Modern Marxists are unintentionally doing NatSocs a favor, but for all the wrong reasons. Their only use in life is to agitate (((corporations/international bankers))) and fuck up Pissrael's Greater Pissrael plans via BDS along with the "progressive reformists". Anything else and they are just basically following whatever (((capitalistic))) trend (homosexuality, feminism, open borders, race mixing, etc.) they can find and claim it's "woke af and revolutionary" and "essential for the proletariat".
Why can't they just admit that they don't really want Whites extinct? They love and use their inventions, after all. Ungratefulness isn't new for them, but still. Are they actually paper tigers or not?
They're not gonna get their communist "utopia" anytime soon if they keep supporting mass Third World immigration and feminism. Because by Marxist logic this would mean they are detrimental to the proletariat, but they don't think that anymore. They have no reason to support these degenerate things, by which in reality actually sprung up from corporate kikes, unless if they are really this desperate to make themselves look very appealing to anti-White shitskins. They are not truly against (((capitalism))), because if they were they would have never believed in anti-White/anti-rural Jewish academia that mostly has nothing to do with actual Soviet communism.
They have no principals, which is why the Soviets of old would have gunned them all down. Which is also why they are secretly trying to erase whatever Soviet idea they seem to be "racist/bigoted". They used to call supporters of (((multiculturalism))) "rootless cosmopolitans" (but never Jewish because of course they didn't). Even comrade (((Lenin))) himself, despite being a massive Talmudic kike, considered homosexuality and "sexual studies" to be "fascism" and a case of "(((bourgeoisie))) morality":
<“It seems to me that this superabundance of sex theories, which for the most part are mere hypotheses, and often quite arbitrary ones, stems from a personal need. It springs from the desire to justify one’s own abnormal or excessive sex life before bourgeois morality and to plead for tolerance towards oneself. This veiled respect for bourgeois morality is as repugnant to me as rooting about in all that bears on sex. No matter how rebellious and revolutionary it may be made to appear, it is in the final analysis thoroughly bourgeois. Intellectuals and others like them are particularly keen on this. There is no room for it in the Party, among the class-conscious, fighting proletariat.”
Ever since then, Jews in universities were determined enough to twist the words of whatever the Soviet Jews said and then tell their useful idiot golems that whatever they hated was actually apparently "good for working class struggle" and whatever they liked is now considered "fascist". You could say this is why commies keep saying "That's not true socialism/communism.". In a way, they might be correct, but again for all the wrong reasons.
So /leftycunts/, you keep telling Zig Forums that liberals are "right wing/crypto-fascist", or anything you don't like is "right wing/fascist". Because in the grand scheme of things, these false dichotomies don't mean jack shit. You subhumans sure do love using the "left vs. right" retardation fantasy so much to "win" in political arguments. And lumping them all in one made up group (i.e. ancaps, lolbergs, cuckservatives are also "right wing/fascist"). Truly they are a force to be reckoned with in politics.