually percipient or zealous fascists was not universally warm. For example, one "rabidly Nazi writer, Curt von Westernhagen, who announced in his book Nietzsche, Juden, Antijuden (1936) that the time had come to expose the 'defective personality of Nietzsche whose inordinate tributes for, and espousal of, Jews had caused him to depart from the Germanic principles enunciated by Meister Richard Wagner'."[29]

The real problem with the labelling of Nietzsche as a fascist, or worse, a Nazi, is that it ignores the fact that Nietzsche's aristocratism seeks to revive an older conception of politics, one which he locates in Greek agon which […] has striking affinities with the philosophy of action expounded in our own time by Hannah Arendt. Once an affinity like this is appreciated, the absurdity of describing Nietzsche's political thought as 'fascist', or Nazi, becomes readily apparent

the history youre getting told in school is a jewish narrative. just like that is the philosophy a jewish narrative. whatever fits their model for the goy is taught. thats why nietzche is shit. ever noticed that all the pseudo smart people (aka atheists) have lots of things to say about nietzsche's philosophy?

Most people who appreciate Evola seem to appreciate Nietzsche, they didnt teach me jack shit about him in school, I heard about him on Zig Forums over and over, through the years, but never bothered to look into him. Now hes being quoted by supposed white nationalists who are obviously just shills and promoting a braindead philosophy without thinking it through.

We'll see who they ban :)

Correct me if I'm wrong but, I'm arguing that you're retarded for assuming he's a hero while you're arguing on how why he even became a hero when he preaches backwards ideologies concerning NatSoc.
You instantly became defensive while I kept on calling you retarded.
You then pull a shit load of text out of your ass, obviously prepared to have this.

Also this


k
nergoid confirmed.
good riddance kike or double digit retard, sorry for your inability :(

Attached: 1539406032768.jpg (252x263 39.91 KB, 2.99M)

Paraphrasing: God is dead. Now we have to become Gods!

How's that shit?

Attached: 220px-Wege_zu_Kraft_und_Schönheitposter.jpg (274x392 294.5 KB, 77.91K)

Doesnt sound very National Socialist to me, Im not a Christian but self-worship is typically associated with Satanism. They definitely didnt believe God is dead, Christianity was thoroughly maintained and catered to even if only because the politicized clergy would exploit it not being, otherwise.

it's not about self-worship it is about becoming gods in the realms of body and mind. The erathly realm.


That's not what it's about, but liberalism and it's children marxism and the lot killed him in a metaphorical sense.

Attached: goebbels on fascism.png (956x600 1.43 MB, 1.1M)

I might tend to agree with you now that god is dead in a metaphorical sense, but at the time it was nearly entirely Christian. The rhetoric still seems alien to what youd expect from National Socialism, not that it really bothers me, just trying to understand how this guy who seems to be something more like a cultural marxist hero is /ourguy/. National Socialism doesnt like subjectivity, were based in objective truth.

fuckk off shlomo….

got eeeeeemmmm
://

Attached: 1554221ae5dd4b0700c584f9ef44f4e83a709a748a13ab28ec4f943d381dd64f.gif (250x194, 46.58K)

The enemy is based in subjectivity, nothing is objective and the end where they have a brown sub 100 IQ race with no ability to attack eachother based on race justifies the means of exterminating all the whites through such cowardly methods. We are based in factual reality, Hitler did nothing wrong, the holohoax didnt happen. 300k kikes died because of starvation, we dont say it was zero, we dont say we didnt kill communist partisans in the east for laying mines, we dont deny they were shot and dumped in ditches. Its more like 10-100k, not 800k+, but we dont deny it. Whatever is factual and real is what you will get from us. We are the good guys, apparently this triggers you. Maybe you should reflect on why, its the fact of the matter. Pic related. Subjectivity is marxist. Critical theory.

