Freedom from Religious Cuckoldry

Greetings anons-

I'm a Formerly Christian National Socialist who has lost faith, and am now seeking answers as to why Christ is not the solution

For years I've been a Christian National Socialist. I've always used the argument that Jesus Christ was a White man, and niggers, mudshits, and Jews are clearly not humans (kikes are the spawn of the devil per Jesus aka the Neanderthal species).
Pastor Bertrand Comparet has made a great argument as to why Jesus Christ is not a Jew. Many others have done the same- that said- I've lost all faith.
I'm an American now. My family comes from Germany. My great-grandfather served the Fuhrer.
I want to know more about the beliefs of our/my ancestors prior to Christianity. I know the Christian spergs are going to start using Hitler quotes to promote the Jew book here, but that's not why I'm here.
Please help this user find peace in tracing out exactly what my ancestors believed before Jesus Christ, and why I should abandon the religion entirely.
Obviously this is an anti-Christian thread since I've completely lost faith. Anything and everything you can provide me with as to where we came from, what we believed, or what I should read I'd fucking appreciate. Desperately soul-searching in a world of despair, and it would be enormously influential to have advice given to me here about this.
The catalogue is seriously lacking quality atm and I was sure to bump high quality threads prior.
Books, preferably pdf- are much needed to seek the answers I'm looking for here. I'll take anything anons… Anything you can give me to help shine a light on truth.
Thanks.

Other urls found in this thread:

creativityalliance.com/eBook-BenKlassen-Nature'sEternalReligion.pdf
freeread.com.au/@RGLibrary/HGWells/NonFiction/NonFiction.html
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Der_Ring_des_Nibelungen
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arete
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nicomachean_Ethics
biblehub.com/niv/romans/15.htm
eupedia.com/genetics/funnelbeaker_culture.shtml
twitter.com/NSFWRedditImage

This is not your blog, faggot. Also good job, you figured out that worshipping a kike because some old shitty semite book tells you to is retarded. Adopt the vedic, the buddhist or the germanic pagan faith if you are interested in an authentic ancestral religion. Also lurk more.

I'd like to know more myself
user, Hatechan is basically cuckchan now thanks to QTards - OP isn't hurting anyone

If heebs called themselves pagan half of this board would claim paganism is a psy-op. It's just a poor way to think of our history.

Drop some acid, unplug and think. Hard.

creativityalliance.com/eBook-BenKlassen-Nature'sEternalReligion.pdf

I'll keep shilling this book until you faggots actually read it.

it is the only religion you can build on you dumbass. go read HG Wells nonfiction work you fucking faggot.

...

freeread.com.au/@RGLibrary/HGWells/NonFiction/NonFiction.html

the pagan religion is not well established enough. there needs to be a union of pagan and christian values. the approximate union of these two faiths is what held our world together.

to expand, you need a union of pagans, essentially a church to organize. the idea of the Trinity is very appealing to pagans, because it represents the union of chaos and logic to form logos.

This line of thinking is entirely retarded. The utility of an idea is irrelevant when compared to how true it is. Furthermore, I'm assuming you're one of the many, many braindead National Socialist(tm) people around here so as one of them how can you possibly make that "argument"?

Truly Judaism is the only way, according to your very own horrifically flawed logic.

I want to know more.

Thanks user

No, I don't think it's the same logic you're exhibiting here. Jews did not fight NatSocs head-on, they simply got whites to kill each other. Furthermore, WW2 lasted only a couple of years as opposed to the religious strife between Christians and Pagans.

I relate to that sentiment because I believe most Formerly Christian National Socialists are in need of "some kind of leader."
Hitler promoted self sufficiency through the state, mind you.
A well oiled machine at minimal.
I think most of us who are lost desperately need a figurehead to bring us together and win the fight, if at all possible with the enormous power of Zionist tyranny across the globe.

Christianity 'won' because of how it was an organized institution and extremely intolerant of other faiths. The most intolerant wins as rulers want the most unity and to deal with the least amount of resistance from their people. Of course that was then, this is now, and the church is filled with institutionalized pedophilia and is quite tolerant of everything else. Islam is going to crush Christianity if there isn't massive changes (there won't be). Why do you think Islam is being pushed so hard in the west? It is still like old style Christianity, our 'leaders' would have an infinite casus beli to attack any country on earth that wasn't Islamic, like Christianity used to be able to do.

TLDR Christianity is dying because it's useless, Pagan religions need institutions if they want to compete but it's 2000 years late

Look, Jews may have control but as long as I'm breathing the fight isn't over for me.

hmmmmmmmmm can you explain this for me user, not sure i agree.


this is why the left's goal is to dox and disfranchise. think about how much they bitch about trump, if we could ever generate an actual leader, they would be fucked.

God isn't real
/thread

All Abrahamists deserve death, every stripe of semitic thought needs to be purged out of existence so we can properly bury the kikes in forgotten history where they belong.

Agreed, that's why I'm so confused now. I know Bible verses like the back of my hand and have ALWAYS used Christianity to redpill others, but user??? I've lost faith. I just get so disgusted watching the amount of Christian Zionist MAGAboomers sucking Trump and Israel off daily… I'm so frustrated with it all–sorry for the blackpill.

This

He WOULD be the solution if everyone was monoethnic inside of a nation. Religion as a whole is an attempt to establish a new moral code in a society which is why you absolutely can build without Christ and why we need to look into a replacement. It's really quite simple, think about how the first religion came about and what effect it had on the most primitive of societies and you'll find out why this came to be. A more modern example is the middle east, went full pisslam and as a result its moral/legal/societal structure reflects those of the religion. Ramadan is a massive social phenomenon that basically everyone must partake in forcing a form of unity despite it being suffering through fasting, calls to prayer all over the place and all the time, war mentality to keep the tribe of mud in constant warfare, regulation of how women are distributed among the males, etc. Their downfall will be the continued terrorism from the fact that there are not enough women to go around, even if the entire world becomes Islamic you will have absolutely astonishing numbers of incels leading to terrorism because muh 72 virgins. It's quite likely this will be abrogated to try and calm them down though people will just splinter off into "muh true islam said virgins so fuck you".

