Libido Dominandi

Logan Wilson
Logan Wilson

Hello chaps

I was wondering if anyone could give me some insight into this book if they have read it or know something about the author I don't. I'm about a third of the way in and up until know I've been very impressed with how E Michael Jones has made the connection to all these people and movements etc, but I've reached a point where he has suddenly made some very ignorant and out of place comments about the National Socialist party which has made me suspicious of the credibility of this book as a whole and his real motives in his writings. Jones makes very offhanded claims that the National Socialist party was a homosexual movement and Hitler himself was a homosexual that merely used the rising degeneracy in Berlin as a opportunity to manipulate the public into getting behind his political party willingly after realizing he couldn't do it through military means due to having had to spend time in prison. To write Hitler of as a mere homosexual opportunist is ridiculous and to anyone who has read Mein Kampf or studied the third reich in general would know these comments are just plain contemptuous especially coming from someone who appears to know what he is talking about.
Is Jones just jealous of what Hitler achieved in regards to the fight against sexual liberation and political control, knowing he would never come close to these achievements in his life time or are there ulterior motives?

Attached: 1449354.jpg (20.2 KB, 267x400)

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=1yCOVQ4MfUo
youtube.com/watch?v=yxR1uikdR0A
fpp.co.uk/Hitler/docs/medical/HitlerPoofter3.html

Camden Collins
Camden Collins

E. Michael Jones is a mouldy christian, do you expect the full truth and vigor of him?
He's one of the old men some lost young men cling to. Always with the christian spin too.

Juan Taylor
Juan Taylor

Yeah I mean I didn't really know much about the author until now and don't know if I will continue to read the book as I must admit, I'm not the most academic of people and its quite a heavy book for me so if he's just going to be spouting christian propaganda for 600 more pages I might knock it on the head.

Leo Thompson
Leo Thompson

Hitler having homo inclinations wouldn't surprise me when i look around at the current nationalist movements. He might've got buggered as a youth in the art scene. But you need some evidence to make the accusation. Can you point to where Jones says this?

Jaxson Jackson
Jaxson Jackson

National Socialist party was a homosexual movement and Hitler himself was a homosexual
Such a typical jewish tactic. Its amazing how nobody understands the Germanic King personality anymore which has followed us in history from around the end of the last ice age all the way up to the 1800s (to some extent). "National Socialism" is just the "Germanic Thing" of old, Hitler became "King" through "Will to Power" and even had a "night of the long knives" like the best Kings before him, such as Hengist and Barbarossa.

Further Hitler didn't win because of the votes from Berlin but from those of the country folk. Jones if not a crypto-jew is of the (((enlightenment))) mindset which sees Kings as an archaic affront to mercantilism and so he denounces the sacred respect, one must have for a King of the folk.

Joshua Powell
Joshua Powell

Page 255-256

Brayden White
Brayden White

That's the problem I have, Jones seems to be very outspoken against the jews so to be behaving like a typical jew himself in his writing to the point where it potentially discredits an entire book seems a bit odd to me.

Blake James
Blake James

That is incorrect. Those pages are about New York, and there is no mention of Hitler.

Evan Walker
Evan Walker

National Socialist party was a homosexual movement and Hitler himself was a homosexual

Attached: 1442869314714.png (32.68 KB, 135x132)

Dominic Nelson
Dominic Nelson

I remember those parts as well but I just went "meh" over it. It's been a while since I read it but IIRC it is more or less chronological and the rest of the content is quite good. Most degeneracy pushers from post WW2 and the whole battle between the Catholics and the jews is quite a good read.
And yes, he is a christian, but it's the kind that gets his inspiration from Augustine of Hippo and the likes.

I think it's his programming interfering here I guess. He certainly isn't afraid to call out the jew, see youtube.com/watch?v=1yCOVQ4MfUo

Henry Price
Henry Price

That's the problem I have, Jones seems to be very outspoken against the jews so to be behaving like a typical jew himself in his writing to the point where it potentially discredits an entire book seems a bit odd to me.
Unfortunately that's what some shills aim for, so that's not a good sign. Shills do this, and many jews & jew puppets will repeat this tactic. They will represent their stance on an issue in a reasonable way, but then package it with something awfully jewish.

