Adolf Hitler The Liberator: Many Russians Hoped That Hitler Would Free Them From Bolshevism

IT WAS COMMON FOR MANY RUSSIANS TO HOPE FOR GERMAN VICTORY TO RID THE COUNTRY OF 'JEWS AND BOLSHEVIKS'

SIEG HEIL! HEIL HITLER!

To put it briefly: Ethnic Russians were much less loyal to the Soviet regime in their encounters with the German occupiers than historians have believed up to now.

This is the story told by UiO researcher Johannes Due Enstad, who has recently published a book about the German occupation of Northwest Russia during World War 2.

But why did so many Russians show such a benevolent attitude towards the occupation force?

“Stalin had failed to generate a strong bond of faith between the Russian peasants and the regime. On the contrary, he was much hated by many peasants who had seen their lives go from bad to worse because of the collective farming the regime had implemented with great brutality,” Enstad explains.

From 1929 onwards, the farmers were forced into collective farms – kolkhozes – often under slave-like conditions. Kulaks – affluent farmers – should be eliminated as a social class, according to Stalinist ideology. This policy also hit hard in Northwest Russia.

In 1937-1938 the “Great Terror” arrived, where Stalin, in an unbelievably brutal fashion, acted to get rid of all who might be thought of or imagined as opponents of the regime. Given such a backdrop, it is possible to understand why so many Russians put their trust in the Germans.

One good example is a letter written to “Der Führer” by the inhabitants of three small villages in the autumn of 1941: “We give our most sincere thanks for liberating us from Stalin’s lackeys and collective farms. On the 10th of July the German Armed Forces – your Wehrmacht – freed us from the yoke of the dammed communists, the political leaders and the Stalinist government. […] We will fight against the communists together with your troops. We give thanks to the German Army for our liberty […] and ask that this message is delivered to our liberator Adolf Hitler.”

When the Red Army and the party apparatus fled from Northwest Russia, the farmers claimed their rights and dissolved the collective farms. Further south, in the fertile black earth region, the Germans maintained the collectives, so as to stay in control of the rich crops. In the North West region, where the earth was less fertile, they accepted the dissolution and introduced a “semi-private” agriculture. According to Enstad, this German agricultural policy was the main reason why the positive attitude to the occupants lasted as long as it did.

Another reason for the relative popularity of the occupiers was their policy on religion. They re-opened the churches the Soviet regime had closed, something which caused something close to a religious renaissance for the Russian

He says that many priests openly supported the occupants and prayed for a German victory in their sermons. “At the same time this acted as a double-edged sword for the Germans. Opening the churches led to increasing Russian nationalism and a growing feeling that the Russians should not live under the rule of strangers,” he says.

Enstad’s sources are in the main first-hand sources collected from German and Russian state archives. German and Russian reports gave a totally opposite picture of the mood of the population, however, in Enstad’s opinion, there are good reasons to believe that the German sources were closer to the truth.

archive.is/yBAZF

Beginning in 1917 it was common for Russians to associate Jews with the revolution (Werth 1999, 86). Even after the German invasion in 1941, it was common for many Russians to hope for German victory to rid the country of 'Jews and Bolsheviks' – until the brutality of the invaders became apparent (Werth 1999, 215).
archive.is/KX7C8#selection-1763.1746-1763.2063

German Soldiers as Witnesses against Bolshevism
archive.is/S8kj7

Attached: 154370328872020058 (1).png (526x720 36.71 KB, 61.29K)

Other urls found in this thread:

warontherocks.com/2018/08/fragile-loyalties-soviet-russians-between-hitler-and-stalin/
archive.fo/MAloZ
youtube.com/watch?v=7xM_12n2zHQ
youtube.com/watch?v=UubTRCIymd4
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Soviet_Paradise
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_North_Star_(1943_film)
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Destruction_battalions
theatlantic.com/international/archive/2017/10/red-famine-anne-applebaum-ukraine-soviet-union/542610/
archive.fo/0CcSr
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Equipment_losses_in_World_War_II
bitchute.com/video/wnoAAuZSnEbY/
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

Hitler would've slaughtered those russian monkeys, fuckoff our board nazi boy

Former aristocracy etc, they don't count.

"many", so like at least three people?

good thread. bump

Hitler attacked a dozen White countries for the Jew.