Religion is critical to the development of a society because it provides a suprahuman justification for laws. If man says do not murder then any stronger man can just say "fuck you" and claim he has more authority through strength, no man in a nation of believers can claim themselves to be above the commandments of a god. Christianity in a monoethnic society works well, it's ultimate downfall is its excessive altruism towards the outgroup. Because religions seek to spread indefinitely, they will eventually die out due to conflicts that arise in this way, Jews will likely survive because to truly be Jewish you must be born to a Jewish mother, converts are not considered real Jews. Through their exclusion of others, their way of life will continue until the Jewish people themselves become extinct.

The actual teachings of Christ are good, be kind to your neighbors, do not want to the point of taking, do not steal, do not murder, respect your parents, be monogamous and do not engage in premarital sex (literally the greatest thing possible), keep the mother with children while men build a great fortune for themselves and their nation, etc. It's all absolutely great, until you have to do so for your not so friendly neighbors. Turn the other cheek towards your abuser no longer works, especially not against barbarians that do not understand the concept of mercy or patience, it does work with neighbors like you who also believe and practice these ideals. This is the problem we have in the west which communist kikes have taken advantage of. The altruism of white Christianity is abused to bring in the poor niggers, spics and muds only for those guests to shit on the host who is expected to turn the other cheek and take more abuse. Faggots even proudly proclaimed this, that they abused Christian virtues by claiming they were victims of society and that Christians themselves were actively abusing them. The reality is of course very different but the lie succeeds because the altruistic nature forged by centuries of Christianity destroy this.

God is really like Santa Clause, it's an invented superhuman with good intentions that seeks to impose good behavior onto people. God wishes XYZ according to religion, just like Santa demands you be good to get presents or be punished with coal if you've been bad. It is absolutely true that this is the case, evidence for it being the heritability of religious belief being extremely high. Nonbelievers who did not adhere to customs, traditions and beliefs did not find as much reproductive success in the tribe, hence we naturally selected for religious people.

Christcucks were subhumans rallied around the lowest common denominator organized as cannon fodder against the vastly superior, but less numerous, and unorganized/scattered pagans. Similar to how the Soviets won on the eastern front.


Jews were ruling for centuries, NS was the last rebellion against them, and it took the Europe's finest to pull it off, even if for such a short period. The playing field was already extremely uneven. Also, according to kike logic, if a virus kills a man, a virus is a superior life-form.

By now some fag dropped the old bait of, "If pagans are so strong, how did christians beat them?" The answer to that is not a strength found in christianity but how christianity was the first and subsequent longest running jewish scheme revolving around taking over government.
1. Christianity started as a subversion campaign to take over rome from the inside by appealing to the slave class for membership and then having their own puppet politicians. Eventually they even got christian emperors and this culminated in Codex Theodosius, a set of laws that made jews a protected class, christians second-class, and pagans a persecuted class.
2. The tensions from persecuting pagans, aka people who didn't want to convert, was the tidal wave that truly caused the division in rome that led to its collapse. In the aftermath arose the catholic church which carried out schemes to convert the rest of Europe.
3. Europe wasn't converted overnight, as many areas were still being converted by the late middle ages. Missionary tactics included but weren't limited to, forcible conversions, lying about christianity to make it sound more appealing, rewriting pagan myths to make christianity seem more compatible. But probably the most notable was promising kingly titles and recognition of the crown if the would-be leader would convert the populace that would be ruled. The latter method was the most effective, making monarchy a tool used by christians.
4. The total persecution of pagans beginning from the middle ages until the power of the church was diminished resulted in a virtual annihilation of information regarding pre-christian European religions; including medicine, science, and other aspects of knowledge and scholarly pursuits. The christians burnt down many libraries and built over many pagan shrines if not just redecorating them. The absence of knowledge that was passed down through pagan traditions resulted in the absence of development aka the dark ages.

Hope this gets you a good starting point. If this thread is still going, I'll help share some thread archives to get you up to speed. In the meantime look up Codex Theodosius and go from there. One archive you must see is how christians that watch Zig Forums for threads that explore the jewish essence of christianity continuously shat up the first thread we had on that topic, many exclaiming it was their duty to prevent discussion about Codex Theodosius. Even in the face of proof exposing christianity as the jewish tool it is going back to the origin of christianity, christians will do everything to prevent others from seeing the truth.

Lamest attempt at blackpilling, Moshe. Time for a new script.

Kikes do help breed superior strains of HIV so I guess maybe the plan is they'll replace themselves with a virus, which will at least be more honest than they are in its dealings with us.

...

Europe was kiked ever since Rome became (((Rome))). The kiking itself reaches as far as ancient Egypt. Then they waged countless battles to subdue every other nation, from the British Isles to Norway and Baltic states/Russia. Them defeating the opposition in USA and taking total control over it was the final nail in the coffin. Christianity was the mental poison which made Europeans do all the work for them.


They are a sentient virus.

Inbred degenerates with a severe case of chutzpah claiming they have ruled the world since day one. Their only power comes from the disunity of whites and mankind as a whole.

So you're trying to claim they had no influence whatsoever over roman politics? Come on user… I will say the other guy is wrong in claiming jews collapsed the roman empire, economics and the increasing freedoms of women fucked this up.

There's a world of difference between influencing and ruling. Even niggers exert influence on our countries.

Wow. Blown away by what I have read so far.

Started with The Fate of Man. In Ch.22 he writes about the education systems.

"And so I return to my refrain: "We need a World Brain," and to my insistence that the creation of a greater mental superstructure to reorient the mind of the world is an entirely practicable proposal.