This way they associate the reasonable part with the jewish, and force people into a false dilemma. Make people compromise on their principles to accept something they want and don't want. E.g. A jew puppet republican will propose a bill based on a goal conservatives dearly want, but then they introduce something that benefits the democrats therefore bringing the jews one step closer to a long term goal. Lastly, it bares reiterating that in general, this tactic is used by various controlled opposition parties from all over the world.

Thomas Long
Thomas Long

I don't have Jones' books but I've digested every talk he's ever done and never heard him say that National Socialism was a homosexual movement or that Hitler was one either. I'd appreciate an excerpt of exactly what he says and the sources he cites, because that sounds absolutely anti-logos to what Hitler's Germany actually achieved against degeneracy.

Tyler Taylor
Tyler Taylor

Watch the first few minutes of this.
youtube.com/watch?v=yxR1uikdR0A

I think he wants to reimplement "Sicut Judaeis non" where we don't harm the jews, but in return the jews don't subvert our society. It goes back to the middle ages.
I guess that angle allows him an appropriate cover under which to call out the jew.
Pics related are a speech by Himmler on the issue of homosexuality.

Attached: himmler-homo1.png (2.73 MB, 478x5318)
Attached: himmler-homo2.png (2.8 MB, 486x5166)

Tyler Rivera
Tyler Rivera

You have the post-identity spin on things. He talks about this as well.

Mason Wilson
Mason Wilson

What idiotic, baseless thing to say that first part. Sounds like something from a tabloid newspaper.

Nathaniel Morris
Nathaniel Morris

Debunked here:
fpp.co.uk/Hitler/docs/medical/HitlerPoofter3.html

Attached: eac09e93c08241e60bcce4b487ef75f1868e55944fe74eafc72b2eb8ce6799a5.jpg (355.3 KB, 729x781)

Josiah Perez
Josiah Perez

I got him to admit that his stance on Hitler is that of a bitter old catholic. was on the money.

Attached: 2.png (45.81 KB, 1202x354)

Liam Nelson
Liam Nelson

I have it on pdf so may be different its part 2 chapter 12 around 6 pages in.

Ryan Rivera
Ryan Rivera

here

Hudson Edwards
Hudson Edwards

He's a good man overall, though he's getting a bit senile ;)
I've enjoyed reading and watching his stuff, though I don't agree on everything he has to say and you don't have to of course.

Carter Foster
Carter Foster

In other words, he's cool with BLACKED, like most Christians, which is why Christianity is Judaized Caesarism and Hitler was right.

Ian Anderson
Ian Anderson

EMJ probably has a BLACKED subscription so he can see God's children united.

Lucas Sullivan
Lucas Sullivan

lol

Kayden Diaz
Kayden Diaz

Jones is a really smart guy and worth reading but he has some serious blind spots and he often just assumes he knows something about a historical period when he really doesn't.

I think he's better when analyzing more specific recent history. I also think his critique of Jewishness as a revolutionary movement against Logos is very insightful. You just have to read him a bit carefully and not assume he's right about everything.

Mason Howard
Mason Howard

What Dr. Jones gets right he gets very right, what he gets wrong, he gets very wrong. Just read the text critically, take what's good and leave what's bad.

The notion that his work should be judged based solely on his opinion of a man whose historical reputation has been slandered and libeled second only to Jesus Christ is silly. Hitler and National Socialism are not the focus of the text, merely a sidenote he occasionally references. If you have information that contradicts his claims, then leave it at that, Dr. Jones is wrong.

For the record, Dr. Jones is also fairly limited on the question of race and genetics, not that I think his approach is WRONG, but it's limited leading to an over-reliance on other explanations.

Attached: tumblr-p5ff39WlQx1uaxri9o1-1280.jpg (136.39 KB, 1280x720)

Jaxon Gomez
Jaxon Gomez

The problem is he likes to spout "dogma" but he throws it himself. In one case he was right in Libido Dominandi (I actually slugged through this fucking thing), when he did diligently display his erudite knowledge of history: when he pointed out Marquis De Sade being one of the original pornographers, which was why the aristocracy locked him up, recognizing him as a harbinger of degeneracy and agent provocateur.

