Reminder

Gavin Howard
Gavin Howard

Socialism must be global, anything short of world revolution is a failed revolution.

Attached: World-Socialsit-Republic.png (9.69 KB, 275x183)

Other urls found in this thread:

marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1875/gotha/
mega.nz/#F!DpAz2IgQ!nW7bPNnpJFk5CAV3ypiaHw
youtube.com/watch?v=dQw4w9WgXcQ

Hudson Reyes
Hudson Reyes

based and leftpilled

Dominic Torres
Dominic Torres

I don't know if op is a tankie being ironic but he's right.

Attached: 3497e93bcd3c970ac1242e10a543d7d635c9b717.png (328.57 KB, 374x581)

Christopher Watson
Christopher Watson

Why?

Jeremiah Foster
Jeremiah Foster

Is that from this comic where a poncho and sombrero wearing Stalinist kills Trotsky with a pickaxe

Ethan Bennett
Ethan Bennett

Because hurr durr no borders no nations. It's true that the proletariat has no borders but an argument can easily be made that huge resource-rich countries like the USA or Russia can easily facilitate autarkic socialism.

Jackson Hernandez
Jackson Hernandez

No one disagrees with this.

Cameron Gutierrez
Cameron Gutierrez

I don't know, but you can have the picture

Because we can't compete in a long run with human stupidity, so we must wipe the capitalist cancer quickly and permanently before it eats and corrupts the revolution like every other before, you can't rest while there are enemies in the planet.

I think I remember that a guy and his conservative bureaucrats friends exiled and killed another guy for this reason among others.

Attached: fe0e043402fba12f8d144f859c5592d135097e2b.png (596.23 KB, 548x674)

James Carter
James Carter

I think I remember that a guy and his conservative bureaucrats friends exiled and killed another guy for this reason among others.
The theory of "Socialism in one country" was pretty much an admission of defeat; the european countries had failed to rise up. Now what do we do? Do we just dissolve the soviet union and let capitalists rape the land? Or do we build a strong power to aid future revolutions?
I know that there are, of course, sages who think they are very clever and even call themselves Socialists, who assert that power should not have been seized until the revolution had broken out in all countries. They do not suspect that by speaking in this way they are deserting the revolution and going over to the side of the bourgeoisie. To wait until the toiling classes bring about a revolution on an international scale means that everybody should stand stock-still in expectation. That is nonsense.
t. Lenin

Caleb Collins
Caleb Collins

ok CONTELINPRO lets hold hands and say kumbaya.

Adam Ramirez
Adam Ramirez

It isn't waiting to magically a world wide revolution occur, it's actively promoting it to happen after a smaller revolution happened.
I'm not saying that the soviet union just isolated themselves of the world and just focused on their own country, but they didn't interfere enough, the capitalist potencies didn't hesitated to do it at extremes. After the war, when the communism was at its firmest they should have went to war, the cold war should have been the third world war, and the final war.

Jordan Carter
Jordan Carter

I'm not saying that the soviet union just isolated themselves of the world and just focused on their own country, but they didn't interfere enough
I agree, but I would say that after WW2 the USSR did pursue a more aggressive foreign policy, and hindsight is 20/20, the soviet leadership was still hoping for western revolutions for a long time, and I can't be too mad at them for doing what they could to avoid nuclear warfare.

Daniel Lewis
Daniel Lewis

I'm gonna need more details. Sorry for being demanding and not contributing any content, but I really want to understand.

Because we can't compete in a long run with human stupidity
Why?

it eats and corrupts the revolution
Proof?

like every other before
Proof?

you can't rest while there are enemies in the planet
Why?

Tyler Anderson
Tyler Anderson

And honestly, if you wanna throw sticks at communists for not pushing for global revolution, you should be shitting on Mao. The Sino-Sovjet split was a huge tragedy for the revolution.

Michael Myers
Michael Myers

Mao based.
Trotsky gay.

Eli Brown
Eli Brown

Better to be no one upon a someone's world than b a globalist for one day.

Nathan Bennett
Nathan Bennett

Reminder that if you are not a Gnostic Pol Potist you are not even trying.

Attached: polpot.jpg (82.02 KB, 600x450)

Connor Kelly
Connor Kelly

Forrest?

