What do socialists think about Eckart and Feder's view on interest? You must realize that interest is the biggest tool of the bourgeoisie. You may hate Nazis but I insist that you read Manifesto for the Abolition of Interest-Slavery by Gottfried Feder.
Manifesto for the Abolition of Interest-Slavery
Isaac Stewart
Other urls found in this thread:
Oliver Rivera
Feder was a pretty based guy, shame Hitler felt he wasn't experienced enough to run the bank and he got shoved into a University job.
Liam Ross
Sorry but Schacht was just a better pick. I don't think he deserved such a harsh relegation but anyway
Jeremiah Long
Schacht was a literal piece of trash if not for his experience in the previous government but what else could Hitler do in a world where the German Empire and Weimar Republic both still held the reins of Germany.
Aiden Perry
Schacht saved Germany from economic collapse twice. Once before the nazis took power and once after
Jacob Robinson
I have been reading a lot of stuff recently, about how the British only ended slavery around the world because they wanted to sell people steam powered machines to do the slaves jobs.
What we thought was kind abolitionists helping people were actually trying to con the slave niggers out of their jobs.
Chase Morales
Schacht did so but that doesn't excuse the fact that his views ranged from capitalist to outright Anti-Natsoc. He fought more with Hitler than Feder did. Like I said Hitler probably knew Schacht was the safest most beneficial pick but taking more risks would have saved them.
Gavin Mitchell
Source? Interesting indeed
Cameron Martin
I have it on another computer. Including a wemb I saved off here.
I should be able to post it later.
Wyatt Campbell
He should've put Feder on the helm with Schacht on an advisory role