Ever notice how soyboy cucks defend monogamy and women infected with the femen virus?

You know you could impregnate the same high quality women multiple times and raise your offspring instead of acting like a nigger.

I don't want to live in that world.

>>12764111

Exactly there is more Whites in the world now then ever and spread out on EVERY SINGLE CONTINENT. There needs to be less shitskins, which starts by shaming charity towards non-whites. Take over the fertility clinics or start back alley ones in shitskins countries. Push abortion heavily in every shitskin nation put and birth control in their kids "free"lunches. Push homosexuals in shitskins countries they naturally are more inclined too it.

Attached: nigger invasion.png (459x410, 126.07K)

user, I think your buzzword combination bot broke.

Attached: 1359905657313.jpg (339x351, 57.03K)

Find one lady of superior breeding stock and have 10 kids in a patriarchal household is much better than producing 100 single moms.

Attached: serveimage (37).jpg (640x627, 82.5K)

Monogamy is still the ideal.

Does she shoot as good as she looks?

Whites have had monogamy since Ancient Greece and Rome. If you wish to emulate the behavior of r-selected niggers, by all means, go ahead. But there is more than one reason why white birthrates are low. First, the sexual revolution fucked up the relations between man and woman. Second, marriage as a binding oath was killed, in the US anyway, by the legalization of no-fault divorce. Third, the economic stagnation that has occurred in practically all Western nations made it onerous to raise one, let alone two children. Fourth and most importantly, the spiritual nihilism that has strangled whites for the last half-century has made hedonism and revelry the most seductive choice.

Who cares? She probably shoots good enough for being a woman.

A woman should be in the kitchen being a wife, not trying to pretend to be a man. Fucking faggots who go for this stupid shit are worthless

Quit cucking for good enough. Demand the best from everybody, and do what it needed to ensure you can do the same in return.

Don't be trash. If you're good at as something excel at jt.

theoccidentalobserver.net/2013/04/08/monogamy-and-the-uniqueness-of-european-civilization/

The Supreme Court, in Reynolds v. United States (1878):

Polygamy has always been odious among the northern and western nations of Europe, and, until the establishment of the Mormon Church, was almost exclusively a feature of the life of Asiatic and of African people.

goodreads.com/book/show/15707651-sex-and-culture

"The whole of human history does not contain a single instance of a group becoming civilized unless it has been absolutely monogamous, nor is there any example of a group retaining its culture after it has adopted less rigorous customs."

Attached: 4.jpg (638x426 91.05 KB, 161.71K)

Attached: civilization screencap.jpg (2405x917, 798.05K)

Critically analyze the situation OP. Look at nogs, yes their men fuck around and impregnate lots of women. But at the same time those fatherless kids are virtually genociding themselves in the inner cities, this is statistical fact.
If you are a white man have numerous kids with the same woman. Raise those kids in a stern but loving manner, the way our ancestors did. 1 quality white > many fatherless minorities

based

Even if you were an Alpha, which you clearly aren't since you're seeking approval on an internet forum, you would still need betas on your side to form a functioning society. An "alpha" that fucks over all the men around him and ruins their chances at pair bonding with women will quickly be stabbed in back in the sort of society you are describing.

Confirmed this with my Mormon ex-girlfriend's father. According to Mormons themselves, polygamy was never common among Whites or Americans before Mormons, and even then, it was strictly out of necessity as a result of severe male UNDERpopulation.

...

Alphas require betas to survive in a human society, retard. Otherwise, how would betas still exist today? Do you seriously think alphas just let betas survive out of the kindness of their hearts? No. The betas exist because of their benefit to the alpha.

Ever notice how jew shills want you to be like bugs and rodents, instead of humans?

Attached: strategies.jpg (960x720, 93.95K)

I almost went into this, but thought noticing the picture was kikesses would be enough of a warning this thread is cancer.

Definitely second the reading of the your infograph, and I recommend the learning of r/K selection theory.

2 million living Englishmen 500 years ago. 36 million today living in England, plus hundreds of millions of their descendants abroad.

No, you idiot, we need to kill, deport, and stop feeding shitskins, not out-breed them, they have 7 children when AIDS-infested, starving, and in a civil war, there's no out-breeding that. We win wars outnumbered 100 to 1 against them, that's a nice plus.

