The Plan
The Benefits
Costs
archive.schillerinstitute.com
Summary
-$200 billion investment
-$60 billion annual return
-Economic growth
-Mexicans have jobs so they stay in their country
NAWAPA Now
Jace White
Other urls found in this thread:
Robert Rogers
Why should the US pay for Canadian infrastructure that helps Mexicans? Either kill yourself or campaign for the annexation of Canada by the US and deportation of all nonwhites.
Brandon Smith
Shared cost.
David Brooks
Always pay attention to the shilled threads.
Oliver Collins
In no way is it shared, just like every single other economic pairing between THE LARGEST ECONOMY ON EARTH and TWO COMPLETELY INSIGNIFICANT ECONOMIES WHICH WOULD COLLAPSE WITHOUT IT. You're shilling for neo-NAFTA.
Commit suicide.
Jonathan Russell
Reported for pilpul.
Luke Brooks
Always pay attention to the shilled threads.
Ian Flores
...
Christian Sanders
The real plan: North America is turned into a third world continent. The east steps in to pillage whatever they need for the next 300 years.
Lucas Lopez
Go away.
Sebastian Edwards
You tried this same thread a month ago, torfaggot.
You are not going to be able to convince this board that helping mexico is a good thing.
As long as uncle sam has the gibs tit out, they will keep coming.
Kayden Johnson
Uh, no. Beaners can get their own water.
Nathan Williams
You should have been smothered at birth.
Nicholas Thomas
This doesn't help America at all, beaner.
The areas in the united states that it will be helping are for all practical purposes, not part of America anymore.
That is the racial chaos of California, and the majority mestizo states of the southwest.
Don't even bother with a response, filtered.
Blake Bennett
...
Nicholas Thompson
...
Eli Torres
Indeed.
And I see nothing new that would merit a thread.
Additionally, I recall the last thread went pretty much the same: this will be used to boost the shitskin populations of all the big cities, instead of the stated use of agriculture (of which we are already a net exporter, so, what's the point), and, what happens in 100 years when the supply dwindles out?
Also:
Nolan Turner
Why not just grow food industrially and indoors with hydroponics and LED lighting, using 1-2% of the current water we do now for traditionally irrigated farmland? Why choose the most inefficient path?
Jacob Gonzalez
You're not making the argument, though. You're copy-pasting Larouche from the tail end of the Cold War.
Jace Cox
That is absolutely retarded.
Anthony Thompson
NAWAPA + Space Elevator = the end of international economic jewry.
Easton Nguyen
Electricity is still too expensive. It's viable if we built thorium reactors and cut the cost of electricity generation from 4-5 cents to 1-2 cents/kwh.
Luke Jenkins
This has never been refuted, in this thread or any other, in spite of a massive influx of shills throwing logical fallacies around to try to oy vey it away. On its face, the idea that economic growth in Mexico would make Mexicans come to the US is the kind of retarded that should result in forced sterilization.
Sebastian Richardson
Everything single other thread on the board is just a distraction.