Attached: AlexanderMacris.png (1680x1050, 506.08K)

ALSO PER YOUR OWN WRITING
Human truth is subjective, the only real truth is nature.
Let's assume that your definition of NatSoc is the same one that Zig Forums preaches. You're wrong.
Let's assume that we're wrong but you're also not right. Humans are subjective, our ideologies are subjective. NatSoc was founded on ideologies, subjective ideologies to someone whose truth may not be someone else's truth.

Without looking at >>1228758 I'm going to infer that you called a kike.

Attached: 1539406722247.gif (480x270, 528.47K)

The genius of Nietzsche was that he simplified a very complex school of thought. "The will to power" disintegrated all prior philosophers theories and put them to task, affirming that life is a virus that continuously reaches further and further for their ever growing need of sunshine, taking over, removing, growing above, everything in it's way.
That's really all we're doing. Growing, eating, growing… When you look at humanity as a whole, we're a spreading plague.

The "natsoc tie-in" you refer to is breaking the constraints of humanism and moving into God-Like beings. Becoming more than a virus or a plague. Thus, Hitlers deep-seeded love for animals and environmental factors. The true National Socialist, doesn't hate niggers or spics or chinks, he loves and respects their cultures. An admirer of Gods creations. A respect for their infantile nature and an understanding of their basic substrates. They, left unattended, "will" kill us.

Reminder to filter the cuckchan sperge trying to destroy this thread because it contains an actual intellectual and informed debate.

Attached: cuckchanners2.jpg (704x376 572.07 KB, 43.82K)

Don't forget, Nietzsche fantasized about killing anti-Semites.

It seems it was just done to hijack him and stop anyone else from claiming him tbh, and not that Im against that, and not that its morally questionable or anything, if half his rhetoric applies then you just selectively take it and downplay the rest. I wouldnt lionize him or anything though, personally.

to me, he's not even really a philosopher.

A real philosopher should in this day and age (post French Revolution) be able to say, analyze the mathematics of the Enlightenment, poke holes in it, show it's fundamental deficiencies and then point the way to radically new ways of doing math, like non Euclidian geometries of Reimann and Bolyai and Lobachevsky. He should be able to think in symbolic logic.

Indeed, take a bump, friendo

Im not even huge into philosophy, we dont need a movement of passive philosophers, we need warriors.. and I guess a lot of Nietzsche is promoting exactly that, a warrior race or class. I can see why some would appreciate that now.

As I said, I don't consider him to even be a philosopher.

A philosopher analyses the fundamental structures of thought and logic. Nietzsche is more of an essayist, a crude Montaigne.

What I mean to say is that its fine if a few intellectual types read Platos Republic, but philosophy is not for everyone. Maybe the Metaphysics of War for the soldier but they dont really need to understand these concepts. Its like when people have lengthy debates about economics, as if anyone is going to ask them for an opinion when it matters, if that time even comes. The economics debate in particular is starting to get on my nerves, our race is being wiped out and theres actually "pro-whites" pushing bolshevism and banning private property now. As if banning private property is a solution to white genocide, these people need to get roped.

as for warriors, the world is replete with warriors. We're all spending vast sums of wealth on warriors and their weapons and what good is it doing? They cannot or will not even defend our borders from intruders. They're always in danger of spinning out of control of their civilian leaders. They're not a particularly admirable crew, they don't bring justice or do good. They're a pack of attack dogs that obey the one that feeds them.

I suppose those thinking at a bronze age tribal level find some kind of comfort in the iconography of the warrior but doesn't it seem a bit obsolete since WWI? At most they're criminals sadists, but for the most part they're pitiful suckers, excess male cattle being led to the slaughter.

Im not talking about warriors for Israel, Im talking about warriors in the race war.. because as we should mostly all now know, we cant vote to stop white genocide.

I'll sure agree with you on that. Though I'd like to throw in almost all religious polemicists on that. I'd particularly like you to look up the Anabaptist uprising at Munster. Taking the bible out of the hands of the clergy was a vast liberation to most but the sudden liberation became explosive in the hands of an army of idiots that saw communism in the New Testament and immediately tried to put it into effect in Munster by burning down the city records office to eliminate all deeds to private property. They were crushed mercilessly by both Catholics and Protestants.

