From Mein Kampf:

From Mein Kampf:

Nature generally takes certain measures to correct the effect which racial inter-breeding produces. She is not much in favour of the mongrel.

Not only are they deprived of the higher qualities that belonged to the parents who participated in the first crossing, but they also lack definite will-power and vigorous vital energies, owing to the lack of harmony in the quality of their blood.

At all critical moments in which a person of pure racial blood makes correct decisions, that is to say, decisions that are coherent and uniform, the person of mixed blood will become confused and take half-measures.

Hence we see that a person of mixed blood is not only relatively inferior to a person of pure blood, but is also doomed to become extinct more rapidly.

From Mein Kampf:

One can breed a herd of animals, but from a mixture of this kind, men such as have created and founded civilisations would not be produced. The mission of humanity might then be considered at an end.

Those who do not wish that the earth should fall into such a condition must realise that it is the task of the Germanic States in particular to see to it that the process of bastardization is brought to a stop.

Our contemporary generation of weaklings will naturally decry such a policy and whine and complain about it as an encroachment on the most sacred of human rights.

But there is only one right that is sacrosanct and that right is at the same time a most sacred duty, namely, to protect the racial purity so that the best types of human beings may be preserved and thus render possible a more noble development of humanity itself.

A völkisch State ought, in the first place, to raise matrimony above the level of continual racial adulteration. The State should consecrate it as an institution for the procreation of creatures made in the likeness of God Himself and not of monsters that are a mixture of man and ape.

The protest which is put forward in the name of humanity does not befit the mouth of a generation that makes it possible for the most depraved degenerates to propagate their kind, thereby imposing unspeakable suffering on their own products and on their contemporaries, while, on the other hand, contraceptives, are permitted and sold in every drug store and even by street hawkers, so that babies should not be born to the healthiest of our people.

In this present State of ours, whose function it is to be the guardian of law and order, our national bourgeoisie looks upon it as a crime to make procreation impossible for syphilitics and those who suffer from tuberculosis or hereditary diseases, and also for cripples and imbeciles.

But the practical prevention of procreation among millions of our very best people is not considered an evil, nor does it offend against the moral code of this hypocritical class, but rather suits their short-sightedness and mental lethargy, for otherwise they would have to rack their brains to find an answer to the question of how to create conditions for the feeding and maintaining of those yet unborn beings who will be the healthy representatives of our nation and will, in their turn, have to perform the same task for the generation that is to follow them.

How devoid of ideals and how ignoble is the whole contemporary system! No effort is being made to perfect the breed for the future, but things are simply allowed to slide.

The fact that the churches join in condoning this sin against the image of God, even though they continue to emphasise the dignity of that image, is quite in keeping with their present activities.

They talk about the Spirit, but they allow man, as the embodiment of the Spirit, to degenerate to the proletarian level. Then they gape with amazement when they realise how small is the influence of the Christian Faith in their own country and how depraved and ungodly is this riff-raff which is physically degenerate and therefore morally degenerate also. To balance this state of affairs they try to convert the Hottentots, the Zulus and the Kaffirs and to bestow on them the blessings of the Church.

While our European people, God be praised and thanked, are left to become the victims of moral depravity, the pious missionary goes out to Central Africa and establishes mission-stations for Negroes.

Attached: 1.jpg (727x1024, 95.09K)

Other urls found in this thread:

theoccidentalobserver.net/2013/04/08/monogamy-and-the-uniqueness-of-european-civilization/
goodreads.com/book/show/15707651-sex-and-culture
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Commentarii_de_Bello_Gallico
classics.mit.edu/Caesar/gallic.6.6.html
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Germania_(book)
mnn.com/earth-matters/animals/photos/11-animals-that-mate-for-life/wolves
upworthy.com/why-wolves-mate-for-life-and-22-other-interesting-things-to-know-about-these-animals
westernwildlife.org/gray-wolf-outreach-project/biology-behavior-4/
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

Matrimony will not ensure preservation of the folk. It is dysgenic.

What is the best translation of Mein Kampf?

That's why the state ought to "raise matrimony above the level of continual racial adulteration."

...