Look at all these kikes.

didn't we just have this thread?

thanks OP, keep going

There were niggers who wished never to be forcibly freed by Lincoln and his butchers, I'm sure there were plenty of Russians who would have preferred risking possible abuse under Germany to certain abuse under the USSR.

Dude, you've done this thread 100 times here. I know from family that the Lithuanians began settling scores with the Jews as soon as the Germans rolled in. And people were cheering as it was happening.
Solzhenitsyn (I fucking hate Juden Peterstein for ruining him now for the hard right) talks about this extensively– when the Germans had to leave in retreat, many of their Russian girlfriends lined up to watch them leave and cried. Also, the story of the Vlasov men.

You have not idea with you're talking about. He didn't see them on name level as Germans, but nowhere near like the Jews. he essentially saw them as under Jewish captivity. As far as movies like "the Untermeschen," you have to convince your soldiers to point their guns in the right direction. Same reason in WW 1, the Brits at i 5 made up stories about Germans smashing babies in Belgium and skewering them on bayonets.

Jew.

Jew.

Jew.

All posts allowed to remain up.

Jew

Hitler's biggest mistake was being brutal to the Slavs he liberated.

>(((((1))))

Of course it's good to have a nuanced view of the the Third Reich and ww2, but what you're claiming is ridiculous. Maybe few Russians supported Hitler at the beginning of the war, but do you really think the besieged civilians of Leningrad liked Hitler while the Wehrmacht was shelling civilian targets for 2 years straight?

Army of foreign nationals comes marching through your streets with guns and suddenly politics don't matter. The average soldier of the Red Army was apolitical and fighting to defend their homeland.

Well questioning the Holocaust is illegal in Russia and "The Book of Veles", which Himmler's Ahnenerbe acquired in Belgium from a White Russian Colonel, is now banned in Russia, even the use of a single sentence from the Birth Book. For the Russians sake I hope Himmler kept the original safe somewhere, for all we have is hastily translated text. If the original is ever found again, like how it was by the White Russian Colonel fleeing the Communist triumph, it must be protected for the jews can't allow its contents to stand.

Attached: ClipboardImage.png (897x249, 20.71K)

Bump

The Average person who was a christian who was being forced to fight by bolsheviks. The human waves, and human mine removers were Christians were forced to do that.

The made them do all of that instead of sending them to work to death in the gulags.

There’s a jewy dot on the Jew radar!!!
Oh hi you little lying иудей.

The S.S. Sturmbrigade R.O.N.A. lead by the Half-German half Polish/Belarusian leader Bronislav Kaminski was heavily involved in the region of Bryansk in Russia. Really there were plenty of pissed off Russians who wanted to cooperate with Germany. Goebbels was a big fan of it, but Himmler was the main one who wanted to wipe the Russians out. As for Hitler, I think he had mixed opinions on Russia.

Bump for knowledge.

Der Untermensch is a book, which consists of stories about Eastern Europeans - slavs, balts, romanians, etc - being oppressed and threatened by communist thugs (the titular untermenschen).

Bismark wisely saw that the Russians should always be kept as allies and closely attended to. This policy was immensely successful for Germany.

Kaiser Wilhelm II foolishly dismissed Bismark, the greatest statesman of the age and decided that Russia should be rejected and treated openly as an enemy whose destruction was desireable.

Hitler continued this idiotic policy and it lost him the war and probably destroyed Germany and Europe for ever.

How much easier would it have been to raise up the cross of Christ and hand out guns and panzerfausts and ammo and artillery and tanks to the rebellious Russians and Ukranians and then give them training in modern warfare?

He would have overthrown Stalin without losing any troops, and then he could have turned his undivided attention to eliminating the jew fortress of Britain with its global financial slave empire capital in the Ancient City of London.

No user what cost hitler that war was playing hero and sparing the anglos left and right they can reason which came to bite his ass.
Hitler was winning till the u.s got invovled added with the fact with the combined effort of some people wanting to side with hitler.
But our government was pozzed as well.

I tend to criticize hitler in a lot of things during war but that is not one of them.

T.((()))

Is this a bot? Seen this exact same post on another thread.