I think with warriors user meant people who are doing something to archive the goals which philosophers (non-doers if you like) set. Not like an actual soldiers.

Yes and no.

Attached: mathews-believe.jpg (489x589, 102.82K)

Like a woman, you call anything you don't understand shitty.

Read his first book again.

Yes but that's the problem; the warrior class should have intellectual autonomy to decide their battles. Evidently in our civilization they don't. So the warrior is obsolete.

It's going to take something else.

I keep saying that the big mistake of the Germans was turning to marching around to oompapa bands in comic opera uniforms, waving red banners and glorying in the accolades of maidens strewing flowers upon them. It's like getting into a boxing match to cure yourself of tapeworms. We need a more silent covert and secretive approach to match and surpass the devious cunning jews.

It's going to look a lot more like Black Hat in Las Vegas than a NAZI rally at Nuremberg, or Iranians hacking a US stealth drone and landing it and taking it apart and copying it with their own modded upgrades.

Attached: images.jpg (282x178, 6.81K)

And you immediately expose yourself as being a complete retard. That's not what "Might makes right" means. It simply means that might = result. The most powerful can enact their will. It's not a moral. Fuckin' idiot.

OP a faggot. Change my mind.

Attached: 1358743332917.jpg (425x301, 45.31K)

yikes.


Yes.
That's why he loved animals, respected Japanese culture but emphasized that they should be left alone in their own place, and why we never saw anything about him destroying nature (somewhat pic related, there's also him being vegan I think and him being around animals like deer).


You misunderstood what he was trying to say btw.
You're arguing that he's shitter when we all know he's a shitter. You're also saying that we need meatheads to defend the white race. The good goys are actively becoming meatheads, therefore can be even more easily manipulated.

So you need those who are doing the thinking to go out there and fight. So you need plato, hitler, etc. to go out there and actively fight. Yikes!

Go back and read the entire thread. I'm starting to think you might actually be an "oldfag" so much that your IQ is that of an alzheimering 60 yo

(checked)
I'm pretty sure they didn't just march around all dressed up just for the shits and giggles.

Attached: 7e1f57ccfe47f6b7d0f231dc564f3df9b521323628adbf3b03fc6da86af7ad11.png (497x497, 153.59K)

Attached: tedbundy.jpg (520x730, 120.03K)

I hate that when women do that.

I bet OP is a female as well…

forgot pic related

Attached: 7f0fa7c1290d000a2f96b4b873b08356b74012b06c29543272174609e8e9e48e.jpg (1200x819, 149.05K)

meh i like stirner better

Thats a purely modern brainwashed outlook, rallies are a huge factor in motivating people. Id suggest you read up on Goebbels, I think its this book in pic related… the rallies are what really made him feel included, being locked arm in arm and actually carried by the men since he was so small. He felt united with his people. Being denied rallies is either a naive mistake or an active subversion, everyone else has them. Look at Ireland, its not larping. The orange order and the UVF march through the Irish neighborhoods to stir them up and the Irish nationalists do counter marches through protestant ulster unionist territory. Its not only a big motivating factor but it stirs the pot, it causes the enemy to do things that make them look bad and gain you followers. This attack on rallies is a big, big mistake.

The Waffen SS soldiers didnt all have personal autonomy, some people are leaders and some are followers… even if they are elite followers. Maybe in the modern day when single action is more likely to be common, okay.. but is it really necessary? I dont think so. Whats necessary is people read about war itself, about strategy and tactics and the specific kinds of things that teach them the logic behind what they need to do in order to survive and in order to be effective. They need to know about National Socialism, they would stand to benefit from history, but statecraft for example is definitely not on the top of the list.

Cuckchan fucking christ youre shitting this place up. Just go back. White women are half of our race, if you hate them you hate your race.