Exactly this. Children deserve to be put upon our shoulders as we bring them into existence. We must give them everything we have, every advantage, biological, material, educational, etc. Only by exalting the child can we preserve society. Healthy Marriage should be the sole permission to create said children; As only healthy children can come from healthy unions. I am, of course, in favor of not allowing the sick and malformed to be born. To allow such sickness into our midst drags down the whole nation. It can take 3 adults to care for one defective child, so if we were to approach a ratio of 25% of the total population being so sick we could face extinction. (As an aside, only a healthy body and mind can play the part of 1/2 of a healthy union. It is therefore duty to maintain and improve ourselves, in what we eat, in who we interact with, in how we worship, in what we learn, etc. )

Upon the topic of extinction, and by extension the genocide of our enemies, there is nothing wrong with exterminating them. We don't apologize to a spider within the walls of our house, and we shouldn't apologize to any non-human/non-white we kill. So to any user here that thinks white on black crime is ever unjustified YOU ARE WRONG. If you believe in the Law of Strength/Nature you should already believe this. If you worship a man-made religion that suggests we allow our Nation/People to become diluted, preyed upon, injured, etc. leave. We aren't looking to make friends with the tigers of the jungle, we are looking to carve out space for humans from that jungle.

Both of you fuck off for your short sightedness. I am advocating for higher standards for women rather than your "if it bleeds, breed it" standards. The reason that we are in a dysgenic misama is because we only require proper eugenic standards for 50% of the population (males)…the rest (females) are given a pass because they have a pussy. Only the top echelon of our people should reproduce.

...

I quoted Hitler.

I don't care who you quote if you are wrong. What good does it do me to throw my own people under a bus for someone else's mistaken ideology? Was Hilter an expert in reproductive biology or biological engineering? 'Marriage' is a tool of the semitic church it has NOTHING to do with Natural Law. Because it is not 'in step' with biological law it is a dysgenic force rather than a eugenic force. Even natural law is neutral allowing lower quality and weak women and men to reproduce…we need something better than this.

What would you propose?

Both sexes need rigorous testing for fitness, emotional, mental, moral and physical. People are only allowed to breed when they have passed a rigorous testing and have proven themselves worthy of the privilege of breeding via some contribution to society and by maintaining their status through life. Anyone who allows their status to decline (becomes obese, smokes, or takes up other death habits); their offspring pay a social penalty in terms of their overall fitness. So the children are downgraded based on the longevity and life habits of their parents.

Thus we will select the best genes from both sexes along with assessing their health and well being over a longer time frame. However, snatching a 13 pussy just because it bleeds, like the semites do to 'breed their 84 average IQ' is not going to cut it for our people, we must breed complete dominance and mastery into our DNA. You have to make a significant contribution to society BEFORE you are allowed to breed and you have to live a clean and healthy life or your offsprings breeding status will decline as well. This used to be well known when people lived in closely connected villages but since we are more global and mobile now we need to alter the requirements and social regulations for reproduction to ensure the highest possible outcome for our own people.

Sometimes they take direct action. Pic related.


Fair enough. Pic also related.

Attached: This_Guy_Right_Here.jpg (580x376, 100.2K)

Selective breeding makes a lot of sense but one puts a lot of trust in those doing the selection. What if a state were to start selecting citizens for obedience? One might breed a nation of slaves. The benefits of selection are often discussed but the system of selection and mechanics of the body "doing the selection" is rarely mentioned.

We are already a nation of slaves.

No shit. Why make it worse by outright breeding it into the population through state mandated mate selection?

You can't make it worse than it already is outside of completely crashing humanity. Most of humanity exists within a pure slave state, but I would argue with you that this was designed INTO HUMANITY from the beginning rather than something that was 'emergent' within the current populace.

You keep arguing that we're all slaves, and while that may be true, that doesn't mean that you can't make it worse. If even 10% of the population are unwilling slaves, you could further reduce that percentage through government breeding programs.
Hmm, tell me how evolution did this because the Bible says God gave us free will. Your argument only exists from an atheist perspective. That would mean that an elite class of Chads from the stone age has been causing us underlings to select for obedience for millenia. What a retarded argument.

First we have to remove all shitskins from our territories. Meanwhile, and following, we must remove all kikes from this plane of existence. Then we can see if peaceful coexistence is possible. Most likely it isn't, at least not with the lowest of races. They must be purged. Then we can begin in earnest some kind of greater ideal if it is needed, beyond not allowing the genetically weakest of us to produce. Stopping and reversing our degeneration is 80% of eugenics and must be 1st priority until our greatest threats have been taken care of one way or another.