Even the neo-cohen think tanks report this

warontherocks.com/2018/08/fragile-loyalties-soviet-russians-between-hitler-and-stalin/
archive.fo/MAloZ

One day in early July 1941, a handwritten, anonymous letter was thrown onto the back of a truck carrying German troops into the depths of northwestern Russia. The soldiers were part of Hitler’s invasion force, which had attacked the Soviet Union a few weeks before. The letter was later translated into German and attached to a military intelligence report which ended up in Germany’s Federal Archives in Freiburg. It reads:

We salute the whole German people and their Führer. We salute the freedom that has returned to us […] We salute the heroes and inform you that we have expected you with great joy. You have freed us from destitution and Communism. We await your orders and will follow them in friendship. We women salute the whole German people, who have liberated us working peasants.

Half a year later, in December 1941, another letter reached a German field office, signed by the Anisimovs, a family from the village of Mezhnik (220 miles northwest of Moscow):

To the Leader of the Great-German People, Mr. Adolf Hitler
[…] We express great gratitude for the fact that the Great-German troops since 15 September 1941 have liberated us from the Bolshevik yoke and the accursed Comunist [sic] regime that has ruled over the Russian people for 24 years and we wish Mr. Adolf Hitler good luck in your future work.

Do you have that copy? Unfortunately, Himmler's library was supposedly found recently, meaning that most of it's contents are in Jewish hands now.

SHIT
When was this?

Did they have an option to just surrender? No.
Did they have an option to just walk away? No.
But not because the ebul Germans would kill them all on site. They were there to capture territory and kill soldiers, not civilians.

During all its history it was a criminal offense in the USSR to move outside your registration place without proper papers from the police allowing you to change places. A capital offense in times of war. Bolsheviks would mass murder people trying to flee. Tie that with propaganda about Germans genociding everyone, it is not like common Leningradians had much of a choice but starve to death.
The Leningrad people were starved to death by the Bolshevik government planned and on purpose, who treated them like dehumanized cattle - they treated anyone like soulless cattle who wasn't of the highest Party echelons. All the while the Party cafeteria were stuffed with desserts and meat, while the next building over the locals had already boiled the last rat in a wallpaper glue broth. It is known that best chance to survive the hunger was giving services to high Party members in exchange for food leftovers.

Hitler's biggest mistake was being brutal to the Slavs he liberated.


Das Sowjet Paradies (The Soviet Paradise), Germany 1941
youtube.com/watch?v=7xM_12n2zHQ
youtube.com/watch?v=UubTRCIymd4

The Soviet Paradise (German original title "Das Sowjet-Paradies") was the name of an exhibition and a propaganda film, which was organized by the Reichspropagandaleitung of the NSDAP and was displayed in the big cities of the Reich and occupied countries: Vienna, Prague, Berlin and others. Its goal was to show "poverty, misery, depravity and need" of the nations in the Soviet Union under Jewish-bolshevik rule and thus to justify the war against the Soviet Union. The accompanying guide for the exhibition noted that "The present Soviet state is nothing other than the realization of that Jewish invention".[1]
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Soviet_Paradise

The North Star (also known as Armored Attack in the US) is a 1943 war film produced by Samuel Goldwyn Productions and distributed by RKO Radio Pictures a unabashedly pro-Soviet propaganda film made in the USA.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_North_Star_(1943_film)
It is worth to watch it for the depiction of a completely fictional pre-war “Soviet paradise” mirroring the “American dream”.

Destruction battalions,[nb 1] colloquially istrebitels (истребители, "destroyers", "exterminators") abbreviated: istrebki (Russian), strybki (Ukrainian)[1][2] were paramilitary units under the control of NKVD in the western Soviet Union, which performed tasks of internal security on the Eastern Front and after it.

The units received authority to summarily execute any suspicious person. Their tasks accounted for the implementation of a scorched earth policy.[3]

The destruction battalion have no mercy for our enemies – bandits and other fascist cankers. They shall be not just destroyed, but sent directly under the ground, where is their right place.

In every village and settlement, the destruction battalion has a number of tasks more besides of straight breaking the enemy. With the bolshevist grimness, everybody who imparts provocational rumours or generates panic, must be expiscated. Everybody, who directly or indirectly helps enemy, must be found out and exterminated.

