Where do I lie in terms of a political identity?

I've been on these boards for some time (4chan in general since 2006), but I've never quite sat well with any particular political ideology. I wasn't strongly in favor of the Libertarian approach, although it did stick with me a fair bit. I wouldn't consider myself a national socialist, either, yet I retain a lot of pro-national ideals. Still, I certainly wouldn't call myself a liberal. Here's a general outline on what I believe, and my solutions for various problems - perhaps some anons can at least pin down or point me in the right direction. Otherwise, feel free to try and change my view on any of this - I'm open to ideas and changing my mind if it can be adequately argued, articulated, and rationalized.

Attached: 1452077055201.jpg (1366x1195, 746.44K)

Other urls found in this thread:

worldfuturefund.org/wffmaster/Reading/Germany/Radical Ecology.htm
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

(continued)

...

Nice blogpost, faggot. No one cares. Maybe post in /soc/.

...

ignore him, hes a angry kike. You're a reasonable green eco-nationalist, welcome to the sane side of Zig Forums.

Instant derail by this faggot. Remember to filter.

First time I've seen the term, but, neat. I suppose that's a more fitting title than liberal or nazi, although I'm not sure if it's quite as encompassing for all the major political points I listed.

Why would you want to know this? It's not black and white. It's not science. People can have any combination of beliefs 'belonging to' similar and or opposing political parties.

Identity and fellowship are extremely important elements of human psychology, and keeps us from the madness and degeneracy as purveyed by Our Benefactors.

Yes, the discussion revolving around YOU. Why do you think you are so important that you deserve your own thread for one random user? It's not all about you. If you care about National socialism and your people, what do you have to give back? In no way does this help the group as a whole. Maybe that will actually help answer your question in a way.

Alright, I'll bite - what are some better threads, then? Threads that I should delete this one in favor of, or should have simply not made this thread in favor of?

Attached: 1344427072134.jpg (826x738, 69.48K)

There is no answer until two years have passed and at that point you can stop lurking and decide which threads are better than this garbage

This thread is fine, it's just on the wrong board. You want to talk about yourself, and there are other boards for that. But this isn't one of them.
If you have specific questions about one of your beliefs, post in QTDDTOT. If you think that question would benefit a larger amount of people, make a thread about it in a way that promotes discussion and is relevant to people.

This thread is fine, although you made it too much about yourself and less about the other anons on this board, thus not being able to create a discussion while the OP is away.
This should be a more general thread letting people who are unsure about their ideologies or where they rank exactly on the scale go and talk about their exact beliefs, rather than it being about what YOUR beliefs are.
Other than that good thread tho

Fucking dumb herd animal…

I'm not just trying talk about myself, but rather, the multitude of beliefs I hold and how they may fit into a particular existing identity or category (or making one, if there isn't one). If there's other people who agree with all my points, maybe they're looking for the same thing, I don't know. Maybe they disagree, list their beliefs, and are equally unsure of where they fit - that's cool, too.


Good point, I usually try to make threads more open ended, so I sorta fucked up there in not specifying that in the OP. Though, I figured it was somewhat implied, but >implications

What the fuck is mentally wrong with you?

Nice strawman, retard. Where are your beliefs? Do you even have any?

you mean the thing that people post here nonstop? even when something happens thats funny, posters here trip over themselves to dismiss it, like that mexican cop or whoever that was that trashed kike holy books. that was funny and everyone just said
over and over. why? to virtue signal and fit in, just like libniggers do irl everyday.

Sure, I have my ideals, but I don't need them to conform with your or anyone else's ideals, because I'm not some insecure little herd nigger like you. You realize labels are not important. Ideals are. How about you stop trying to conform with a label and just have independent ideals?

He didn't have to be so harsh, but he's right. Zig Forums isn't about some horoscope comparison or personality test. Not mention to be an insult, but are you a female?
You may have some good ideas or topics of discussion in everything you said. Focus on those and you might get more out of a thread.

You realize a large portion of that is shills trying to derail a thread or stifle any positivity, right? And the few genuine anons that find a need to virtue signal about how they're not a Jew, are white, or are more Nazi than the rest are low IQ. The real anons don't find a need to prove or defend against anything.

