Because whether his information is true or not, it's nebulous and a huge portion of his message is that the people who rule you will handle everything, so you don't need to prepare. If you need me to tell you why that's bad you don't belong here.
SGT
Here's how I see it. Q puts up bullshit predictions and deep state discussion topics. Some of the users look into the discussion topics. They're as retarded as any other group of channers, but some of them actually dig up good intel. The threads are 70% disruptive spam but people pick out the worthwhile posts into the notables.
Chelsea clinton is shmoozing because shes one of the "nobles" progeny, just like turd jr in canada and much like turd is probably not the farhers kid And like turd has a desire to be in office as "one of the chosen nobles" despite being clearly too retarded to ever hopd office as anything other than a puppet with 100 hands up their ass. As for pence, we meme but at the end of tue day he is a neocon, just a much more calm and less outspoken one than the majority.
That's not what I was asking. You're avoiding the question and building up a strawman in the process. I won't disagree that letting others handle things for you is foolish, but you also go based on the assumption that anyone is listening to that fact. You also aren't taking into account that your average normie is relatively 'powerless' as far as computers are concerned, but not all of them. As points out, and this actually applies to the general populace as well, the Q predictions and overall attention to the deepstate and underhanded dealings have given inspiration to many people to actually start asking questions. For anons, it's given points of interest to dig, while for your average normie, it's made that lightbulb light up overhead as to what's really going on.
I mean, you know something is having an effect when you see the average normie on someplace like facebook or twitter, actually admitting they think that Parkland or Sandy Hook was a hoax. So regardless of the accuracy of his 'predictions', it's getting a lot of attention on things that the kikes don't want attention on. It's why I think there is some legitimacy to Q because of how hard shills go at screaming 'muh q larp'. I mean, you had a few who commented it was a LARP when it first surfaced, but that was normal. They didn't start screaming as loudly as they do now until Roseanne brought Q into the public light and drew attention. Now, they're hammering hard at the MOSSAD angle when their attempts at convincing people 'it's just a LARP' fell through, and Q started gaining more ground and support.
Building 7 is very very important, but let's not forget Building 6. It's easy to pass over Building 6; it's only about 8 or 10 stories high but the roof blew off it before any of the towers collapsed. Rick Seigel Wall St quant and precocious adolescent math genius videotaped what he saw and time stamped it with his transistor radio. He checked Columbia University's seismograph. The entire roof and core of Building 6 blew away leaving a big square hole all the way to the basement.
Full video "911 Eyewitness, What I Saw"
youtu.be
Short segment
No people were already waking up and Q is there to distract and mislead them. You're overshooting this whole thing because you want there to be a man on a white horse.
Also, stop and think about NORAD. Since the 1950's Canada and the US have spent at least a trillion dollars on NORAD. On 911 NORAD went AWOL for an hour and forty minutes while four hijacked airliners wandered all over the most closely watched and heavily policed air corridor in the world with NO NORAD response whatsover (apparently).
In Oct 1999 Payne Stewart's little private jet strayed off course for a few seconds and failed to respond to ATC. NORAD was on his wingtip within two minutes..
Lt. Col Bob Bowman of the USAF has something to say about this.
He's overshooting this whole thing because he's a zionist disinformation agent who needs to signal boost Q because it presents a narrative version of historical and current events that is supportive of the jewish occupation of Western civilization.
...
So we're going to ad hom then? Are you going to answer my question and provide proof of your assertions? Or are you going to sit here and continue screaming 'kike' at me and conjure up more accusations? Up to you since I'm actually willing to read what you have.