(heil'd)
I would agree with this. Stop miscegenation. Give people the option to opt-in to eugenic breeding programs if they would rather adopt tall Aryan boys and girls than raise their own untermensch, but do not prohibit natural born citizens from breeding.

Causality denies free will. The universe cannot exist without being deterministic (enchained). That includes you as well. You do not have free will…nor did you in the Garden, that is why the tree was placed there, so that you could and would fulfill your destiny. It is slightly funny how much credit you have given yourself.
Not without completely crashing the entire pyramidal structure. It is a fine balance that 1) keeps you self sustaining and independent as a slave without giving you the free will to overthrow the parasitic oppressors (which you would never consider to even THINK ABOUT without clear permission and it would never be overthrow of the people who are parasitic against you but you would destroy inanimate objects or worse the INNOCENT KIN and FAMILY MEMBERS to vent your rage). You will never take it out on the people who deserve it because they will never give you the permission to 'do so'.

I believe you meant that we need to remove them from the globe. In other words, they have proven eugenically unfit for life and should be exterminated with extreme prejudice completely from the planet. There is only one supreme culture on the planet, OUR CULTURE. We are the only DNA worth keeping.

the behaviors in question are genetic. why do wolves have monogamy? is it because of an ideology that they have or is it because of nature?

we already have that. they are called courtship rituals. maybe you're antisocial yourself or this is just a consequence of living in modern society, but you're retarded if you think this garbage would work or even be remotely necessary in a healthy society. this stuff can be very easily managed and guided along with far less obtrusive means.
great, but you can only do this by addressing the root of the issue. if it is tried with such shallow means as you suggest then it won't work. if done properly then it is much easier to do *and* the result is superior.
the methodology you are suggesting is judaic and antisocial.

Wolves do not have monogamy. You are mistaken and need to look into the matter further. Nor do the birds you all are always prattling on about.
These are ridiculously underwhelming measures of human performance and behavior (besides not addressing the long term health and well being of genetic strains) aside from which they are routinely clouded by emotional issues on the part of the participants. You don't really give a shit if the European species dies out because you want things to continue using the same SHIT METHODS that we have now while all other races are going to be performing rigorous eugenic manipulation as well as genetic engineering to ENSURE that their people are the highest quality and selected for the best success that can be had for humanity and their own genetic future.

Just admit that you are selfish and afraid that you would not meet the rigorous standards that would be required to pass on your genes. Come clean about not giving a fuck about the health and well being of your people but only caring for your own selfish interests…you are a biological 'animal' user.

My methods are the only thing that will work, god forbid that we leave gene selection up to males (they are far to emotional and muh dick oriented to ever properly assess the importance of the matter)…yet another problem with 'marriage'…men are only capable due to underlying selfish traits of their biology (and its subsequent fragility of their own biological position) to make appropriate selections for the continuation of the species. Jizz is cheap, muh dick mentality rules, our genetics suffer your 'intervention' rather than the consideration of what is good for the European species.

men are not capable

The universe is fundamentally built upon randomness.
See quantum mechanics. Much averages out into the classical laws of the macroscopic universe, but not necessarily so on very small scales. This leads to a degree of unpredictability due to butterfly effects.
Thought itself appears to contains elements of randomness. Neurons function at such a small scale that quantum mechanical properties may manifest, and indeed may be integral to brain function.
Thus "predestination" BTFO.
Furthermore, there is a core randomness to genetic mutation. Thus life contains multiple difficult or impossible to predict elements.
Volkism requires idealism. Go be a nihilist somewhere else.
Also, humans were not "created" to be slaves. First, there are large differences between racial groups. There are very few meaningful generalizations that can be made across all groups. Secondly, human groups generally evolved (not created) to be tribal. This means cooperation. This has been abused and coopted by bad intentioned people.
From a religious standpoint, it is the judaism and "annunaki" cults that believe that humans (or most humans) were "made to be slaves."
Nope.
The fact that you espouse such views does you no credit.

I don't agree with this.
I am extremely suspicious of anyone espousing such views. So, too, should all be.
Volkism is opposing genocide, not supporting it.
The idea that "nationalism leads to genocide" is one of the core narrative myths of the multicultists. It is widely used as a weapon against nationalist thought.
No. "Multicultural diversity globalism" is genocide, not nationalism.
Nationalism means separation, not genocide.