Because if everyone has "independent ideals", then you end up with a herd of cock-gobbling marxists parading through streets while onlookers say oh-so-proudly "Wow… at least I'm not marching with them!" before getting bludgeoned to death by the Progress Police. Having some form of shared identity is fucking important - not just a simple, shallow label, but some factor (beyond race) that you can tie to other people. Even if you're not a natsoc, you can find value in this.


I get that, but I imagine there's more that can be said of everything I've listed in the OP - surely, other people are curious. Given the amount of circlejerking people have around "muh natsoc only board", I'm pretty sure a lot of people do give a shit about a shared political ideology.
nope

Also, most times when I start threads on individual topics, they got shot down or bogged down in general because it's not innately about a cohesive set of ideals. Thus, points that would already be covered aren't listed and are harped on, IE: the downfalls of a meritocracy without strong immigration/deportation standpoints and a conservative societal structure. I'm more interested in the particular effects and overall identity one can form over the various interactions of the points listed in the OP, as a cohesive whole.

Yeah, that's called race/ethnicity. Heritage. Culture. Not your ideas. We're not successful, unlike chinks, and other similarly more "intelligent" peoples (not more intelligent than whites, just relative to all humans), because we're group-dependent filth. We're successful specifically because we think independently. The only identity we need is who we are as a people. Anything else perverts who we are as a people. For example, marxists, who identify with a social and political ideology over their own people, and thus that identity perverts our culture, heritage, and way of life, the same way your blind adherence to a political identity over a real identity will pervert our heritage, cultural, and way of life just the same. You're a herd animal. That's really all there is to it. An "NPC."

But there's tons of other shitty whites who don't share that heritage or culture, out of rejection - trash, who much more literally fit the definition of an "NPC". It's clearly not enough, especially when you consider the amount of whites who actively betray themselves and other whites.

If all you can offer me as an answer to my question in OP is merely "NPC", "herd animal" or other pejorative bullshit, then maybe you're not as independent as you think.

Rather than make it about yourself you should discuss your beliefs. No one cares about what you think, they care about why you think. You tell us why you think that your political ideas are superior to ours, and give us some good reasons with references to history and appeals to logic; and we'll argue back and forth a bit, and hopefully we'll all come out a bit smarter.

Just informing us of what your beliefs are and asking us to brand you is not conducive to discussion.

82 IQ at work here. You're so pathetically simple-minded the only think you latched into in the lengthy paragraph I typed were the words that hurt your feelings. Fuck off and sage your slide thread. This shit doesn't belong on Zig Forums. This isn't a blog site.

I made this thread specifically for that, instead of just posting it on QTDDTOT with a TL;DR bullet point list in a binary fashion. I've given paragraph summaries as to why I believe the things I do. I mean, shit
right in the first paragraph of the OP


user says, ignoring the other poster's points without a shred of self-awareness.

Oh? What does, then?

Political news, not your blogs where you beg to fit in.

Read OP. Good shit.
TL:DR the thread, looks shit.

Did anyone have a good answer for OP? Sounds very conservative but with some flex. soft classic conservative?

Literally the wrong board if you think that's all Zig Forums is
>>>/new/
inb4 "b-but muh kampfy!"

Yeah, I'm just not as keen on the religious aspect often tied to conservatism is the issue, although I largely attribute the massive destruction of the term "conservative" to (((modernism))).

You're a national socialist and you don't realize it yet.

Welcome to being a nazi.

Attached: banners.jpg (737x918, 379.51K)

No, it's "literally" not. This board has long been established as a board for right-wing news of all kinds. It has never and will never be your blog.

Well, the answer is simple user, you're a fucking faggot.

Attached: 725b3031423080454c75c8484d2ebe8b6751a6aec9451226b8082f4bb26b6ab6.jpg (960x783, 59.44K)

Think so? I figured a good few bits would be at ends with natsoc. Gonna find some good reading material for it then, always figured at least some of the listed beliefs were in disagreement.


Nah, fuck off, cunt.

Filtered and reported for making slide threads and blog posts.

Attached: 1351989838226.png (253x235, 80.19K)

I think the only real point of disagreement is possibly in free speech, but not as much as you'd think. The image of Nazis burning books is a bit of a false image, they weren't burning Plato they were mostly burning books that told you to make your kid into a tranny (ya, that was going on back in Germany back then).

It's a point where I can see both sides. There is value to have educated people debating ideas in society, it becomes a problem where you have large subversive institutions that are trying to lead people astray.

Other than that you'd be surprised how much an overlap between your ideas and natsoc ideas.

