USMCA agreement not good. Censorship is a real thing if ratified

breitbart.com/tech/2018/12/03/usmca-entrenches-tech-companies-right-censor/

shits bad, man.

Attached: gyakkyou_burai_kaiji_002411.jpg (125x125, 33.73K)

Other urls found in this thread:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marsh_v._Alabama
ustr.gov/sites/default/files/files/agreements/FTA/USMCA/Text/19_Digital_Trade.pdf
twitter.com/NSFWRedditImage

Censoring on social media is illegal.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marsh_v._Alabama

Go back to 4chan

Fuck off yid.

The Liberal media intentionally ignores anything bad for the left. Then, when you say something about it and someone asks you for a source, you only have Conservatives sites to use and the Liberal asking you for the sources says "got a source besides some biased Conservative Faux news site?'

Hmm, that'd be pretty retarded of them if the only way to get updates about it is through news reporting sites and there'd be no way to prove or disprove - while they eat up their own news sources with abandon.

The actual text of it is not available to public anywhere I see, so none of anything can be verified independently before it happens or is published.

In other words: They. Are. Retarded.

Tell them to their face they're fucking retarded for that reason - that they will not even entertain something being true by a 'competing news source' when it cannot even be verified by either side independently.

ustr.gov/sites/default/files/files/agreements/FTA/USMCA/Text/19_Digital_Trade.pdf

Read closely

Article 19.17: Interactive Computer Services
1. The Parties recognize the importance of the promotion of interactive computer services,
including for small and medium-sized enterprises, as vital to the growth of digital trade.
2. To that end, other than as provided in paragraph 4, no Party shall adopt or maintain
measures that treat a supplier or user of an interactive computer service as an information content
provider in determining liability for harms related to information stored, processed, transmitted,
distributed, or made available by the service, except to the extent the supplier or user has, in whole
or in part, created, or developed the information.7
3. No Party shall impose liability on a supplier or user of an interactive computer service on
account of:
(a) any action voluntarily taken in good faith by the supplier or user to restrict access
to or availability of material that is accessible or available through its supply or use
of the interactive computer services and that the supplier or user considers to be
harmful or objectionable; or
(b) any action taken to enable or make available the technical means that enable an
information content provider or other persons to restrict access to material that it
considers to be harmful or objectionable.

4. Nothing in this Article shall:
(a) apply to any measure of a Party pertaining to intellectual property, including
measures addressing liability for intellectual property infringement; or
(b) be construed to enlarge or diminish a Party’s ability to protect or enforce an
intellectual property right; or
(c) be construed to prevent:
(i) a Party from enforcing any criminal law, or
(ii) a supplier or user of an interactive computer service from complying with a
specific, lawful order of a law enforcement authority.8
5. This Article is subject to Annex 19-A

Heavily condensed version:

No party shall impose liability (sue, claim a grievance) on account of any action to restrict access to material that the supplier considers objectionable.

They agree that you have no right to free speech online.
This is huge. Somebody needs to get it to Trump that his supporters are allowed to be physically attacked, that they are not allowed to defend themselves, and they are not allowed to communicate online, thus, by 2020, he will have no supporters.

It's pretty vague, but doesn't it sound like it could include ISPs as well effectively removing someones internet service?

It's not vague at all. It's saying that the complaint that your access was restricted in any way and at any point is meaningless whinging and you should just accept getting kicked off the internet. Throttled? Censored? You have no case. If you see a lawyer they will say there's nothing you can do.

Freeze peach works both ways
It was only withheld because it was large enough to be considered a public utility

Fucking sidewalks

you must live with your head in the clouds

So we become like the Chinese and their internet?

No. The Chinese care about their people. Your government wants you dead.

This. In China they don't have any rights, but if you do as you're told and stay out of the way, your belly will be full. Here Eric Clanton gets probation for attempted murder.

bump

REMINDER

THIS is the same thing we didn't want in the TPP

Top kek. No, Chinese only care about their rich and the pockets of said rich. They care less about their people than other Asians care about them.

Trump gets elected because of Wikileaks

Wants Assange thrown in prison…

By 2020 Trump will be happy if nobody looks into his relationship with Jeffrey Epstein.

...

And Trump signed this? Fucking compromised.

Goddamn retard.

Is there a reason this never went anywhere in 2016?

Bump for a real thread.

What do we do now, Zig Forums?

Attached: IMG_0389.PNG (699x703, 79.53K)

Gotta stop the USMCA. Thankfully we have all of Canada working to stop it too.