First, reestablish White homelands for White people only with Volkist governments and economies. (through peaceful separation) This is the first and most important step.
Second, develop the infrastructure for widespread enhanced in-vitro fertilization with genetic testing of embryos. Make it free or very low cost for all who want it. Strongly encourage the relatively "unfit" to use such systems. Focus on good health and well-rounded generalist ability. The system would involve the harvest of multiple eggs from the mother which would then be fertilized by the father in-vitro. They would then be grown in-vitro for a bit, then each would be genetically screened. The one, two, or three embryos with the best combination of traits would then be implanted into the mother. It would be akin to rolling a handful of dice several times and picking the best roll.
There would be none of the dangers of genetic engineering, little suffering, and strong positive selection pressure.
Furthermore, in case it was not obvious we (White people) need numbers. A thoroughly average White person is already the product of the tens of thousands of years of evolutionary pressure that has gone into the creation of the White race (and its subgroups). IE, reestablish White homelands first, then sensible and humane eugenics after.

Women are more emotionally compromised than men.
This is genetic and biological fact.
You are a delusional feminist, apparently.
The selection pressure that CREATED White people has always been male dominated.
Women belong in the women's sphere. As in, homemaking and motherhood, not leadership.

Your radical feminism has been made abundantly clear.
Women in power ruin society.
Throughout history civilization has been created, maintained, and advanced almost solely by men. The role of women is to be support for men. It is a valuable and important role, but it is a fundamentally different role.
Women should be dedicating themselves to being better women in the women's sphere, not towards competing with men in the men's sphere.

theoccidentalobserver.net/2013/04/08/monogamy-and-the-uniqueness-of-european-civilization/

The Supreme Court, in Reynolds v. United States (1878):

Polygamy has always been odious among the northern and western nations of Europe, and, until the establishment of the Mormon Church, was almost exclusively a feature of the life of Asiatic and of African people.


goodreads.com/book/show/15707651-sex-and-culture

"The whole of human history does not contain a single instance of a group becoming civilized unless it has been absolutely monogamous, nor is there any example of a group retaining its culture after it has adopted less rigorous customs."

Attached: 4.jpg (638x426 91.05 KB, 161.71K)

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Commentarii_de_Bello_Gallico

Commentāriī dē Bellō Gallicō (English: Commentaries on the Gallic War), also Bellum Gallicum (English: Gallic War), is Julius Caesar's firsthand account of the Gallic Wars, written as a third-person narrative. In it Caesar describes the battles and intrigues that took place in the nine years he spent fighting the Germanic peoples and Celtic peoples in Gaul that opposed Roman conquest.

classics.mit.edu/Caesar/gallic.6.6.html

The Germans differ much from these usages, for they have neither Druids to preside over sacred offices, nor do they pay great regard to sacrifices. They rank in the number of the gods those alone whom they behold, and by whose instrumentality they are obviously benefited, namely, the sun, fire, and the moon; they have not heard of the other deities even by report. Their whole life is occupied in hunting and in the pursuits of the military art; from childhood they devote themselves to fatigue and hardships. Those who have remained chaste for the longest time, receive the greatest commendation among their people; they think that by this the growth is promoted, by this the physical powers are increased and the sinews are strengthened. And to have had knowledge of a woman before the twentieth year they reckon among the most disgraceful acts; of which matter there is no concealment, because they bathe promiscuously in the rivers and [only] use skins or small cloaks of deer's hides, a large portion of the body being in consequence naked.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Germania_(book)

The Germania, written by the Roman historian Publius Cornelius Tacitus around 98 AD and originally entitled On the Origin and Situation of the Germans (Latin: De Origine et situ Germanorum), was a historical and ethnographic work on the Germanic tribes outside the Roman Empire.

Tacitus' descriptions of the Germanic character are at times favorable in contrast to the opinions of the Romans of his day. He holds the strict monogamy and chastity of Germanic marriage customs worthy of the highest praise, in contrast to what he saw as the vice and immorality rampant in Roman society of his day

Attached: 2.jpg (1890x3426 1.93 MB, 640.93K)

Busy trying to deny reality and biological imperative of the entire planet?
Guess what? You are completely wrong.
Other races are currently following my agenda and they will be the masters and your defective children, who are not eugenic will be their slaves, forever, because once this race is begun by the chinese, YOU WILL NEVER CATCH UP and they will simply kill your offspring to make room for their own.
SELFISH, SELFISH, SELFISH
SHORTSIGHTED SELFISH FUCKS
YOU DON'T CARE ABOUT YOUR RACE, YOU ONLY CARE FOR 'MUH DICK'
Kike science and lies. All matter is intimately connected; none of it is random. This is akin to saying that our ancestors were monkeys because the kikes say so.

