Zig Forums: the book

I made the mistake of going outside among the normals yesterday, I made the worse mistake of talking to them about things of importance while not hiding my own true opinions from them, due to this experience, I have discovered just how uninformed the average person is from my interactions with them.

One half of the people I talked to didn't know even the most basic and surface level of facts not taught to them by the propaganda machines or the indoctrination centers, out of sheer apathy, or outright fear of what they might learn and how it might be perceived.
The other half were the left-of-center people who thought they were so smart and edgy, for basically being the rick and morty type, they knew only the unpopular truths that didn't conflict with their kosher political and "moral" positions.

We create a little book that contains nothing but empirically verifiable facts and multiple openly available sources, the more liberal the source, the better (as our targets will trust facts supporting the far right positions more if they come from mainstream, left wing or far left sources).

We will include no opinions, no logical, philosophical, or religious argumentation, we just put down the truths that have been withheld from the average westerner, and leave drawing the inevitable conclusions to the reader (they either come to the realization of the truth and awaken, or they remain asleep, in which case they are so stupid or dishonest with themselves that they were incapable of awakening anyway).

We will sort the facts in the order of the time period they first apply to, starting with the dawn of humanoids (the "homo" family), and ending at the projected possible futures from current data and it's responses to possible actions taken by humanity.

It shall be created via collaborative effort using the wiki format for it's creation, using appropriate measures to ensure we get as much quality facts in as possible, while filtering out all the unintentional trash and intentional sabotage attempts.

Once created, we place there books all over the place where normals will pick them up and hopefully read them, to ensure they get picked up, we must avoid anything that would discourage a normal from doing so, no swastikas, no mention of Zig Forums on the cover, no mention of any particular political identity at all, this is to be presented as a politically non-partisan publication containing little known facts about science/technology, history/statistics, religion/irreligion, politics/economics, "education"/academia, "entertainment"/sex, commerce/industry, etc.

We will include some red herring facts that, while true and little known, also have little relevance to our political ideology, this is so it does not appear biased in such a manner as to get the normie to identify it as a book made by the far right, throw away the book, and purge their minds of all they had learned like the good goys that they are.

We are living in a world with all of the tropes from two books combined into one: "1984" and "The Brave New World", it turns out that Orwell and Huxley were both correct about society (what a twist!), but they very much underestimated the role futuristic technologies would take in facilitating such a society.

Attached: 5ae61bc6bf1f6.jpeg (830x974, 210.05K)

Other urls found in this thread:

libraryofhate.com/
youtu.be/ScChhH0Se5I
en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Igor_Bunich
media.8ch.net/pdfs/src/1422785560965-0.pdf
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

It's impossible.

Modern Zig Forums has become too hugbox-y.

Nowadays you can stop at the part when reason Hitler invades Poland, nazi sympathizers will say because the poles massacred ethnic germans in Poland, then people will ask for proofs, then nazi sympathizers will proceed to call for jews and shills and ad hominem themselves out of argument.

It's too sad, but Zig Forums really is too dumb for an attempt of basic evidence analysis anymore.

The source is ”John Toland, Adolf Hitler”

Even if you don't count the massacre against ethnic germans you still have the vote of the Upper Silesia plebiscite from 1921 with 59.6% voting to remain in Germany and the poles annexed the half of it anyway.

That's Weimar government, correct?

It's true, there are a lot of Hitler fangirls here that don't want to believe Hitler ever made a mistake, or did something that's uncomfortable to acknowledge. A man who has been unpersoned, imprisoned, and beaten for stating what he believes is the truth after an unparalleled amount of research, David Irving, is vociferously shilled against here because he doesn't worship the Fuhrer. Personally, I highly value Irving's input as about the most accurate work you could hope for while still thinking Hitler was a fucking boss.

Attached: 3900b5b81ea3cffb2c0b376f74e1821a2471048f591732afed2d8792896cc78a.jpg (1586x1600, 1.99M)

Zig Forums wasn't used to be like this.

But after imkikey, people have become unironic retards who ignore reason, prefer to call out people being jews and shills.

this, the board was killed by moderators

I got banned so many times for quoting Irving back then.