Attached: not-the-jews-its-women.jpg (768x960 24.38 KB, 162.64K)

Terribly jewish way to phrase that. There's truth and then there's human perspective. There aren't different types of truth.

Back. Out.

Attached: leftypol-in-a-meme.png (959x707, 514.15K)

Attached: On-Guerilla-Warfare1.png (1434x1318, 477.22K)

Pretty sure that N was trying to say that a might is right, according to those holding that "might". This means that the Jews are right, according to the Jews, and therefore exercise their will on the goyim. This also means that the ebil Natzyeets are right, according to the Nazis, and therefore should (((gas))) all the Jews.


Yeah that's what I was trying to say, came out wrong, thanks for correction

Attached: f6f8632cae8904e25c9b5222b400f34658035bde809e56be305e08d7fc40ba18.jpg (352x254 90.99 KB, 75.29K)

Let me get a hold of that Ecodefnse book, user?

...

Kike!
(checked)
Spell it with me! K! I! K! E!

Attached: who can it be now.mp4 (960x720, 1.87M)

...

So am I, but the end result was getting surrounded for no good reason at Stalingrad and losing the greatest army in the world because they were a bunch of blockheads.


We don't need stubborn blockheads that get wiped out needlessly.

We need thoughts that act as immense force magnifiers. We need to transcend the www and find a new way to use the internet. The memes being generated here are amazing force magnifiers. I remember watching you guys when the NPC thing started and thought it was just some dumb shit, another stupid forced meme. Now it's got all the MSM in a major tizzy on the eve of an election of world history importance.

If Trump loses this election Britain, France, Turkey and Israel and possibly Saudi Arabia will immediately attack Syria again and the Syrian civil war will reignite with 5 to 10 times its previous fury. And this time Russia will be right in the middle of it asserting full air dominance over Syrian airspace. And Iran won't go away. They're ready to sink a US aircraft carrier in the gulf if need be. And if Russia and Iran get sucked into that how far behind will China be?

voltairenet.org/article203382.html

Let me brake down Nietzsche in a simple whay and explain why his thoughts are interesting. Bottom line Nietzsche Was A Bitter Cripple he’s not a role model or a sant if that’s what you’re looking for read Cicero;Nietzsche sed of him that nobody has nor will wright something as wise. Again he was a bitter crippled man and that makes him interesting but he’s not exactly the guy you want personal advice from.

You're a good user! thanks

Missed your post earlier.
That was easier to say at the time when they werent living among us, it was also largely rhetoric from what Ive seen. Pic related, Goebbels on niggers. Its a crime to bring them here and he didnt seem to happy to have them. There was plenty of imagery of niggers and kikes etc that was meant to provoke disgust.Goebbels words about Jews being a monster in Those Damned Nazis comes to mind also. And I guess why not make a third Goebbels reference because when you said bacteria this quote also came to mind, obviously not a real Tay quote. Anyways I appreciate the information on Nietzsche, I think I understand now.

Attached: Taylor-Swifts-Fascist-Europe.png (1530x969 349.48 KB, 1.37M)

That's nice but if you blow your horns and beat your drums in preparation to attack your enemy, he'll be sitting there waiting in ambush for you totally prepared for the attack you were preparing for him. We're no longer in the Napoleonic era and even Napoleon foolishly failed in the end. Why would anybody want to attack the Pripet marshes, particularly in an age when a clever electrical engineer can take over any airliner by it's own telemetry?

What could be more useless and stupid than the cliched "boots on the ground"?

No one cares about you if you dont. Its a purely modern confusion over this issue, rallies and marches are good. Say it, rallies and marches are good.

Attached: rockwell-us-right-wing-picture.png (786x1019, 598.02K)

I want (you)s please, thanks

Yeah it was needed for morale and in the end the white kikes ended up outsmarting them. I don't know why you'd assume it was a bad thing in general, if I'm reading you correctly, instead. just say that that particular move was idiotic considering their circumstances.


