Charles Darwin & Evolution

Darwin is not a kike. His genealogy goes back at least a hundred years and he's 100% anglo.

Research Anunnaki and Nibiru

Attached: anunnaki2.jpg (610x283, 54.23K)

I died on the inside when i first watched that episode, it was pure agenda pushing garbage aimed at kids to basically encourage them to whore around and just listen to their "feelings".

It really fucking pisses me off that suddenly everything goes in our society, nothing has any value anymore.
Nobody encourages you to start a family anymore.

It may have been posted already, but I don't care to look.
He had it right, but what he couldn't know at the time was there are 2 branches of humanoid that evolved separate from each other. Rhesus Negative and Rhesus Positive.
There is no reason, there is no evolutionary tale, there is no logic behind differing blood types and the fact that RH- Wombs will often reject RH+ babies.

Filthy lying Creationist bullshit. Mutations add "information" all the time - it's why Whites are able to digest lactose past childhood, and pathogens are able to add resistance to antibiotics and the like.

It's a masonic lie. No transitional specimins have every been found.

In fact, mutation isn't even close to the only mechanism that drives evolutionary change. Remember Natural Selection, dumbass?

And to answer your question, OP. Humans didn't evolve from hairy monkeys - we still are hairy monkeys, in the exact same way we are still mammals, synapsids, vertebrates, and eukaryotes all at the same time - because evolution is descent with inherent modification, meaning every new species is just a modification of their ancestral clade. You never grow out of your ancestry. I recommend studying the Law of Monophyly and learn what nested hierarchies are.

This is wrong, christcuck. Falling average IQ in the west is the result of nonwhite immigration. White people are not getting less intelligent. The population on average is getting less white, and thus, less intelligent.

Every species is transitional. Not every species clearly demonstrates how newer species are descended from older ones - but there are definitely those that fit the bill, such as Archaeopteryx.

This. Also Darwin was a fatherless edgelord, didnt even believe his own theory by the end of his life, and the only reason you know his name is due to relentless masonic shilling

If it wasn't there would be no point to be a National Socialist.

btw that's all the redpills you need on the subject and when leftards claim that conservatives are anti-science.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lysenkoism

That's a fabricated Christian lie. Here is a lengthy refutation:
apologeticspress.org/apcontent.aspx?category=9&article=1134

Except he was subject to immediate and constant criticism. The fact that his findings withstood the rigorous testing is why we know about it.

Thanks for bringing that up. It blows the Christian Creationist argument that "Communists love evolution" out of the water.

George Lincoln Rockwell was truly a good man, but very unfortunate that he fell for the Evolution meme and denounced Christianity as "the poor man's opium". Evolution is the inherent belief that chaos is the natural state of the universe, and out of that chaos comes order. The belief of God is also the belief that the universe has a natural order, and that man brings chaos into this established order. In short, Evolution (and Judaism and Communism) is absolutely αντι λόγος and, as every anti-Christian development in the 19th century, one puzzle piece of one giant Jewish trick.

Anybody who tells you that humans come from monkeys and niggers is guaranteed to be a kike or a golem. The idea that non-human things can become human with enough time and luck is as fully jewish and as fully pernicious as an invention can be.

Attached: jewliar.png (665x459, 105.05K)

Quit disparaging the poor monkeys by comparing them to niggers, please.

And the evidence shows us that humanity didn't just pop out of the ground, but instead are descended from pre-existing ancestral clades.

1. You're posting on a board with a history of worshipping a frog god of chaos, so don't disparage chaos as something Jewish when people know better
2. Evolution has nothing to do with belief. It is the process of change in allele frequency in any given population of organisms.

The criticism levied against him wssnt masonic so your comment is moot.

Thr entirety of the (((theory))) is that the strong survive and the weak die off. The other part is that spontsneous evolution is develops beneficial adaptations leading that benefit the suevival of a slecies and make it more likely. This latter assertion is not proven by any measyre let alone imdisputable lol

sry for typos

Of course it is a belief. It is a theory, it is not proven. Atheism is a belief, Evolution is a belief, and the board worshipping an Egyptian god post Trump is not an excuse. Zig Forums was and is inherently Christian. Worshipping idols is something what kikes do. You should know better.

It is a fact that the genetic code evolve. Sorry but you are spreading lies, you are an ignorant lier

oh the humanity!