Cooper Nguyen
Cooper Nguyen

Cambodian anime waifus. Gibs.

Jayden Smith
Jayden Smith

Attached: 5375-63116-original.jpeg (88.17 KB, 1600x900)

Dylan White
Dylan White

What is the opposite of ☘️International☘️ Socialism?

Mason Clark
Mason Clark

Menshevism

Chase Stewart
Chase Stewart

Autism.

Nathaniel Edwards
Nathaniel Edwards

Thanks, I hadn't heard of it.. Also, is there a System of Socialism that successfully integrates a Meritocratic model of Pay?

Henry Nelson
Henry Nelson

Thank God for Adderall, and Ritalin to cure Autisms

Kayden Anderson
Kayden Anderson

Communism.
What we have to deal with here is a communist society, not as it has developed on its own foundations, but, on the contrary, just as it emerges from capitalist society; which is thus in every respect, economically, morally, and intellectually, still stamped with the birthmarks of the old society from whose womb it emerges. Accordingly, the individual producer receives back from society – after the deductions have been made – exactly what he gives to it. What he has given to it is his individual quantum of labor. For example, the social working day consists of the sum of the individual hours of work; the individual labor time of the individual producer is the part of the social working day contributed by him, his share in it. He receives a certificate from society that he has furnished such-and-such an amount of labor (after deducting his labor for the common funds); and with this certificate, he draws from the social stock of means of consumption as much as the same amount of labor cost. The same amount of labor which he has given to society in one form, he receives back in another.
(…)
But one man is superior to another physically, or mentally, and supplies more labor in the same time, or can labor for a longer time; and labor, to serve as a measure, must be defined by its duration or intensity, otherwise it ceases to be a standard of measurement. This equal right is an unequal right for unequal labor. It recognizes no class differences, because everyone is only a worker like everyone else; but it tacitly recognizes unequal individual endowment, and thus productive capacity, as a natural privilege. It is, therefore, a right of inequality, in its content, like every right. Right, by its very nature, can consist only in the application of an equal standard; but unequal individuals (and they would not be different individuals if they were not unequal) are measurable only by an equal standard insofar as they are brought under an equal point of view, are taken from one definite side only – for instance, in the present case, are regarded only as workers and nothing more is seen in them, everything else being ignored. Further, one worker is married, another is not; one has more children than another, and so on and so forth. Thus, with an equal performance of labor, and hence an equal in the social consumption fund, one will in fact receive more than another, one will be richer than another, and so on. To avoid all these defects, right, instead of being equal, would have to be unequal.
t. Margs
marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1875/gotha/

Isaac Nelson
Isaac Nelson

Menshevism
I hadn't heard of it

Attached: 1453276580394.jpg (18.66 KB, 510x430)

Eli Hill
Eli Hill

Internot socialism is an oxymoron. Relations between nations inevitably are relations of commodities.
Meritocracy is retarded. He who merits the more is who that needs the less.
Marx was really stupid sometimes.

Blake Reyes
Blake Reyes

No duh, seeing how capital immidiately leaves for other countries along with braindrain it is obvious. Just like it happened to USSR. You can't sieze the means of production if they pack up and leave you. Also a one world socialist government could theoreticly stop populationmigration of the better social benefits type.

Joshua Wright
Joshua Wright

Relations between nations inevitably are relations of commodities.
What rot. Economies are not delineated along national lines. Relations between nations are military.

He who merits the more is who that needs the less.
What is the rationale behind this claim?

Joseph Murphy
Joseph Murphy

Because we lost the Cold War and if it happens again we might lose again.

Nathan Moore
Nathan Moore

Also, is there a System of Socialism that successfully integrates a Meritocratic model of Pay?
Meritocracy is an abstract consept.

Disable AdBlock to view this page

Disable AdBlock to view this page

Confirm your age

This website may contain content of an adult nature. If you are under the age of 18, if such content offends you or if it is illegal to view such content in your community, please EXIT.

Enter Exit

About Privacy

We use cookies to personalize content and ads, to provide social media features and to analyze our traffic. We also share information about your use of our site with our advertising and analytics partners.

Accept Exit