Apolgy for the Catholic Church's Teaching on Absolute immutable Morality and Absolute immutable Trut

Same people think that the first wave feminist the, Oldschool feminists, actually cared about women, and that the current feminists care about only for power, contrarily to Oldschool feminists.
My answer:
That's not true. When you deny the immobile immutable hard pillars of absolute Moral Law and the Absolute Truths of the bible, then, you enter in moral relativism, meaning that you enter in quicksands, meaning that you may start with a somewhat modest relativism, but you'll end up going deeper and deeper in the quicksand, going deeper and deeper in moral relativism, and thus you end up with the crazy ideologies we have now, where "men and women are social constructs".
It's true for absolutely everything. If you don't conform yourself to the absolute immutable established pillar Moral Law and Absolute Truth by God, the ORDER of the universe, LOGOS, then you'll enter in those quicksands of relativism, trying to be your own God, and you'll sink deeper and deeper into CHAOS, ANTI-LOGOS.
It's like everything really, if you deny that sexual intercourse should exclusively be done inside of the marriage and open to procreation like in good Catholic fashion, then, you'll enter in sexual relativism, beginning with sex for "recreation" with your wife, then followed with contraception with your wife, then with the sexual liberation, then with homosexual acceptance (logical consequence of the contraception for heterosexuals, since you use contraception to deny the purpose of sex which is procreation, and that you use it to have sex in a sterile (and transient way with the advent of sexual liberation and heterosexual hookup culture), then, homosexual acceptance is the only logical consequence of that, because homosexuality is just that, sterile and transient "sex" with sodomy, which can't create children, just like heterosexual sex with a preservative or the pill), then with gay marriage (logical consequence, when you have heterosexual sex inside of marriage in a sterile way…) and you sink deeper and deeper and deeper and you'll end-up with a situation of absolute moral relativism, where NOTHING is true, ALL is relative.

So no, oldschool feminists did not care about women, but about power, wanting to create their own rules, to be their own God. If they cared for women, they would encourage them to submit to the Absolute Catholic Moral Law and tell them to NEVER tempt to rebel against this Absolute Moral Law and Order (LOGOS), even though we have a natural tendency to want to rebel against the Logos of the universe, the Absolute Order of the universe, because of our fallen nature because of the original sin of Adam & Eve (and not Adam & Steve as could claim moral relativists).

Attached: Jones.jpg (1714x697 1.3 MB, 775.53K)

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=d-OXt5NWcRs
youtube.com/watch?v=eeFnlWgTwhE&bpctr=1550070846
biblehub.com/niv/romans/15.htm
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_the_Jews_in_Poland_before_the_18th_century
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Timeline_of_Jewish-Polish_history
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paradisus_Judaeorum
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_the_Jews_in_Poland
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Logos
en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Latin_proverbs
biblehub.com/john/3-16.htm
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Catechism_of_the_Catholic_Church
vatican.va/archive/ENG0015/_INDEX.HTM
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zeno_of_Citium
biblehub.com/niv/john/3.htm
churchandstate.org.uk/2013/05/child-abuse-scandal-how-the-irish-government-protected-the-catholic-church/
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pope_Gregory_I
twitter.com/AnonBabble

PS: A little 8 min video that you could watch to go a little deeper, on why homosexuality is so important for the Jews. Dr. E.Michael Jones is partially responsible for bringing me back to the Catholic Church.

youtube.com/watch?v=d-OXt5NWcRs

In the premise I made before about sexual relativism, I could have placed the sin of masturbation somewhere in the first steps, because it's as much as a deceit of the natural purpose of sex as contraceptive sex or worst, sodomy. That's why masturbation is anti-logos/anti-nature. So if you were to promote masturbation, in the name of some twisted principle, then you will promote this anti-natural sterile (and transient, some people masturbate daily, or even several times per day) behavior, and you'll force people to enter in the quicksands of moral (sexual) relativism and they'll go down, be enslaved by themselves and they'll sink so low that they'll end-up straight to hell on earth. Sometimes, this need several generations to pass from a moral society based on Logos, to what we have now, it's gradual, it's the "boiled frog" experiment. That's exactly why masturbation is promoted by the Jews, it's a mean to corrupt us and enslave us. Wilhem Reich was a freudian communist jew and he promoted sexual liberation, which began with the acceptance of masturbation. The "sex education" courses of today that are taught in school to young children/teenagers is a direct legacy of this Freudian communist jew corrupter.

Pick one. Catholic moral law says some gay child rapist in a funny hat is more important than Jesus and the bible. Catholicism is garbage.

Except that isn't Catholic. Catholics decreed that priests could not marry in 325 and denied their married priests access to their own wife's vagina in 385. Catholics have been anti-marriage since the beginning, because of course, they have always been judaizers from the beginning.

Anti-marriage? Because they don't let priests marry, which are an extreme minority?
The reason they did it, it's because like that, the Clergy wouldn't recruit from itself, their own children and their own families, thus putting at risk of a higher conflict of interest of the Clergy, and also higher risks of moral corruption and stealth of Church Propriety for their own family. So since the clergy can't reproduce, it means that they always have to take new volunteers from the population, and it's a better solution.
Of course, you take a vow to the Church not to marry or have sexual relations, and so it's a very serious sense of sacrifice you commit because you want to live closer to Jesus. But those people are an extreme minority in terms of demographics, and the Catholic Church is absolutely pro-marriage, pro-procreation and pro-furtility in stable families, for the rest of the 99,99% of the population.
Even Hitler saw this as a good thing, he wrote it in Mein Kampf. (French version quote here)

Attached: Masters.jpg (646x484, 90.37K)

And where does the bible say there should be a class of weird celibate people ruling over everyone else? Oh wait, it doesn't say that.
That's a crock of shit. Bishops routinely exploited their position for the benefit of their brothers, nephews and illegitimate children.
How is that closer to Jesus? Jesus didn't say anyone should do anything of the sort.

Jesus isn't Mohammed. The bible isn't a political doctrine like the Coran. The bible lies the moral foundation, the rest is to be figured out by people with their free will and rationality.

What you are telling me is that people sin. Of course they sin. But they are a lot more likely to sin in favor of a wife or of their children.
Today, a lot of priests sin and are from Satan,the Jesuit Order, once a very good christian force, is now a subversive force inside the Church, having 30% of homosexuals in that order and 70% forced to follow along. How is that possible? It's a complicated and long story. But the point I try to make here is that we all sin, we all have a natural tendency toward irrationality and toward sin, but it's exactly why the Moral Law is here, it's to give an objective Moral point of reference, so that they can rule their irrational passions toward sin with their rationality, which is free will. Humans can do this, humans can chose between the good and the bad, they can use their free will to control passions toward sin with the use of reason, which will tell you that you have to submit to the Moral Law fully if you want to be free from sin, or you can use free will to succumb to temptation, and consume the appetite for sin. It has to be a free choice, between the good and the bad, because if it's isn't a free choice, then you are not accountable for your actions, just like with children or animals who don't have the capacity for rationality, and thus are slaves to their passions without any chance of freedom by rationality.

Attached: 1534166315243.jpg (481x720, 38.98K)

That's the brass. Down at the parish level there is no tolerance for pedos and the bishops know they are very closely scrutinized.

Pretty much every -ism is a form of pilpul trying to convince the goyim that wrong is right.

Attached: pilpul.png (1124x599, 119.23K)

Full retard has a containment board.
>>>Zig Forums