E Michael Jones Interview Archive

Protestants all wish to be like the Jew, but few of them have the means to achieve that kind of power.

Quite the opposite.

Wrong. Jones cites sicut judaeis as a good thing and wants to bring it back. The papal bull that set jews up as a special minority class with power and rights over goyim. Jones is either a retard or a jew-loving faggot. Most likely he is both.

ok kid

you angry retards are blind with rage and will never reach the kingdom of heaven.

Sad

Jews are Satan-worshipers.

And your god is literally a Jew. How do you square that circle?

the guy has extremely scathing and brutal criticisms of the jews, as well as putting american history in a very interesting perspective, that is, the rivalry of the primary ethnic and religious divisions.

Because my God was rejected by jews and are now cursed to burn in hell for eternity. Only a golem fucktard would join the side of the jews against their destroyer.

I'm not a Jew worshiper.

And this somehow makes him not a Jew?

Fact check: False

Thanks for sharing these user. I'll be working through them over the next few weeks/months during meals at home.

Attached: Clyde Caldwell - Hydre.jpg (586x600, 130K)

I'm not a Jew worshiper.

According to Jones, you’re wrong. You’re saying Jesus was a Jew. He was an Old Testament Jew. Modern Jews are Talmudic inbred monsters. Essentially, Jones distinguished between the two groups. It’s a difference with a distinction, one that makes a lot of sense, and answers the D&Q claim “you worship a kike on a stick”.

Yes. He was racially a Jew.
The distinction is that ancient Jews were even lower racial quality than modern Ashkenazi Jews are, since ashkenazi at least have European admixture. Ancient Jews, like your god Jesus, were 100% subhuman kike

Jones makes some points relevant to Jews that few j-woke people truly understand.
He claims Jews are defined by their revolutionary spirit, and that they are anti-logos, essentially, anti-truth, anti-God. Their existence is defined by their denial of Christ’s divinity ever since he walked the earth. Not known to many run of the mill anti-semites is the Jewish allergy to Christ. It’s almost like the crucifix to the vampire. It affects, hurts, injures, insults, burns, scares And agitates them more to proselytize them than even holocausting them with electric floors or brain bashing machines. I know this as I’ve been very close to Jews, and can confirm.
You and more counter-semites would do well to learn this.

“The Christ pill”
That would be an interesting book, especially if it were to address the need to proselytize the Jews

Hitler was very aware of what Jones was referring to here.
He always made it a point to say that the truth comes from within, and God was within us all.
But the Jew would always look to cheat and steal his way to God, but always seemed to strike out.

Who?

Catholic, Jew-hater guy.

Can confirm. I saw a jew flip out recently because he saw a baptist church that was displaying some old testament jewish reference as their own. Really got to him.

Voting, naming the Jew, psy ops, fucking optics and going in… none of these compare with a default position to proselytize the Jew. It was once the widely accepted position. Weakening this position is in the interest of Jews.
Is weakening this position in the interest of Nazis, national socialists, etc…
it amazes me that people Claiming to be (((anti-semites))) will also push away the one thing that will solve the JQ. And guess what? It’s not socially unacceptable to want to proselytize the Jews. That’s another reason they fear it. It’s illegal to proselytize Jews in Israel, not here.

No, it didn't. The bull said that you can't force or compel them to convert to the Christian faith with violence, unlike say, Islam would and does, for example.

It also said they were allowed to live in Europe and Europeans were not allowed to (justifiably) kill them.

Also said Jews were to be allowed to practice their customs (i.e. Jewing people) without interference.

You can argue that those were mistakes from whatever your unstated, unsubstantiated position is, but the other guy said it gave "power and rights over goyim", which isn't true. Secular laws can change, as well, so it's a mountain out of a mole hill in any event.

This implies that Jews are merely defined by a set of opinions, which can be changed, not defined by their subhuman genes. This is incorrect. It is this false understanding of the Jewish problem that has allowed Jews to take over European lands, because they only needed to concel their opinions in order to gain acceptance from low IQ christkikes. The Jewish problem is a biological problem, and the only solution to the Jewish problem is total extermination of the Jewish genotype.