The fight against Anti-Soviet partisans and the implementation of the scorched earth tactics were accompanied by terror against the civilian population, which was treated as supporters or shelterers of Forest Brothers. The destruction battalions burnt down farms and some small boroughs.[3]

Thousands of people including a large proportion of women and children were killed, while dozens of villages, schools and public buildings were burned to the ground. A school boy, Tullio Lindsaa, had all bones in his hands broken then was bayoneted for hoisting the flag of Estonia. Mauricius Parts, son of the Estonian War of Independence veteran Karl Parts, was doused in acid. In August 1941, all residents of the village of Viru-Kabala were killed including a two-year-old child and a six-day-old infant. Occasionally, the battalions burned people alive.[21] The destruction battalions murdered 1,850 people in Estonia. Almost all of them were partisans or unarmed civilians.[22]

Another example of the destruction battalions' actions is the Kautla massacre, where twenty civilians were murdered and tens of farms destroyed. Many of the people were killed after torture. The low toll of human deaths in comparison with the number of burned farms is due to the Erna long-range reconnaissance group breaking the Red Army blockade on the area, allowing many civilians to escape.[23][24]
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Destruction_battalions

POWs and defectors 1942–5
POWs Defectors Share of defectors (%)
1942 1,653,000 79,319 4.80
1943 565,000 26,108 4.62
1944 147,493 9,207 6.24
1945 33,110 2,015 6.09
Total 2,398,603 116,649 4.86


Stalin’s Defectors
How Red Army Soldiers became Hitler’s
Collaborators, 1941–1945
MARK EDELE
Oxford University Press
2017

Filth nazi, this is why so many slavs fucking raped poor german women.

Starving the Ukraine
Walter Duranty was The New York Times correspondent in Moscow from 1922 until 1936,
a role that, for a time, made him relatively rich and famous. Duranty enormously useful to the regime, which went out of its way to ensure that Duranty lived well in Moscow. He had a large flat, kept a car and a mistress, had the best access of any correspondent, and twice received coveted interviews with Stalin.
His missives from Moscow made him one of the most influential journalists of his time.

In 1932, his series of articles on the successes of collectivization and the Five Year Plan won him the Pulitzer Prize.

Soon afterward, Franklin Roosevelt, then the governor of New York, invited Duranty to the governor’s mansion in Albany, where the Democratic presidential candidate peppered him with queries. “I asked all the questions this time. It was fascinating,” Roosevelt told another reporter.

Duranty himself discussed the famine with William Strang, a diplomat at the British embassy, in late 1932. Strang reported back drily that the New York Times correspondent had been “waking to the truth for some time,” although he had not “let the great American public into the secret.”
Duranty also told Strang that he reckoned “it quite possible that as many as 10 million people may have died directly or indirectly from lack of food,” though that number never appeared in any of his reporting.

Jones … A few days later, on March 30, he appeared in Berlin at a press conference probably arranged by Paul Scheffer, a Berliner Tageblatt journalist who had been expelled from the USSR in 1929. He declared that a major famine was unfolding across the Soviet Union

Malcolm Muggeridge, at the time the correspondent for the Manchester Guardian, had just smuggled three articles about the famine out of the country via diplomatic bag. The Guardian published them anonymously, with heavy cuts made by editors who disapproved of his critique of the USSR, and, appearing at a moment when the news was dominated by Hitler’s rise to power, they were largely ignored.

On March 31, just a day after Jones had spoken out in Berlin, Duranty himself responded. “Russians Hungry But Not Starving,” read the New York Times headline.

Duranty continued, using an expression that later became notorious: “To put it brutally—you can't make an omelette without breaking eggs.” He went on to explain that he had made “exhaustive inquiries” and concluded that “conditions are bad, but there is no famine.”

“Russians Hungry But not Starving” became the accepted wisdom. It also coincided nicely with the hard political and diplomatic considerations of the moment.
As 1933 turned into 1934 and then 1935, Europeans grew even more worried about Hitler. By the end of 1933, the new Roosevelt administration was actively looking for reasons to ignore any bad news about the Soviet Union.

The president’s team had concluded that developments in Germany and the need to limit Japanese expansion meant that it was time, finally, for the United States to open full diplomatic relations with Moscow.

Roosevelt’s interest in central planning and in what he thought were the USSR’s great economic successes—the president read Duranty’s reporting carefully—encouraged him to believe that there might be a lucrative commercial relationship too.