Neat. However, I still don't want to go full goosestepping "gas the kikes race war now". I imagine that line of thought is largely persisted by edgy retards, though.

These are key to my understanding of your thinking. I don't see any racism here, but I fear that others cannot see this difference when faced with groupings of colours and shades that will form based on other factors.
CULTURE AND VALUES
That's all that matters. The war of humans is defining culture and values. Skin colour is not at issue. We all a global animal and our movement and mixing will continue for all time now. Colour is no longer at issue.

OP, you are a faggot. congrats

There are only two meaningful position: ethnonationalism and globalism. Either your blood and soil comes first or it doesn't. Nothing else is really important.

May I refer you to the points espoused by the NSDAP:

25 points of the NSDAP
1. We demand the union of all Germany in a Greater Germany on the basis of the right of national self-determination.
2. We demand equality of rights for the German people in its dealings with other nations, and the revocation of the peace treaties of Versailles and Saint-Germain.
3. We demand land and territory (colonies) to feed our people and to settle our surplus population.
4. Only members of the nation may be citizens of the State. Only those of German blood, whatever be their creed, may be members of the nation. Accordingly, no Jew may be a member of the nation.
5. Non-citizens may live in Germany only as guests and must be subject to laws for aliens.
6. The right to vote on the State's government and legislation shall be enjoyed by the citizens of the State alone. We demand therefore that all official appointments, of whatever kind, whether in the Reich, in the states or in the smaller localities, shall be held by none but citizens.
We oppose the corrupting parliamentary custom of filling posts merely in accordance with party considerations, and without reference to character or abilities.
7. We demand that the State shall make it its primary duty to provide a livelihood for its citizens. If it should prove impossible to feed the entire population, foreign nationals (non-citizens) must be deported from the Reich.
8. All non-German immigration must be prevented. We demand that all non-Germans who entered Germany after 2 August 1914 shall be required to leave the Reich forthwith.
9. All citizens shall have equal rights and duties.
10. It must be the first duty of every citizen to perform physical or mental work. The activities of the individual must not clash with the general interest, but must proceed within the framework of the community and be for the general good.
We demand therefore:
11. The abolition of incomes unearned by work.
The breaking of the slavery of interest
12. In view of the enormous sacrifices of life and property demanded of a nation by any war, personal enrichment from war must be regarded as a crime against the nation. We demand therefore the ruthless confiscation of all war profits.
13. We demand the nationalization of all businesses which have been formed into corporations (trusts).
14. We demand profit-sharing in large industrial enterprises.
15. We demand the extensive development of insurance for old age.

cont.

16. We demand the creation and maintenance of a healthy middle class, the immediate communalizing of big department stores, and their lease at a cheap rate to small traders, and that the utmost consideration shall be shown to all small traders in the placing of State and municiple orders.
17. We demand a land reform suitable to our national requirements, the passing of a law for the expropriation of land for communal purposes without compensation; the abolition of ground rent, and the prohibition of all speculation in land.
18. We demand the ruthless prosecution of those whose activities are injurious to the common interest. Common criminals, usurers, profiteers, etc., must be punished with death, whatever their creed or race.
19. We demand that Roman Law, which serves a materialistic world order, be replaced by a German common law.
20. The State must consider a thorough reconstruction of our national system of education (with the aim of opening up to every able and hard-working German the possibility of higher education and of thus obtaining advancement). The curricula of all educational establishments must be brought into line with the requirements of practical life. The aim of the school must be to give the pupil, beginning with the first sign of intelligence, a grasp of the nation of the State (through the study of civic affairs). We demand the education of gifted children of poor parents, whatever their class or occupation, at the expense of the State.
21. The State must ensure that the nation's health standards are raised by protecting mothers and infants, by prohibiting child labor, by promoting physical strength through legislation providing for compulsory gymnastics and sports, and by the extensive support of clubs engaged in the physical training of youth.
22. We demand the abolition of the mercenary army and the foundation of a people's army.
23. We demand legal warfare on deliberate political mendacity and its dissemination in the press. To facilitate the creation of a German national press we demand:
(a) that all editors of, and contributors to newspapers appearing in the German language must be members of the nation;
(b) that no non-German newspapers may appear without the express permission of the State. They must not be printed in the German language;
(c) that non-Germans shall be prohibited by law from participating financially in or influencing German newspapers, and that the penalty for contravening such a law shall be the suppression of any such newspaper, and the immediate deportation of the non-Germans involved.
The publishing of papers which are not conducive to the national welfare must be forbidden. We demand the legal prosecution of all those tendencies in art and literature which corrupt our national life, and the suppression of cultural events which violate this demand.
24. We demand freedom for all religious denominations in the State, provided they do not threaten its existence not offend the moral feelings of the German race.
The Party, as such, stands for positive Christianity, but does not commit itself to any particular denomination. It combats the Jewish-materialistic spirit within and without us, and is convinced that our nation can achieve permanent health only from within on the basis of the principle: The common interest before self-interest.
25. To put the whole of this programme into effect, we demand the creation of a strong central state power for the Reich; the unconditional authority of the political central Parliament over the entire Reich and its organizations; and the formation of Corporations based on estate and occupation for the purpose of carrying out the general legislation passed by the Reich in the various German states.
The leaders of the Party promise to work ruthlessly – if need be to sacrifice their very lives – to translate this programme into action.
* On April 13, 1928, Adolf Hitler clarified section seventeen in the programme in order to stop political mischaracterizations: "Because of the mendacious interpretations on the part of our opponents of Point 17 of the programme of the NSDAP, the following explanation is necessary.: Since the NSDAP is fundamentally based on the principle of private property, it is obvious that the expression "confiscation without compensation" refers merely to the creation of possible legal means of confiscating when necessary, land illegally acquired, or not administered in accordance with the national welfare. It is therefore directed in the first instance against the Jewish companies which speculate in land.

