National Socialism is not Socialism

The goy know, the next gen is jew aware and the more rat censors the more they realize jews are the problem.Literally proud of the awareness of the jew and identifying their death hooknose early wooooo.The parasite can't survive without a host and eviction notice posted .

Everyday you deranged subhumans amuse me.

Which existed when Liberalism meant either old classical Liberalism (thoroughly Right-wing), or modern Liberalism of Lloyd George (Liberal Party, UK). And when Weimar existed, modern Liberalism was not considered Left even in US.

State Capitalist. And only during 1920s (NEP). After introduction of Central Planning it became fully Socialist.

Again, your very own picture proves collectivism is bad.

Collectivism literally forces you to racial integrate with niggers.

No, the liberals are definite left wing in Weimar, considering the actual right wing parties exist at the time (monarchists, traditionist, nationalists).
Didn't know socialism is when the government owns all national companies.

And collectivism provided you with muh "western civilization", considering the nobles and tax money that funded Carnot, Da Vinci, Mozart, Bach, etc… And Hitler, but since you insects worship white marbles, lets bring you right to that period.
Be a subhuman somewhere else.

oh hell naw fuck all that

Collectivism sure did not provide me with muh western civilization.

Western civilization has much to individualism much more.

The nobles PERSONALLY patronages these artists, they weren't taxed for that.

Try again.
Go enjoy collectivism in South America and China then.

You did not present evidence of Bismarck supporting privatization.

Neither did you explained why you think that Socialism is not about abolition of wage labour, nor did you agree with obvious evidence that is.

Now you intend to start "discussion" about what Left/Right means.

Shitposting.

You have no idea what is and what is not considered Socialist for Marxists.

You haven't provided a evidence, a quote from Proudhon, father of anarchism, has nothing to do with socialism which was defined in the early 19th century as common ownership of goods.
Yes, liberals have been thoroughly seen as left wingers.
Yeah I do, socialist for marxist is when workers control the means of production.