Eventually a deal was struck. Litvinov arrived in New York to sign it—accompanied by Duranty. At a lavish banquet for the Soviet foreign minister at the Waldorf Astoria, Duranty was introduced to the 1,500 guests. He stood up and bowed. Loud applause followed.

theatlantic.com/international/archive/2017/10/red-famine-anne-applebaum-ukraine-soviet-union/542610/

Samuel Dickstein (February 5, 1885 – April 22, 1954) was a Democratic Congressional Representative from New York (22-year tenure) and a New York State Supreme Court Justice. He played a key role in establishing the committee that would become the House Committee on Un-American Activities, which he used to attack fascists, including Nazi sympathizers

In 1999, authors Allen Weinstein and Alexander Vassiliev learned that Soviet files indicate that Dickstein was a paid agent of the NKVD

Legacy
A one-block section of Pitt Street, between Grand Street and East Broadway in the Lower East Side of Manhattan, is named Samuel Dickstein Plaza


Dickstein was born on February 5, 1885, into a Jewish family of five children near Vilnius, Lithuania. His parents were Rabbi Israel Dickstein

During his tenure as Chairman of the Committee on Naturalization and Immigration, Dickstein became aware of the substantial number of foreigners legally and illegally entering and residing in the US, and the growing Anti-Semitism along with vast amounts of anti-Semitic literature being distributed in the country.

This led him to investigate independently the activities of Nazi and other fascist groups in the U.S.

Throughout the rest of 1934, the Special Committee on Un-American Activities conducted hearings, bringing before it most of the major figures in the U.S. fascist movement. Dickstein, who proclaimed as his aim the eradication of all traces of Nazism in the U.S.,[7]

"Dickstein ran a lucrative trade in illegal visas for Soviet operatives before brashly offering to spy for the NKVD, the KGB's precursor, in return for cash."

Documents discovered in 1990s in the Moscow archives showed Dickstein was paid $1250 a month from 1937 to early 1940 by the NKVD, the Soviet spy agency, which hoped to get secret Congressional information on anti-Communist and pro-fascist forces.

Kurt Stone wrote that Dickstein "was, for many years, a 'devoted and reliable' Soviet agent whom his handlers nicknamed 'Crook'".[5]

Dickstein denounced the Dies Committee at NKVD request ("a Red-baiting excursion") and gave speeches in Congress on Moscow-dictated themes. He handed over "materials on the war budget for 1940, records of conferences of the budget subcommission, reports of the war minister, chief of staff, etc.", according to an NKVD report.[12]

Dickstein later served as a Justice on the New York State Supreme Court until his death in New York City on April 22, 1954, aged 69. A one-block section of Pitt Street, between Grand and East Broadway in the Lower East Side of Manhattan, is named Samuel Dickstein Plaza.[13]
archive.fo/0CcSr

That's not true. Hitler had a pact with Russia to develop secret arms. It wasn't Hitler who broke his promises, that was Stalin

HE HAD NO CHOICE
Stalin was amassing a gigantic Army at the border of Europe and constructed 20000 tanks. Hitler discussed this with mannerheim, hear the conversation on YouTube. Also, Hitler reopened the churches and technically did raise the "cross of Christ" for the Russians. See general vlasov. See how the first mission for the first German met was in the Caucasus from a Russian legion, bearing the symbol of the tsar

Not entirely related, but interesting nonetheless: Hitler was also appointed the "High Protector of the Holy Mountain" by the Orthodox monks of Mount Athos, the largest orthodox monastery.


“You know Germany is going to become Orthodox very soon. The Holy Fathers have prophesied it. It is said that there is now a great king ruling in Germany, who slaughters all the Jews and Bolsheviks. We love him for that. It is the beginning of the prophecy.”

bismark saw the big picture, the most dangerous enemy was always (the vatican) and he had no problem allying with the czar. this is why prussia had to be annihilated. Hitler was fighting bolshevism, which was spreading like a virus with wall street funding.

Slightly related, but do we have a collection somewhere of hard evidence of jewish manipulation of the British (and American) government into war with Germany? Chamberlain was willing to appease Hitler, after all. I need sources on how jews were directly responsible for the change. And specifically regarding the US government, do we have hard evidence of FDR's genealogy to know whether he was actually a jew, and how that, if at all, affected US entry? After all, "Rosevelt" was a jewish surname at one time.

Attached: jewish slave ship owners.png (643x915, 227.2K)

Youe insults are not effective schlomo.

Sorry your view is badly skewed. The Germans were done by the end of the first year into Russia. They were already beaten by the time the US hit the Normandy beach head.
You don't seem to understand my arguments. The Germans helped put the commies in power so that they could make Russia drop out of WWI and then turn all their forces against the west front. How do you think Lenin went from Zurich to Russia in a sealed train car?