They were never among is when we were great, and to assume that he wanted to go out to Africa and gas every single one of them is idiotic. Hitler ""emphaized"" that they should remain in their own land and not be dealt with unless they become a threat, he was mad at them mixing, not at them existing.

Attached: kdndr30nffl11.jpg (1400x1627, 317.72K)

YIKES KIKE!

Attached: dios mio!.png (288x415, 155.6K)

No they're a waste of time and resources and you're telling the enemy exactly who you are and where you live. And that is what the jew thrives on. They're about as useful as going to a big wrestling match with 25000 howling idiot fans. They're as useful as building $48 billion dollar aircraft carriers like the USS GHWBush that will be sunk to the bottom of the sea, a burned radioactive hulk in the first week of any war you get into.

The planet without a jew separates itself.
They have no home. They are the destroyers of worlds.
Hitler was first employed by the NSDAP as it's Chief Propaganda Specialist. It was a position they took very seriously. The Americans and French posed a threat because niggers were something Germans had never seen before. It was a different time, but we're talking about a species of animals that hadn't invented the wheel. They are and were no threat to humans.
There is truly one enemy to humanity. I can't figure out how Hitler knew the jew and let it go but I imagine he was just trying to avoid the war. Then once they got Palestine and settled in, they started their boycott and the rest is history.

by a shitskin-motorboat and some rocket launchers

Attached: 6ebfaafd7ba8f9489b327e99f4bdecc5c2d93ebc5a8dc7d41f4b7ee7ad134c70.png (665x1050, 157.12K)

Nope by a 25000 kph cruise missile fired off from an ICBM

don't feed the trolls….

This is just cowardice. The Jew is not invincible and we need white power, not white deception. You cant out sneak a kike, they attack every moderate cucked organization. This PR cucking bullshit doesnt work. Here, let him do the talking for me.

Attached: Rockwell-FIGHT.jpg (1618x897 94.95 KB, 335.7K)

Objectively wrong.

europoor confirmed
please define "ICBM" and how they work
also eurotard also confirmed


This is my form of entertainment, laughing at tards on the internet. But dully noted, thanks.

Attached: 5bcb7dec2bfc6fc8db77905d1599378f4e00ec8b827dd422a60e1d7dffcf19f1.jpeg (450x450, 85.9K)

Attached: george-lincoln-rockwell2.png (932x2169 649.1 KB, 1.13M)

Look at the overall political struggle leading up to WWII. The jews were playing all these subtle moves using banking and espionage and treachery. Louis Ferdinand Celine went crazy when the Germans reached Paris; THEY WERE ALL DOWN IN THE NIGHT CLUBS SHOWING OFF THEIR HUGO BOSS UNIFORMS AND DATING HOT JEWESS SPIES. He was invited to speak to the top German officers; he gave them a scathing denunciation and told them they were acting like it was a big holiday for themselves, not a deadly total war that would end up with them in mass graves and their entire families gang raped by central asian illiterate filthy savages. They were taken aback by his harsh words. It was really too impolite…

The GERMANS LOST THE WAR.

The time has come to stop sentimentalizing over the NAZIs and start figuring out how we're going to get out of this hellish trap sprung on us by the international jews. Surely not by imitating past defeats brainlessly.

This is a National Socialist board, you must leave.

Attached: get-out.gif (615x346, 3.94M)

Correct, under the current circumstance, the pose a great threat. I was still stuck in the Africa nigger thought. African niggers (inhabitants of Africa) are no threat to humans. They don't have missiles or any capability of attacking a civilized nation.

Ok, watch this you faggot.

Nietzsche was a sick weakling his whole life, and it taught him to actually value strength and health as intrinsically good. He wrote On the Genealogy of Morality: A Polemic in 1889 long after Marx wrote his faggot garbage. He saw how weak people decided that strength and success was evil because they were failures who needed to feel better about themselves: they labeled their parasitic failure as morally good. He basically anticipated the SJW mind-frame, and his ideas are almost exactly mirrored in the Unibomber Manifesto where Ted Kaczynski describes the psychology of the left.