Genetic code has been proven to mutste, nit evolve
In fact, the evidence leans heavily toward devolution at the genetic level rather than evolution

Evolution was at one time both a Scientific Theory and a fact. Nowadays, there is no such thing as a Theory of Evolution since it is now known as the Theory of Evolutionary Developmental Biology.

But that's irrelevant since your dumb ass doesn't know what a Scientific Theory (Better phrased as a "Scientific Explanation") even is and why it's not the same thing as a common uneducated guess, or a belief.

Are you sure? Do you realize how many big-name critics of Darwin there were? It's stupid to assume none of them had ties to Masonry, especially Sir Richard Owen. He was the supreme authority of paleontology at the time - something Masonry would be very interested in.

mutate, not evolve*

You are a golem or a kike.
See how easy it is to spot one? They will cling to their monkey-nigger theorem because they need to believe that either time and luck will make them human someday, or that it is okay to abandon their humanity and behave like a nigger monkey

Attached: 346346523dfhy4684.png (355x189, 113.95K)

stupid imbecile that is exaclty what Darwin is arguing for. He provide a book full of documental proofs. One century after that we had genetic proofs of evolution

The question is - Are you sure?

cause i am sure

???
Do you mean mutate?
Wrong. Do you know how common mutation is? The average person carries 60 mutations from error during reproduction between their parents, and the vast majority are benign. However, some are objectively beneficial, and some are detrimental. Usually they are about equal to eachother.

He did retract that

It is the poor man's opium. None of the elites are credulous enough to believe in Christian memes.

So essentially, the belief in Yahovah is a feel good religion. Kinda like opium. You believe in all this nigger-magic nonsense because it feels good.

Communism, Christianity, and liberalism are all universalist religions. Judaism is indeed the opposite of Christianity because it is an ethno-religion. It is also the opposite of communism.
None of the elites actually believe in communism or chrustianity or liberalism. Communism and all the other religions are just tooks to motivate lemmings.Communism IS opium for the poor. Christianity IS opium for the poor.

Attached: Who could it be.png (472x594, 26.19K)

He isn't arguing for anything because he's dead, you absolute genius. Darwinism posits that positive, beneficial mutations cause a species to be more likely to survive. Lol at your arrogant ignorance. Deadly combo bud. Keep it up lol

offers no proof of his accusation and also post only once in the thread.
Sometimes I wish I was a mod, people like you deserve a ban, even if you change your IP, the extra effort you'll have in order to post here again will be worth it.

There are not enough beneficial mutations to support the theory.

Is infinite chan dead too? People used to at least feign intelligence and be able to think rationally. This board is nearly worse than reddit now

It is much more complex than that but you want to discuss your idiotic point let it be! Some mutations are beneficial some neutral some negative , and this normally depends from the environment. Think about sickle cells disease that gives you resistence to malaria in the heterozygotic variant

It's impossible to determine what is "strong"
Are cockroaches "strong" cause they'll survive

it fucking depends from the environment you brainlet. Basically it is "strong" what gives you a positive advantage

Humans are monkeys. We fit every taxonomic and physiological criterion of the word. "Monkey" is properly known as "simiiformes" and no honest person can say that humans are not simians.

Does this excuse objectively degenerate behavior? It doesn't even come close. Even the dumbest of the other monkeys act with a conscience (Mourning the dead - vid related)

then get the fuck over to reddit cunt

What Charles Darwin advocated (theoretically) was very logical and reasonable. Whether we evolved from an ape specie is irrelevant tbqh; as the logical next step is based upon 'Natural Selection'. Natural Selection has manifested into reality the level best that a human can achieve in the spirit of this time.
This is not to suggest that any other "humans" are inferior, but only that there are humans today that have reached the pinnacle of their abilities in the spirit of this time.
This said; Nature and Biology are the most cruel, unforgiving, emotion-less Eugenicists of the day. The mere gall of any human today to suggest that their ideology trumps Nature&Biology is a crime against all humanity and should be extinguished.

Yoy kids love to call people stupid and shit like that for no justifiable reason at all, just because someone disagrees with you amd completely unprovoked. Attacking wrongthink is your duty and privilege though, so please forgive me! Lol

Are

you

sure

about

that?

Mutation isn't the only mechanism of evolutionary change, retard.

Genghis Khan is a human proof of a man with a great competitive advantage, having 16 millions descendents in Asia:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Descent_from_Genghis_Khan

A part from that, his life story is more akin the life of a god than that of a human..

