E.Michael Jones on Ethnic Cleansing in the USA !

Evangelical pastors have been caught with CP too so spare me the usual talking points. Every institution can be corrupted from within but your answer is to tear it all down instead of fixing it. Anarchy is somehow preferable to civilization, isn't it? Good luck trying to destroy an institution that has outlived national socialism. While I sympathize with the cause, you fail to understand how much support it had among Catholics too.

Attached: 5.jpg (777x777 61.58 KB, 63.61K)

Fuck off, jew.

Doesn't mean it's perfect but obviously it played its cards better than Hitler did (who was Catholic too, ouch). You're trying to frame billions of people as jew worshipers, now where is support for Israel the highest on the planet?

no need to victim-blame Hitler and lie about his world-view in the same sentence.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Socialist_Program

We demand freedom of religion for all religious denominations within the state so long as they do not endanger its existence or oppose the moral senses of the Germanic race. The Party as such advocates the standpoint of a positive Christianity without binding itself confessionally to any one denomination.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Religious_views_of_Adolf_Hitler

Article 24 of Hitler's National Socialist Programme of 1920 had endorsed what it termed "Positive Christianity", but placed religion below party ideology by adding the caveat that it must not offend "the moral sense of the German race".[138]

In Jan. 1934, Hitler angered the churches by appointing the neo-pagan Alfred Rosenberg as official Nazi ideologist.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alfred_Rosenberg

Alfred Ernst Rosenberg (German: [ˈʀoːzənbɛɐk] (About this sound listen); 12 January 1893 – 16 October 1946) was a German[1] theorist and an influential ideologue of the Nazi Party. Rosenberg was first introduced to Adolf Hitler by Dietrich Eckart and later held several important posts in the Nazi government.

The author of a seminal work of Nazi ideology, The Myth of the Twentieth Century (1930), Rosenberg is considered one of the main authors of key National Socialist ideological creeds, including its racial theory, persecution of the Jews, Lebensraum, abrogation of the Treaty of Versailles, and opposition to degenerate modern art. Unlike most other Nazi leaders, he is known for his rejection of and hatred for Christianity,[2] having played an important role in the development of German Nationalist Positive Christianity.[3]

In January 1934 Hitler had appointed Rosenberg as the cultural and educational leader of the Reich.[35][36] The Sanctum Officium in Rome recommended that Rosenberg's Myth of the Twentieth Century be put on the Index Librorum Prohibitorum (list of books forbidden by the Catholic Church) for scorning and rejecting "all dogmas of the Catholic Church, indeed the very fundamentals of the Christian religion".[37]

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Myth_of_the_Twentieth_Century

Hitler awarded the first State Prize for Art and Science to the author of The Myth of the Twentieth Century. The official document accompanying the prize "expressly praises Rosenberg as a 'person who has, in a scientific and penetrating manner, laid the firm foundation for an understanding of the ideological bases of National Socialism.'"[5]

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nazi_persecution_of_the_Catholic_Church_in_Germany

On 22 March 1942, the German Bishops issued a pastoral letter on "The Struggle against Christianity and the Church".[69] The letter … accused the Reich Government of "unjust oppression and hated struggle against Christianity and the Church"

The letter outlined serial breaches of the 1933 Concordat, reiterated complaints of the suffocation of Catholic schooling, presses and hospitals and said that the "Catholic faith has been restricted to such a degree that it has disappeared almost entirely from public life" and even worship within churches in Germany "is frequently restricted or oppressed", while in the conquered territories (and even in the Old Reich), churches had been "closed by force and even used for profane purposes". The freedom of speech of clergymen had been suppressed and priests were being "watched constantly" and punished for fulfilling "priestly duties" and incarcerated in Concentration camps without legal process. Religious orders had been expelled from schools, and their properties seized, while seminaries had been confiscated "to deprive the Catholic priesthood of successors".[70] The bishops denounced the Nazi euthanasia program

Attached: 3.jpg (628x773 330.28 KB, 66.96K)

Filtered.

good question.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pope_Pius_XI_and_Germany

