Controlled opposition meant to bring about (((communism)))
Many people here would proclaim to be (((race realists))) and (((White supremacists))). However, the two positions are kiked and hilariously weak because they're a form of controlled opposition intended to undermine the cause of human biodiversity and ethnic homelands for all. Let's start off with the elephants in the room: the (((race realists))). Who kicked off the recent wave of race realism? (((Richard Herrnstein))). What does race realism say? (((Herrnstein))) would have us believe that we are just a step above niggers, squashed under the Chinese and the Jews. Clearly, anyone who proclaims to be a race realist is either deceived or controlled opposition. The race realist point of view has created a fixation on claiming genetic and intellectual superiority, a "who's the most effeminate, studious soyboy" contest, a "who has the smallest penis and therefore the greatest intelligence" contest. This has led us down the wrong path: we do not need average collective intellectual superiority to have a right to survive as a people. What about (((White supremacists))), then? Well, the White supremacist position is as flawed as one would expect a controlled opposition point of view to be. Studies show each race has its own strengths and weaknesses: Asians are good at math but uncreative, Jews are smart but devious, etc. Weighing these strengths and weaknesses requires subjectivity, so proclaiming superiority can only give us a flimsy position. What, then, is the end goal of this controlled opposition? The success of a civilization depends on the hard work of its individual members. It depends on meritocracy. If we become proud of our membership in a collective, then we risk falling into a "(((communism))) for White people" trap. Already, I've seen so-called redpilled people advocate (((socialist health care))) and a (((big government welfare state))) as long as it's for White people only. This is (((controlled opposition))) at its finest, puppeteered by the same glowniggers who would benefit from a big government welfare state. What, then, should we be moving towards? We should move towards a homeland for White people, preferably in Europe (America is a second choice). All other races can fuck off back to their own homelands. Chinks can fuck off to China, Japs can fuck off to Japan (no I don't support Whites defiling themselves with Japanese fucksushi or sucking the dick of Japanese girls because the controlled-opposition cuck Hitler who didn't even support a final solution for the Jews was a Weeaboo) and Jews can fuck off back to Israel where they belong.
I'm not supporting civic nationalism, I'm supporting racial nationalism, which appears to be the true position of this board beneath the "shoah the Jews" circlejerk
Isaiah James
Each race has adapted to its respective environment in different ways. Except our race prospers over the other races in our environment amd theirs, thats how you really test for superiority. Why push for racial homelands when we know we are better and can just genocide them all and take all the land? You are still accepting the leftwing Jewish media driven premise of egalitarianism, "we are different, but still equal". Kill yourself.
The only reason 'white supremacist' is bad is because it is existentially bad faith - one is supreme by mere fact alone, and demonstrates through action, not ideology. However, seeking the supreme position is not 'supremacist' - supremacism means you think you're owed something without working for it; like being a 'chosen' Jew.
The only reason 'race realism' is bad is because it leaves open civic nationalist ideas - but as position on reality, there is no subversion to it. Only when 'race realism' is used as a "race is real, buuuut…" for the favor of some kiked up bullshit. One example could be libertarians. So no, race realism (by/in itself) is not 'controlled opposition'.
Andrew James
this
Easton Gomez
By your test for superiority, the Jews would be superior because they've infiltrated all environments You're a (((kike troll)))
Landon Cruz
>another (((individualist libertarian))) stop sucking juden b peterstein's dick
Jewry is, in game theory, a bad actor that eventually destroys every environment it comes in contact with and then faces backlash out of its own stupidity. It is very effective at subverting the society, but not maintaining it. The many oustings of Jewry is evidence of that - the human species is slow to learn, especially in new frontiers of warfare like societal subversion.
Benjamin Fisher
(((KIKE ALERT)))
Landon Sullivan
Yes they are arguably superior, except that their success contains the burden of dependency, being group-level biological parasites, and also that their success can end at any given moment, it just seems unlikely anytime soon given the long history of the subjugated goyim.
Remember: the Holocaust was made up to make us look bad. So anyone who says "genociding people good" is controlled opposition (intentionally weak position)
The primary difference between now and then, is where we are now. Information can be readily data based and shared near instantaneous. When the cycle completes itself, there will be no brakes on this train.
Then why did (((Herrnstein))) reinstate race realism? This elephant in the room has been ignored! Clearly shilling is occurring here.
Jordan Cruz
this is laughable
Anthony James
(((Jew))): White genocide is good because I'm not White
Charles Murphy
Again, unable to address the elephant in the room: why are people like (((Herrnstein))) supporting YOUR position?
Thomas Taylor
No shit.
Isaiah Turner
no u
Ayden Rogers
Maybe it's a bot.
Christopher Foster
Sounds right. You're not a bot, you're a race traitor (((glownigger)))
Joshua Peterson
Yep it's a bot.
Jason Clark
"No shit" is not a real argument and therefore does not require anything other than "no u"
Cooper Young
>Who kicked off the recent wave of race realism? (((Richard Herrnstein))). What does race realism say? (((Herrnstein))) You contradicted yourself faggot. Why would anyone listen to a thing jews say as if they have any relevance over your own culture unless you think their voice actually matters to your own internal sense of being. Race realism has been around since the 1800's it's nothing new despite whatever some newfag kike wants to make it out to be along with how they tried to re-work what white supremacy means. In fact "racist" was derived from the idea of race realism from the 20's and 30's when these same kikes you're quoting had to come up with a way to outmaneuver the science behind race. Just like they twisted white supremacy and its original meaning to be "better at everything in every way to ever non-white". It never FUCKING MEANT THAT.
Now, kill yourself.
Brody Brooks
I simply agreed that you were never going to be white, shitskin.
Caleb Scott
i think it's a retarded strawmanning kike or confused lolberg; or both, attempting to shill and failing miserably - or very scared.
Ian Evans
You mad?
Brandon James
Right. Because they're all just going to do that willingly. You need to practice your planning skills.
I find your behavior amusing. Like you think I am your property or something
Hunter Stewart
I think Jews are people and some Jews like Herrnstein are good people for supporting race realism and thereby bringing positive publicity to our movement.
John Morgan
Either way it's fun. Look at it play the rubber and glue game.
The correct term is they "corrupt" race realism, taking jewish credit for it, exploit it for their own benefits. Like they do with everything they stole.
Here is how you act as an organism: pay threefold benefits to those who benefit you, pay thousand fold damages to those who damage you.
Kikes attempting to genocide us means, in the very least of natural law (tit for tat), they are not owed consideration against genocide; as they have specifically brainwashed themselves into thinking that Aryans genocided them, they think they're performing tit-for-tat; but it's a lie.
Jaxson Bailey
WE ARE THE TUMBLR ARMY We are raiding your board You will receive slide threads and shill comments You will not know friend from foe You will think legitimate comments are shill comments You will think shill comments are legitimate comments You will break up and fight amongst eachother You will not be able to discern which ideas are your own because your current ideas are already off the rocker
Michael King
You still mad?
Luke Phillips
The first priority is securing an existence for your people, defending yourselves against lunatics, not convincing the lunatic to 'please not do that'.
Zachary Jenkins
Fuck off Script kiddie making stupid kike bot
Jacob Nelson
So the way 8/pol/ has always been, then. Congratulations. You're accomplishing what everyone's already used to.
James Barnes
first of all I understand another race wanting to commit genocide so what is your point? It is not inherently "evil". secondly Jews arent really after genocide, they just instinctually reduce our cohesion and fitness through promotion of immigration and miscegenation to high levels. If that ends in white genocide it will be a tragedy of the commons for the jews who depend on white countries for hosts, and it is a regular occurence in parasitic organisms.