Monogamy allows inferior men to reproduce, and therefore degrades so iety's genetic material

Attached: 1546243146736.gif (554x400, 237.54K)

God damn were women hot back then even if their titties weren't that big.

Monogamy was created for and by beta males to "stabilize" society. Now that the beta gene has spread too far and society is collapsing, the betas must be culled form the genepool if we're to survive.

Have fun protecting your women from the armed incel rape squads

...

OP should have made it clear that it's polygyny, where one man has multiple women to look after, not nigger polygamy where women have multiple men because they each think that it's their child, which secures the matriarch extra protection and resources.
Successful, healthy, intelligent men should be able to have multiple wives to his own if he is intelligent enough to see the benefit of multiple wombs to his own and how that will help eugenically until such a time arises that the entire race has figured out a way to avoid birthing degraded traits like it was when nature culled and Aryan man paired with Aryan woman while each young and most fertile to produce the healthiest and most numerous Aryan families.

Get on my level.

Attached: ClipboardImage.png (670x519, 244.29K)

Attached: karlfranz.jpg (434x586, 147.48K)

The monogamous couple that has 14 white children and raises them successfully to adulthood is better than all you guys who fuck a hundred women and father exactly zero children or maybe just one child and then that woman raises it single mom mode and it becomes fucked up and your lineage doesn't survive in the end.

Seriously, I don't see people maximizing on how many children they can have with just one woman. If you aren't already pumping out as many children as possible as fast as possible with your first wife, you shouldn't be considering a second wife.

This strategy has been tried many times and doesn't work. See your supervisor and hand in your pass. You will not be paid for shilling today as this is a probationary period.

Attached: index.jpg (209x241, 10.64K)

This.

the weak men also shill for arranged marriages with 12 year olds so they get a chance at getting their dicks wet

t. "alpha" who has fucked 100 different women and fathered exactly 0 children

True, but how many women are willing to either have 9+ children or to share a capable husband? There are societal problems at many levels to be fixed and it's going to take White men to become WHITE MAN and start laying down the law and excelling at life including exterminating his enemies. The greatest trial the White man faces in front of his own extinction is the complete eradication of the cuck faggot element from the race. As it stands we feel trapped that we can't determine the destiny of our racial success, men can't talk many women to have more children while all the other destructive elements of society are pulling her away from her natural cooperation with her man. It's a serious operation doomed to near certain failure to invoke ancestral femininity in most women while the heeb book, the electrical jew, and myriad of corrosive elements are twisting her natural 'agreeableness' trait to conform to the society. The problem continues with the next generation being subject to the jew norms in place.
Yes we are personally liable to our immediate situation, but larping on the macro level can get men thinking like a team that can effect major action to retake the whole damn world as our oyster, our world to roam and realize our destiny. We can't ignore the greater elements at play just because of some individualist 'juden Peterstein' tier sentiment of hedonistically thinking only of our immediate surroundings. There is a White man and he will be awoken if we work for that, if not we probably go extinct.

Attached: pilpul with example.png (1220x1624, 505.01K)

Fuck off

Listen man I think this is the best model:

1. Every quality white man gets himself a quality wife and has as many kids as possible with his wife. This is his first wife, his "real wife", who holds status over all other wives.
2. Other wives ought to be obtained through conquest. AKA they are slaves. This is the old model from Rome, which btw Fascism is all about reviving Rome.
3. The logistics must prioritize the man and his wife and children first, and the slaves and their children should be more expendable (if they can be provided for, then yes… but if not, if there isn't enough food… then they don't matter).

Good luck with raising 14 children with your wife and 33 slave children from your 5 feminists you captured and enslaved.

Oh also, liberal men (soyboys) can be taken as slaves too, but obviously they are just to support the household but aren't allowed to breed.

So this is best possible situation because you have your real wife who breeds a line of genetically redpilled children, then you have your slaves who have your own redpill genetics + their weak ass bluepill genetics, and the bluepilled men simply don't reproduce at all but their labor is none the less used to support your family which would be hard to support on your own.

Reality though: all these posters talking about taking multiple wives probably won't even get one wife and have any children.

Having more White Kids would Help.. We still live in a Democracy, and when we are the Minority.. things will ghett mush mush worse.

What about a Man being in a Monog relationship, but also Co-Parenting or Sperm Donation to Aryan Lesbians, and Single Aryan women, who desire a Child? Perhaps older women, who have not had success in finding a mate, but who still want a child?