Hitler > (((Jesus)))

libraryofhate.com/
Enjoy this useful website for your project.
I suggest creating a leaflet rather than a book.

As I said to some other anons people are tired and don't want to respond they have heard the same arguments so many times that they decided to take the lefty approach if you want to believe believe if you don't die. Off course we are logical and only want intelligent people that can connect the dots and adapt and on the other hand you all come so fucking aggressive and useless that we literally win nothing not even a thank you when we tell you our truth. You are disgusting people that deserve no sympathy so we will never tell you our truth if you don't even care about showing yourself respectably.

Again, you don't have a fucking argument in order to engage in honest discussion.

That's why it piles up on you, meanwhile, I don't need to do anything but raise the same question + point again and again.

Didn't used to have "Hitler fangirls"? Are you retarded? Kikey tried his hardest to un-National Socialist Zig Forums and banned all of the actual nazis during 2016 with his infinite purge of any threads related to national socialism.

>Hitler > (((Jesus)))
Wotan > foreskin demon god

Kikey banned me when I questioned Hitler's decision to attack Poland and asks for proof.

Kikey wants the retarded unthinking national socialism as the official board ideology, the only difference is that he's zealously loyal to Trump (which is a boon I still say).

>Hitler > (((Jesus)))
Hitler = Jesus
The timing is "odd" and the story sure sounds similar. 2,000 years later a white man chases the money changers out of his temple and delivers his people from the hands of evil only to be crucified by the money changers…
It's a bit uncanny when you think about it.

It's an insult to compare Hitler with Jesus.

Jesus whips some jews and got crucified like bitch.

Meanwhile, Hitler actually leads an army, albeit he failed.

He wanted blind GOP worship as the board ideology, just like all of the other kikes.
>>>/poland/

And what's your question why Germany invaded Poland?

He's just some asshurt polski doing the usual polski thing of claiming that they dindu nuffin. I'd ban all polish from Zig Forums tbh, they shit up every thread they post in with their victim bullshit.

Unlikely to work.
The information is already out there and has been gathered together and put out many times.
The book would only have any success if we had power and even then it would be successful so long as we had said power.

The normies don't have any opinions other than what society tells them. It doesn't matter to them who runs society or what it tells them their opinions are.
They're quite happy to do a complete 180 in a moment if that is what society demands.

dude what there's photos and video evidence of that all over the internet
and if you don't believe Hitler maybe you don't belong here.

I'm Polish and I absolutely agree with Hitler taking back his land. Shit was fucked up.

It seems that pigs do fly after all.

Still he seems ready to be hanged by my details and answers so i am waiting his questions

fuck i hate it when people use this word incorrectly

Attached: 9f7a43fa9a0f6a41db8ccaa6bf3bf57f4813ddae53d80757db6e4284025327d5.jpg (653x601, 106.38K)

youtu.be/ScChhH0Se5I

Is there proof to any of the ethnic massacre of germans in Poland?


Again, this hostitlity to this question is unreal on this board.

If you are talking about that website, no, that's not proof of anything.
1. It was record of the germans.
2. It did not have proof that this is crimes of the polish government or even the polish citizen.

No, retard, you're trying to claim that kikey was a national socialist while also claiming that Poland dindu nuffin. Expect to be met with hostility when you shill so blatantly.

1. Kikey bans me because I question national socialist actions.
2. I ask what is the proof of Polish massacre of german, the single bastion idea that many "national socialists" here bank on relentlessly yet with no proof.
Asking for proof is shilling now?

Some months ago I saw this pdf uploaded here, it's pretty good stuff. In QTDDTOT no-one knew where it was from, but it's definitely from Zig Forums. Looks like the foreword of some kind of book.
Doing some searches I came across this other version which has some more content, but the foreword itself has a lower page number which may mean it's actually from an earlier version.


I don't see many negative comments about Irving here. In fact I started looking up his work because Zig Forumsacks recommended him.

Attached: national_socialist_animals.gif (320x240, 2.22M)

You're probably that asshole who relentlessly shills Miles Mathis works.