Yeah, and your precious elites are the kike's henchmen for the dirty work, treacherous and without any integrity left. They play by the kike's rules, and that's the reason they enjoy their success and elite status in the first place. You realize that Jews hate Jesus Christ more than anyone else in history? Do you even know why they hate him? He was the literal anti-Jew and called them out on their hypocrisy and evil nature. Who are you to talk about politics if you haven't even read and understood the very fundament of Western Civilization? There is no other book as preserved and copied as the Holy Bible, and exactly this book exposes the Jews from the Old Testament up through the entire New Testament. The New Testament coined the word "Jew" from a racial term to a theological one; a "Jew" is everyone who is against Christ, and everything that is good and wholesome in our natural order.

Yeah, but I didn't search for an alternative since imageboards have always the same circle. Also, staying too long on them rots the mind.

I heard once that the guy who caused blue eyes to come into existence was someone who pretty much murder/fucked it into existence.

Sounds like Jewish propaganda to make Whites look bad.

That definition includes a whole lot of self-declared, Church-going Christians.

Of course it does, but your point is? Hypocrites are not a new phenomenon.

Pretty sure it was a woman and she got the chadest of all men out of it since blue eyes is such an alluring physical trait to sexually select for.

We are talking about genetic mutation and it is the primsry mechanism
Spamming "retard" to anonymous strangers just because they disagree with you indicates that you are unintelligent.

I would argue that anyone who worships the vile (((YHWH))) is opposed to Christ and his noble teachings - so that would make just about every "Christ"ian a Jew.

Mutation isn't even the primary mechanism. Natural Selection is.

And getting called a retard is tame stuff compared to getting called a kike shill like so many ar fond of spamming.

Mutation is the ultimate source of any genetic variation, though. Natural Selection is informed by mutations.

No elites have ever been Christian. Just as no elites have ever been communist or liberal. It's just a label to motivate lemmings.

Kikes don't care about a dead jew. Maybe the religious zealot kikes who bob their heads and suck penises think that, but none of the jewish elites give one shit about Yeshuah other than how they can use him to get people like you to have sex with niggers.

If Jesus was anti-jewish, he should have exterminated them. Why didn't he? Hitler is a far better anti-jew than Jesus. Worship him instead.

Literally everything about Western Civilization that is good is EUROPEAN in origin, not Christian. EUROPEANS created the law codes and archetecture and ideas and traditions. Even most of Christianity is stolen from European traditions.

Also, I want to rephrase what you said to make it more honest
See, this is why we know that communism is a religion. When a communist encounters someone who is not a communist, they assume that you have not read Das Kapital.
Religious lemmings cannot comprehend how people could read their books and not be convinced that they're accurate.
That's how dumb they are. Pure NPCs

One more reason why the Torah mark II is shit. Jews are a RACE not a theology.

Again, notice how perverted Kiketianity is. This Christian is not loyal to his race. He is loyal to Jesus. And he thinks that White people who do not follow his religion are the enemy. And he thinks that jews who "convert" to his religion are his friends.

Attached: Christianity has contributed so much to Europe.png (700x3775, 5.17M)

Stop with your gnostic nonsense. Read the Holy Bible. There is no difference between our Lord and Redeemer in the Old and New Covenant. God is always the same and never changes.

It's not the only source of genetic change. There's plenty of other mechanisms that yield genetic change, such as genetic recombination that occurs during sexual reproduction, or epigenetic changes.

Yeah, you go enjoy worshipping a vile demon that slaughters White babies. I'll stick with Jesus who hands out bread and fish.

how does evolution theory excuse that?

It doesn't. He just subscribes to a nonsensical false dichotomy.

You know that God created everything, also the white race? If Caucasoids decide to be degenerate Sodomite animal worhsippers then they need to be cleansed entirely. The white race is the best of all, but with great abilities comes great responsibility. And if whites decide to do the most heinous acts then they deserve to nuked. It is a disgrace to the natural order. This is why whites right now are slaughtered en masse, because they choose to sin and not repent. They had it coming and do not listen to the prophets of our time, instead trade with the merchant and worshipt the Synagogue of Satan.

Dont try to reason with it. It will just csll youna kike and retard. So much for intellectual discussion. Boring

Those are incredibly insignificant. Again, mutation is thr primary mechanism of the theory.

Do you know what any of these words mean?

inb4 kike retard. Yes i am a jewish downie. I concede! You win! You are the mighty enlightened one!

