Polygamy and Decadence

Who the fuck makes these ridiculously ignorant threads??? If you actually read fucking books and didn't spend all day watching porn you would clearly know why polygamy is dangerous

Fact of the matter is that masculinity as we know it has evolved to improve the fitness of those who have it.
With monogamy, the source of that fitness is forfeit, and so masculinity is made not only obsolete, but disadvantageous.
Can polygamy cause problems for a race or civilization? Maybe. Does monogamy cause problems for masculinity? Absolutely.

You rationalize that and get back to me.

Yea I don’t know if you’ve been paying attention to the last half century butttt uhh that policy isn’t exactly working especially with a radical top down shadow cabal that conveniently controls culture ( where they base their objects of desire from) and money ( inherently linked with a women’s biology that she will survive). You need to stfu and lurk moar or Kys

Yep. What’s with the fucking alpha loving faggots that completely ignore we don’t live in a society based on strength and might only an artificial rendering of it. The strongest, boldest most attractive alphas all have to answer to schlomo shekelstein and have their entire existence threatened by a limp wristed Semitic bean counter. This pilpul of the strongest surviving only serves to hyper primitivism which is right in the jews master plan as he conveniently floods our countries with 3rd world scum that can’t plan ahead a fucking week and will not hesitate to slaughter the weak pathetic white men that squeal over soy lattes and aborting their own children. The only true generation of physical fitness left to boost the morale of white men is a monogamous system that mirrors that national socialist state of Germany and encourages both child bearing and a high standard of civil and military participation. The only way the primitivism you claim is God would do wel is if humanity were to revert back to small city states, zero technology and the complete disappearance of money beyond said city state. Anybody who doesn’t understand this is delusional.

Obligatory sage

Who said women would have any choice?

That is exactly what should be happening in a system where masculinity is rewarded and lack of it punished.
And there is nothing wrong with being a "fat assed disgusting harry thieving rich fuck" when you are a man. Neoteny is for the weak.

Further women are not men. They only need to be as strong as a woman needs to be and as smart as a woman needs to be in order to raise children.
In fact, I resent the idea that men like myself should be responsible for picking a quality mate at all. It is effeminate to be picky with mates.
Or rather, it is the job of the sex which contributes more to the offspring to be picky, which in most natural circumstances is the female.
To be thinking about finding "one good woman" is faggotry. A man should settle for nothing less than to mate with every woman he can get away with.

Let natural selection decide who wins and loses, not law or tradition. Anything else is actual degeneracy, because it progressively forgives weakness.
This is not a debate of some shifting morality of the times, but of simple and unchanging biological fact.

This is a big no no. Not only is polygamy not apart of western culture, but there is a movement right now (especially in Canada) that seeks the acceptance of polyamorous relationships. They’re using the argument of “if we progressed to allow gays to marry, than why not allow a woman to have multiple cucks around her and her kids.” It’s an extremely slippery slope and no person with a sense of normalcy will support this. We shall not succumb to this degeneracy

Looking at the presences of pair bonding and polygamy in nature doesn't really factor in the fact that humans are intelligent organisms capable of long term emotional bonds between one another that polygamy endangers.

Is love a virtue? If so, promiscuity in all it's forms is a vice that must be avoided.

Where were you when I made my Rape, Crimes and European Culture OP?

Don't ask me; I am having a Nihilist existential crisis right now and 'love is unprovable' in this realm. I think polygamy is a terrible idea that causes endless problems from inheritance to violent murder and fratricide as well as infanticide. I prefer independent choice and eugenics for both partners, shouldn't they both breed as high up the ladder as they can? Someone posted something on Zig Forums the other day that said (and I haven't verified it) but that a child had a 60% higher risk of being killed if they lived with step parents I can only imagine that when inheritances are involved it is substantially higher than that.
If 'God', as you understand him, is in everything, can there be any mistakes? Nope, not really…so there can't be any vices either. There are only 'things we want in our society' and 'things we don't'…killing someone for not conforming to societal standards can't be wrong either because God is in all.
This eliminates any worries or guilt of any kind about exterminating kikes or any other degenerate filth.