It seems to me that Birth Rates, are our Most Important priority.

But, we musn't get into the idea of Quantity alone, we should first seek Quality/,, IN a sense Chads have a Moral Responsibility to have as many Aryan Babies as is humanlu possible

We need Lebonsborn Folk Communities friend.

There is a massive shortage of Men in Russia, and many of them are qWhite beautiful, and desirous of strong, and handsome American Man.

Can we Import some Russian Women perhaps?

Yeah.. this is the Epitome of Degeneracy/

LDS Entryism anyone?

Attached: RomneyFamily7ThCommandment.png (1200x675, 1.9M)

oh god the Alimony

What you are saying is bullshit but sure import as many White Europeans as you want as long as they are here to either serve as cannon fodder in the race war or to raise babies to serve as cannon fodder in the race war. We don't need women who refuse to have babies nor do we need men who refuse to participate in the war effort in some way.

pushing feminism and 'womens rights' is the surest fire way to kill a countries population, so push those for non-white countries

There would be no civilization without monogamy.
There's plenty of good women out there, user. It's nobodys fault but your own that you don't measure up to their high standards set by their Christian fathers.

most people in any given society are not "alpha", by definition(including you)
that said, this doesn't mean the few alphas present could not indeed enjoy this privilege
in Germanic society it seems things were this way, Tacitus recounts that Germanics were monogamous as a whole, except for their nobles that enjoyed this privilege "non libidine, sed ob nobilitatem plurimis nuptiis ambiuntur" i.e not because of some animalistic/nigger impulse to fuck everything around them

...

Why do mods keep up a fucking kike thread about polygamy?

uuuuuuhhhhhhhhh

This is exactly it. It's R vs K reproduction. Whites don't need to just go around shooting out kids early and often that's nigger tier behavior. Whites absolutely should have as many children as they can financially support but it's not going to change the fact that we are vastly outnumbered and the real issue is importing shitskins and not deporting them.

Well they're playboy bunnies so yeah they're hot.

Mitt's family looks great, not a shitskin in sight.
Gotta hand it to him.

OP you're a fucking faggot who must also be a shill if you're on this board and don't know what R/K reproduction is.

Oh look it's another veiled fetish thread.

Some of the raunchiest chicks I've fucked before being redpilled had "Christian fathers", a couple were preachers daughters. While I agree with the importance of monogamy, Christianity has absolutely nothing to do with the quality of a woman.

The overwhelming majority of white cultures have been monogamous since antiquity (With a few exceptions for the elite). The only polygamous societies are nigger-tier, like Islam.

Whites have been monogamous for thousands of years. Fuck off, op.

>just about every male species in the animal kingdom

Muh jewish "but the penguins are gay so fuck each other's shit holes and be natural." Should we fuck our children like animals too? Eat our shit like dogs? Cannibalism? Should we be rapists now? Howl out the fucking moon, you stupid shithead? Dominant species alpha. How are you fitting so much "I want to be a werewolf" into one sentence? Furfag yiff in hell. Go and stay go.

There's no way you haven't seen what single motherhood does. The fact that you don't give a shit about that makes me want to, after it has been made legal, smash your fucking face into the concrete.

Yes, I think the same way about having one primary sort of soul mate as a wife while adding additional wives according to ones capacity to provide love and resources to new families. However, on the thread of empire and slaves, we should examine the many potential downfalls such a society has. We can review Greek and Roman downfalls and their replacement of the original Aryan stock by the slave stock, while I assume you understand racialism and presume that you meant the slaves would be White, I can see both benefits and detractions from this. It may come to pass that a Genghis Khan mentality will be necessary to get past the first hurdle, like the European Barbarian of Old, slay their men and take their women type of deal. The annexation of entire states by superior states may be necessary, where states are taken over night by their neighbors to initiate the rebirth of the nations, enlisting the native strong men to help slay the inferior males in their own nation. I doubt it necessary to enslave other groups entirely, though I suspect a thrall system is more likely to reemerge within ones own group to self select and submit inferior men of weak composure into the watch of superior men.
I want there to be studies into how phenomena such as homosex faggots and feminist subversives come into being, if it's genetic of sociological. This will either necessitate a culling or a mass reform to society. If we can strike the roots of decay we can prevent future suffering and promote positive development of the race.

