What do you guys think about the neccesity to take away women's rights in order to raise the fertility rate among high IQ populations?
Thoughts on: "taking women's rights away"
Dylan Stewart
Ryder Morris
based on the info I have provided I can show that taking away women's right (particularly voting) solves all of the problems of the developed West:
Not needed anymore since the population is growing now instead of shrinking.
Mostly women vote for socialist politicians. so all states would immediately become right wing nationalistic states overnight.
Without women voting for socialism, taxes would go down by 30% (Thats what the US gov spends on Gibs)
When women know their bastard baby with the local badboy drug dealer will not get welfare she will choose to find a man willing and able to provide a stable household for her (40% of kids grow up with single mothers, DO NOT UNDERESTIMATE the importance of this one).
etc etc
Sebastian King
Women should be educated well enough that they can reasonably pass down their traditions onto their children. They should be able to help greatly with homeschooling, while the man goes and works to provide for the family.
16 years old might be a little too early for "must" be wed off. Even in biblical times, not all women could be married off at the age of 16.
Women should generally not be allowed to vote - I'd argue that in a democracy, only married men should be allowed to vote.
Leo Hernandez
Agree with most but id add.
Married men WITH PROPERTY
That way they will vote in interest to the future. We dont want another welfare voting brigade.
Lucas Gomez
I don't think about women at all.
I think about race war…
Benjamin Lewis
kill all women tbh
Anthony Gutierrez
taking women's rights away WILL prevent that racewar because:
no immigration
no socialism
no more SJW
no more feminism and women talking about "toxic masculinity"
no more divorce and women fucking their new boyfriend with your kids in the next room
Austin Thomas
No sex is anti intellectual by design. Its literally hack that shortcuts brains with orgasm. Think about it for a second. Rubbing excretion organs against each other. Blehhh. Why? Abomination. This is why only genes with hacked by orgasm brains survived natural selection.
Intellect is too smart for such hack it easily outhacks it with oral sex or condoms. Nature BTFO.
Only why fro intellect to survive natural selection is forget about "natural way" and threat it like an industry. there is nothing natural about modern industry and devolops exponentially. Unlike making families and offsprings "natural way".
Aaron Williams
More education leads to less children because of opportunity costs. Low IQ wastes of carbon pump out lots of children because lots of children means lots of little automatons to take care of them in old age. Also because they live in conditions where they are likely to die off. The educated have less because they don't need to have 12 spawn to work the farm with them and eventually for them once old and decrepit.
I still think women should not work though, because it is more important for the future that children are raised properly by their parents and values are passed on by the family rather than in some government school where the children can me molded. They most certainly should not be allowed to vote either, since it splits the vote of the household and ferments conflict between man and women. To say nothing about how women have the right to vote with no responsibilities like the draft or bucket duty. Add onto that the tax discrepancy the tendency to vote for gibs, particularly if they are not married with children. The sole compromise I can think of is that men should not get a vote if they do not provide a net positive to society through their labor while women can only vote if they have/had children.
Ethan Long
Here is an obvious example of low intellect, anons.