So half or most of his rhetoric is good and discard the bullshit, thats pretty much the result of this thread if you read it.

Define "right". There's the natural right of force of will granted when you have greater power than another, and there's moral right and wrong. I haven't read Nietsche, but I would wager he's referring to the former.

The new Russian hypersonic missiles are a fusion of ICBM and cruise missile technolgy.

voltairenet.org/article203462.html

Il faut savoir que lors de la rentrée dans l’atmosphère à une vitesse proche de 7,8 km/s (soit 28 000 km/h), entre l’onde de choc inclinée précédant le véhicule cosmique et l’onde de choc stationnaire qui y est attachée, il se crée un espace d’environ 1 m. Le temps nécessaire à une molécule d’air pour parcourir cet espace est de 18 microsecondes. Ceci est la période pendant laquelle la molécule d’air dans l’onde de choc est soumise à un procédé chimique qui libère de l’énergie calorique, ce qui la ramène à son état d’équilibre initial.

voltairenet.org/article203486.html


Regardless of the details the entire US and Russian and Chinese surface fleets are destroyed utterly within one week of total war breaking out.

I know, you're a socialist.

I'm far to the right of you.

To be honest I just saw a bunch of WWII garbage and skipped over it. Didn't see a huge amount of Nietzsche.

I dont think you understand when someone says "might makes right." It's like saying the winner of a war writes history books and you are saying they shouldnt.

National Socialism, in it's recognition of the laws of nature values a collective, and right of the individuals within that collective to live as they please, free from the oppression of another culture.

Lenin, Trotsky, Stalin, Zinoviev, Kamenev, Molotov and Kirov

What do they all have in common?
1. they're all creators of communism
2. they're all aliases

They were all criminals willing to go the distance. A gang. A fucking gang of 7 men took control of a country and ended up taking over eastern europe.

Now they control the world through wage slavery.

If you guys think you're going to rise up and overcome in a fair manner. You have no idea who you're rising against.

stop pulling quotes out of your ass without context kike


Yes I understand, but you shouldn't blame an entire habit over one mistake. They lost the war but it doesn't mean it was ""just"" because they held that single march. It was plenty of military defeats and the involvement of 2 parties on 2 fronts that, imo, lead to their ruin, not a stupid fucking march…


shut filthy kike. Not because you can't comprehend what user is trying to say means that he's a rat like you.


A tard, by himself is no threat, but if that tard can hold a gun and be trained to shoot certain people, or even just feel a sense of oppression, then you have a deadly weapon shooting your children or asking for gibs.


yes

You're arguing against yourself you moron


Those who hold a certain ideology will see their actions acting upon their ideology as morally and objectively correct because it holds their truth, AKA their ideology/belief system. You don't have to read the entire Encyclopedia to understand one particular topic.


interesting read but you're still wrong. An ICBM is a missile by itself, InterContinental Ballistic Missile, ICBM. The article says that the missile employs cruise missile technology, it doesn't actually launch an ICBM then that ICBM launches a cruise missile.


I think like 4 anons have tried to tell this to OP already, but OP is being a huge faggot.

Attached: 744f1cd338333a7e74a13f909ecd8ebe9d8b728f456c386b33130283ebffabb8.png (659x1538, 1.47M)

Pretty much started from an argument where a supposed white nationalist suggested its fine if communists shoot white people in the back of the head at 3am because might makes right, when it was pointed out only shooting communists in the back of the head at 3am is a good thing but its obviously bad when they are doing it to promote a false equality based slave ideology that would exterminate the people responsible for everything good on the planet, theres not really any argument to be had on it but apparently Nietzsche supports this trash. Then another one of them whos promoting lefty/pol/ trash subversively had also quoted him with the one I put in the OP about morality.

kek!

Also found the pic about hitler on other races.