As the extreme nature of Nazi racial antisemitism became obvious, and as Mussolini in the late 1930s began imitating Hitler's anti-Jewish race laws in Italy, Pius XI was perturbed. In the 1930s, he urged Mussolini to ask Hitler to restrain the anti-Semitic actions taking place in Germany.[48] When the newly installed Nazi Government began to instigate its program of antisemitism, Pope Pius ordered the Papal Nuncio in Berlin, Cesare Orsenigo, to "look into whether and how it may be possible to become involved" in their aid. Orsenigo proved a poor instrument in this regard, concerned more with the anti-church policies of the Nazis and how these might effect German Catholics, than with taking action to help German Jews.[49]

Following the Anschluss and the extension of antisemitic laws in Germany, Jewish refugees sought sanctuary outside the Reich. In Rome, Pius XI told a group of Belgian pilgrims on 6 September 1938, that it was not possible for Christians to participate in anti-Semitism:"[54] "Mark well that in the Catholic Mass, Abraham is our Patriarch and forefather. Anti-Semitism is incompatible with the lofty thought which that fact expresses. It is a movement with which we Christians can have nothing to do. No, no, I say to you it is impossible for a Christian to take part in anti-Semitism. It is inadmissible. Through Christ and in Christ we are the spiritual progeny of Abraham. Spiritually, we [Christians] are all Semites"[55]

On 11 November 1938, following Kristallnacht, Pope Pius XI joined Western leaders in condemning the pogrom. In response, the Nazis organised mass demonstrations against Catholics and Jews in Munich, and the Bavarian Gauleiter Adolf Wagner declared before 5,000 protesters: "Every utterance the Pope makes in Rome is an incitement of the Jews throughout the world to agitate against Germany".[56] On 21 November, in an address to the world's Catholics, the Pope rejected the Nazi claim of racial superiority, and insisted instead that there was only a single human race. Robert Ley, the Nazi Minister of Labour declared the following day in Vienna: "No compassion will be tolerated for the Jews. We deny the Pope's statement that there is but one human race. The Jews are parasites."

Attached: 5.png (1500x1151 61.91 KB, 223.98K)

He wrote a book 'slaughter of cities' on the topic it's top quality.

Are you going to quote Elie Wiesel next? I love how you conflate Church leadership with laypeople. If the American government is corrupt, does this mean ordinary Americans are evil too? Look up St. Simon of Trent, he was ritually murdered by kikes. Seems like intellectual dishonesty to me.

do you think elie wiesel wrote catholic papal bulls?

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sicut_Judaeis

Sicut Judaeis (Latin: "As the Jews") was a papal bull setting out the official position of the papacy regarding the treatment of Jews.

The first bull was issued in about 1120 by Calixtus II and was intended to protect Jews. It was prompted by the First Crusade, during which over five thousand Jews were slaughtered in Europe. The words sicut Judaeis ("and thus to the Jews") were first used by Pope Gregory I (590-604) in a letter addressed to the Bishop of Naples. Even then the Pope emphasized that Jews were entitled to "enjoy their lawful liberty."[1]

The bull was reaffirmed by many popes including Alexander III, Celestine III (1191-1198), Innocent III (1199), Honorius III (1216), Gregory IX (1235), Innocent IV (1246), Alexander IV (1255), Urban IV (1262), Gregory X (1272 & 1274), Nicholas III, Martin IV (1281), Honorius IV (1285-1287), Nicholas IV (1288-92), Clement VI (1348), Urban V (1365), Boniface IX (1389), Martin V (1422), and Nicholas V (1447).[2][3]

The bull forbade Christians, on pain of excommunication, from forcing Jews to convert, from harming them, from taking their property, from disturbing the celebration of their festivals, and from interfering with their cemeteries.

so let me get this straight, christians murdered white non-christians AND protected jews?

Dude, why are you even on Zig Forums if your world view is informed by Wikipedia? Did you know Hitler was a genocidal maniac according to your precious Wiki?
So let me get this straight, your goal is just wholesale slaughter of jews without cause or trial? Am I talking to a fed?

This guy is always dumping his kikepedia pasta in any thread where Christianity is mentioned.