At this point I imagine an angry critic interrupts. He has been skimming through this book—he wouldn't deign to read it or mark the course of its argument—looking for occasion for offense. And now he cries: "Who are you, Mr. Know-all, to tell us that all these splendid institutions. Harvard, Yale, Princeton, Columbia, Chicago, Johns Hopkins and a multitude of others, and abroad Oxford, Cambridge, Paris, London, Coimbra, Upsala, Tokio—one could count a thousand galaxies of clustering colleges and dreaming spires—and all these wise and good men, thousands of them, men of eminent learning, men of distinguished character, doctors, teachers, investigators, scholars, not one who is not in every respect a far better man than yourself, that all together they amount to nothing! that this great constellation, this veritable shining skyful of gifts and powers is not sufficient for the needs of the world today! that altogether it amounts to no more, scale for scale—what did you say?—than the brain of a horse! that it needs something far more powerful, some far vaster embodiment of knowledge and purpose—some queer fad of yours?"

To which I answer: What are they doing now? So far from lighting the world, the skies are so overcast that these starry constellations seem scarcely to be shining.

And far from being "Mr. Know-all," I am in helpless ignorance, in a sea of unconscious ignorance. There is one thing, and one thing only, I know, that you do not seem to know, and that is this—that neither you nor I know enough nor know the little that we do know well enough, to meet the needs of the world's occasions. Unless we do something about this ignorance of ours, this universal blinkered ignorance, we shall be overwhelmed, we shall destroy one another."

the problem with Christianity is tolerance, it's too forgiving to it's own followers, if it has any chance at redemption it will start enforcing it's own rules. There area lot of them, and most are good as above user said,

Any random whore white girl is a proud tolerant Christian, this should not be allowed, we can't kill her the west, but we can disown her and ostracize her from her own family, chruch and social group, but that almost never happens, her friends will celebrate her whoredom her dad won't have the heart to tell his little princess shes dead to him and never show her face again. Chad running around fucking every girl who throws herself at him, this should not be allowed, but with abortion and birth control, it is. They need consequences, in christcuckantiy there are none, so the behavior goes on and the authority of the church erodes as no one follows or enforces it's own teachings. Christan are Christians in name only, they simply don't have the heart to caste out their whore daughters or Chad sons. In Islam, the girl would be killed, her family shamed. Not sure what would happen to the guy, probably nothing, Islam is shit just in a different retrograde way. Those are examples of them not following their own rules, which makes anyone who follows it look like a disingenuous fuckwad. Christianity in it's current iteration in the west, is a fucking joke, and everyone knows it

Chris is not the answer because catholics turns the religion of christ (which began in a well meaning enough place) and turned it into a monarchy. That monarchy then got corrupted with faggots and niggers and pedos (choose mostly to prevent inheritable rank in the church but not to also mention that the lower the monarchy goes the more women go up with this love bullshit and make it even faggier).

Then you take all of this and add the CIA to the mix and you will see why the church and all the sub groups (including basically every church in NA and Europe) that basically there is only one or two unpozzed christian churches orthodox and whoever else encourages you to beat your wife.

You want a relationship with Christ, that's fine. All you need for that is a bible and the amazing world we live in. Anything to do with a church is and has been cucked for centuries. Go find your own answers. The lord didn't give you reason to sit with your thumb up your ass and waiting for some jew to tell you why its so important to support immigration.

Attached: Kindness.jpg (1280x1627, 552.35K)

Ah it's a D&C kike what a surprise

Everybody here seems to understand that Science is a religion, but what you retards don't seem to question is as to WHY science is a religion, and it is because evety single religion EVER was nothing but a people's way of science.

Germanic pagan gods were antropomorfized natural phenomena, an association of two patterns - human social behaviour and whatever happens on the sky, the earth, the sea and so forth. That is one of the most perfect way of transmitting knowledge in an illiterate society, with interesting lore and mythos (hell the word "myth" itself means "explanation to a phenomenom").

Christianity arose at the same time as other oriental cults such as mithraism, isis-cult, that other weird oriental goddess with a thousand tits whose name I can't recall - they were all the response to a transition from an illiterate society to a scholarly society, romans were basically doing archaeological work and historiography of the oldest literate cultures they knew (babylonian and egyptian cultures) to precisely determine WHAT was the precise origin of the world, where did history start and so and so.

This is why paganism is always a LARP, it is an attempt of bringing knowledge about the nature of reality with all its lore and lyricism, but it falls flat since its taken out of context entirely: it's thinking that the values and culture of the ancient greeks or germanics are at all the present aryan man's, and of course whilst all that INFLUENCES the aryan man's perception of reality, they are NOT the aryan man's perception of reality.

That is why at any given level Esoteric Hitlerism seems way more authentic than pagan LARPing, as kooky as EH writings and lore might be.

By trying to bring back paganism you are subtracting 1000 years of history of what we are, by studying Esoteric Hitlerism you are adding all that and so much more.

Do research on the esoteric nature of national socialism, on the books of Savitri Devi, Miguel Serrano, the arianists and theosophists of yesteryear, Evola, Hitler himself, hell read even SIEGE.

Try to look at those writings not as a "religion" with its "rituals" and "beliefs" but as a world-view and philosophy of our people, a philosophy of its history and its future.

I'd recomend Alex Linder's audiobooks as well, with his commentary. Good stuff to get you more big-brained and to build up your knowledge pool so that when you read stuff like Evola or Serrano you might understand many of their allusions and presupositions

I did read it, it was a great read.

Jesus Christ is the solution.
You losing faith is your own fault.
Get back to your roots, do penance, and work on your faith instead of trying to wiggle your way out of a crisis of faith.

If I wasn't a christian I would probably be a hindu, because catholicism and hinduism are very similar. That being said it's always best to have a religion that produced a living culture that surrounds you.