He did make mistakes, but none of those mistakes were the ones he is usually accused of.
You are free to name one better leader in the entirety of human history.

Attached: hitler and friends.png (809x965, 1.22M)

Who what?

Otto von Bismarck, Augustus Caesar, Frederick the Great, Philips II, Alexander the Great and so on, and so on.

It will get edited by ciafags and jews to insert lies/unsourced info to discredit the book, insert d&c, etc.

wiki might be better than a book tho. pushes for a book always peter out.

Good plan bossman, but.
There's your first huge mistake.

an oxymoron

National socialists can be smart.

I doubt that many people give a fuck why Poland was invaded. One action doesn't distract from the positives of Jew removal.

You mean Philip II and he was a bit of a christcuck, the likes of which you can thank for Europe being infatuated with hebrew gods.
Great strategist, terrible anger management issues and alcoholism.
Not bad, but they didn't fundamentally change everything in the way Hitler did.
Fantastic leader, but his empire wasn't a disarmed pile of rubble and degeneracy when he began.

Philip II of Macedon was a very competent ruler that made the conquest of Alexander possible.
Alcoholism is a grave of many great leaders, Hitler included, but his strategy and tactics were far away compared to modern leader.
They established the very framework that Hitler followed, Hitler didn't just sprout out of nowhere.
On the contrary, he took the empire via a civil war, when the empire is currently in huge instability due to the death of Jesus Caesar and established Pax Romania for the next 200 years. He's the archetype of good statesmanship.

I do give a shit because the invasion of Poland was the first step of Hitler's downfall.

The USSR's invasion second.

But Hitlerites will defend these choices to the death.

I want them all back tbh.
I'm an idiot, was thinking of the Iberian.

They cannot be back but you can learn from them, especially Augustus and Bismarck.

Very, very competent leader.

If Bismarck was able to oust Wilheim II, there wouldn't be WW1.

Oh look a bunch of people who did nothing to the jews.

It's these people who keep their world jews free.

Jews only get into prominent during the 17th century with banking firms and the decline of nobility, and they explode with the fall of the 2nd Reich in WW1.

Everyone here agrees that invading commies was a bad idea. Tbh USSR would have fallen one way or another and it was an easier-to-defend front. Only an idiot would defend that, and I think that was his actual last mistake, not Poland. Invading Poland was understandable because it was seen, even by many people at the time, as taking back what was theirs.


Can you imagine? It's hard to even imagine what the world would have been like. You're right, we have so much to learn from history.

Many people here quote fucking Icebreaker to justify the invasion of the USSR.

Just wait a bit, they will pop up.

Have the pasta.
Numbers of jews gassed by national socialists since the alleged holocaust: 0. Zero.

Numbers of penises mutilated by jews since national socialist Germany: millions
Numbers of animals slaughtered with inhumane kosher slaughter practices since NatSoc Germany: probably billions.
Boycotts against domestic gentile trade with the kosher label and prerequisite for jewish patronage: countless.
Instances of masquerading as whites of European descent by ashkenazim for the purpose of race baiting and other sabotage: countless.
Resources drained from gentile nations and people, including the alleged saviors of the jews, the Americans: many, many billions worth.
Numbers of chickens waved around in the ritual of kapparot that transfers sins from the jew onto the chicken: probably billions.
Numbers of oaths and promises voided which whites take seriously and at face value via the ritual of kol nidre: countless since it happens every year at yom kippur.
Amount of antiwhite propaganda produced and aimed at even their alleged saviors: countless.
Amount of atrocities committed against gentiles: countless.
Amount of usurious FIAT currency created, peddled and cultivated by jews: a figure that doesn't fit inside this comment due to the sheer number of zeroes.
Amount of meddling in foreign affairs despite usually being only 1-5% of the population: nigh infinite
Amount of marxism, bolshevism, globalism etc: infinite
Amount of kvetching in general: infinite.

And many, many, many other things that happened after the alleged holocaust, including the lie itself and all the atrocities against whites derived from that.

