Everything I Don't Like is Hitler: Understanding Why "Leftism" Isn't Even Real

Does "the left" even exist at this point? Short answer: of course it doesn't. Long answer: of course it doesn't. It's just their way of claiming that the so-called "other side" of politics must have a "counterbalance" so that they can feel good about being on the "right side of history". They're using (((Marxist))) narratives for the sake of "progressive ideas", in that you have to be something very specific (like a genderfluid polysexual African/Mexican/Indian/Jewish El Goblino transexual handicap with two biqueer tranny moms) to be part of their group, or simply just be a woman or "minority". As of now, their understanding of politics is next to nothing other than calling anyone they don't like a Nazi/fascist. Their "opposition" of (((capitalism))) is only in the sense that they think it has something to do with (((capitalism))) supposedly opposing homosexuality, open borders, race mixing, and feminism, when it's the complete opposite entirely. Their "opposition" against the (((media))) is that they think all these (((media))) outlets are all like a bunch of Der Stürmer-tier TV/radio stations, with no further actual proof other than they just say so.

The fact that they think that Zionist Evangelicuck known as Donald Trump is the reincarnation of Adolf Hitler, further solidifies my point. Even the most lax cuckservative is a Nazi/fascist in their eyes. Why? Because they say so, just like I've said before. This is by far the slimiest personality of the so-called "left", they'll forget almost everything they have ever protested about in the past for the sake of protesting something in the present. When the 2016 elections came in, suddenly Hillary was a saint to them. Only a bunch of "centrist" normalfags stuck to their principals of calling out both sides. Not that they know anything about politics, either. With all that said, how can you actually properly debate any of these freaks? I'm running out of ideas here because even if you call them out on their retardation, they'll just switch it over to an irrelevant topic to the debate because they never want their beliefs to be challenged by anyone. Either that or they will just nonchalantly call you a "troll". I would love any of you anons to give me your own interpretations of the "left" and their twisted personalities. This might give anons a better understanding on how you can actually deal with a lefty debate situation anywhere. The NPC meme could not be anymore true, folks.

Attached: bolshevism.jpg (680x823 132.45 KB, 129.31K)

Other urls found in this thread:

isgp-studies.com/liberal-cia-immigration
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

Don’t engage them. Just redpill the normies and move on. Once we have enough people agreeing with us, social proof will put all the leftists in line.

I don't know about that, maybe leftists still have a chance to be redpilled as well.

Simple answer: you can't debate or red pill an NPC because NPCs are incapable of independent thought.

There is only one (((problem))). Period.

$150 billion in "charitable" nonprofit foundations attacking Trump and promoting illegal immigration
isgp-studies.com/liberal-cia-immigration

(check 'em)
This.

Put them on the streets and see how long they remain leftists. The far right has always been the group that created poverty to work programs. From Hoover to Hitler. Proven fact, it works every single time.

Zig Forums is why progressive rightists go to be abused, Zig Forums is where conservative leftists go to be abused. The partisan sorting must be perfected.

Stab stab guess stab.

The thing that I find staggering about the accusations that Trump is "populist" is how transparently it reveals the media to in fact traffic in lies. Trump isn't popular. Not giving people what they want is pretty much the schtick he's been hitting the economy with. Trump is more of an unpopulist.

I don't even think most people accusing Trump of popularism realize that they're lying. I don't know what they're thinking when they bleat that out. Is it supposed to be a sin to care more about what helps the pops than what the pops popularize?