Hitler could have beaten Stalin without one German casualty. All he had to do was raise up the Ukranian and Russian christians against the jew bolshevik scum.

Hitler never had a pact with Russia. He had a pact with the USSR. Big big difference.

Yeah Shlomo…

Is just British propaganda how peace loving they have been, in reality did Chamberlain multiply the British military budget. In fact Britain prepared for the next war in Europe already in the late 1920's when there was no Hitler.

I don't believe the jews needed to "trick" the British into a war with Germany, they always wanted it. Roosevelt was pro-communist and perceived them as the future for the world.

Good shit, OP. Keep it up.

No shit, Sherlock. Haven’t you read the Gulag Archipelago?

Attached: 5f5e7409af6b17c5c38f3d8e9036408ebe9f2ce3c850752f94d47b5e5b5c53b9.jpeg (1200x1600 43.05 KB, 161.66K)

The reason germany lost was because of the involvement of the u.s.a and with lend lease.
But try explain your plan and how it would work.

A similar thread recently, what about it?

Bullshit. They weren't. Unless your definition of brutal is opening religious services again and rebuilding and feeding towns.

Oy vey, you're caught Moishe.

The kike shills all sound like teenage girls, I just read a few words and then the filter goes on.

Another great leader has that policy. The kikes can't stand that the majority of people who BELONG here (not 'travellers') support him too.

Attached: index.jpg (225x225, 5.59K)

Russia was the USSR since 1922

So it wasn't Russia, got it.

What of the House of Windsor being sympathetic?

Attached: 2AAB124F00000578-3169457-Controversial_Buckingham_Palace_is_braced_for_new_embarrassment_-a-70_1437481655224.jpg (962x888, 122.72K)

really makes you think

To be fair.
The British opposed the final terms of the treaty of Versailles. Considering them a guarantee of another war.
So no shock they were preparing in earnest for the next war.

trumpkike just dissed Iran again, retard.

My grandfather told me that the French weren't happy to see American soldiers (him). The US soldiers were confused.

Fuck that, its current year +4.

Attached: 1448627512374.webm (486x360, 7.65M)

...

Attached: 230f0f7f8051806560e509f2bcdf93aee981b6bbe5484f4bc62b4dfbdd83c81b.jpg (568x595 67.73 KB, 67.73K)

>(((German invasion in 1941)))

It's called an preemptive strike.


He had to much political saying. He should have kept playing archaeologist ….


This is crazy shit, totally crazy shit…

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Equipment_losses_in_World_War_II

Attached: ClipboardImage.png (1135x808, 99.67K)

not only that but during the time of rudolf hess's mission to england the establishment was thinking of siding with germany against the americans, obviously getting back a nice chunk of the colonies in the process. this is why there was never all out war from the german side.
who knows if they were just stringing them, along but i am guessing this is why america finally got involved.

Problem the UK had was churchill really.
He'd only been able to seize power because he had the backing of the banks, industrialists, etc along with a sworn statement of loyalty and obedience from the leader of the opposition party.
But he only had those if there was war.

Britain was essentially in or on the verge of war so the Tory party leadership were stuck in a position where they couldn't deny the value of letting churchill have his way because it would mean theywouldn't face Labour trying to start a communist revolution during a war and wouldn't be facing any bitching from the banks or industrialists.

But because his backing came with the precondition of total war against Germany no matter the cost. It limited what could be done to end the war.

Meanwhile in occupied France

Attached: DyGWjE_X0AIL2BO.jpeg (800x600 78.84 KB, 54.38K)

druf_tochin_wall.jewpg
trumptards btfo

This is known. Or rather, should be known because if people were aware of that, they'd have to rethink history.
The October Revolution in the first place was funded by US (((bankers))), without them the Reds would've been nothing more than a bunch of brigands and the Whites would have won. And then during WW2 the USSR had to be propped up by the US, without that massive help Stalin would've just ended up in the history books as another madman.

Wer plündert wird erschossen!

Plunderers will be shot!

Yeah we Germans are very disciplined and very harsh when it's about breaking the rules

Adolf Hitler's Speech On Operation Barbarossa. October 3rd 1941.
bitchute.com/video/wnoAAuZSnEbY/

lol, what the fuck are you even talking about?