Attached: hitler_and_preservation_of_race.jpg (657x557 254.95 KB, 312.73K)

You idiot according to themselves it's right but not to us. How dense are you REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE

Attached: 1539404912532.jpg (360x360, 8.04K)

I see.

So, to beat the communists I have to become a communist, for real, or as you say, a collectivist, and not just as a secret saboteur or spy, but in good earnest.

And I must adore a charismatic leader who will lead us to defeat.


Great.

Is that the point Nietsche made? 'Cause that's not philosophy, that's a psychological assessment. It has zip to do with determining if might is morally right in an objective sense, as opposed to subjective.
You're doin' it again. *Perspective.

Attached: Ukraine-2014.jpg (3080x1306, 444.47K)

I do believe it's a cruise missile launched to the edge of the atmosphere by an ICBM that then separates from its booster to behave as a super high speed cruise missile.

Attached: Voltairenet-org_-_1_2_-152-c337d.jpg (397x298, 18.34K)

Heres all the average person needs to know, this stuff is whats going to save our race.

Attached: lemmings.png (1468x7317, 2.38M)

Unless you're gonna become the ultimate badass who can anything he wants, you're gonna have to ally with the people most aligned with you against those most opposed.

You realize there was more freedom for Germans under Hitler than before he came to power, yes?

It's the same thing, their truth, perspective.
If you're interpreting it then yeah it sounds like philosophy, but you have to remind yourself that that's my pov, and philosophy is all about "perspectives", that's why the left can adopt the same quotes yet use them in different contexts and totally justify them.


Then the cruise missile, in itself, is the ICBM. It just has a first stage that takes it to space and a second that guides it to its target.


I know you filtered me and probably won't read this I'm very sad indeed but I just want to make it clear that I think you're either a shill or a moron, even going as far as a retard.

Philosophy is all about determining the truth, not perspectives. Perspectives will amount to different conclusions, but the goal is always truth, or it isn't philosophy.

Yes, it's about the truth, but it's a concrete subjective truth based on perspective(s), of which all came to the same conclusion.

I can agree with that.

Look I'm not totally decrying Hitler here; he was a man who came of age in WWI, with all the virtues and intellectual vices that implies.

WWI ended a century ago.

I don't say it's totally bad to look back and see what was attempted but to over obsess upon it and take it as the paradigm to be followed is totally stupid now. Look back and learn from the mistakes.

They won we lost. Why?
And also, the situation now it totally changed. For one thing, the jews are in racial retreat. Something has happened and the jews are in a catastrophic intellectual decline. Was it the hedonism of their own women? The med schools and dental schools are not longer swarming with overwhelming numbers of jews; muslims have taken their place. They're coasting on past accumulated power and wealth but the younger generation of jews are imbeciles, incompetents. For example think IDF 1946 and IDF 2006. Where are their Stanley Kubricks? their Richard Feynmans? There's no one there to take their places.

This all has to be analyzed and an entirely new approach has to be conceived. Not the approach of a veteran of WWI.

Your "truth" isn't truth. Something can't be a "concrete subjective". If it's right, it's right. Wrong is wrong.

This is basic semantics, giving in to loose definitions is the #1 way certain (((people))) obfuscate what is and isn't.

It's imperative that logically consistent definitions are kept intact and expanded into fuzzy areas. Lock them down and force them into a corner.

“We’ve started the development of new types of strategic weapons that do not use ballistic flight paths on the way to the target. This means that the missile defense systems are useless as a counter-means and just senseless,” Putin said in his speech.

thediplomat.com/2018/03/russia-reveals-unstoppable-nuclear-powered-cruise-missile/


And then there's the Avanguard. It's launched off an ICBM but it has the maneuverability of a cruise missile

The Avangard is powered by a scramjet engine that accelerates it up to Mach 20. When approaching a target, the glider is capable of sharp high speed evasive maneuvers in flight making it “absolutely invulnerable for any missile defence system”.