STUDY FINDS THAT KILLING NATIVE AMERICANS WAS GOOD FOR THE ENVIRONMENT

Based

It was a plague.
slate.com/technology/2012/11/leptospirosis-and-pilgrims-the-wampanoag-may-have-been-killed-off-by-an-infectious-disease.html
cvltnation.com/the-great-dying-new-englands-coastal-plague-1616-1619/

Because injuns were farmers lel. Remember the myth that Europeans had no idea about farming and injuns showed them how to do it.

Oh, and remember the myth that Northern Europeans, who evolved in the fucking snow, had no idea how to deal with winter and the brownskins had to show dem dey wey.

As well as their bones would be lying around all over the open ground and would have been recorded when settlers came, there would have been massive plague zones that were just villages with piles of bones…noe one is going to convince me that when 56,000,000 people were 'genocided' that 56,000,000 graves were dug. I don't even believe that 1/56th of that number died by disease, there would have been massive amounts of evidence of this and the settlers would have run across decomposing and plague infestations all the time…it would have been creepy for them to be occupying a plague zone.

So are they implying we should kill shitskins again?

Attached: 5459c17c9da149aaaf0d7d3d8380ca795ef063c6599ce71a62a72e766417c994.jpeg (255x191, 9.52K)

Make sure anons never speak in such incomprehensible clichés. What the fuck does this even mean ?!?

Ack. Read into wikipedia.org/wiki/Aaron_Huey

what are the jews up to…

into the trash it goes.