He's pro Hitler but doesn't get the irony of posting from Talmud 2.0

Attached: Jewish Takeover of Wikipedia Online Information to Implement Disinformation-hMBramnCg_s.webm (320x240, 2.84M)

let me get this straight, wikipedia is a bad source because it contains some false information AND the jewish bible is a good source that is 100% truthful?

biblehub.com/niv/romans/15.htm

Accept one another, then, just as Christ accepted you, in order to bring praise to God. For I tell you that Christ has become a servant of the Jews on behalf of God’s truth, so that the promises made to the patriarchs might be confirmed and, moreover, that the Gentiles might glorify God for his mercy. As it is written:

“Therefore I will praise you among the Gentiles;
I will sing the praises of your name.”

Again, it says,

“Rejoice, you Gentiles, with his people.”

And again,

“Praise the Lord, all you Gentiles;
let all the peoples extol him.”

And again, Isaiah says,

“The Root of Jesse will spring up,
one who will arise to rule over the nations;
in him the Gentiles will hope.”

biblehub.com/niv/romans/15.htm

For if the Gentiles have shared in the Jews’ spiritual blessings, they owe it to the Jews to share with them their material blessings.

Attached: 1.png (680x584, 110.49K)

What inverted reality did that image emerge from?

Thanks for completely derailing the thread.
E. Michael Jones has excellent work, but no let's just spam the same horseshit copypasta.
You're not convincing anyone, you're just making everyone annoyed at you. How fucking autistic do you have to be to not have enough social graces TO POST ON FUCKING Zig Forums.

credit for the following text goes to the other poster(s) that wrote it:

It's not clear what you intended to mean by your post, but that has to do with the overall lack of coherency in it. Did you mean you advocate aggressively driving a wedge between the two? Did you mean to disapprove of any aggressive wedge being grown between Zig Forums and Zig Forums?

Because if it's the latter, the wedge has already been there and it continues to grow. You are so out of your element and ignorant of how things are. The main reason why is this simple fact: Zig Forums as a board is in essence about jewish worship. The continued practice of the religion of jewish worship for gentiles aka christianity, is what that board is about. Anything that criticizes christianity in any sense is inherently growing a proverbial wedge.

Take a look at Zig Forums itself. They talk more about Zig Forums and actively formulate how to get around Zig Forums-discovered redpills on the jewish nature of christianity as subversion more than how Zig Forums tries to come up with another excuse to defend the jewish scheme called communism. The similarities are staggering. To make it easy, use the Zig Forums search tool, type Zig Forums as the keyword, and search that on Zig Forums and on Zig Forums. Their intentions are exactly the same. It would be impossible for each board to discuss coming to terms with how they worship jews and jewish schemes within their boards, so they do the only thing they can: come up with ideas for how they can argue around things said on Zig Forums, alternative ways of avoiding damning information on christianity/communism, and blatantly lying about what Zig Forums says while associating it with a topic so an extra ignorant Zig Forums&Zig Forums-user is programmed to reject anything/pol/ says on any topic by default. The only superficial difference worth noting is that Zig Forums has a steady supply of "let me tell you why I'm ex-Zig Forums" posters. Is it astroturf? Is it legit? Hold that thought.

There will be no reconciliation. Many times Zig Forums posters will start an astroturfing thread and when confronted on the accusation they will flat out admit that their true intention was to convert posters on Zig Forums and the surface level topic was a tertiary goal or just complete front. They have no intention of facing the related topics nor evidence that christianity is jewish subversion. Even babby's first logical minded principle would compel them to do so, "I'll examine the evidence that goes against my beliefs and see if it has merit." This sentiment of challenging pre-conceived beliefs is nowhere to be found in a Zig Forums mind. Conversion and ignoring damning information about christianity is the goal. And that's only for the ones interested in converting anons. The rest are blatantly leftist and see Zig Forums as a natural enemy: right-wing racist pagan "nazis" that hate based jews.