There isn't much point in being a hindu when you live in a city full of christians and cathedrals.

But above all, what matters more than denomination is your personal relationship to God. Ritualism and larping won't save you no matter what your religion is. Building a relationship with God will. Seek the Kingdom of Heaven within first.

I'm not religious myself, but Christ could be the solution if redeemed. John 8:44, Revelations 2:9 and Revelations 3:9 clearly point out the true enemy. The stories of Sodom and Babel can be seen as ancient wisdom, warning of the evils of fags and globalism. Religious people always have higher birth rates than the non-religious.

However the modern church has clearly been perverted by evil. It's all about passivism, worshipping kikes, converting niggers, pederasty and faggotry. Clearly the modern church needs to be destroyed and as many of it's followers as possible freed from the grasp of satan.

I think the future of white people is linked to developing a christian church that's parallel to modern churches, but can cannibalize it's adherents, which promotes healthy living, non-degeneracy, nationalism and other positive virtues.

Attached: 1458940899621.jpg (250x484, 11.27K)

colloquially not really. Monsanto doesn't rule the DoA yet colloquially people will say they do.

This, you need absolutely foundationless belief magic bullshit will happen and if it doesn't you didn't believe in magical bullshit enough. user's not a retard at all.

It's not a religion so much as it's a mindset, seeing the world through a mythological lens. You should read the book "Myths to Live By", by Joseph Campbell.

he is probably the most underrated nonfiction writer of 20th century. when you get to his section on jews you will laugh your ass off. if only he had a more complete truth, or access to the internet. both he and teddy K would have gassed the kikes themselves.

retard confirmed. Politics are religion, from the insane leftists that deny basic evolution and biology to the magafucks that believe niggers and whites are equal and that every difference is due to upbringing or cultural/personal choices.

Science is the study and observation of natural phenomenon through testing and replication of results. Faulty science does not make a method a religion and the fact that it changes to fit reality is a good example of why this is. Religion itself does not change, the bible does not change, what people choose to practice does.

Attached: tfw you're your own son.jpg (516x600, 81.73K)

that is the problem though, it offers an amazing weltenschauung, i think wagner's rings should be looked at first and foremost. that is the precursor to the lord of the rings, and wagner is /ourmusician/

This relates to this btw

I might sound harsh calling germanic paganism a LARP, but if that is the way that you use it then that's ok, way more so than actually doing like my local "pagans" that basically go to church with funny hats. That is absolutely degenerate. Clearness of mind is anti-degeneracy, and creates a religious mindset by itself.

read history of science by Dampier you faggot.

Christianity is just the newest form of this Semitic method to take control of other societies. If you look at what revolves around the events in the Old Testament you can see the same Semitic nature. This is why the philosopher Polyphony didn't even need to show the jew lies in the newer jewish texts of his days, he only had to go back to the Torah to find how these Semites were liars, only after their own survival, and why all copies of Porphyry's Adversus Christianos were hunted down and destroyed.

Attached: semitic nation wreckers.mp4 (640x360, 4.24M)

Except for the "replication of results" - as scientists don't actually care for replication of results - part, you'd be correct. What I am saying is that the process behind a Tradition such as norse paganism was the same. Study, observation and explanation of natural phenomena. The insertion of those phenomena into a wider weltanschaaung

dupol btfo right fellow quality poster

christianity was an attempt to fix judaism. it requires a return to Nature. it is incomplete, not flawed like judaism.

I like you.

Christianity was meant to replace judaism. It wasn't meant to be subservient to it.

Keeping telling yourself that, maybe you should stop asking your rabbi

Attached: (((you))).gif (480x336, 1.45M)

Yep, gave me a good laugh. I love the start to this chapter:

"FIRSTLY, because of its illuminating quality, we must consider the progressive segregation of the Jewish community. It has diverted, wasted and sterilized an amount of ability and moral energy that mankind at large can ill spare. In the previous section we have shown how naturally it arose out of the state of world affairs of the centuries before and after the Christian era, and how the realistic genius of Saint Paul sought an escape from its perilous limitations. From the very beginning, there must have been men of vision among the Jews who realized and rebelled against the moral isolation to which they were being condemned, there must have been a continual seeping-away of individuals to the larger opportunities of the outer world, but the uncompromising tradition carried by the old Bible and the associated writings which grew into the Talmud has been sufficient to hold together a core of inassimilable and aggressive orthodoxy to this day clinging obstinately to every detail of ritual, behavior and avoidance that emphasized the central legend of a Chosen People. It is this orthodox remnant and its behavior and influence, the repercussions it evokes and the dangers to which it has exposed the whole Jewish community, which constitute the Jewish problem. There would be no distinctive Jewish question at all were it not for this remnant and its activities.

The whole question turns upon the Chosen People idea, which this remnant cherishes and sustains, which it is the "mission" of this remnant to cherish and sustain. It is essentially a bad tradition, and the fact that for two thousand years the Jews on the whole have been very roughly treated by the rest of mankind does not make it any the less bad. Almost every community with which the orthodox Jews have come into contact has sooner or later developed and acted upon that conspiracy idea. A careful reading of the Bible does nothing to correct it.

Every sort of man is disposed to get together with his own sort of people and prefer them to strangers. That is the natural disposition of our species, fair play to the outsider is one of the last and least assured triumphs of civilization, but the indictment against the Jewish community is 'that their religion of a Chosen People takes this universal human vice, justifies it and stimulates it to the form of a persistent organized attitude of self-exclusion from the common fellowship of the world."


That is too good. I will definitely be reading more. I've seen his name thrown around but I never sat my ass down to read any. Thanks for the push I needed!

yea, that is what i said. obviously jews are gonna mistranslate and throw a bunch of shit in there and warp it to their own purposes. this is true of just about anything on earth.


read philo and josephus bitch

this is true, most lefties are atheist and they transfer their need to believe in something greater then themselves into their bullshit politics, like global warming, most liberal dogma is more based on belief then any observable phenomena

no problem user, his views are about as balanced as you could ask for overall. just wish he knew the whole picture lmao (i should mention he did write a history of mankind).

the sections on socialism are also pretty interesting.