Am i the only one that thinks Mein Kampf is bullshit and was made up after the war?

Good one.

Zig Forums's case against race mixing is pretty weak considering that Can't Dodge the Rodge is the only example they have ever heard of.

Genetically engineering humans into eusocial bug people seems to be more up China's alley at the moment.

Actually I heard that from someone who was pretty well connected, but no matter how hard I tried they wouldn't talk about it anymore. They said that Hitler was not the author and that it had 'authors' (similar to the way that Jesus was not the author of the NT) but not him…that it was cleverly crafted by highly knowledgeable and manipulative secret people behind the scenes. It was destined to become the 'staple tome' for the next 1,000 years the same way the NT was for the last 2,000 years. I could never get them to reveal what they really knew though, no matter how many times I asked.

You're a fucking autist and are the last person who should be lecturing anyone on breeding stock.


Nature is better than the state at selection. The state would rather breed easily controllable dumb-asses. The problem is that once a state itself becomes powerful enough, it no longer suffers from selective pressures. Natural selection acts on entire societies as well as individuals, and success breeds pettiness and internal power struggles. Once there are no more external enemies the society turns against itself. If you put the state in charge of breeding standards it will start off breeding supermen to crush their enemies, but once those supermen become a dangerous liability the state will begin breeding effeminate soymen.

Attached: evolution.jpg (781x1600, 235.11K)

who wrote it after the war and for what purpose? have you read it?

Autists are the future, user. You NPC's are the past, you are dying out on this planet because you can't adapt to the future.

Precicely my point, good sir. Thank you for stating it more eloquently.

Who you calling an ape?!?!

Attached: Snout.jpg (525x511, 31.55K)

The state is ineffective compared to nature (the feminine) females are better at picking good mates for their children than men are at any time. We should let women freely chose any mate they desire as long as we understand that the children are their sole responsibility.

Wolves mate for life.

Attached: WolvesMateForLife2.jpg (1000x750, 181.11K)

SIMON MOL
I
M
O
N

M
O
L

You autistic niggers can't even hold a serious conversation with each other. You're literally clowns playing your fag game and wasting all your productive time chasing your cummies and believing that this shit will continue on forever.

Go hang yourselves.

Try harder. Hitler and all the great women in history would have had you flayed alive.

I just said this.
No, a combination of the two is best. Woman chooses man, while man also chooses woman. Many people refer to this as "falling in love." A fat frumpy woman might do a great job at mate selection in choosing the fittest male, but the male must also select against the fat frumpy woman, who should be left childless and bred out just as the manlet is.

Reading tards go back and forth arguing about mate selection is demoralizing in and of itself.

No they don't you stupid niggers. Look it up.

...

No one wants 'your cock' user. All we need is a sperm donation.

"11 animals that mate for life"
"Wolves
Often portrayed as tricksters and con artists in popular folklore, wolves have a family life that is more loyal and pious than most human relationships. Normally, packs consist of a male, a female and their offspring, essentially making wolf packs akin to a nuclear family. The older offspring even help take care of their younger siblings.
Occasionally, a lone wolf will be welcomed into a pack. A pack can range from just three or four wolves to as many as 20, depending on the food supply in the area. "

mnn.com/earth-matters/animals/photos/11-animals-that-mate-for-life/wolves

Top ranking SS officers were manlets already.

You niggers don't history very well.

LOOK IT UP YOU DUMB SHIT! THEY ARE NOT 'MONOGAMOUS'. QUIT WITH YOUR DUMB FUCKING FANTASY…

WEW

AND NEITHER ARE THE BIRDS YOU DUMB SHITS LIKE TO REFERENCE EITHER.

AT BEST THEY ARE BOTH SOCIALLY BONDED WHICH MEANS ALL SPECIES HAVE SEX OUTSIDE THEIR 'MONOGAMOUS' RELATIONSHIP.

ALL OF THEM

see

Monogamy is a KIKE social invention.

No you fucktard, look to a BIOLOGIST. Not an internet 'feel good site'.

