PragerU sues Google/Youtube

Sauce that any website that uses safe harbor protection is not allowed to curate its content?

By that same logic a super market is a public utility since it requires the electrical grid and the water mains, public infrastructure, to operate. This is a shit argument. If you really want to push this angle, you should be trying to prove that Google gets funding from various alphabets.

Actually the videos prager U makes do not belong to google in any way.

Go back to leftytwat.

Prager U is extremely anti-White. They're in bed with Peterstein and the (((Intellectual Dark Web))).

They are.

this

In your dreams you communist fuck.

Attached: communist_super_market.jpg (490x360, 48.52K)

hey bro have anything else to enlighten us with?

dont get mad , no one cares what they think

Yes things like super markets and pharmacies are public utilities. For example Costco can't prevent you from using their pharmacy even if you don't have a Costco card because the pharmacy is a public utility.

I'm angry that no one can provide a good argument for why jewtube should not be allowed to censor videos for wrongthink. I want it to be true.

Nigger cake baking is a taxed service. Raw food is not.

And for the record faggot he offered to bake the faggot's cake he just refused to put the wedding message on it. At least have a clue what you are talking about you ignorant fuck.

Marsh v. Alabama

user already did, you illiterate pile of nigger turds

Nationalize Youtube

Attached: 1360580607634.jpg (274x323, 73.53K)

why would i provide sustenance of any character to a sodomite user? i'm certainly not obligated to.

Freedom of association = allowed to deny service to anyone for any reason whatsoever. If you can't ban faggots from entering your property you do not have freedom of association.

Youtube practices freedom of association. They ban people from their platform for arbitrary reasons based on their character. If you are in favor of allowing businesses to arbitrarily ban niggers and faggots from entering their property, then you are in favor of youtube banning whoever they please.

This is a bullshit thread and reads like middle school law discussions anyway.

OP sucks cocks and is also not on our side.

So in other words if a church has a community bulletin board, it's illegal for them to stop members of the community from pinning up photos of themselves sodomizing one another while wearing fursuits. So by this logic, it should be illegal for the mods to ban anyone on Zig Forums for shitting up the board.

I'm all for fucking youtube over with this precedent, but if it works it will open a pandora's box that could essentially make it illegal to moderate and curate content on private websites that allow the public to post on them, unless there was some kind of hard user limit set to classify a website as falling under this legal requirement.

Haaaaaaaaaaaaaarrrrrsh.

>>12594863

they would be come a gov entity that would be funded by tax dollars

fuck them left them censor and ruin themselves

Where did I "demand a non-moral argument"? And what is "moral" about forcing private businesses to allow gay pride parades?

REMINDER PRAGERU HAS A WHY WE SHOULD SUPPORT ISREAL VIDEO. THERE IS NO GOOD ECELEBS.

Mark Dice is inarguably good

(((Prager U)))

These fucking kikes are all about lower taxes then shills for giving more tax dollars to their sandnigger pariah state pissrael. Fuck them.

Wrong. Pornography has long been rejected as a public right, but freedom of political speech is not pornography, so your kvetching is double pointless.

From entertainment to educational, hundreds of thousands of videos created by the public, for the public.

Attached: IZvFoga.jpg (550x425, 32.7K)

Promotion of homosexuality and degeneracy is (((free speech))).

kikes suing kikes

ehh

So they accepted a commission before knowing all the deti. Stupid, but not unusual. Should they not have the option to step back from the contract?

*all the details

Okay, go post some porn pictures around your town and learn about your local decency laws. I'm sure your freedumb of speech argument will work.

You copy/pasted this from leftypol.

Every year my city allows a gay pride parade to take place where men walk around naked in front of children. This is considered (((free speech))).

At any rate, I said "promotion of homosexuality and degeneracy", not "displaying pornography", though I did make a joke about furry porn in the other post.

Stop strawmanning.

No the baker refused the commission to decorate their sodomite cake. That is why this entire thing is stupid. It implies that you cannot refuse a commission of an expressive work to a protected class, which is absurd.

Okay. Then I'm not sure who or how that issue was misunderstood, because that's what it looked like to me in the first place. Not to mention hat they specifically targeted that bakery.

PragerU is a bit of a red herring here, it's a controlled op gravity sink for Trump supporters. This isn't a defense of PU.

Google/YT functions more similarly to a public utility than a bake shop.

It's not that they use such services. It would be rather akin to having the supermarket exercise de facto control the roads and the electrical grid, in addition to being the only supermarket.

are you Jewish? he literally makes a moral argument , in response to your moral argument (OP)

then you just stop arguing morals
"OH YE WELL GOV SAYS NUH UH"

I'm pretty sure Alphabet/Google/Youtube are publicly traded, chartered corporations of at least one the United States, which are legal entities, and not under the same set of rules as private, non-corporate/commercial/chartered people. What they do is a privilege granted by the gov't, not a right. A great deal of abuse has been perpetrated by those taking advantage of people not knowing the difference. You don't have a right to commerce on public infrastructure in any way you see fit without any rules or regs.

