He seems like a proto-communist, but would he be someone who should have succeeded in his goals?
Honest question, did this guy do anything wrong?
Other urls found in this thread:
en.m.wikipedia.org
twitter.com
He was so violent he got himself killed and the movement snuffed out in the reaction, for starters.
I hate this distinction so much.
Anyways tell me how he wasn't but in any case not really, to this day he still causes liberals more asshurt than Hitler does.
He's hella based, easily the most based french to have existed. He's the type of guy who I'd love to have a 30cm bust of in my desk, you know what I'm saying?
For firebrand dictators, what's the tipping point of killing too many of your own party to stay in power, versus not killing enough to avoid being couped?
Jacques Hébert called for a dictatorship of the sans-culottes
No clue what that is
The tipping point is being a dictator who needs to kill any of your own people to stay in power.
Literally means those without breeches (leg coverings), it was used to describe the common man (who mostly wore pants).
And who was Jacques? I don't know that much about the French Revolution tbh.