Been in roughly the same boat for several years OP. The problem is Christ as a divinity offers basically nothing, and I mean that. Assuming we skip all the fedora tipping reasons that would put any thinking man into "agnostic" assuming they were Christian, what has Christ done for me lately? That may sound silly but just ask the question. The Bible teaches "accept your shit life and in death you'll be free", its definitely a message for the slave. I don't even mean that to sound edgy, its literally just a slave religion, one to make them feel like their suffering means something.
You should read Might is Right by Ragnar Redbeard for starters, a good wake up call on a multitude of subjects.
I found myself constantly mulling this one over too OP, and I haven't come up with any good answers. Theres Paganism, but shill threads aside to descedit them its basically accepting a religion you don't believe, and that's basically larping.
Honestly it may not be out of the question to pray to "A God" who answers, and that requires some level of A, imagination and B, Occultism because you are basically starting a religion even if the tally is 1 or very small otherwise.

Attached: 48e95ccc790e4badd90ff70f17c73477594a056a835eb5f8700cd7ce94a8aa25.jpg (1200x1200, 109.19K)

I understand why you are saying this, it is also a religion of self awareness though. it is also designed to be a religion of logic, Logos, but kikes are good at subverting…


>en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Der_Ring_des_Nibelungen

this is the story that needs to be ironed out for a pagan religion. tolkien tried, but he didn't see the bigger picture yet. didnt have the data.

Yes, im sure you're rabbi's reading list is long and proud and diverse. The great thing is I only need history not religion to see that everything that comes out that area is shit and anything that comes from the jews is a lie.

Attached: Help Me.jpg (675x412, 79.47K)

don't overfit user, you need an understanding of your enemy to defeat them. jews lie to themselves first and foremost.

The Myth of the Twentieth Century, by Alfred Rosenberg

Here is neither Jew nor Greek, here is neither slave nor free, here is neither man nor woman, wrote Paul to the Galatians — that last remnant of a great Celtic migration down the Danube valley and into Asia Minor. On the basis of this nihilism, which is a denial of everything organic, he then calls for a belief in Christ. This constituted a total rejection of all the culture creating values of Greece and Rome — although to be sure, Christianity took over a degenerate form of such values — and effected their disintegration.

The Vatican has again made itself known as the bitterest enemy of the improved breeding of the biologically valuable, and as the protector of the preservation and propagation of the inferior. Even to serious catholic eugenicists, Pope Pius declared — at the beginning of 1931 in his encyclical Concerning Christian Marriage — that it was not lawful to restrict men who were capable of entering into a marriage, but could only give life to inferior offspring; to in any way prevent propagation because of the inviolability of the body. The individual man has the right to use his own limbs. He must use them corresponding to their natural purpose. This was revealed by reason and by the catholic Christian moral doctrine, and the worldly authority never has the right to go beyond this. To set up unrestricted propagation of idiots, the children of syphilitics, alcoholics and the insane as a Christian moral doctrine is undoubtedly the height of a thinking that is hostile to nature and folk. This has today been declared to be impossible by us. In reality, it represents nothing other than the necessary outflow of that racially chaotic system that Syrian African Roman dogma has forged. Therefore, every European who would like to see his people physically and spiritually healthy, and who takes the stand that idiots and the incurably sick infect his nation, will have to permit himself to be represented, according to Roman teaching, as anticatholic, as an enemy of the Christian moral doctrine. And he will have to choose if he is the anti Christ, or if the Founder of Christianity can really have himself conceived — as a dogma — the unrestricted breeding of all kinds of inferior types. This is what His representative boldly demands. Therefore, whoever wishes for a healthy and spiritually strong Germany must passionately reject this encyclical. Such is the work of a pope who aims at the breeding of subhumanity. We thus reject Roman thought as antinatural and hostile to life.

The church has given every murdered missionary the stamp of a martyrdom and named him a saint. Even when Emmeram, represented by Christian tradition as a Jew, violated the daughter of the Bavarian duke and was therefore killed, the infallible church declared this disgraceful end as dying for the faith. Today Emmeram is a saint to whom prayers are uttered in pious Regensburg. But it is the duty of a coming German generation to mention with great respect only the names of those who in storm and wrack fought for the greatness and honour of the German people. We will honour them for what they are: martyrs of the folkish faith. Here, in this corner of our soul, lives the hope that the peoples of Europe will one day recognise the nature of the present frightful catastrophe. We hope that they will recognise the folkish Leader who is coming soon. We hope they will recognise what is most precious; the human blood of their nation. We hope they will become everywhere conscious that an application of the latter principle can be the only final solution. It is not found in heeding the call of any kind of Christianity or of liberal pacifism.

Attached: 1.png (579x359, 257.62K)

The Myth of the Twentieth Century, by Alfred Rosenberg

Originally, the Hebrews and Jews had been involved in an entirely pluralistic theology. To be sure, their tribal god looked after their interests and they after his, but none doubted that other gods of other peoples were just as real and effective as Jehovah. It was under the Persian empire that the Jews first learned of a universal, cosmic god, Ahura Mazda (the god of light) and of his enemy, dark Ahriman. They were later taken over as a universal despot—Jehovah—and his rival, Satan. The Jew gradually rid himself of all pluralisms, placing Shaddai Jehovah at the centre of all things, with himself as his authorised servant. Thus he created a focal point for himself, and this has preserved and bred his thinking, his race and his type—even if purely parasitic—up to the present day and despite any marginal racial mixing. Even when recreant Jews abjured Jehovah, they only put in his place what was essentially the same concept under other names. This they called humanism, liberty, liberalism, class. From these there reemerged the same old rigid Jehovah, breeding his offspring under a variety of designations. Since Jehovah is conceived as being materially effective, the rigid Jewish insistence upon one single god is interwoven with practical material concerns—that is, materialism—and the most sterile philosophical superstition, for which the old testament, the Talmud and Karl Marx represent closely related visions.