Zig Forums isn't deliberately growing a wedge, it's doing what it always does: spreading hard life-altering truths that always seem to trace back to jews spreading lies. Zig Forums is more than a wedge apart. It's anti-Zig Forums, and it should have been recognized as such because since when does Zig Forums, the board of unmasking the breadth of jewish schemes revolve around jew worship? That thought from earlier. Did you hold onto it? Is it too coincidental that Zig Forums manages to have "I'm totally ex-Zig Forums" posts the same way the media has plenty of "How I stopped being a bigoted ebil nazee, By: Schlomo I'mtotallywhitegoy,whywouldyouthinkotherwiseberg" articles? Think about it, if you're capable.

churchandstate.org.uk/2013/05/child-abuse-scandal-how-the-irish-government-protected-the-catholic-church/

In April 2009, Archbishop Diarmuid Martin of Dublin publicly warned all Irish Catholics to brace themselves for the publication of the Ryan Report in May. This was a monumental investigation, named after Chairperson Judge Sean Ryan, begun in 1999 and concluded ten years later. Entitled ‘The Report of the Commission on Child Sexual Abuse’, it dealt in great detail within its 2,600 pages with clerical abuse reaching back to before the Second World War. The Commission’s brief was to investigate all forms of child abuse in Irish institutions for children. The majority of allegations it investigated focused upon the system operated in some sixty residential ‘Reformatory and Industrial Schools’ operated by Catholic Church Orders, more often than not run by the Christian Brothers.

The report should be made compulsory reading for the wide range of apologists not only for the current Pope, it is a truly shocking indictment. The report establishes that the system within these schools treated children ‘like prison inmates and slaves’ devoid of any legal rights. The report identified sub-human behaviour that repeatedly records beatings and rapes, subjection to naked beatings in public, being forced to perform oral sex, and even beatings after failed rape attempts by Christian Brothers.

Adjectives including ‘systemic’, ‘pervasive’, ‘chronic’, ‘excessive’, ‘arbitrary’ and ‘endemic’ are used by the Commission to describe the indescribable. Those apologists will search in vain for evidence that what occurred was perpetrated by a very small minority, although even one perverted degenerate would be one too many. It is clear from the details contained within this document that we are confronted with a widespread evil that went on year after year, decade after decade.

Not much comfort for the apologists is to be found in those conclusions. Indeed, as can be seen, although the area of investigations differed vastly from Justice Ryan’s epic investigation of industrial schools and orphanages, the evidence and the conclusions to be drawn from the respective reports have an overwhelming symmetry. As for the ‘learning curve’ pleading of ignorance, Archbishop McQuaid was dealing with such cases in the 1950s and 1960s. There have been bishops all over the world who have used this defence during the past thirty years. Any adult male – be he a bishop or a man in any other walk of life – who did not know long before this scandal became public knowledge that grown men having sex with children is wrong and insidiously harmful to children is either an idiot or a liar or both.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pope_Gregory_I

Non Angli, sed angeli – "They are not Angles, but angels". Aphorism, summarizing words reported to have been spoken by Gregory when he first encountered pale-skinned English boys at a slave market, sparking his dispatch of St. Augustine of Canterbury to England to convert the English, according to Bede.[76]

Attached: 5.jpg (1000x667 349.66 KB, 122.56K)

Report him for off-topic

Yes, even whe nI was in fuckign middle school they would not allow us to cite it as reference, and not for beign jewish but because you can put whatever the fuck you want on there regardless of whether it's made up or not. Burger middle schools have better standards for citation requirements than you do.

Attached: ClipboardImage.png (389x376 276.96 KB, 110.68K)

OP:

E.Michael Jones on Ethnic Cleansing in the USA !

my post:

Here is neither Jew nor Greek, here is neither slave nor free, here is neither man nor woman, wrote Paul to the Galatians — that last remnant of a great Celtic migration down the Danube valley and into Asia Minor. On the basis of this nihilism, which is a denial of everything organic, he then calls for a belief in Christ. This constituted a total rejection of all the culture creating values of Greece and Rome — although to be sure, Christianity took over a degenerate form of such values — and effected their disintegration.