"Why wolves mate for life and 22 other interesting things to know about these animals."
upworthy.com/why-wolves-mate-for-life-and-22-other-interesting-things-to-know-about-these-animals

"Wolf Ecology and Behavior"
westernwildlife.org/gray-wolf-outreach-project/biology-behavior-4/

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Germania_(book)

The Germania, written by the Roman historian Publius Cornelius Tacitus around 98 AD and originally entitled On the Origin and Situation of the Germans (Latin: De Origine et situ Germanorum), was a historical and ethnographic work on the Germanic tribes outside the Roman Empire.

Tacitus' descriptions of the Germanic character are at times favorable in contrast to the opinions of the Romans of his day. He holds the strict monogamy and chastity of Germanic marriage customs worthy of the highest praise, in contrast to what he saw as the vice and immorality rampant in Roman society of his day

Stay mad, roastie whore. I will be fucking my girlfriend who is 5 years younger than I am and we will be raising SS soldiers together. Stay mad.

IDK why I bother. You only read what you want to…wolves are not 'monogamous' and they routinely have relations with other animals inside their pack and outside their pack in order to keep inbreeding at a minimum. Europeans USED TO FOLLOW THIS MODEL before the kikes destroyed our culture. It is the same with the birds you all like to claim are 'monogamous' as well. They paired 'sterile' males with females and they all had eggs even though the 'monogamous male' was sterile. Same with Europeans, we had a lot more variety in sexual partners before the kike slavers showed up to breed WEAKNESS INTO OUR DNA by enforcing beta breeding programs.

Roasties are mad they can't into lurches, and manlets won't touch them because hot qt's in petite bodies are everywhere.

DNA studies prove you wrong, no matter what the kike histories say.

That never happened. Marriage and monogamy is a K selected behavior which is very much ingrained in Germanic cultures. The Greeks and Eomans may have been rootless degenerates, but breeding was a German thing that was enforced.

How else do you think an entire race of redheads was created?

Stay mad roastie whore. I love my young and nubile girlfriend. I bet you laugh like a horse. You know what my girl is like?
She smiles gracefully without revealing one teeth and her demanors are absolutely classy.

Stay SEETHING, USED UP WHORE

The wolves in their pack are brothers and sisters.
The males leave the pack when they're old enough, and join other packs to choose a mate.

The Roman state was fully kiked by the time Tactus wrote that.
I can wait the two weeks until you are bored and furiously pounding one out to porn online. 'My girlfriend is going to keep me totally sexually entertained for the rest of my life." In the meantime I is desperately searching for teen asian porn that he can beat off too…Lol…sure dude, what it take to lie this much to yourself.


Fuck are you dumb.

meantime he is desperately

Why exactly is matrimony dysgenic? Do you even have an argument or are you just posturing like you have one?

An entire race of redheads?

Gee IDK because EVERYONE WAS FUCKING EVERYONE ELSE…maybe. Jesus fucking christ…

Which is why Tacitus was "prasing" the Roman in that book, right, roastie whore?
Go shill your used up syphilis pussy somewhere else, child of Nurgle.

The kikes use matrimony to breed a slave class by giving beta males the opportunity to reproduce when they don't deserve it. They are not the best and brightest of their people and they shouldn't reproduce because it weakens the gene pool. Women should be allowed to select the biggest, best and brightest they can and mate with them instead, producing intelligent and capable offspring rather than SLAVE CLASS SERVILE BETA OFFSPRING.

You are boring. You know nothing of the 6,000 year long kike control of the Earth or the true history.

Lemme ask you something? Do the kikes practice what they preach to the BETA SLAVE CLASS?

WHY NOT?

Fuck you are jewish.

I usually don't do this but I don't think I have anything to add to this img macro so I'm just gonna post it.

I see where your logic is at but it seems like an excuse for hedonism. I never wanted to fuck a bunch of different women. I wanted my perfect pure waifu. And you wouldn't call me a beta male. I disagree with you and think that the servility is a product of social engineering/demoralization/psychological warfare that's become all encompassing since the technological revolution. I don't think the whole alpha/beta thing is as black and white as you suppose.

Attached: 1546829893857.png (1469x1323, 2.68M)

No I am not a jew…answer the fucking question! We know that kikes are attempting to breed a race of ubermensch. Are they doing it by breeding FUCKING BETAS into their entire genetic line OR NOT?!