Yes it is. By allowing Jews to practice their ethnic customs of Jewing the goyim, while forcing Europeans to adhere to Christian laws, this gave the Jews a leg up in society, which is why they have always been generally better off and more politically powerful than the majority of Europeans. One good example is in commerce. Christian merchants were forbidden from advertising their goods, by church regulation, but jewish merchants were allowed to do so with no regulation. Jews
throughout history occupied a space between the nobility and the peasants in European society, due to church privileges such as sicut judaeis, and often above the lower nobility as well.

Civic af bro. How do you suggest to prevent another Spanish converso situation? Take their word that they really mean it this time?

Not true. (whatever "Jewing the goyim" means)

Citations required. Was that in the bull Sicut Judaeis? The lower nobility were forced by violence to convert? Had their graves desecrated and sold? Seems to me you're just making stuff up…

its alright. The guy is a great orator, regardless of whether or not you agree with his positions or not. I personally don't, because he doesn't even believe in race, but he does make a lot of sense with other issues, ie: logos, criticism of jewish groups etc…

Yes, true.
"Jews and Modern Capitalism" by Werner Sombart documents this thoroughly, as well as several other privileges Jews enjoyed.
Increase your reading comprehension, low IQ Catholic. I said Jews occupied a societal position generally above the majority of Europeans and sometimes above lower nobility in status. This is due to privileges provided by the church. And these are privileges, by definition, "privilege" literally meaning "private law" such as those granted to Jews by sicut judaeis.

No, he believes in race.
He thinks race is defined as the nation from which you came.
I.E. Irish, German, Spanish, etc.
He said somewhere that the Jew actually contrived the Black vs. White contention in America in the 1960s when they brought blacks into the white neighborhoods in the cities.
Then when the "whites" got mad and moved to the suburbs, they became "white" because they were no longer in Irish neighborhoods, Italian neighborhoods etc.

Jews have been considered white in the JewSA since it was founded.

Which statement? Chapter? Page?

Which part of Sicut Judaeis, exactly, granted privileges that allowed Jews to occupy a societal position generally above the majority of Europeans and sometimes above the lower nobility?

Wrong.

No, I am right. Even the first "American nationalist" group, the no nothings, was founded by Jew. Irish and Italians were also considered white (obviously, otherwise they would not have been allowed to naturalize under the race-based citizenship laws in the first place). Just another case of E Michael Jones being uneducated, illiterate, and retarded. Not unusual for a catholic.

What is wrong with you? Know Nothings, not 'no nothings', and they were anti Catholic, just like you and jews.They only lasted ~16 years and were founded in 1844. Quite a while after the USA was founded, don't you think?

You actually think I will tolerate them in my community in any shape manner or form?
You absolute crizcuck!
Guize,DOTR,every crizcuck that dont reeducate…

Attached: 0cb0bf89ed4f20a6e4a757f34042afd3059b4754ea1f63dc145747ec44e449ec.png (824x800, 106.91K)

Read some history you dumb fuck.
We can just expel them. Send them to Israel for all I care.

I didn't say anything about expelling them,you illiterate nigger.

Attached: 35b89559cbd7ed83fa92ea3592d3711dff2177503a6b7152ed30c0903ba73eed.jpg (251x255, 10.69K)

Are you blasphemous devils actually jews pretending to be white supremacists? Behaving in a vile and offensive manner, spreading lies and division in order to 'poison the well', amirite?

Jews also helped found the USA. Benjamin Franklin built them a synagogue in Philadelphia. That's why the USA is such a kiked shit hole. Founders should have banned jews and catholics and then america could have been a paradise. Unfortunately, they didn't, and then in the 60s jews and catholics worked together to open our borders to the third world.

Cool story, bro. Too bad none of it's true.

Jews ran the slave trade, and so are primarily responsible for all that implies.