The Vatican has again made itself known as the bitterest enemy of the improved breeding of the biologically valuable, and as the protector of the preservation and propagation of the inferior. Even to serious catholic eugenicists, Pope Pius declared — at the beginning of 1931 in his encyclical Concerning Christian Marriage — that it was not lawful to restrict men who were capable of entering into a marriage, but could only give life to inferior offspring; to in any way prevent propagation because of the inviolability of the body. The individual man has the right to use his own limbs. He must use them corresponding to their natural purpose. This was revealed by reason and by the catholic Christian moral doctrine, and the worldly authority never has the right to go beyond this. To set up unrestricted propagation of idiots, the children of syphilitics, alcoholics and the insane as a Christian moral doctrine is undoubtedly the height of a thinking that is hostile to nature and folk. This has today been declared to be impossible by us. In reality, it represents nothing other than the necessary outflow of that racially chaotic system that Syrian African Roman dogma has forged. Therefore, every European who would like to see his people physically and spiritually healthy, and who takes the stand that idiots and the incurably sick infect his nation, will have to permit himself to be represented, according to Roman teaching, as anticatholic, as an enemy of the Christian moral doctrine. And he will have to choose if he is the anti Christ, or if the Founder of Christianity can really have himself conceived — as a dogma — the unrestricted breeding of all kinds of inferior types. This is what His representative boldly demands. Therefore, whoever wishes for a healthy and spiritually strong Germany must passionately reject this encyclical. Such is the work of a pope who aims at the breeding of subhumanity. We thus reject Roman thought as antinatural and hostile to life.

No you misunderstand, the image implies that atheists are not pedophiles.

Back on topic, EMJ's exposition on the sexual revolution is pretty spot on, and ties into the ethnic cleansing of the USA and the West in general. Embed related.

do you think the jewish bible is 100% truthful?

Stop responding to the derailing kike.

Attached: 1Post.webm (640x360, 1.53M)

Irrelevant, Wikipedia is not a good source of information and that is all I am saying.

a catholic pedophile is merely a catholic pedophile.

...

The majority of pedophiles are still athiest or (((athiest)))

I am being consistent. Regardless of your argument citing wikipedia makes you look like a fool.

>The majority of pedophiles are still athiest or (((athiest)))

prove it.

demonstrably false, as you are using two different standards for citing wikipedia versus citing the jewish bible.

Attached: 1.png (886x129, 12.36K)

At no point did I mention any bible.
You're clearly not from around here so further discussion with you would be a waste of time.

...

Since none of the churches have anything to do with Jesus Christ or his teachings I am more supportive of your views than others. It would be one thing if they weren't all hopelessly and utterly corrupted, top to bottom.

we already have a bill nye thread

dont post this christcuck boomer asshole

go back to israel. Mocking Christianity, you either are: a Kike, a Reddit fedora fag.

Attached: ReeditFedora.png (637x332 319.31 KB, 56.91K)

Shut up slave.

Being a Christian is being Free from sin. LARPagans are just protestants who stopped going to the Church.

Attached: 1543537036556.png (1170x2176, 2.84M)

No, he speaks as if traditional Catholicism is better than America, which is fact.

your "hot" takes are old weak and stale

Truth is truth. Let the metaphysical chips fall where they may friend.

This. It's a crazy person complaining about crazy people.

Attached: 1518554536512.jpg (550x404, 44.34K)

Attached: 1542829767585.jpg (500x333 48.24 KB, 3.22M)

Honest prayer is deep and meditative. It can give you the power to pull the trigger on others, or even to never do it. All depends on what you ask for. However, it is a perspective and self-changing experience.
Schools are the brainwashing industry that is the cause of all of this mess, pushing atheism, egalitarianism, reductionism, race guilt, and the sentiment that authority should fix all problems instead of people themselves. All school shooters have been atheists on depression medication, and usually bullied in school.

Attached: 1544061928656.jpg (565x554, 60.56K)

Correct. It's neither. A Judeo-Masonic (((secular))) republic that was bound to destroy itself from the very beginning.

WHAT THE FUCK IS WRONG WITH ATHEISTS?
You can't have a discussion about the religious and ethnic change in USA before going to your meme folder to spread your butthurt. What is wrong with you? Are you not civilized?

Atheists are usually kike tools. The most secular an upstanding White man should be is agnostic, as militant atheism is just full-blown kikery.

Atheist: an uprooted Christian in transition to a new religion.

An upstanding white man should have firm convictions, not be a faggot centrist.

Enraged Zig Forums posters are a parody of themselves.

Is that what's actually happening or are you framing the situation in such a general way, and hoping no one actually pays attention to the exchanges in this thread? I think anyone joining this thread should pay attention to the language in your post, and then begin reading the thread to see if it's a apt description of what's happened here.

Papist have Jew wisdom grandfathered in, despite deviations

He's right though. You throw away something and get nothing in return, the kikes is happy with you.