And he is right when he says sexual liberation fosters control: not only are the poor masses addicted to porn, but with the demise of monogamy and the rise of hookup culture and loose unchaste sluts as normal, the "elite" are people who are not like the elite of the past who wanted beautiful societies, but now just people who scam and scheme and will be immoral in any way they can (immoral meaning they don't give a fuck about posterity or long-term ramifications) for short-term cummies and excitement.

Elon Musk is the perfect example, when, on Joe Rogan, he bugman-theorized "everything you do is to please your limbic system." What "wisdom" from this fucking welfare queen scum who made his fortune as a crook with PayPal, such a contribution to culture.

Yet, he's a hero, such a hero, fucking that used slut Amber Heard, who just wanted him for money. Our elite are degenerates, our plebs are degenerates. This is the price we pay for abdicating from God's realm, and God only exists if the people enforce "God," in the sense that if you let rapists run free and rape, then your "God" that commands rape be punishable doesn't exist.

The "Gods" of the Third Reich found it that miscegenation was criminal, that adultery was criminal, that so many other things that today are common degeneracy were criminal, and they chose that, and "God" existed only because the fucking SS was his arm to enforce it.

Coalburners wouldn't burn coal and social media whores wouldn't be social media whores if there was "God's wrath" to face; that there isn't is why you live in a Godless society.

Good men who do nothing aren't good men, they're dead men, and whites are on a path to death; they're already minorities in the world, approaching minorities in many of their own states if not already (London and Paris are no longer white, Washington DC is not white, NYC is 1/3 Jew and a bunch of other non-whites).

You're Godless because you believe Jewish bullshit that you were raised with that you can just talk about your problems. You can't. Niggers know talk doesn't hurt them, Jews know talk doesn't hurt them.

The Romans didn't write a fucking polemic to Hannibal.

Parker Cooper
Parker Cooper

So when do we begin the purge?

Liam Gray
Liam Gray

Jones confirmed for a moron who unscrupulously spreads lies. And of course spinning things to exalt churches.

Andrew Russell
Andrew Russell

The author is the guy speaking in this vid on brainwashing with porn/pornographic images as a weapon
the actual interview begins at 1:25

Jordan Allen
Jordan Allen

He's a worthless christcuck, what do you expect? He's not interested in truth, he's interested in defending the church. When the truth lines up with those goals he tells the truth, when it does not, he lies. The purpose of reading works like this are not to find some messiah that is "red pilled" about everything, it is to find pieces of truth. Don't care about the author, only care about the content. Take the truth, discard the rest.

Evan Cox
Evan Cox

He's one of the only one to ever call out Jews, while all the rest either play along their plans or never call them out.

Zachary Lopez
Zachary Lopez

And?

Benjamin Fisher
Benjamin Fisher

He's a bit cucked on race and stuff but you gotta realise that this guy is a boomer catholic. He likes to pin everything on culture, which is milquetoast considering that even Jews like Brother Nathaniel believe Jews have cursed blood (i.e., their behaviour is genetic, partially). Being said, you can't expect much more from a boomer catholic, really. Take the good stuff and move on.

t. Eastern Orthodox

Lucas Ortiz
Lucas Ortiz

And it has done way more against the jews than any other LARPERS, and he did it publicly, so he has to put up with Jewish pressure . Like him or not, but his contributions are very good to know the nature of the jews and if people read his books, people would be more aware of the Jewish problem. So stop trying to discredit or ridicule people who are contributing to show the Jewish's plans.

Attached: 1539153158392.jpg (145.74 KB, 513x900)
Attached: 1540839422779.jpg (47.73 KB, 461x328)

Nathan Jones
Nathan Jones

Nothing you said has anything to do with what I said.

Daniel Reyes
Daniel Reyes

Pretty much. I even think the concept of Logos is pretty profound/very useful, but I also find it terribly ignorant how Jones thinks Catholicism has a monopoly on something as far-reaching and deep as God/Logos. Get the fuck out of here with thinking your old sect is the sole arbiter of truth. His stance on race is retarded too, as I could easily fit into his concept of Logos how miscegenation is a blasphemy against the natural order of things, and using something like basic eugenic practices to enhance/add to what is already there to make it better is simply being aligned with Logos as well. His Christcuckery traps his mind, and if I had to bet about the future, going back to Christianity isn't going to revert the jew's poison, but only something radically new like the Fuhrer was attempting.