Now to the important tally:
Number of worries about jews voiced by gentiles based on actual things happening like genital mutilation et cetera legitimized by jews and golems: 0
Number of worries about nazis actively hunting, killing, persecuting, gassing jews despite none of that happenin legitimized by jews and golems: as many as there are claims made.

tl; dr:
jewish fear of persecution, which they deserve due to their heinous acts and despicable nature but is, sadly, not happening is routinely legitimized.
Gentile fear of the degrading, parasitical, atrocious effect of the jewish race in the light of their many, many actions which they commit daily is stamped away as irrational.

Chutzpah is a mental illness, though, and whitey has long grown tired of this stupid game. Next time the table gets flipped, you'll wish for the lies about the holocaust because they will be considered heavenly in comparison to the fate this abomination of a race will face due to its own, never knowing when to leave well enough alone, actions.

The axiom of jewish - human relations:
Philosemitism has no advantage for humans, only disadvantages.
Antisemitism has no disadvantage for humans, only advantages.

jewish and golem indignation is not a true disadvantage, it's only one if you let them make you think that it is.

You mean this? I've never seen anyone here bring this up

Attached: 700262.jpg (310x475, 47.61K)

Plenty do, I just argue with one yesterday.

it's pretty infamous now on Zig Forums.

That was mostly the work of imkikey. He couldn't tolerate any dissent or intelligent discussion.

So Zig Forums now views the book in a negative light?

Well as I wanted to say but forgot Germany invaded Poland because first ethnic cleansing from bolshevik jews, after that US/Britain/France sanctions and blocking ports and other supply lines and also bombing tourist vessels and trade ships before the war started. Britain/France being faggots and having a harsh treatment on Germans in general for no reason. An unlimited amount of insults from all sides against Germany not only militarly and ethnically but also diplomatically . Having a alliance with USSR wasn't going to last forever so you better use it, and Poland killing one of it's greatest leaders, also the general fear Communists had in all of Europe they had to be removed one way or another war was the last resort if Britain wasn't going to help well we will do it on our own way.

Firstly Hitler invadera Poland to stop the massacres against Germans (John Toland, Adolf Hitler)
Secondly the USSR were planning an attack on Germany, Hitler received a report stating that they were planning on attacking on the 7th of july, Hitler, thus was forced into attacking, he attacked in the 22nd of june.
Irving explains a little about how Hitler’s generals restructured the plan of attack which led to the fiasco at Stalingrad.

*Invaded

Here you go, exact things I mention.
Again, I require actual proof of that. An actual massacre is a huge thing, it cannot be hearsay.
Again, transcript of this report.

And here we have in action concensus breaking in another thread. Attempts to claim "Everyone thinks Hitler did nothing wrong, it became a hugbox" while also claiming "You provided no evidence on your claim even after evidence was provided". Welcome to nu pol.

Fucking state of this board. Did retards even read the GCHQ guidelines for manipulation or are all the shills hoping newfaggots from half and donald don't know what it is. Remember, ropes are cheap and one has your name on it.

Again, evidence of either?

I do because it is badly done research but people use it to defend the russian invasion.

Sure thing fren, here is the Wikipedia article explaining, if you want to look it up yourself the document is called:
Document No.103202/06
en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Igor_Bunich

People particularly don't like has position that an unspecified number (but a lot) of jews were executed in a quiet cleansing program initiated by people beneath Hitler in hierarchy without Hitler's approval. Without ever providing historical documents to counter him, they just say "the jews must have gotten to him", which is absolutely silly, because he still holds positions that, if ever gaining popular traction, would probably see the jews attacked on a worldwide scale.

Irving also doesn't refrain from letting his own sense of morality be known in his writing, and calls many acts of Natsoc leaders "evil". Of course, he also humanizes the people he writes about, so the jews still want him silenced. Irving pisses off both extremes. He even disgusted me and many others a bit with his anti-gun position.