No… Triggered jews like you are the true parody of themselves. NOTHING triggers a jew like Christ. Please continue, Chaim.

And, for the gentiles in here…

You don't even have to be a believer… Just walk up to a jew on the street and ask, "Hey, have you found Jesus yet?… Where's that messiah you've been seeking for the last 2000 years?.. What happened?" The ensuing meltdown is something you will NEVER forget.

"It's been what, 6,000 years or so according to the Torah? And you've been in exile, without a temple or priesthood for like 2,000 years? At what point do you realize that Jesus probably was your messiah, and that your ancestors murdered him because they didn't like hearing Greeks were cool with God now?"

Attached: kvetching.png (990x990, 235.9K)

Don't care. Even in genocide, you kike worshippers value your foreign jew religion over your own race.

It's all tiresome…Happy Hanukkah though. Jesus is your savior and you'll be saved if you get baptized. Otherwise, you'll know real holocaust when you'll burn in hell for eternity.

Attached: 1541719645659.jpg (829x600, 88.47K)

Attached: Mexican Vampire Jew (Curados de espantos, 1992).webm (800x554, 1.08M)

End yourself.

This guy thinks that a sprinkle of magic water will end the JQ, and make niggers stop nigging.

You mean how they all voted for the catholic Zentrum party, and were hostile to the racialist aspects of NS the entire NS period?

Your church was just as easily corrupted as America, so that is debatable.
Almost like forming a organization or country around semitic concepts always ends up with said organizations and countries becoming flaming piles of garbage.

Hitler did more to wreck Europe than anyone else.

Go be jews somewhere else.

I like E. Michael Jones, but this is where he really gets fucking cringe.

Only faced with absolute and certain information. One cannot prove that there is no God, likewise, one cannot prove that there is a God; to do so, is to engage in intellectual dishonesty, and falling for either one of the Jewish-controlled options makes one wittingly, or unwittingly, a kike tool.

catholic = religious mason
mason = secular jew

its 2 global frats

He's expanded on that, but it's obvious he means that a 'white identity' is not a strong enough uniter in the real world, beyond internet shitposting.

Dreams. You too can have them.

He goes on to say nationality, ethnos, is more important than whiteness, because as he sees it, whiteness is a soup of suburbian atoms washing their cars and mowing their lawns. He's speaking as a man who remembers the old ethnic neighborhoods, my dad used to talk about the old neighborhoods in St Louis like that. It was really special times before the jews bused the niggers in. I wish the so called greatest generation stood and fought.

watch the whole video and you'll understand what he means really.

Yeah, I recommend people watching this debate featuring Spencer and E.Michael Jones

...

...

It's clear as day from this what to do, you go after jews, personally.

Then American whites are doomed, because we have been Western european mutts for a long time.
Ethnogenesis is also a thing, Afrikaners are euromutts as well, but developed into their own ethnicity.
It was extremely possible that American whites would have done the same thing, if we were not subverted.
and EMJ's precious catholics held back the ethnogenesis process considerably. The Irish, the Italians, and the poles disrupted the emerging American identity, which was Germanic and protestant.

Attached: IMG_2002.PNG (1393x2412 2.48 MB, 1.21M)

anyone still watching porn is probably brain damaged.

And the only way to fight this is to kill them all.
Less words. More violence.

How about just stop dragging jews into your life if you want to succeed?

Jones is alright, he's a christcuck but at least he's paganized catholic. He's also a shill for Iran. You can see how he struggles to defend church stances when it comes to things like interracial unions which are obvious moral anthemas.

...

My first violent act will be to kill you glownigger

-germany occupies france, holand, the netherlands
-the allies bomb france, belgium and the netherlands to "liberate it"
-the soviet union rapes its way through the baltics, poland, romania, hungary, bulgaria
-jews

Also, as a dutch person I understand why our neutrality was violated. Neither axis nor allies cared about it, as shown by the simultaneous move on Norway.

If you could go back in time and show those brave dutch fighters the current state of the Netherlands they would have all joined the SS straight away.

all kikes will be filtered

Jones is a Jew-loving faggot and Catholics are trash. They have always been the Jew's junior partners in the war against whites, even to today.