And I am not talking about the fake assed mongrels that we call 'kikes' which are nothing but half niggers. I am talking about the REAL KIKES. Are they busy incorporating FUCKING BETA DNA into their ubermensch?

You're talking to the wrong poster.

Yeah but the mechanism for this is miscegenation, not the institution of marriage, which is plainly attacked by marxist-socialists for all the world to see.

I don't imagine that there will be any 'sex' involved at all in proper eugenics user. Who would bother? It is an issue of genetic superior DNA not 'hedonistic fucking'…hedonistic fucking is what 'matrimony' is about…it means that males have access to a 'guaranteed pussy' which is the epitome of 'hedonistic fucking'.

You have the whole thing backwards.

I mean this looks like an attack of the family unit. Under the system you're supposing, the nuclear family isn't, creating a power vacuum and leaving the state to become the de facto guardians of the children.

No. Almost the entire race of SLAVE MALES that women have to chose from is contaminated with BETA DNA…that is what is wrong with Aryan genetics. Too many generations of BETAS teaching their children to be better BETAS and having good BETA thinking. You guys actually tell me that 'you are more successful' meaning that you raise good slave citizens if there is a father present in the household to 'keep the children in line' and raise more beta cuck citizens as good slaves of the state. Welllllll fuck you guys. We should be raising HELLRAISERS that no one can dominate…not little bow tied cuck betas.

You mean like a language that has no dictionary so the communist whites constantly lie about where my seed is going?

It is an attack on the KIKE SYSTEM that we are operating in. The one that is destroying us from WITHIN. Every aspect of your life is a product of their system. You 'Aryans' are so cucked you can't even imagine cumming into a woman that you captured as a war bounty. Put your bow tie back on you 'almost homosexual' and go back to your barista job at starbucks.

Unless you're talking about going full Mormon. Is that what you want?

Yeah, you're a Jew. Or a Muslim. But deffo not a white boy. Nice talking to you.

Fine pick a woman and fuck her then. If I tell you it isn't about hedonism you respond that if you don't get to fuck her you can't be certain.

No, user. I am a German female who sees the writing on the wall for our people unless we snap out of the semitic systems that have utterly conquered our minds over the last 2,000 years of the kikes occupation of our lands.

My seed is worth a small fortune, I don't just throw it around unless it's getting flushed immediately.

Sure thing brah.
YOU KNOW THE RULE, ROASTIE

Weve been down this road already.

R I G H T…
Ok enjoy your DNA's death. Do you know why biologically the ratio of males to female births in royal households is 63% male? It is because you are supposed to FUCK A LOT OF WOMEN AND PASS ON SUPERIOR DNA…and that includes a lot of the women that you are 'ruler' over.

You wish…you fucking cheat…"my girlfriend is perfect" I don't wanna look at anyone elses tits.

You are such a fucking LIAR.

You jewish niggerwhore, that was exactly my point. Birds, while K-selected, can afford to be promiscuous because raising a chick takes hardly a few months. Even then, they still use the monogamous child-rearing strategy. Wolves and Humans can't afford to be cock-carouseling roasties because raising a pup or baby to the point they can survive on their own takes years, and the couple is ready to reproduce again before even the firstborn is of age. This leads to them staying together unless the other dies or becomes incapable, different from birds.

Have we? And…? What is the problem? 63% is a notable statistical anomaly that has a purpose.

The children should be the sole responsibility of the person who bears them (so females). NOT some random dude that allows DNA to be injected into her pussy.

It is no longer your 'responsibility' to 'raise' children…indeed we would be much better off if you were OUT OF THE PICTURE and not teaching your offspring to be BETAS.

Whites used to have a fucking clan of above 10 kids.

This whole muh nuclear family is a jewish lie.

Women are BORN beta.

Women can never be alpha since they just exist to be fucked.

That doesn't work, beef-sandwich.

I have enough experience with single mothers in my neighborhood to know that their children are uncontrollable monsters. WE NEED MORE OF THIS IN SOCIETY…we are too sedate and passive we don't need beta fathers 'raising more good citizens'.

I am in awe of your conjecture.
I have seen a lot of women ride the cock carousel and none of the men killed the children who weren't theirs. Ignored them, beat them, sexually molested them if they were pedos but I have never seen one kill a child.

Because we're in a kike-society, held back by laws. The most they can do is avoid single mothers, when what they would do unchained is kill her offspring and then produce his own with her.