Hard to say how anyone else would have done in Hitler's shoes, but I put forth Genghis Khan. Decisively dealt with anyone who fucked with him no matter how close relationally, and spread his seed far and wide. Hitler likely doomed himself and country because of his blind loyalty to useless people and some outright traitors. Mongolians are still some of the most free, grounded people on the planet, huge quantities of them still living in peace off the land, and upholding a warrior spirit; meanwhile Germans are depressing to look at now. Hitler was great, and accomplished things against odds known to few, if any, in history, but he made some devastatingly bad decisions that, even without having had to deal with half the Reich betraying him, might have cost the him the war. It's arguable that his cockiness following his early swift victories in regaining old lands got Germany into war with Britain sooner than it should have, too.

Anyway, there are lots of mistakes and unsavory (from certain perspectives) acts that Hitler is credited with that aren't often spoken of that I get shouted down for mentioning when I think they're relevant. Like the liquidation of the mentally ill population in Germany. Personally, I see nothing wrong with it apart from a political tact point of view. There are ways to enact eugenics that don't require killing anyone. But oh boy does suggesting it happened get me labeled a jew.

I think a lot of the people here are still so new to the idea that killing your enemy is perfectly fucking righteous, that they still frame actions taken by people who did just that as "evil", and then in Hitler's case, because they're infatuated with him, just refuse to believe he could have done anything that goes against the kike-promoted universal morality still poisoning their minds.

Attached: QMan_FF_Legacy_553_Kane_on_the_Golden_Sea.jpg (989x1400, 430.28K)

Ignore all this other bollocks
What the fuck are you going back and forth about, nothing to do with anything you autists.
Good idea OP, I think it would help
I'd also suggest a chapter on financial history (as that's the history with the most modern relevance and least known)

There is a huge problem in that people who you argue with will immediately fire up jewgle, find a wikipedia page, and then attempt to debunk your argument based on that. I could show them a room full of kikes who's sole purpose in life is to go and make articles on wiki less antisemetic, but it won't matter.

...

Not your blog, faggot.

You are full of shit faggot, merchant banking dates back 500 years before that, and even further before that to the Roman and Hellenic times. Gas yourself.

Actually, banking as an instutition was invented by the Knight templar.

Really, you are quoting a revisionist historian now?

Happened 3 days AFTER the German invasion of Poland.

In what ways?
Are you saying the whole christian propaganda that jews control the Roman empire?

Again, so what's your evidence that those sources are wrong and you are right?

I will concede that when it happens.

Vid related.
(don't take it to seriously)

Not an argument fag!

It's not even questioning history, everybody does, but you are quoting a revisionist historian who is making shit up.

Like the argument where were historian revisionists for not believing the holohoax?
Not an argument, now tell me how jews them selves aren't historian revisionists that distorted history, also from the way you type, you are the same faggot from the fucking faggot meta, just can't stop getting btfo and became this obsessed eh?

The Holohoax cannot believe in due to the lack of concrete evidences, the same for that historian claim (that Stalin somehow knew there's going to Operation Barbarossa when Stalin himself was terrfied for weeks when Barbarossa happens).
Jews are historian revisonists, but that's a reason you shouldn't be one, don't distort the truth even further.
I desire to be actually BTFO'd, and not just being showered with unfounded claims lacking of proofs.

That's pretty laughably rich coming from you.
Good point, but what about a revisionist that wants to bring the closest truth possible..
Also for a respond to this.

As for this… You are correct jews kinda had little to no power, after the whole jewish-roman war and when the romans destroyed their temple is when and how the whole shit show started, honestly it could've ended right then and there, but romans didn't. Then Josephus came along and that is when things had started to shift.

Why?
Then that's no revisionist, but an actual historian.

Your meta is proof of it.

The meta is proof of it when I sat down and ate popcorn.

The meta thread is where I literally asked for proof and got none.

Nice lie, they've sent you plenty of proof, you either ignored them or denied it.

BUMP. superb. I fully endorse this enterprise. Someone put me to work plz! (I’ll need a bit of time but it’ll get done). Tag me if you got an assignment that needs doing.

Wow this is pretty good actually. Needs footnotes with references though. I can help if there is need. Is this the whole document?