And for the side of conservation of nature:

"The German countryside must be preserved under all circumstances, for it is and has forever been the source of strength and greatness of our people." – Adolf Hitler

Source: Hitler quoted in Raymond H. Dominick III, The Environmental Movement in Germany: Prophets and Pioneers, 1871-1971 (Bloomington : Indiana University Press, 1992), p. 81.

"Nations whose feeling for nature dissipates because they destroy their homeland, carry the seeds of death in them; they only continue as a nation artificially. Nations with a strongly defined feeling for nature, like the Germans and the Slavs, overcome even the hardest blows and have an unlimited capacity for regeneration. Therefore a government that seeks to maintain the feeling for nature of its people is smart, and to that end no sacrifice is too large, no means too small, and everyone who helps with that serves his Völk." – Hermann Löns, Popular Writer in Second Empire Germany

Source: Zeitschrift für Vogelschutz und andere Gebiete des Naturschutzes 1, 1 (1920), p. 44.

"Man should organize his existence meaningfully in the natural sphere of his living space, should make everything that nature offers him useful for himself while being conscious of his responsibility, should be the master of nature but at the same time its protector and conserver." –Julius Wagner, German educator

Source: Julius Wagner, Die Biologie im Dienste heimatlicher Landschaftskunde (1934).

further reading worldfuturefund.org/wffmaster/Reading/Germany/Radical Ecology.htm


You are an ecofascist. Here is a thread

I’m going to copy the OP word for word and run for mayor in Boring, Oregon.

...

This is the literal definition of a blog post.

Most other boards give zero fucks about politics though, so I can't imagine OP's thread getting any discussion there. Maaaaybe on /r9k/ since the anons there seem quite redpilled, but even that's a stretch, not to mention it's slow as shit.

To have democracy, you need public vote.
Secret vote is kikery. Everything you do in public that affects state matters, must literally be public in democracy, in function and principle.

More importantly,some points that most people miss:
Statecraft is not a business and it is not for everyone. You need to have Zig Forumsites. Meaning men that have families and property that is tied to the state. Men that own the means of production. kek Not unmarried men. Not women. Not anything else. Not slaves
Those same Zig Forumsites must be oplites. They must own their own armor and weapons. They must be Zig Forums tier. So your Zig Forumsites are also the heads of the army, those that defend the state. So democracy is effectively a utopian patriarchy for very advanced peoples.

CITIZENS ARE NOT Zig ForumsITES. VOTING ONCE IN A WHILE DOES NOT MEAN YOU HAVE DEMOCRACY. IF YOU DON'T PARTICIPATE IN STATECRAFT, YOU DON'T HAVE DEMOCRACY. YOU, THE PEOPLE, DO NOT GOVERN IN (((DEMOCRACY))). DEMOCRACY IS A PIPE DREAM UNTIL THE KIKES ARE GONE.