The same static instinct is the central core of the Roman church. It sets up a synthesis, with itself as the successor of the displaced god’s chosen people, and develops the same rigidity and formalism as Judaism, and as the later, also Semitic, Mohammedanism.

The Myth of the Twentieth Century, by Alfred Rosenberg

Between the mass hosts of Marxist chaos and the faithful of the churches, millions wander around upon false paths. These people are completely destroyed inwardly. They have been delivered up to confusing doctrines and false prophets who seek only personal gain. In the large, however, they were driven by a powerful longing for new values and new forms.

It must be stated over and again that we must have a new genius who will reveal the new Myth to us. … This recognition still does not remove us from the duty of performing those preliminary works which have always had to be done when a new vital feeling struggles for expression, producing spiritual tensions. Soon the time will come for the great man who will teach and live what, hitherto, millions have only been able to stammer.

As the introduction to this work says, our message is not directed at the present day generation who still believe in the church. … It is directed at all those who have already broken inwardly with church belief, but have still not found their way to another Myth. These persons must at least be snatched away from despairing nihilism through a revitalisation, through a new feeling of belonging. We seek the rebirth of very old yet eternally young values. It will be the task of a later genius to elevate to real forms of religion.

Thus we wait for the poet of the world war, for the great dramatist of our life, for the great architects and sculptors. Thus we struggle for the Leader of the new Reich.

Attached: 5.jpg (913x1322 170.02 KB, 296.37K)

alright idiot, YOU HAVE TO MAKE MISTAKES TO LEARN FROM THEM. the issue is preventing jews from pretending they are making mistakes.

that is why you should let a nigger fuck your wife so you can learn from it, right?

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arete

Arete (Greek: ἀρετή), in its basic sense, means "excellence of any kind".[1] The term may also mean "moral virtue".[1] In its earliest appearance in Greek, this notion of excellence was ultimately bound up with the notion of the fulfillment of purpose or function: the act of living up to one's full potential.

The term from Homeric times onwards is not gender specific. Homer applies the term of both the Greek and Trojan heroes as well as major female figures, such as Penelope, the wife of the Greek hero Odysseus. In the Homeric poems, Arete is frequently associated with bravery, but more often with effectiveness.

In particular, the aristocratic class was presumed, essentially by definition, to be exemplary of arete: "The root of the word is the same as aristos, the word which shows superlative ability and superiority, and aristos was constantly used in the plural to denote the nobility."[4]

By the 5th and 4th centuries BC, arete as applied to men had developed to include quieter virtues, such as dikaiosyne (justice) and sophrosyne (self-restraint).

It was commonly believed that the mind, body, and soul each had to be developed and prepared for a man to live a life of arete. This led to the thought that athletics had to be present in order to obtain arete. They did not need to consume one's life, merely exercise the body into the right condition for arete, just like the mind and soul would be exercised by other means.[7]

Arete is a significant part of the paideia of ancient Greeks: the training of the boy to manhood. This training in arete included physical training, for which the Greeks developed the gymnasion; mental training, which included oratory, rhetoric, and basic sciences; and spiritual training, which included music and what is called virtue.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nicomachean_Ethics

The Nicomachean Ethics (/ˌnɪkoʊˈmækiən/; Ancient Greek: Ἠθικὰ Νικομάχεια) is the name normally given to Aristotle's best-known work on ethics. The work, which plays a pre-eminent role in defining Aristotelian ethics, consists of ten books, originally separate scrolls, and is understood to be based on notes from his lectures at the Lyceum.

The theme of the work is a Socratic question previously explored in the works of Plato, Aristotle's friend and teacher, of how men should best live. In his Metaphysics, Aristotle described how Socrates, the friend and teacher of Plato, had turned philosophy to human questions, whereas pre-Socratic philosophy had only been theoretical. Ethics, as now separated out for discussion by Aristotle, is practical rather than theoretical, in the original Aristotelian senses of these terms.[1] In other words, it is not only a contemplation about good living, because it also aims to create good living. It is therefore connected to Aristotle's other practical work, the Politics, which similarly aims at people becoming good. Ethics is about how individuals should best live, while the study of politics is from the perspective of a law-giver, looking at the good of a whole community.

The Nicomachean Ethics is widely considered one of the most important historical philosophical works, and had an important impact upon the European Middle Ages, becoming one of the core works of medieval philosophy. It therefore indirectly became critical in the development of all modern philosophy as well as European law and theology.

The first philosopher to write ethical treatises, Aristotle argues that the correct approach for studying such controversial subjects as Ethics or Politics, which involve discussing what is beautiful or just, is to start with what would be roughly agreed to be true by people of good up-bringing and experience in life, and to work from there to a higher understanding.[4][5]

Taking this approach, Aristotle begins by saying that the highest good for humans, the highest aim of all human practical thinking, is eudaimonia, a Greek word often translated as well-being or happiness. Aristotle in turn argues that happiness is properly understood as an ongoing and stable dynamic, a way of being in action (energeia), specifically appropriate to the human "soul" (psuchē), at its most "excellent" or virtuous (virtue translates aretē in Greek). If there are several virtues then the best and most complete or perfect of them will be the happiest one. An excellent human will be a person good at living life, who does it well and beautifully (kalos). Aristotle says that such a person would also be a serious (spoudaios) human being, in the same sense of "serious" that one contrasts serious harpists with other harpists.

Attached: 1 - Arete_-_Areté-_Éfeso.jpg (1756x3513, 3.94M)

this is actually pilpul.