Catholics are for the rule of God and everything that is true and right, unlike you.

Jones addresses the conversos. He says their conversion wasn’t genuine.
Let me put this in a clearer way:
Those against Jesus on one side (Jews/atheists)
Those for Jesus on the other

The Catholic Church has only in recent times determined the (?) covenant to be eternal. In fact, that was not a law, but just something a pope said in a speech back in 1980 or so. But, proselytizing the Jew is precisely what is needed now. It repels them more than your spray painted swatstikas. You have to define an anti-proselytizing position toward the Jews as anti-semitic, and about 1% of them will convert. The rest will leave.

I am for the rule of the Aryan man, and the extermination of all brown people (who are majority of catholics).

That must be why groups like "Jews for Jesus" exist, huh? Because Jews just hate christianity so much?

Pick only one.

Pagan here. Jones is a Christkike, but one of the better ones and should be defended from kikes like these (((posters))).

Please go suck (((William Finck)))'s circumcised dick
>>>Zig Forums

You can read my posts here where I lay out exactly why he is a Jew-loving faggot.

You'll never win, jew.

Fascinating, isn’t it..

By and large it does. When was the last time you talked to a Jew about Jesus? If you had ever done it, you would know.
Uhh how successful and how welcome are J4J in Jewish circles? You kind of make my point, bruh

Maybe you should stop speaking to strangers as though you’re a slimy pervert who can’t so much as engage in polite discussion. Savage.

The problem with >>>Christian is that discussions like this don’t get off the ground over there.

Majority of Catholics (the brown ones) will be wiped out with race-targeting bioweapons. Your jewish older brothers will also be taken out with bioweapons. After that, cleaning up the handful of white catholics will then be a very standard genocide operation.

Jews for Jesus is a Jewish circle, dumbass, so it is quite successful.

How about no.

Ok, go to a Jew, and ask him how his Jews for Jesus are doing.
Seriously, do it irl. I have. They hate Jews for Jesus. If you’re truly counter-Semitic, explain why a Jew won’t pray in a church but will pray in a mosque.

Your trips say otherwise. It's only a few more years before these kinds of weapons can be made in anyone's kitchen very cheaply, so you will not be able to save your brown brothers in christ.

I'm still not even slightly concerned about your assertions. Kitchen made bio-weapons are not on my list of threats.

Could it be because (as everyone knows) Jews hate Jesus? But why mosques?
It has to do with idol-worship. They call it avodah-zarah. Strange service. They believe Christians are idol-worshippers. It’s avainst their religion to give credence to the practice, and against the rules they believe all goyim should folllow (noachide laws).
Mosques have no such images.
Get into it a bit deeper my friend. You have to know what Jews hate from their own perspectives, not just what Hollywood tells you they hate.

What if I ask this Jew?

Attached: DavidBrickner.jpg (1024x768, 118.78K)

Or this jew

Attached: london-2012-olympic-outreach-conversations-010.jpg (600x449, 148.85K)

They should be. Even big time kike strategists like Kissinger have talked about the threat of these coming up in the near future. Obviously almost everyone will be scrambling to create a nigger-killing super-disease (except for catholics, who are too faggy to want to kill niggers).

He and you are just blowing smoke with your psyops and unsubstantiated race targeting bioweapons.

Why do you advocate for wiping out entire races like some jews do, anyways? Why not just separate nations for races and creeds? Are you a genocidal jew?

Here Girls Always Want to Fuck - sex-meeting.com

You need to read Uncle Ted to understand how and why these technologies will slip out of our control and destroy mankind.