Kevin Davis
Kevin Davis

Pretty much. I even think the concept of Logos is pretty profound/very useful, but I also find it terribly ignorant how Jones thinks Catholicism has a monopoly on something as far-reaching and deep as God/Logos. Get the fuck out of here with thinking your old sect is the sole arbiter of truth. His stance on race is retarded too, as I could easily fit into his concept of Logos how miscegenation is a blasphemy against the natural order of things, and using something like basic eugenic practices to enhance/add to what is already there to make it better is simply being aligned with Logos as well. His Christcuckery traps his mind, and if I had to bet about the future, going back to Christianity isn't going to revert the jew's poison, but only something radically new like the Fuhrer was attempting.
Catholicism in its modern form doesn't represent Christianity but a liberalised form of it, despite claiming pedigree. If that wasn't the case, you wouldn't have acceptance of LGBT, acceptance of Islam, x liberal-approved thing, etc. It's run by apostates and heretics. It's safe to assume that Catholics aren't real believers considering how much the Catholic church contradicts biblical teaching. The church was subverted by they who shall not be named and company because Catholicism was deeply embedded in Europe at one stage.

Nathaniel Murphy
Nathaniel Murphy

His stance on race is retarded too, as I could easily fit into his concept of Logos how miscegenation is a blasphemy against the natural order of things
As a Christian, that's something I agree with. God has placed blacks in Africa, Reds in America, Whites in Europe, Yellows in Asia,… It was the LOGOS, the order of the world, and of God. And we were meant to be separated, by tongues, by nations and by races. I think that """racism""" and """xenophobia""" are natural and intended by God, since we aren't meant to be mixed, but instead, we are meant to live within our own people, in our own borders and continent. The Tower of Babel is a SIN, some people claim that it has nothing to do with miscegenation, but I think it actually has somethings to do with the sin of miscegenation, at least implicitly. Race-mixing, cosmopolitanism and "multi-culturalism" are inhirently anti-logos and anti-christian in my opinion, since it mess with God's original design and logic, and thus men try to play God and disrupt the natural balance of God's logic by trying to force different people to live and mix together. It's up to God to rassemble the diverse people, not up to men. And that's why in the USA and in the EU, they are doing just that, because it's anti-christian and anti-logos. And that's why the EU has an official building in Brussel inspired by the Tower of Babel, because they are trying to recreate the unforgivable sin and to surpass God once more. That's inherently Jewish and thus evil. So I disagree with Jones on this one about race, but I do agree with him that there are not "a white race", in the sense that the "white race" is constitued of many different white "races" (Portuguese,Spanish,French,Germans,Italians,…) but I think it's still important that all the different kinds of whites start identifying as being part of one single race, because we need to unify against the war waged against the white european people.
So yeah, I think that each races should stay within their own continent and with their own countries, but the difference is that we don't have to be supremacist about our race, but to respect God's order. Because racial supremacy is Jewish.
I wrote too much, sorry.

Attached: 0c9a099eba5256f36992853f38566682b95ec34b17158d5789685b8d7f85d234.jpg (67.44 KB, 620x364)
Attached: 1541373859895.jpg (453 KB, 1583x2048)
Attached: MuhSupremacy.png (312.54 KB, 488x399)

Joseph Cox
Joseph Cox

Even if you try and related it back to Babel, the answer of how we all somehow came from Adam and Eve is never made clear. One can theorize, but there is no absolute statements in the Bible as to how the many races came to be. As for the statement about X continent for Y people, I have to wonder. After all, we know not what the original distribution of the peoples (people itself is plural, but I could almost swear peoples is a word) was. Therefore, to claim any land is owned by anyone is foolishness.
inb4 you're promoting the shitskins taking over Europe
Technically, I wouldn't mind it if we lost in a real battle, but the manner in which Europe is losing is what irritates me. Great, get manipulated to hell and back, kill your brothers in WWII, absorb propaganda like made from the TV/internet, and just do nothing as the world collapses around you. That is my sole problem with the current state of things (because I know in a real battle whites would win every time).
racial supremacy is Jewish.
Sorry, I'll never believe that. As long as a metric is defined, better and worse can be defined, therefore supremacy can be defined.