Ever notice how you're an obvious jew shill.

Citation on that image?

You do realize that if you believe in eugenics, then a lot of people wouldn't be allowed to breed, right?
In theory the best/smartest/strongest breeding is what is best for the people.

As far for the argument that without wives, men have no reason to contribute - that is BS. The People are the reason.

Bad idea, they're worthless for labor and their feminine appearance would invite assfucking.

Solid first post user. Before the modern area, most men either had 2 or 0 children while women always had an average of at least 1. This is due to high statues men having mutiple wifes while low status have none. Non- monogamy is not a road you anons want to go down.

Attached: 1525862087396.jpg (4288x2848, 2.02M)

No duh.

In reality. It's not a theory. It's the blatant truth.

No? Soyboys and their feminist gfs want open relationships because who is the cuck to limit his gf's sexuality?

This map should tell you all you need to know about "polygamy"

The distorted availability of females to males makes for some of the most impoverished, unstable nations in the world. It's really only something Niggers and Mudslimes continue with, while the rest of the world managed to evolve beyond it

Attached: the world and polygamy.png (1590x718, 193.43K)

wew

And they sure used to, back in the days of constant death and warlordism. Only the very powerful had harems of concubines

That infographic is bullshit because we have no data on Western Sahara because it is a disputed Territory with Morocco.

Commit suicide. By the way, Western Sahara is 100% muslim, so polygamy is legal there and the map is correct. KILL. YOURSELF.
web.archive.org/web/20121008074741/http://www.unhcr.org/cgi-bin/texis/vtx/refworld/rwmain?page=search&docid=429b27eca&skip=0&query=polygamy

Attached: Screen Shot 2019-02-06 at 3.50.21 PM.png (888x106, 42.07K)

This brings up a thought that occurred to me. You know how most women are automatically attracted to the most social men? The ones most sought after by all other women? This is the loud one who likes to focus attention on himself, and left a string of broken relationships behind him. This is Chad.

CHAD IS A NIGGER

Many many young men have noticed the habit of women to suddenly care about them when they have a relationship - This is because women are social animals to such a degree that they are wired to take interest in anything their peers also take an interest in. There IS such a thing as a female hive mind.

Best response.

You are right. Feminism. Feminism and feminism. Get rid of that and white birth rates will escalate massively. Women with any rights is a terrible idea. This is exactly why everything has gone down hill so quickly in so many countries at the same time. Japan, America Western and Northern Europe (even countries like poland finland etc)

Literally the last 70 years is all it took

Feminism birthed before WW1 started progressively eroding the birth rate after WW2

That is called the inability to support your own people due to genetically coded stupidity and corruption.

It's a good point. We used to have women under control - to the benefit of both sexes, with no nigger-tier wife beating and stoning a la Muslims - just 100 years ago.

That is bullshit. We didn't "evolve" beyond anything.

This is a blatant missues of the word, like lefties like to call their things "progressive".
The progress and cultural advancement have no direct relation to monogamy/poligamy

Polygamy in Europe under christianity has been practiced by simply having other children with other Women whilst married. Or multiple divorces and remarriages. Christians are pretty naive when it comes to undertanding human nature.

No society has been purely monogamous….
Wife dies in childbirth, man knocks up new wife. Man fucks other women within his marriage, Man divorces wife to have other children with other women.

Hey OP, all women aren't created equal. Let's say you're 90%ile. Do you want a 90%ile wife to make 90%ile babies with or two 60%ile wives to make 75%ile babies with? Do you want an 80%ile mistress to have 85%ile babies? How does the 80%ile man who has to settle for a 70%ile woman because you took his 80%ile woman feel about that? Monogamy is the only way we get the kind of behavioral traits that make Aryans Aryan.

That isn't polygamy and even if it was, unfaithfulness was frowned upon.

What if you are stuck with a 50% woman due to monogamy and no other women being available due to monogamy?

Divorce is heresy against our ancient traditions. Remarriage upon the woman's death is okay.

And yet it happened everywhere all the time, the state and women did not control reproduction, men did. And that is always a good thing.

There are far easier ways to close the gap between white and non-white populations that don't involve a generation of fatherless white kids that won't contribute anything to society.

They are not our ancient traditions. Also you often ended up in situations where instead of divorcing, couples would stay married but not even live in the same houses and have kids with new partners because "it was still better than breaking up a marriage"