Jones doesn't understand the Hellenic concept of logos, and he doesn't understand early Christianity's indebtedness to Hellenic philosophy, and he doesn't understand the racial/ethnic history of this country, but he does understand the negative consequences of the sexual revolution. I'll drop this here, it's probably the only thing of his worth reading imo and I've pretty much read them all. Even then, take what he says with a grain of salt, like most Christians he suffers from a Dunning-Krueger effect.

its a pretty fucking spurious position he takes & (he rightly), gets criticized for it - but that doesn't negate the other reasonable positions he takes, especially when providing historical context (for his religious views) that are generally buried & heretical to the (((mainstream)))…

Not getting killed and not having any access to cultural outlets is not an overlord position. They lived in Ghettoes in Catholic countries where they were allowed to live.
Sure, prostitutes and bums had it worse - because they dealt with the kikes and were resentful subhumans like them.

Oh I'm sure you know all about the hellenic concept of logos and early christianity.

Stop raping and murdering white people, darkie.

Yeah, I know. Dumb fuck.
Read some fucking history kid, instead of being le white supremacist Jew killer.

You kill the Jews, and you'll have the whole world after you. You expel them back to their "holy" land and they'll thank you for it.
Hitler did this.

This is a fact.

Have fun with your based conversos, I suppose.

This whole idea of "we can all get along" will never happen.
Seeking power, dominance, resources and land are eternal.
You think that after we remove their brothers and sisters from our countries that the nonwhite nations of the world will just say "don't worry, its cool fam"?
The Chinese are already working on bioweapons to depopulate North America and Australia of Europeans.

By "after you", do you mean in common cause?

The only people that would support you are Arab countries.

I already gave examples of the privileges they enjoyed. And invaders not being killed or violently driven away is a special privilege. Jews would have been eradicated from European society centuries ago if not for church protections. In reality, the situation was similar to how shitskin Invaders are treated by the state today. The Jews would persecute Europeans under church protection, and when Europeans opposed them or fought back, the church would step in and punish the Europeans who defended themselves. The church played an essentially identical role in facilitating invasion as Merkel does today.
Christfags like you always uncritically believe false Jewish persecution lies. Jews were comparable to what would today be called "middle class" and had more political power than 99% of European society. They lived in ghettoes because that is what Jews prefer. Kind of like most rich Jews today prefer to live in squalor in Jew York City. It's just because they are a dirty and disgusting subhuman parasites who enjoy living in filth.

Obviously we would work with Arabs to exterminate you.

Nobody cares about Jews, retard.

The Rothschilds in the UK would disagree with you.

What are you the dumbest fuck on the internet? The jews were in Europe as tax-collectors for feudal lords.That's where the protection came from.

To everybody kvetching, Alex Linder is one of the most hardcore anti-Christians in the "movement", yet he can still see the value in Jones' work, and even made audio versions of a few of his books. As long as you can think for yourself, you should be able to get a lot of value from the 90% of the time when we can all pretty much agree that he's right. The only people who should avoid it are the TRSodomite types, who just look for ecelebs to do all their thinking for them, and completely lack the ability to think critically.

Attached: Libido Dominandi.jpg (600x600, 349.53K)

This was because of church orders, dumbass.

yes, everything will just sort itself out while you shitpost on 4chan, smartgoy

Not really. Church tried to ban jewish usury multiple times. You see, Vatican had its own usury practice, inherited from Rome. The monarchs and lords didn't always like Vatican having too much power on them, and preferred the jews they felt like they could get rid of at their leisure.

Court jews =/= all jews. It's not my fault they are garbage people who can't produce anything of value.

another fucking off topic Zig Forums thread

Suck a dick you dick lover Larper.

Attached: 306a4ad11e3177e20b9c541b0918c1eefdf6447eaf6d5e11d741faa2edd7aa78.png (500x694, 187.3K)

Wrong. The Church prevented Jews from being removed from European society. The Church also imposed Christian laws on Europeans, but exempted Jews from these same laws. This allowed Jews to operate as tax collectors in ways that would be considered illegal for Europeans. Therefore, Jews were the most efficient tax collectors and Europe had Jewish tax collectors. You (like a typical low IQ christian) defer to Jews and uncritically accept Jewish revisionist history on this period.

The church created a jewish mafia, imposed it on Europe, and then protected them from any retaliation from the populace.