Jace Fisher
Jace Fisher

God has placed blacks in Africa, Reds in America, Whites in Europe, Yellows in Asia
Except that's total nonsense. The bible says everyone came from Adam and Eve. The bible is retarded jewish nonsense, and if you try to view the world through that lens you will never see truth.
but the difference is that we don't have to be supremacist about our race
Our race is superior. There's nothing wrong with acknowledging this.

Jackson Adams
Jackson Adams

The Babylonians maintain that there are four root races and that all the people sprung out of the four root parents. The kikes like to say that all came from Noah because they want to play big daddy to the earth instead of the role as kike degenerate mongrels. It makes them feel better about themselves to change the REAL STORY from 4 brothers to 1 father and three sons.

Jose Reyes
Jose Reyes

Suffice to say that NOT A SINGLE RACE should enjoy mongrelization with another because it is DEGENERATE and SICK. It is fucking disgusting…I can't STAND looking at mongrels.

Adrian Collins
Adrian Collins

4th nofap or women hate thread since yesterday. 3 made in the last hour.

Parker Evans
Parker Evans

Fuck off kike

David White
David White

but there is no absolute statements in the Bible as to how the many races came to be
There literally is though. After the Flood, Noah lived with his three sons Shem, Japheth, and Ham. Ham insulted Noah, so Noah cursed Ham's descendents to be shitskins and said that they would be the slaves of Japheth, who was said to have fathered the European races.

John Cook
John Cook

cursed=shitskin
You have a source for that?
slaves
Yes, but being a slave to another doesn't mean you're a shitskin.
father of the European race
Source? Again, European is never stated in the Bible (for obvious reasons–no one called their self European), so there is no way to prove he is European. Also, let us suppose you are correct: curse = shitskin, Japheth = Europeans. Well now, that's quite strange. How did Asians come into the picture? It'd be quite funny to me for Noah to have a blonde haired blue eyed son, a burnt black son (blame the curse for this one if you wish), and a yellow, black hair, slightly slanted eyes son.
Remember, each of these is the progenitor their respective race, so Noah could've have had sex with someone of one of these races (since they didn't exist yet).
In addition, on the matter of the curse–how would this explain the savage nature of the African? Are you saying the curse encompasses the destruction of the soul as well such that one not only looks ugly, but is also a savage? If this is so, I'm surprised because you'd think Ham would have to be put to death immediately after the curse for being so savage.

Ryder Myers
Ryder Myers

You have a source for that?
Literally just read the Bible.

The curse of Ham.

Genesis 9:24-26
When Noah awoke from his wine and found out what his youngest son had done to him, 25 he said,

“Cursed be Canaan!
The lowest of slaves
will he be to his brothers.”

26 He also said,

“Praise be to the Lord, the God of Shem!
May Canaan be the slave of Shem.
27
May God extend Japheth’s territory;
may Japheth live in the tents of Shem,
and may Canaan be the slave of Japheth.”

All right, I was mistaken about the curse being the cause of the shitskinnery. However, "Ham" means "dark", and if you'll keep reading this post you'll see his descendants.

And the part where it's specified what races came from each brother.

Genesis 10:1-7
2 The sons[a] of Japheth:

Gomer, Magog, Madai, Javan, Tubal, Meshek and Tiras.

3 The sons of Gomer:

Ashkenaz, Riphath and Togarmah.

4 The sons of Javan:

Elishah, Tarshish, the Kittites and the Rodanites.[b] 5 (From these the maritime peoples spread out into their territories by their clans within their nations, each with its own language.)

6 The sons of Ham:

Cush, Egypt, Put and Canaan.

7 The sons of Cush:

Seba, Havilah, Sabtah, Raamah and Sabteka.

The sons of Raamah:

Sheba and Dedan.

It's a little bit obscure if you're not very familiar with where each of these nations was said to be, but Ashkenaz is traditionally held to have been in modern day Germany, and Tarshish is scripturally located on the northern edge of the Black Sea, ie modern Caucasia.

And of course for the descendants of Ham, you'll notice that all of them are either African or dark brown.

And I was only answering the claim about the Bible not providing an explanation for where all the races from. If you want to object by saying that Egyptians weren't niggers that's a fair point. I'm just saying that an attempt to explain was made.