I forgot the most important point. To have any kind of democracy, you need ETHNIC HOMOGENEITY.

OP has some good points, but one thing I want to look at is the creation and utilization of goods and money.

First, are these large companies actually producing good and useful tools or devices? Are they environmentally safe?

Second, if they are not, what entity will allow the right people to acquire funding so that decent people do decent things with their economic resources?

No one asked, whore.

Who in the ever-loving fuck gives a shit about where you are on the politcal spectrum?

Self absorbed faggot kill yourself.

IT DOESN'T MATTER WHO WE ARE. WHAT MATTERS IS OUR PLAN.

Yeah, those seem to be key points that drive away those who see race as a necessary determining factor, and also those who like to pretend it doesn't exist (while also screaming about MUH RACISM at every corner). It seems to just be a controversial view all around.


no u


The idea of black-or-white dichotomy is, and always will be, ridiculous.

Ahh, this is more like it. Gonna pick out some of the things of note
This one's a bit too vague for my tastes - I know Hitler expanded on it in his various speeches, but it leads too much of an open door for "we're taking this because it's ours!" mentality. Still, Germany did get unreasonably fucked over after WWI, so this one's not too outrageous.
Specifying jews is a bit redundant, but hey, it's literally Hitler, so
I disagree with this one. It allows too much of an issue where people can slip by immigration easily. Unless carefully monitored and easily deportable, you'd see outsiders abusing this a LOT (as was the case, I'm sure)
This one's pretty important, and I agree with it. Your people should always come first, but I wouldn't stop at just "food" - other basic necessities should be met as well (shelter, sanitation, clothing/bedding, etc).
This one's also too vague. "equal rights" depends pretty heavily on what you consider these "rights" to be, although on a surface level is admirable and desirable nonetheless.
I disagree with this, and believe it clashes with point #15, but only with regards to care for the elderly/reasonably disabled. While we shouldn't consider every manchild or tranny schizo to be "disabled", I think genuinely wounded soldiers or people suffering from other disabilities that prevents them from truly working should see some form of living guaranteed. Though admittedly, this could be worked out in the form of direct needs being met, rather than being given NEETbux.
This should only really be for corporations that are supplying the needs of your people. Otherwise, free enterprise for luxury items and non-essentials.
This one is also a bit too vague, because it relies on a nebulous definition of "small traders", but is again an admirable goal.
This one's worded weirdly, but generally is extremely important. It basically lets your nation's governing body create community areas that aren't fucking charging anybody simply because of MUH LAND VALUE. IIRC this is what led to the various free hostels for the Hitler youth.
Shit, I forgot to mention education in my OP, but this is 100% important and basically the way to go about it. Quit treating education like a business - it's training for children for a common future.
This one's fairly dubious, and while it would probably be fine at first, would reasonably lead to an abused system where only "allowed" news is let in. Even if there's no (((special interests))) to manipulate the press, this still has the simple issue of bottlenecking and arbitrating the value of the press. I think it's better to let the press be free, and only crack down on repeated attacks made via the press as I mentioned in the OP.
This one's fine if it cuts out the second bit about "Positive Christianity" and whatnot, mostly because it's redundant, but because it railroads the religious aspect to "Christianity vs Judaism" and doesn't give enough foresight to potential future cancerous religions (see: Islam, Scientology, etc).

All in all, while I have my issues with natsoc, I'd say it's a much more reasonable doctrine if it sticks to these 25 points. At the very least, most European or ethno-centric nations would benefit heavily from its ideology.

Seems like a longer version of a thread we've already had. Sorry OP, tl;dr.

Good in theory, but could easily be abused to cull powerful rising forces who would rise against corruption. Imagine if they did this with Hitler in 1929. I mean, they tried, but


Democracy isn't an inherently great system, either. Tyranny by majority rings true especially in the modern age - all it takes is leading along a bunch of retards with some money on a string and stick.


Yeah, I went over this briefly with
There's really ultimately 15 things you absolutely need for your society to function and prosper, each split into 3 groups of 5.
all of these must be well defined, of course, but every single one of them must be met and maintained. If any one of these pillars fall, so will the rest of your society. Thus, your currency must reflect the production the first 10, and your civilization must maintain the last 5 to keep producing the first 10.

