Another Christian thread

Paul should be forgotten and scratched from the record.
He's a degenerate kike and has no place anywhere near a doctrine for western values.

The 1960s were apparently the time when Christianity was beginning to die, with the sexual revolution. The Bible was also apparently meant to be changed. Here is a link for the conspiracy archive.org/details/New_Order_of_Barbarians_remaster_tapes_1to3/New Order of Barbarians [remaster] tapes 1 to 3.mp3
It's at about 42:55.

I've just read claims by people that this board has been infiltrated

Gas yerself kike, jesus was the only one fighting the jew in his day, even the roman governor of Judea just did what they told him.

I don't talk about things as they should have been. I talk about how they were, are and how they can affect things to come.
Yes, Jesus stood against he Pharisee and those that say "jews are our greatest ally" are literally committing blasphemy, but until Christians realize they are praising the very thing Jesus gave his life in opposition of, they are a MAJOR blight upon the white race and detriment to the future of our people.

Paul mutilated Timothy’s genitals, you can say it’s fake all you want, the fact of the matter is, no major Christian church (if any) works against genital mutilation. It is Christian canon that god commanded the mutilation of infants without consent or anesthetic.

Paul is part of the New Testament canon. If you read what he says, inspired through the Holy Ghost according to Christians, you'll see that his teachings generally go along with Christ's.

False, absolutely and unequivocally False, the Book of Acts is largely about the way in which the law (Hebrew religious laws) no longer matters and never would or should apply to the gentiles and Christians.

The first church gathering in Antioch clearly lays out that circumcision is not required of anyone to be christian, it is also made clear you don't need to observe the dietary restrictions of Judaism any-longer.

My problem is that he commanded it in the first place.

While I see no direct fault in Paul's teachings I understand the suspicion being that he underwent an unobserved religious epiphany and then took on the leading roll in the early church as an apostle even though the other apostles had, themselves, replaced Judas with Mathias.

The book doesn't say we must embrace Paul, just direct them to a Jefferson Bible and you'll probably be fine.