Carter Phillips
Carter Phillips

The Nobody vid compiles what the book is about and you don't really need to read it. He goes into a lot of weird tangents that goes nowhere in the book and it is a bit of a chore to go though. However his book on the jewish spirit is really good.

Henry Richardson
Henry Richardson

He wasn't savage he was a homosexual who raped Noah while he was drunk as fuck and then told his brothers that he had homosexually raped their dad. You people have to learn a few things about euphemisms and kike subtlety. He was cursed because he was a low IQ faggot rapist of other men.

Caleb Hill
Caleb Hill

Kill yourself, cunt.

Gabriel Carter
Gabriel Carter

Shabbat ramp-up.

Eli Kelly
Eli Kelly

Jesus Christ the state of this board

Attached: 1515035423318.png (144.13 KB, 644x865)

Brandon Fisher
Brandon Fisher

Attached: e-michael-jewnes.webm (5.46 MB, 640x360)

Jack Richardson
Jack Richardson

Your father is a fat lowlife who fantasizes about your mother getting raped by niggers

Joshua Brooks
Joshua Brooks

Hitler is a fucking faggot

Carter Cruz
Carter Cruz

E Michael Jones is a very smart man but his Catholicism does cause him to put bias in his world. Must reae book regardless

Mason Garcia
Mason Garcia

Attached: 20181123-092211.jpg (662.64 KB, 630x1203)

Matthew Reed
Matthew Reed

Jones is a fucking retard, like all Catholics. The Catholic Church will be destroyed and all Catholics exterminated for racial treason on the day of the rope.

Nicholas Walker
Nicholas Walker

op is a fag

Attached: 6B19F6E2-BA4F-4BFF-8F4A-7180C953735B.jpeg (2.78 MB, 4032x3024)

James Flores
James Flores

As with most books learn to filter what you know is bullshit. Aside from what you mention the book is truthful.

Samuel Parker
Samuel Parker

hello goys
I do have a E michael Jones MP3 archive, i'd say a minimum of 150 or more of his lectures and interviews. I will do a mega link if there is enough interest .

Luis Butler
Luis Butler

He says explicitly that that's what he wants; in numerous video, including the pittsburgh synagogue shooting, in which he blames jewish lying for driving someone to the act of last resort violence.

Charles Scott
Charles Scott

Ha, nice!

Asher Walker
Asher Walker

LD, like all books by E. Michael Jones, are good sources of information but you have to interpret their content through a racial lens. Jones will claim that Jews are Jewy because they rejected Jesus Christ when it's the other way around. They rejected Jesus christ because they are Jews and they want power and money, not spiritual salvation.

Ethan Ward
Ethan Ward

Wow you actually smoked him.
muh moral incoherence when it suits me

Brody Perry
Brody Perry

What exactly is he talking about though? What specific sexual behaviours is he referring to?

Christian Green
Christian Green

Jones will claim that Jews are Jewy because they rejected Jesus Christ when it's the other way around.
Jews and Jesus rejected themselves mutually.

Zachary Powell
Zachary Powell

What specific sexual behaviours is he referring to?
That's the true question. I want to know what he meant by that. I hope he writes a book about NatSoc/Facists party in Europe during the 20th century (Germany,Italia,Spain,Portugal,…) or that he does a least videos of that. Could be very interesting.

Attached: 66af4a522438a8bbee702e4ef190cce7c70a025c8129d1f95d031768b3ebff70.png (330.69 KB, 1010x783)
Attached: 1540505902943.jpg (364.1 KB, 795x855)
Attached: 23534654536543.png (36.88 KB, 600x600)
Attached: 987654321566678.jpg (39.16 KB, 850x400)
Attached: Moral.png (22.23 KB, 806x236)

Carson Edwards
Carson Edwards

Yeah its not surprising. Weimar conditions turned a lot of people perverse.

Anthony Adams
Anthony Adams

He also wrote “Jewish Revolutionary Spirit”

Disable AdBlock to view this page

Disable AdBlock to view this page

Confirm your age

This website may contain content of an adult nature. If you are under the age of 18, if such content offends you or if it is illegal to view such content in your community, please EXIT.

Enter Exit

About Privacy

We use cookies to personalize content and ads, to provide social media features and to analyze our traffic. We also share information about your use of our site with our advertising and analytics partners.

Accept Exit