To answer your questions, though
Similar to the NDASP doctrine, you should have a nationalized set of corporations who are tasked with these goals. So they're not beholden to "profit" so they can squeeze money out of people for necessities - they merely produce, if only for the common goal.
I would say this should naturally be maintained under any proper nationalized entity.

"funding" is a mere means to an end - what's more important is that you have the physical resources to do so, without any means of interference by "market values", brokers, etc. Regardless, the nation should provide these means to its people, so that the people may look after their nation.

Kike angering bump. keep on evolving and discovering who you are user.

Much of point three is exactly what you said. Various pockets of ethnic Germans were cut off from Germany (and in some places were being persecuted [this is what motivated the invasion of Poland]). Hitler wanted to re-unite the German people under one empire. The concept of "Lebensraum" is all that is mentioned today though. Hitler's motive for invasion was to bring Germans back under German rule.
Think carefully on this one. The reason for this is to eliminate people earning incomes only from investments and money-lending. The development of insurance for old age can still be earned by the person working their whole life for the betterment of their country. With the nationalization of large industries, providing a pension would be equivalent to this insurance.
I think this was mostly geared towards extremely large companies and trusts.
I feel like language used in point 16 would help combat behemoths like walmart from destroying businesses and communities.

Bullshit.
There must be a complimentary balance between individuality and community.
Human beings are tribal animals. Civilization is a group effort. Individuality, individual initiative, and individual liberty are important, but they must exist within the context of one's own Volk and must be in consonance with that Volk.
A human can accomplish essentially nothing alone, no matter how strong or smart he or she is.
If you are one of the "peterstein" disciples, then do you know that he is supportive of White genocide?
Also, the White race, and also the various breeds within the White race, is genetic. Culture is very important, but genetics is the foundation of everything living, including humans, their abilities, and their behaviors. Culture is a thin veneer applied on top of individually immutable genetics.

"stay atomized goyi, erh, guys!!!!!" "only "herd animals" ever work together and organize tribally!!!! "STOP ORGANIZING AND FORMING GROUPS WITH SHARED BLOOD TIES AND HERITAGE!!!!!!!!!!!! THAT'S (((OUR))) DEAL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!"
This is how you sound.

National Socialism, essentially. Very close to it, anyway.
Other than
1. Somewhat weak on race. The "best quality" people from other races should still remain separate in their own homelands. The correct way to get more "good genes" is through sensible eugenics policies within your own Volk.
2. While a shared "White" identity is somewhat new, it is genetically plausible. White peoples are closer related to other Whites than to non-Whites. Also, the USA was never even really an "all types of Whites" Nation. 90+% of White Americans come from Northern Europe, mostly from Britain, Germany, Ireland, or Scandinavia. "White American" is Gemanic plus Celtic with some Italians and a smattering of other European groups.
3. Religion is what people believe in. It is an incredibly powerful thing. Some "religions" are seriously harmful, such as judaism and islam. Religions that are harmful to the Volk and the unity of the Volk should probably not be allowed within the homeland of the Volk.
4. On capitalism: ban all foreign corporations and "investment." All companies within the country must be owned and operated by the Volk. Also, massive antitrust measures and policies to prevent "megarich oligarchy" formation must be put in place, otherwise "a hundred giant capitalists who own everything and buy the government" will reform.

False. It is a place to discuss "politically incorrect" topics. It is not "right wing news," although shills try to make it so. Hell, it is not even "right wing" since many, or even most, legitimate posters recognize that much of the "left/ right" divide is a false dichotomy.

THIS IS UTTER BULLSHIT.
GENETICS IS THE FOUNDATION OF EVERYTHING LIVING.
INCLUDING HUMANS
INCLUDING THE BEHAVIOR OF HUMANS
Opposing White genocide is morally imperative for all White people.
The White race is a vast collection of complex genetic factors. It is not "skin color." It is not only cosmetic. Cosmetic differences are the SMALLEST differences. The largest are in brain development.
You support genocide. You are the enemy. You are a monster.
To hell with you.

As a foundational starting point, pretty much this.

WHAT we are is what matters most.

I will point out that the people living in the Danzig corridor before WW2 were mostly German and that that area had been part of Germany, before that Prussia, and before that the (German) Teutonic Order for 700 years or so. There was no legitimate reason for that area to have been given to Poland after WW1, other than out of pure hatred and spite towards Germany.

You're an autistic pseudo intellectual. End of discussion.

The NatSocs were eco nationalists as well. National socialism is the political system that will send humanity to the stars.