Firstly; ignore all christian posters and shitposters ITT, they are not here to post anything useful or constructive, they're here to screech at each other like faggots instead of helping anons discover true Aryan spirituality.

Start at the beginning
Read the Eddas / Havamal
Read the Vedas / Bhagavad Gita
Or at least listen to documentaries and podcasts explaining these books. Understand that there are universal truths and similarities among all forms of Aryan spirituality. These are the best preserved forms of Aryan "paganism" (reminder the pagan just means "goyim").

You could look into Hellenism, since the ancient Greeks and Romans were actually of Nordic stock (something like 70% of Roman emperors were blonde), but Nordic is the most well preserved and relevant to you biologically.

Read into the spiritual origins of the NSDAP.
Research the Volkisch movements, Thule Society, Edda Society, Ariosophy, Guido von List etc.
These are the spiritual movement foundations upon which Germanic National Socialism was founded.

Read spiritual literature produced by NSDAP party members
Read Himmler's The Voice of Our Ancestors
Read The Myth of the 20th Century
etc, etc.
Also look into Himmler's Ahnenerbe expeditions
He invested a great amount of time investigating Aryan mythology and history across the globe. Robert Sepehr has produced some interesting videos on this topic. Martin Bormann and Goebbels also have been critical of christianity in their writings.

You can READ as much as you want, and it is good to learn from this literature, but you will not be a true European unless you DO.

"Paganism" is about action, ritual, tradition, if you are inactive, you are not a pagan. "Belief" in a system is a judaic concept, you must live it.

If you want to understand exactly why christianity is shit and gay, you could also read Nietzsche. Anti-Christ, Twilight of the Idols, The Geneology of Morality etc.

I also recommend reading The Holy Grail by Julius Evola, as well as his other works, as it helps to gain an understanding of Aryan perennialism.

Attached: pagan reading list.png (960x688 154.32 KB, 103.12K)

Not with the writings of Saul the Pharisee, whose writings make up most of the New Testament. Saul in his writings is specifically trying to prevent fellow jewish conversion into Christianity through his words by showing the Messiah in such a way that would be unacceptable to the jews who'd know the Torah. Saul even has reason to do this since he had already spent most of his life trying to prevent jewish conversion into Christianity and so figured out how to end it for good by pushing all of it onto the gentiles.
I may despise all Semites but they are around and in power so their ways, however degraded and unfair are not flawed for their own preservation. This isn't the first century the gentiles have figured out the jews and their plans but at each time the jews survive and most of the Antisemites die, the war continues.

cringe, so pathetic

Attached: 1532798684883.jpg (1024x1024, 540.49K)

Attached: 'The Jewish Worm Makes His Move'.jpg (811x894, 109.09K)

can you be more specific? this seems as though it would be in line with the ideology of philo, at least in terms of outcome. this is also strange since saul the pharisee is a jwe convert…

Sorry that the Arabs raped your entire country. Don't get mad at me.

Attached: ancient greeks and romans.png (824x737, 306.65K)

nice projection white trash, you are so pathetic you are left only with wewuzing, like some low niggers
meanwhile, DNA debunked this shit years ago already
dead race walking

Attached: white master race.webm (400x224, 2.57M)

care to explain this?

biblehub.com/niv/romans/15.htm

Accept one another, then, just as Christ accepted you, in order to bring praise to God. For I tell you that Christ has become a servant of the Jews on behalf of God’s truth, so that the promises made to the patriarchs might be confirmed and, moreover, that the Gentiles might glorify God for his mercy. As it is written:

“Therefore I will praise you among the Gentiles;
I will sing the praises of your name.”

Again, it says,

“Rejoice, you Gentiles, with his people.”

And again,

“Praise the Lord, all you Gentiles;
let all the peoples extol him.”

And again, Isaiah says,

“The Root of Jesse will spring up,
one who will arise to rule over the nations;
in him the Gentiles will hope.”

biblehub.com/niv/romans/15.htm

For if the Gentiles have shared in the Jews’ spiritual blessings, they owe it to the Jews to share with them their material blessings.

Boy did that ever go off the rails.

Sure thing buddy.
< He admits that he isn't white

Attached: ClipboardImage.png (1585x1073 1.46 MB, 1.35M)

I cannot for the life of me understand why you feel the need to jump IPs and talk to yourself. Its very off-putting.

Typical /int/ posts.

were you not a pathetic race of subhumans and jew slaves you'd know there is plenty of DNA from ancient south Europe, demonstrating presence of mediterranid people since the neolithic, but oh well, you are being genocided for a reason
for your information, neolithic Scandinavians scored even more "african" on that old ass test than any modern south European
eupedia.com/genetics/funnelbeaker_culture.shtml
surely you could demonstrate any of that admixture is post Roman, but obviously you can't
dead race walking

Attached: white master race 2.webm (720x720, 1.79M)

...

He must have said something right if a shill like you comes in freaking out.

From Mein Kampf:

Nature generally takes certain measures to correct the effect which racial inter-breeding produces. She is not much in favour of the mongrel.

Not only are they deprived of the higher qualities that belonged to the parents who participated in the first crossing, but they also lack definite will-power and vigorous vital energies, owing to the lack of harmony in the quality of their blood.

At all critical moments in which a person of pure racial blood makes correct decisions, that is to say, decisions that are coherent and uniform, the person of mixed blood will become confused and take half-measures.

Hence we see that a person of mixed blood is not only relatively inferior to a person of pure blood, but is also doomed to become extinct more rapidly.

From Mein Kampf:

One can breed a herd of animals, but from a mixture of this kind, men such as have created and founded civilisations would not be produced. The mission of humanity might then be considered at an end.

Those who do not wish that the earth should fall into such a condition must realise that it is the task of the Germanic States in particular to see to it that the process of bastardization is brought to a stop.

Our contemporary generation of weaklings will naturally decry such a policy and whine and complain about it as an encroachment on the most sacred of human rights.