We care why.

I asked for evidence that DMCA safe harbors must uphold the first amendment in lieu of actively curating content. Are you retarded?

Sue them for fraud cause that is exactly what they are guilty of.

Attached: Dennis Prager - Social Justice.webm (640x360, 2.86M)

It should be pointed out that the video this pic is from this was very late term in the Soviet Union, I think like 89 or 90. Their markets didn't look like this a few years earlier.

They also never had stocks on the level of 1950-1990 western super markets even during the "better" times in the first place.

That's accurate. I'm not sure whether that is entirely a bad thing.

Youtube shutting you down is comparable to an ISP shutting you down.

Because you're a bernie bro who thinks there is too damn much deodorant

Attached: Deodorant_Bernie_Socialist.jpg (600x400, 72.81K)

I think the tech companies know they are going to lose, they just don't care, this is just about 2020. They only need to hold it off for 2 more years.

SCOTUS decision on public access.
These nigger liberals become libertarians when it's their kike masters getting fucked by their own injustice system

My issue is their active role in ensuring our kids grow up totally fucked from the lack of Youtube's compliance to laws like COPPA, not removing the livestream feature for kids so they are getting groomed 24/7 and elsagate type poison.
They have no moral qualm in ignoring all risks to children.

scarymommy.com/youtube-wont-delete-channels-child-molester/

youtu.be/-2AUplJtioY

thesun.co.uk/tech/7940021/paedos-grooming-children-live-on-youtube-as-they-trick-them-to-take-off-clothes/

Yet they swing their banhammer on any and all wrongthink

You couldn't be any further from the truth, but there's a certain subset of American who just cannot get enough of their niggerspic cycle and everything that enables it. It makes them rock hard to think of unlimited nigger magnet they've constructed.

Attached: Screenshot_20181220-131208.png (549x453 192.37 KB, 21.18K)

Then you moved the goalposts.

Until facebook, youtube, twitter , etc no longer hold a monopoly on online communication you can shove your fair play up your ass.
I don't see them banning blm / isis / la raza videos calling for violence against whites.

Snapchat, twitter/periscope etc. do the same and worse things. It's disgusting how they will mix in even pre-teen children with some grown hairy guy masturbating, or naked thot twerking live on cam for thousands to see. They will even allow people to stream porn or engage in sex acts when they know kids are watching. If a kid gets on cam, they get swarmed by pedos who try to get them to do sexual things and get them to go private.

The twitter ceo fucked up by saying that his company is a public space.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marsh_v._Alabama

Guys, I have something important to say about the terminology we use to discuss these things. For the longest time I use to think in these same terms: Left vs Right.

We need to stop using these terms cause they have lost all meaning. In context of the discuss on hand, that is, google/youtube's videos's censorship. Youtube is not left wing nor is it right wing. It has no 'ideology' in the traditional sense of the term but its actions falls into a pattern.

This is the pattern we see in actions of global elite. The pattern is that certain ideas are being forced down the throat of the people, these are what we call liberal/left wing ideas in cultural sphere and colonial right wing ideas in financial sphere. For example youtube's censorship of conservative videos and promotion of what we call liberal ideas. Its not about left or right, its about something else.

All we know is that they want us to move away from a world with borders, shun our cherished ideas like free speech (If we use free speech its hate speech, if they use it its free speech). They want all consensus to break and the new ideas that are being promoted put one group of people against another (blacks vs white, male vs female, muslims vs chiristians, left vs right)

Its simple divide and rule strategy and everyone in power is using it. Be it google/youtube or mainstream media houses or governments around the world. Basically the 1% is pitting the 99% against each other.

When we see things in this light we understand the game better. Internet is being tamed slowly by tech monopolies or maybe has already being tamed to a much higher percent than we suspect.

Wild west days of internet are coming to an end. Just six-seven years ago order born out of chaos ruled the internet now you can see how controlled it has become. Any avid internet can tell that all the mainstream TV stuff is being pushed hard on internet.

Are you trolling or just really really new?

Attached: ClipboardImage.png (530x687, 181.97K)

Guys, I have something important to say about the terminology we use to discuss these things. For the longest time I use to think in these same terms: Left vs Right.

We need to stop using these terms cause they have lost all meaning. In context of the discuss on hand, that is, google/youtube's videos's censorship. Youtube is not left wing nor is it right wing. It has no 'ideology' in the traditional sense of the term but its actions falls into a pattern.

This is the pattern we see in actions of global elite. The pattern is that certain ideas are being forced down the throat of the people, these are what we call liberal/left wing ideas in cultural sphere and colonial right wing ideas in financial sphere. For example youtube's censorship of conservative videos and promotion of what we call liberal ideas. Its not about left or right, its about something else.

