A short documentry on why Western Europeans developed the way they did, from 10,000BC when it was covered in ice, to the viking age. It dispells a lot of the mudhuts bullshit (you can't live in mudhuts in a whet climate, shills).
Skip to 12:25
A short documentry on why Western Europeans developed the way they did, from 10,000BC when it was covered in ice, to the viking age. It dispells a lot of the mudhuts bullshit (you can't live in mudhuts in a whet climate, shills).
Skip to 12:25
Other urls found in this thread:
en.wikipedia.org
unz.com
unz.com
unz.com
unz.com
unz.com
unz.com
unz.com
unz.com
en.wikipedia.org
twitter.com
I wish more people cited their sources in the description.
Yeah, it's sad young Millenials have been trained like monkeys in school to say that exact phrase. It's the fallacy of authority. There are no sources that are authoritive anymore because of world zionism taking control. But a few ancient authors are cited in the video, as well as artifact locations.
You're essentially looking for daddy to lead you by the hand but all of this stuff is general knowledge once you get passed the cult of EL ('Abrahamic' religions/Communism) controlling history in college or on 4chan.
no such time. Earth not that old.
Propose here into your mind that Vikings are a myth. They did not exist. Vikings are a myth for the scandinavian states to act as invented history to tell their scandinavians that they had worth, at least in the past.
scandinavians no longer care about vikings because they all want to become afghanistan.
So, these viking gypsies what exactly did they acomplish? Danes? Fucking Vikings? Why is it that there is not one Viking language? Why is that people do not speak Norman in england? For example, the english colonized america, and now the americans speak english. If the vikings colonized all these supposed places, like england, and germany and france and kiev ukraine and russia, why is that none of these places speak these viking languages?
So vikings had runes, but did they even write anything down? Because apparently they did not leave any writings around about themselves beacuse its all fucking made up.
Dont waste your times with this vikings shit.
There's no need for this type of aggression here, especially since I haven't even watched or listened to the video.
Look, I only asked for a few sources so I could read through them myself, silly me for expecting that, right? I mean the least he could do is add a bunch of sources underneath the images as captions. Pff. Whatevs.
Another interesting fact was the Althing. A senate of viking Godi (Druid like leaders who worshiped Odin/God/Godin/Godan), also known as the Gothi. Like Druids, the ruled over a merchant brand which farmers/craftsman could join. If they didn't like the particular brand they could join a different one. This was an early form of guilds and commercialism.
filtered for Middle Eastern demonic book worship.
I'm teaching you not to be an NPC, kid.
I just watched the video. There was like 7 fucking books in it you lazy modern college brat.
Ye, let us bow down to mr. science fag, as he postulates imaginary time frames.
Though he may not shew us how he tabulated the years, and that there is not scientific experiment to display the manner in which he reckoned 10,000 years, let us bow our heads in reverence to Mr. Science fag.
We all are in agreement with his arbitrary year allotment beceause we believe.
It is through faith that we believe 10,000 years ago.
It is only through faith and belief that 10,000 years ago existed. Just because you believe 10k years ago happened doesnt mean it's real.
it is real in your mind.
Their concept of colonization is to drop a mercenary gang somewhere and become a ruling class. they don't disperse any culture. They absorbed it from Celts and Germans.
How can I be lazy when I'm doing all my college work including after-studies? Which includes all but not least, all the books I'm supposed to read and resume, look, it's all standard stuff and that's the point of college, grandpa. Things might've changed since your times.
I'm already being taught how to think by actually paid professionals so I'd take their word over yours. ( With you being an anonymous person on an image board, no offence.)
Plus, you don't even know me, and I think you're just overreacting and misinterpreting this entire thing.
Side note.
Studies show that you are more likely to remember stuff by reading them out loud than listening to them.
If you want to be helpful though, you can always give me the time-stamps of those seven "sources". I'd be more than grateful for that.