But there is only one right that is sacrosanct and that right is at the same time a most sacred duty, namely, to protect the racial purity so that the best types of human beings may be preserved and thus render possible a more noble development of humanity itself.

A völkisch State ought, in the first place, to raise matrimony above the level of continual racial adulteration. The State should consecrate it as an institution for the procreation of creatures made in the likeness of God Himself and not of monsters that are a mixture of man and ape.

The protest which is put forward in the name of humanity does not befit the mouth of a generation that makes it possible for the most depraved degenerates to propagate their kind, thereby imposing unspeakable suffering on their own products and on their contemporaries, while, on the other hand, contraceptives, are permitted and sold in every drug store and even by street hawkers, so that babies should not be born to the healthiest of our people.

In this present State of ours, whose function it is to be the guardian of law and order, our national bourgeoisie looks upon it as a crime to make procreation impossible for syphilitics and those who suffer from tuberculosis or hereditary diseases, and also for cripples and imbeciles.

But the practical prevention of procreation among millions of our very best people is not considered an evil, nor does it offend against the moral code of this hypocritical class, but rather suits their short-sightedness and mental lethargy, for otherwise they would have to rack their brains to find an answer to the question of how to create conditions for the feeding and maintaining of those yet unborn beings who will be the healthy representatives of our nation and will, in their turn, have to perform the same task for the generation that is to follow them.

How devoid of ideals and how ignoble is the whole contemporary system! No effort is being made to perfect the breed for the future, but things are simply allowed to slide.

The fact that the churches join in condoning this sin against the image of God, even though they continue to emphasise the dignity of that image, is quite in keeping with their present activities.

They talk about the Spirit, but they allow man, as the embodiment of the Spirit, to degenerate to the proletarian level. Then they gape with amazement when they realise how small is the influence of the Christian Faith in their own country and how depraved and ungodly is this riff-raff which is physically degenerate and therefore morally degenerate also. To balance this state of affairs they try to convert the Hottentots, the Zulus and the Kaffirs and to bestow on them the blessings of the Church.

While our European people, God be praised and thanked, are left to become the victims of moral depravity, the pious missionary goes out to Central Africa and establishes mission-stations for Negroes.

Attached: 1.jpg (2048x1486, 845.14K)

If I were saying anything similar about Germanic races and attacking their roots, calling them Huns or Saami mongrels I'd be getting called a jew/mossad agent, but when it comes to south Europe, destroying our roots is allowed and encouraged on this board, thus I reply with similar tone, don't get too butthurt.
To us, you are nothing more than depigmented jews as far as your behavior goes.

Attached: nature23310-f1.jpg (685x611 214.75 KB, 62.07K)

Hitler was D&C! You can't say mean things about my dead kike on a stick!

Also, protip:
from an attachment of your source:

nigger I'm honored.

All kinds of retarded shitty kike shilling is allowed. Quit with the oppression narrative if you want people to believe you're not a kike D&Cing.

Pagans would never have lost if both the Romans and eventually the European Christians didn’t sell their souls for jewish money. Julius Caesar never would have been able to conquer the European tribes if he did not have access to the Roman state coffers exploding with the money of the jew

What group do you suspect we are all involved with?

I barely said anything. I think you might have some kind of retardation.

You would.
Whoever said that? The Souther European people are a fine bunch, albeit browner than their Northern brethren.
The fact remains my man: Southern Europe got hit with a different set of circumstances. You can't be butthurt that people are honest about the perception of Southern Europe being more mutt'd up when a fair measure of the data shows that to be exactly the case.
Say what you will, the genetic data I've seen suggests a greater degree of admixture, and from more disdainful sources, amongst the Meds. That doesn't suggest I have any hostility towards them necessarily despite this, but it certainly acts as a wedge for "is X even White" type shilling.


Its not an honor not an attack, you just hit enough of the check boxes to mark you out as likely the same faggot I've been seeing around here lately.
I certainly don't think its unfair to point you out as likely being the OP, given its a (1) and done and you're now at (18), head and shoulders above all other posters.


4chan /int/
The only things you said were support of the OP-on-another-IP and attacking someone who pointed him out.
That's enough.

which attachment? fact remains that some shitty ass tests like those old ones from eupedia, constantly posted by wewuzing minus habens who obviously cannot do any sort of research on their own on anything happening in the field in the last 9 years, can demonstrate the same sort of "african" mixture even as far as ancient samples from scandinavia go
and don't give me the "damages" or low coverage argument either, since the numbers are consistent for all of the samples available, which are of perfectly decent quality as well
some papers coming right in these months are already demonstrating that something "african" was in Iberia since the neolithic already, they even found a typical sub saharan maternal lineage lineage in a neolithic sample from there recently

this is a lot different than


you also forgot tone, but w.e

Your reasoning is so elite m8. I wish my brain worked the way yours does. I could get free gibs

Zig Forums is also a Christian board
>>>/out/ heathen

In the beginning was Christianity, what you call Judaism turned up along with other apostate religions in the centuries after Christ. Rev2:9, 3:9. They are literally children of the devil, once you understand this you understand why they do what they do, and the only solution against it.

sage for blog thread

mutt'd is a relative concept
compared to Basques and Sardinians, north Europeans are siberian mongrels, it's all relative to whatever group you take as a reference for purity
the difference is that while meds typically do not care and recognize these percentages of siberian ancestry in north Europe are part of their specific ethnogenesis, the reverse doesn't happen, and anything more "MENA" that is certainly present in south Europe(even for obvious geographic reasons) is constantly, here and everywhere on the internet(even in youtube comments) blamed on some purpoted recent admixture event for which there is not really any evidence

since the mods don't do anything against this sort of shilling*, I have to reply with the same tone
*it isn't even shilling, really, nordicism has existed for centuries, since de gobineau, and is very much alive