You goys that voted from Drumpf, you're insecure

web.archive.org/web/20181201034849/https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/monkey-cage/wp/2018/11/29/how-donald-trump-appeals-to-men-secretly-insecure-about-their-manhood/


Nothing says insecure and fragile like holding yourself to demanding standards.

Yep, sounds legit.

Attached: the soyim know.jpeg (1280x960, 177.69K)

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=hvNNtBmA3SQ
foxnews.com/politics/washington-post-mocked-over-study-claiming-trump-voters-could-be-insecure-about-their-manhood
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

You should really post the data, which studied only 300 men on some Amazon service. Completely legit research. Really the gold standard of the social sciences.

Yeah but no. Where is the true research that shows the intense pressure jews have put on men to look and behave like faggots and cucks?

youtube.com/watch?v=hvNNtBmA3SQ

Attached: blackpill.jpg (1200x1368, 222.23K)

Just because it has to do with Trump doesn't mean it has anything to do with politics. Reported

/thread

Not just any service! A sampling size of 300, with leading queries, ON MECHANICAL TURK. MT is basically already for turbonerds.

Women don't actually know what they want. That's why, in the absence of a strong male presence in their lives, they have jews to create what they think for them.

Attached: 2d00e8153d3fcfc926a78e196fe964b6f17ba931eb2e88db7fcf3396ac42e2d0.jpg (600x634, 26.88K)

Eat red meat every day of your life

They're right. I was insecure about thermonuclear exchange with russia

Attached: 1422637690908.png (640x480 504.71 KB, 39.47K)

>300 (((men)))

Doesn't work on me. Jew yourself (((OP)))!

Attached: rude_nazi_anime_girl.jpg (736x743 133.26 KB, 128.48K)

Yea, the people who stood by their candidate despite all the public denouncements and literal violence against them are the "weak" ones in this.

Over the past few years, the surveys on MTURK have become more bizarre. Lots of tranny shit. I am positive that all those studies used to say that trannies are good, and other stuff, is from MTURK. I wish more people understood that surveys are the worst kind of science.

Demanding standards like forcing yourself to remember ridiculous pronouns?
Sage

As a Tyler durden archetype where's the lie?

OR it could be men naturally want to act masculine, but due to men becoming more feminine the urge to be masculine is perceived as "pressure"

Good God, (((they))) cant help them selves but try to spin everything as insecurity or fear.

Attached: optimism replinished.JPG (378x444, 41.86K)

Not going to the link, but anyone that has please tell me;
How are the comments? In favor?

The left are the kings and queens of projection.

its the only thing they understand, living in fear of their insecurities being made public

This reminds me of the classic "study" where they determined that the alt-right loses their virginity seven years later than "average." Never mind that the alt-right doesn't even really exist, especially not in the way the media portrays.

What the takeaway is for me, is we need less funding for sociology because they're basically wasting my money providing unsceitnific, politically motivated fodder for their cousins in journalism.

Also this thread has made (((them))) mad for some reason, most replies are (1) posters and obvious shills.

A half-baked Washington Post op-ed is not thread-worthy imo. But to turn this in to a potentially worthwhile discussion, has anyone ever thought of getting in to journalism in order to turn the tide a bit? J-schools are one of the worst offenders in the purveyance of Marxist nonsense to the common man. Education faculties are pretty bad too, but obviously once school is done for kids, there needs to be another medium to transmit this kind of bullshit to the general populace. For example, even McNews outlets like BuzzFeed will hire people who have their Master's in journalism.

masculinity is all about admiting your own vulnerabilities so you can overcome them. just don't do it frequently to women since they see weakness as a justified chance to fuck with you.

That one continues to shock.

ORANGE MAN BAD

Yeah, it's like I have to tell people that no, I'm not homophobic because faggots don't scare me, they annoy me. I'm homosubodioic.

And not to Jamal or Uncle Rick.

...

Have you tried being manly and pretty?

You don't have to take a cock up the ass to be "pretty". Learn how to play an instrument, even if you're a fucking casual about it. Being rich defeats the need of being manly or pretty, but if you're not rich? Stand apart from the crowd by showing that you've bettered yourself by learning something that provides art to the world.

And no. Not modern art, might as well hang yourself if you start producing Pollock tier bullshit.

I'm a plain guy and women fall for me eventually every damn time, just because I'm an actually decent guy who isn't a faggot.

I don't date, though, because I got an autoimmune disease and I don't want to risk a child, and I would never date a woman that doesn't want any children.
Furthermore, I won't get "snipped" like a dog, birth control is incredibly damaging to women and condoms are not 100% safe and sex does feel fucking amazing and I don't wanna risk a child having to live with bullshit like this.

Anyway, just don't be a faggot, women love stability, if you're stable, they will really want you, a lot. Even if you're mean.

You are not a decent guy, you are genetic trash.

Neither my morals or temperament are negatively affected by my condition.
On the contrary, my sense of eugenics despite suffering from something that would "get me gassed" speaks bounds of my great integrity and understanding of beneficial and nurturing things for our species.

Not necessarily a genetic disorder. Many auto-immune "diseases" are caused by having the garbage that is in vaccines injected into you and developing anti-bodies to them, such as human, DNA, RNA, proteins etc.