Attached: 38C21A33-9856-4AD5-927D-03A0ECC51F73.jpeg (415x520 49.46 KB, 260.85K)

Way to ruin a good day m8. :(

Things that never would have happened.
Hess was following illusions. Illusions that cunningly might have had been nurtured by the Brits to goad Hitler
There was no establishment support and against america even less. There existed an Anglo-American nexus already before the first world war and after them, Britain was bankrupt and in the (((financial hands))) of America. The second world war served for the intentional transition of leadership from GB to the USA. It was really just fleecing the Brits, that were the biggest looser. The British Empire was intentionally butchered.

Attached: 300px-Jewdarscope.gif (300x300, 199.49K)

Man reading this guys wiki is fucking lulz worthy. Proving once more the slippery jew meme and how they'll stay all the way until the final second when disaster hits to milk the host nation for whatever he deems worthy. Half his biography is about him fleeing.

Any more info on occupied France. Particularly the French attitude?

A collage of them.

Attached: France - bookstore in Paris during the German occupation.jpg (800x3600 847.53 KB, 671.06K)

What did OP mean by this?

Attached: e52db7011e7148a23e87040807792e9737abe0d11891de71232bcdd3f56d6838.jpg (128x128 84.98 KB, 9.4K)

^ Weak bait

bump

It means in order to free the world from international jewry we must kills all the milions of jews, and yes, that includes their golems, that prop up the system that they use to enslave us.

You first have to get a capacity for literacy above a third grade reading level. Slavs THOUGHT Hitler would save their asses, unfortunately for them, Hitler believed they were a plague on the European ethos. Had more of a distinct disliking of the Slav more than he could have for Arabs or the Negro, in fact he liked the Arabs and the Turks.

How'd that work out during WWll? Who won WWll? Hint: It wasn't Christians, Slavs, Germans, Americans, French….

That's an outright lie. He thought that of the Soviet system

Just . . . just stop . . . the salt . . . the kosher salt . . . its too much . . .

Attached: xcgyj .jpeg (800x607, 219.51K)

No really. The kosher salt itt is too much.

looting and rape were very serious crimes, german soldiers would be executed by their own side for this kind of beahavior.

bump

The Soviet Union, whatever it's fault, was the instrument of Slavic dominance and that's why Hitler hated it and wanted to attack it.

No, hitler didn't hate Slavs, you fucking kike.

It is a war of ideologies and struggle races. On one side stands National Socialism: ideology, founded on the values of our Germanic, Nordic blood. It is worth the world as we want to see: beautiful, orderly, fair, socially, a world that may be, still suffers some flaws, but overall a happy, beautiful world filled with culture, which is precisely Germany. On the other side stands the 180 millionth people, a mixture of races and peoples, whose names are unpronounceable, and whose physical nature is such that the only thing that they can do - is to shoot without pity or mercy. These animals, which are subjected to torture and ill-treatment of each prisoner from our side, which do not have medical care they captured our wounded, as do the decent men, you will see them for yourself. These people have joined a Jewish religion, one ideology, called Bolshevism, with the task of: having now Russian, half [located] in Asia, parts of Europe, crush Germany and the world. When you, my friends, are fighting in the East, you keep that same fight against the same subhumans, against the same inferior races that once appeared under the name of Huns, and later - 1,000 years ago during the time of King Henry and Otto I, - the name of the Hungarians, and later under the name of Tatars, and then they came again under the name of Genghis Khan and the Mongols. Today they are called Russian under the political banner of Bolshevism.

The Slav is never able to build anything himself. In the long run, he's not capable of it. I'll come back to this later. With the exception of a few phenomena produced by Asia every couple of centuries, through that mixture of two heredities which may be fortunate for Asia but is unfortunate for us Europeans — with the exception, therefore, of an Attilla, a Ghenghis Khan, a Tamerlaine, a Lenin, a Stalin — the mixed race of the Slavs is based on a sub-race with a few drops of blood of our blood, blood of a leading race; the Slav is unable to control himself and create order.


Himmler's quotes on Slavs, and given how close Himmler was to Hitler there's no doubt that they were of like mind.

Okay, no, you were proven wrong. Hitler didn't hate Slavs and the Soviet Union wasn't slavic. It was jewish. Kill yourself.

Attached: aryan 2.png (4000x2700 396.14 KB, 1.38M)

You're delusional, any right thinking Slav needs to see Hitler and the reich as being enemies of their people and their defeat as a good thing.

Okay, you were proven wrong. Keep repeating things that you are literally lying about. It's over. You failed. Your jewish narrative doesn't work here.

fuck off retard