All we know is that they want us to move away from a world with borders, shun our cherished ideas like free speech (If we use free speech its hate speech, if they use it its free speech). They want all consensus to break and the new ideas that are being promoted put one group of people against another (blacks vs white, male vs female, muslims vs chiristians, left vs right)

Its simple divide and rule strategy and everyone in power is using it. Be it google/youtube or mainstream media houses or governments around the world. Basically the 1% is pitting the 99% against each other.

When we see things in this light we understand the game better. Internet is being tamed slowly by tech monopolies or maybe has already being tamed to a much higher percent than we suspect.

Wild west days of internet are coming to an end. Just six-seven years ago order born out of chaos ruled the internet now you can see how controlled it has become. Any avid internet can tell that all the mainstream TV stuff is being pushed hard on internet.

Sorry it got sent again. Why did you say 'are you trolling or really really new? What do you mean?

Third position is not a new concept.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Third_Position#History

Is National Socialism really a 3rd position if communism is in the other 2 positions?

It is fine to curate content, but it is too easy to fashion rules to promote ignorance and degeneracy. For instance, a rule that says that negative comments about trans people will be banned on a site that has nothing to do with trans people, like parenting. If a thread appears asking how to transition a child, then you will find that all warnings against doing so, even citing studies or articles, will be deleted. The community may personally believe it is wrong to transition a child, but that will not be reflected in the content. This leads to pluralistic ignorance. The board is no longer a community to discuss topics. It is a propaganda tool. The correct way to curate the content is to delete all trans threads and tell people to go to a different board.

Your city is engaging in propaganda, nothing more.

I hate those zionists

You seem confused. Capitalism and Communism represent Right and Left. National Socialism is neither.

Attached: hitler's socialism.jpg (400x400 149.92 KB, 79.59K)

kike stooges.

Only if you re-define communism. State owned or directed capital is the premise for the communist/socialist model.

Sorry it got sent again. Why did you say 'are you trolling or really really new? What do you mean?

Of course its not but then we are still using their language and thereby playing their game.

No need to redefine anything. What we need is a new definition to describe the current situation and related concepts. Otherwise it results in confused discourse.

Isn't that a result of presenting socialism as if it were opposed to, or at least not in the same leftist category as, communism? Socialism results in state owned and directed capital, the same as communism.

Attached: stalin.gif (850x400 1.99 MB, 51.58K)

What you are saying is the kind of theoritical bunkum I am talking about. All the systems direct capital whether they admit it or not. Capitalism, Communism, Socialism are fanciful words with no relation to reality at all. Our current system is promoting this debate over dead theories and ruling over us laughing comfortable in knowledge that we have no idea of the prevailing politico-economic system that rule over us and are happy to debate about stupid theories of philosophers who died decades ago.

Not equivalent you lefttard.

Best comment itt so far. I'm going to see how long it takes imbeciles who think Costco is a public utility to be convinced otherwise.

Grocery stores close if they don't make a profit. Costco won't let me in with out my Costco card. I've tried it.

I'm still laughing about the Kroger that closed in a local 'hood' because the rats stole more groceries than they purchased.
City Council informs them the government doesn't control Kroger. Rats BTFO… have to walk 5 miles to Food Lion to shoplift.

Same thing with YouTube. Unless the government steps in and regulates them, they can ban anyone for any reason, ultimately… which is exactly what they've been doing.

Seek alternatives… because I seriously doubt we the people can convince corrupt politicians to regulate big tech. Would we even want state-run YouTube? Can only imagine that would be even worse.

It's a monopoly because PayPal and banks won't allow competition. It shouldn't be allowed to break the Constitution of the United States. If the government allows YouTube to ignore the law then it should allow citizens to ignore the law and burn it down.

juden attacking juden

well in all seriousness
GOOD

Attached: adolfhitler1930.jpg (241x315, 11.54K)

BTW this is old news and pragerU's lawsuit was dissmissed

Let me guess OP, it's da jooz fault

there it is

he even uses the word vansinnig.. he doesn't know what that really means I think…. or did he? he has two eyes, yet he want dead people

This thread proves lolbergs should be gassed.

Excellent that you're forced into your CIA containment browser just to post meaningless shit like that Moishe

mossad on tor, how surprising

I know you all have to do this, but ffs can you even learn? look it's the same shit over and over, something that your leadership should tell you..ffs we(norway) made mossad, what are you doing now?

there is 1 major video service on this world and if you get banned from it you basically get silenced
there are 1000000 bakers on this planet and its very easy to pick one who is not a devoted Christ who doesn't want to insult god

sage for being an extremely gay slide thread

All that aid money and they won't pay for VPNs to help the economy. Shameful.

How surprising given that (((Dennis Prager))) is the owner.

And yet we get only half of that, wonder (((why))).