But I thought homosexuals were more sexually active than the rest of the population?

Attached: All that jew can be.jpeg (484x252, 48.81K)

Any man worried about status isn't a man. Step up do your fucking job and don't worry about safe fucking spaces.

Literally this dismal article is your research proof for cuck propaganda.

The left always projects.

woman don't want you to try hard
they don't want extremes

I see masculinity being attacked these days as being some sort of a "front" for insecure men rather than an upholding of the perpetual development of the self.

Song related (the album this is off got rave reviews from critics this year, of course):

I hear that Eurovision tranny with the beard is pozzed too.

[Watch Thread][Show All Posts]

foxnews.com/politics/washington-post-mocked-over-study-claiming-trump-voters-could-be-insecure-about-their-manhood

If you’ve Googled “erectile dysfunction,” “how to get girls” or questioned your penis size – you might be a Trump supporter, according to The Washington Post.

Critics slammed Post over a “ridiculous” analysis that suggests male Trump supporters could be insecure about their manhood and masculinity.

“We call this the ‘fragile masculinity hypothesis,’” the Post study claims.

Thursday’s piece, “How Donald Trump appeals to men secretly insecure about their manhood,” was written by New York University social psychologist Eric Knowles and a student, Sarah DiMuccio. It features an assortment of phrases that would make a middle schooler chuckle and points to things such as Trump “boasting about the size of his penis” as to why he – in the eyes of the authors – exudes machismo.

However, the authors feel that men in MAGA hats aren’t always as “confidently masculine” as the president himself.

Conservative strategist Chris Barron couldn’t believe his eyes when he saw the analysis in one of the nation’s most respected newspapers.

"Honestly, I have read more coherent thoughts scribbled on the bathroom walls in gas stations,” Barron told Fox News. “If a news outlet had written something similar about Obama supporters, the publication that printed it would be roundly - and rightfully - ridiculed by every other media outlet."

Knowles and DiMuccio wrote that “fragile masculinity” is when men fall short of “unforgiving standard of maleness” that is expected in America from an early age.

“The political process provides a way that fragile men can reaffirm their masculinity. By supporting tough politicians and policies, men can reassure others (and themselves) of their own manliness,” Knowles and DiMuccio wrote before trying to explain how “fragile masculinity” is measured.

“We could not simply do a poll of men, who might not honestly answer questions about their deepest insecurities. Instead we relied on Google Trends, which measures the popularity of Google search terms,” they wrote.

The authors then selected search terms they believed would be common among men concerned about their respective manhood, such as “erectile dysfunction,” “hair loss,” “how to get girls,” “penis enlargement,” “penis size,” “steroids,” “testosterone” and “Viagra.” Then Knowles and DiMuccio asked 300 random men whether they ever would ever search for those terms and declared that their responses suggest “a valid way to capture fragile masculinity.”

Daily Caller media editor Amber Athey told Fox News that if anyone is lacking masculinity, it’s the type of people who would conduct this study.

“I’ve never met more insecure men than sad leftists who lecture women about what they’re supposed to believe,” Athey said.

Psychotherapist and "Be Fearless" author Jonathan Alpert doesn’t buy into the study either, pointing to a tidbit about fragile masculinity not being associated with support for Mitt Romney in 2012 or support for John McCain in 2008, which the authors feel indicates that “the correlation of fragile masculinity and voting in presidential elections” was stronger in 2016.

“Most people, men and women, would say that John McCain is the height of masculinity – about as manly as you can get. But the study indicates that fragile masculinity was not associated with support for McCain in 2008,” Alpert told Fox News. “He was a war hero who epitomized fearlessness in the face of his captors. What about Trump is more masculine than McCain?”

Alpert also feels that several of the search terms used indicate that a man is simply concerned about health issue and want to improve his life, which has nothing to do with whether or not someone is manly enough to match the authors’ expectation.

The report was published in the Post’s “Monkey Cage” section, which allows political scientists and scholars to contribute to the paper. The takeaway from the study, according to the authors, is that “fragile masculinity is a critical feature of our current politics” but warns readers that the entire article could be nonsense.

“We can’t be entirely sure that fragile masculinity is causing people to vote in a certain way,” Knowles and DiMuccio wrote. “It remains to be seen whether any link between fragile masculinity and voting will persist after Trump exits the national stage.”

The Hill media reporter Joe Concha pointed out that the Post has raised eyebrows with an assortment of over-the-top stories over the past few days.

“When Donald Trump is no longer in office and the media like the Washington Post – who in the span of a few days have called Melania Trump’s Christmas decorations a ‘nightmare forest’ and now a story on Trump appealing to a lack of manhood, which as ridiculous as it is sad – we will see a crash of clicks and views that resembles the 2008 financial crash,” Concha told Fox News.

The Post also admitted it made a blunder on Wednesday by placing a story about Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh coaching youth basketball under the “Public Safety” section online.

Attached: 1530123963141.png (1118x1004, 906.35K)

Very unsurprising.

How about realism, is that any good?

Yes goyim power is weakness, remember that being able and willing to beat the living shit out of the soyboy means your masculinity is "fragile".

Her tattoo spells taco. fitting