I guess I was a little quick to the draw on that, then. You're correct, recombination does account for genetic variation, but the way I see it recombination doesn't create new expressions in the same way a mutation would. You do bring a good point about epigenetics, though. I'm not too familiar with the current consensus on exactly how it works, although I get the impression that its ability to change things is played up to appease certain ideological goals common to academic institutions. Muhterial condishuns and all that.

I posted a reasonable response here:

Race trumps faith any day. Would you rather your daughter marry a non-Christian White man, or a godly Christian Nigger from Africa?

Attached: 1468977001148.png (440x442, 377.82K)

Mutation itself is extremely common and yields beneficial traits all the time.

Anywho, we're stuck arguing genetic process when that's a done deal. We know for a fact we share common ancestry with every living organism on the planet, and that's just looking at the shared genetic material. We can see fossil evidence, and we can see new species arise all the time. I don't actually know where you object, but I assume you object in good faith so I will try to help as much as I can.

Neither. Miscegenation deserves capital punishment according to God. Negroes can be Christians but Christianity is not meant for Negroes or Asians in the first place. Christianity - or really the Holy Bible - is the history of the white man, from the white man and for the white man.

You shall not worship the created, but the Creator. Whites are literally the Herrenrasse (Lord's Race). We are only that way because God intended us to be so.

I'm sure I can find a picture of a preacher wearing a shirt saying "We're all God's Children" but the egalitarian implications of both messages would both be unfounded and run counter to our understanding of genetics which shows that equality is a myth.

"Neither" wasn't a listed option. non-Christian White man, or godly Christian Nigger from Africa?

If anyone is interested here is the part from the book.
colchestercollection.com/titles/chunk/I/imperium/chapter9.html

Again, there are not enough positive, beneficial mutations to support the theory
Furthermore the vast majority of all mutations are detrimental (like downs syndrome for example)
Again we sre talking about genetic mutatipn here.
Ive already said all this earlier in the thread.
This is the scientific fact and because it doesnt support Darwinism dogma, it is ignored.

You can be a child or act like an adult. You don't tell me what to do, you can do that with women and children, but not with men in a discussion. Learn etiquette, read the Holy Bible and then come back.

Wrong again. The vast majority of the average 60 per person are benign.

I don't disagree with you on a single point but I am going to tell you that you're fighting the losing fight.
You are not going to win the knowledge battle against the jew. Spirituality/Religion is what makes men die for a "cause greater than their own."
There's no point in trying to enlighten the masses, user. Nobody will ever thank you for being so smart and nobody will ever remark of how pleased they are that you showed them the light.
Work with what you have at your disposal, don't try to tear down what's already built and readily available.

Well I certainly don't hold you in contempt for anything really. I suppose I just got a little self righteous and wanted to split hairs as I often do. I do maintain skepticism on the importance of epigenetics when it comes to variation, though. It all sounds very Lamarckian to a pedestrian like me.

Define a "positive, beneficial" mutation
Also, you say that there aren't enough. How much is enough?
Do you think evolution is about developing more muscle mass so you can lift cars or something?

If you don't want to answer honestly, fine. It just makes you look (((suspicious)))

the basis of evolutionary theory is the sum of four basic facts.

1. Organisms vary. "every organism is genetically unique."
2. Traits (Including mutations) are inherited.
3. There is differential success. "some things have more babies than others" (success being surviving to generate offspring).
4. Resources are scarce. "organisms better at getting resources have better success than others."

These four facts together make the fact of biological evolution.

Attached: 000Shouldhavekilledthecommiestoo.jpg (1560x922, 67.1K)

Humans are NOT monkeys.

We are apes. Like gorillas and chimps.

When a discussion involves a body of knowledge, I want to contribute my understanding. I never once said that the spiritual is irrelevant to the good fight, I just didn't bring it up until others had done so because it is irrelevant to this thread.

We are both. All apes are monkeys, but not all monkeys are apes.

I'd rather have my daughter become a spinster than marrying her off to an ungodly man or a negro. The former would corrupt the morals of my descendants, and the latter would corrupt my bloodline. Stop being a nigger.

So it would seem. But it doesn't actually supplant the conventional descent with inherent modification that defines biological evolution - it complements it.

apes are to monkeys what bears are to canines.

So one has to be Christian to be morally upstanding or godly in the conventional sense? Ridiculous.

Except monkeys are the older ancestral clade within which apes are found. Apes are to monkeys what dogs are to wolves.

Lamarkianism is bullshit.
it's the pseudoscience equivalent of epigenetics.