No I disagree , book form is good. More people read books than you might realize. The method of consumption might be a bit different though. For instance , we could take turns reading a chapter or parts of it or release it as podcast , or audio chapters read aloud — for instance , see librivox.org for an example of crowd sourced audiobooks — was super popular before audible sort of killed the demand a bit. Librivox is still good though for hard to find older books though.

normalfags are too lazy to read a book

I dunno if better leader overall but I think Goebbels would've been an even better fuhrer for Germany if Hitler would've died in the many attempts at his life or stepped down for whatever reason. He just lacked the legendary charisma to get the ball rolling to become fuhrer in the first place.

This. Make a documentary instead, tell most people to read a book and their eyes glaze over. What percentage of the population reads outside of pop culture trash like Harry Pooter, boomer (((military))) worship like Tom Clancy or shit-tier self-help bullshit?

If Hitler had listened to Goebbels sooner rather than later, the war might have gone differently. Goebbels really became a German hero in the war years, despite being a cringey slimeball all his life.

The Bible is the story of Man, so it's not so surprising when you think about it. If only we all could pick up the scourge as Jesus, as Hitler did, and drive the plague from our homelands. My God, what a world this would be.

I'm actually already doing that. It's 500 pages and will probably be another 500 by the time I get my first draft done. I posted about it a few months back.
And this is retardation. A collaborative effort is not a singular vision. A wiki is not policeable. The book has to be done with a single editor and a final revision of all the data by one person, otherwise it's just a shill repository.

Oh, hey. You actually saved my book. Now I feel a lot better about its contents. I'm further along now.

You're still alive! Amazing. Was sure you'd been suicided by now. Current chapters are amazing. Please take care. And post it on pdfs, fascist and the other bunkers when you're done. Literally the only reason for still dropping by nu-pol is anticipation for your book and fear that it will only be dropped here.

Attached: 78341831834837834.gif (293x300 272.9 KB, 23.59K)

Step 1: Make book
Step 2: Leave at college campus
Step 3: ????
Step 4: Profit

Fire bombing of Dresden
USS Liberty
WTC 7
Male Genital Mutilation/aka circumcision and its detrimental effects
lower testosterone in western countries
declining birthrates in western countries
increasing birthrates in third world countries while somehow these people are starving
Balfour declaration (and the status quo peace offered by Germany)
UN bribery during the formation of Israel
Ownership of the porn industry
Britain declared war on Germany first
IQ
Inventions/art/creativity
Mental illness stats of gays and trannies
Indians used to be blue eyed (documented in their religious texts)
Quotes about Jesus in the Talmud
Murder/violent crime stats
Rhodesia
The federal reserve and the income tax
Influence in the NAACP
Influence in postmodern art
Influence in the media/ownership of CNN et al.
Invention of birth control pill
The slave trade
Sterilzation of Ethiopians moving to Israel
Divorce rates and premarital sex

It's late and this is all I have for now, the above is a list of mostly provable, with (((studies))) or primary source evidence, things that can be mentioned in the book

One problem I've found while redpilling is that people will say "oh that's only the liberal (((ones)))" or "that's only the conservative (((ones)))" or "that's only the atheist (((ones)))". If an argument vector can be found to overcome this false logic, I'm all ears

Another problem is that the truth is so ridiculous it'd be hard to believe even if fiction. One or two of the above things would be fine for normies to accept, but the whole shebang? People think it's too insane it is

Also this, Hitler arrested the Rothschilds:
media.8ch.net/pdfs/src/1422785560965-0.pdf

I found your book, I read the first chapter today. Can you post any newly developed work? It succeeds where I feel the redstick initiative failed: it's extremely approachable and is written as to sound convincing, and not just a sober statement of brutal facts.
Should you post the updated file I would print it out and leave it around the local campuses. Also, the files I've checked don't have functioning web features (colored text doesn't actually take you anywhere), though that may be a function of exami going the .PDF on my phone. In either case best of luck and keep up the great work

Did that actually happen?

Everybody I know just wants to play golf at $135 a round.
They have never listened to one word about 911 being a coup d'etat.