Body hair map

Body Hair Master Race.

Attached: d943bccbb427eb08930e16f630392ef2.jpg (446x337, 26.42K)

General fashion observation: it now makes even more sense - other than that it imitates children - why porn promotes body shaving, since it imitates the 5% sub-saharan niggers & child prostituting Thais & Filipinos.

Attached: tumblr_o0vvtkrYlv1r539hzo1_400.gif (300x166, 1.41M)

I was watching some music video on youtube from 60/70's and it was showing ads from magazines and all the men at the beach had hair like mine. No chance today

On the subject of slightly unusual racial characteristics, what's the deal with pink nipples? How many have them?

I think even Asians have pink nipples, it's not a white feature

Fashion trends like these matter more than people care to admit.

Attached: vlcsnap-2016-12-02-20h30m27s079.png (1280x738, 648.54K)

One thing that repulse me is large brown male nipples, fucking disgusting. Mine are small areola and slightly pink but not actually fanny pink

Hair (Pubic as well) coarse, fine, curly, straight, etc. plays a part.
.
Andre Walker system

Attached: ClipboardImage.png (736x545 870.02 KB, 213.15K)

Higher concentrations of Jomon (proto-mongoloid) blood, which was for the most part annihilated by Yayoi (later mongoloid) peoples who are more similar to Mongolians, Koreans, Han chinese, etc.
In fact, Japanese foundation myths are about culturally Jomon-ized Yayoi peoples conquering Jomon peoples with superior technology.

Mongoloids usually have brown nipples.

humanphenotypes.net/metrics/texture.html
straight and wavy are white, everything else is non-white

So the hairier places in the American continent are the French-speaking areas of Canada, most of the original Thirteen Colonies area (which is inhabited mostly by French, English and Irish descendants), Uruguay and neighbouring Argentinian provinces, both inhabited mostly by Spanish and Italian descendants.

It's kind of surprising how much effort they did put into this, they actually managed to delimitate where certain Europeans did emigrate the most.

Attached: Southern_Cone_Ethnography.jpg (800x684 1.1 MB, 188.42K)

So the less body hair a man has the more likely they are a worthless humanoid species.

Is there a single male celebrity with body hair? Seems like they are trying to fuck us over.

strawpoll.me/17480023

Attached: 180412-trinidad-and-tobago-lgbt-ew-354p_a85a2e8a7efb36b7d0e1607f90a0c679.fit-760w.jpg (760x507, 123.8K)

Ewww faggot mutts…they are all so ugly and gross looking

r/The_Donald there absolutely triggering the DEMOCRAPS

The hair on my chest is almost exactly the same as the hair on my head and so thick that I cannot see any skin on my chest, Also my back is almost completely covered. You cannot see the skin on my toes or feet either. Thankfully my fingers pass as somewhat normal. My Beard line stops just underneath my eyes, so I have to trim it regularly so as not to look like a freak, been growing a beard since early high school.

100% Polish

pretty smart too, talking about that, many studies have linked body hair esp including the back to intelligence.

Succinct. I'm embarrassed for everyone involved.

The Hairy Ainu are not super - hairy. But they can actually just manage to grow beards and not the super - wispy old age beards that the majority of Chinese and Japanese try to pass off as beards

Most women are lesbians, honesty I think natural selection through fighting and environmental exposure were far more responsible for culling the male herd in Northern Europe.

No user…just no.

Men with blonde hair are the least likely to have extensive body hair, then there is red hair, followed last but not least by Brown hair which is the hairiest hair color. Interestingly eye color and skin tone have little to do with androgenic hairyness.

but having said that blond nords have more body hair than black africans

Do you recall being bitten by any odd looking large wolves?

most men of all races esp. the asian races are effeminate brainless fuckwits who should be brutally killed by natural selection outside of the ever - protecting nanny - state

Yes, just yes……. Sorry mate.

I’m also werewolf and part Polish. I agree with you.

Methinks it has to do with likelyhood of being fully enroabed. Holding onto pheromones and pushing clothing away from skin for proper perspiration.

No way, user. That is in your mind. I have been approached by women but we are talking about a handful out of my entire life not something that is prevalent among women.

I have swamp moss on my legs, balls and arms. Baller ass goatee too
But I have zero chest hair besides my nips and a 1 inch bald patch on one cheek.
I'm over 25 so I guess I"m stuck with it

Attached: 7C052D60-6F73-4892-9B90-85DB760EF808.jpeg (634x481, 57.22K)

Anons have fun with mirrors?

Women are mostly lesbian / asexual. That does not automatically mean that they will not approach you. Men are far more interesting / funny / intelligent. Have more money and can make you pregnant.

um…. not quite that hairy !!!!

Kek'd

Cannot say I'm displeased with my hair. I'm multiracial, but from European descent. I have straight hair that goes wavy if it grows too much. No receding lines on my head and it grows pretty quickly. Thank God, I'm not bald. My brother used to have long straight hair like a grunge guy, but he used so many drugs that he went bald after his 20's.
I have a lot of hair on my body, but none at my back, which is also good. I have a perfect chad beard very well designed but really short, I started shaving when I was 15. Eyebrows are perfect too, nothing to complain. I have some hair on my chest and belly but I trim it, and I shave crotch/balls hair because it is unbearable. Hair on both arms and legs, wavy.

Basically me, but I'm skinnyfag, need to work on that.

We used to have quite a few not too long ago. Nowadays we only got "metrosexuals" though, with honourable exceptions like Alex Jones.

Attached: 20915250_10155593967262200_5872875781899820536_n.png (663x1024 25.58 KB, 87.17K)

Whatever floats your boat. I have never been sexually attracted to a woman in my life, not even once (I think women can be beautiful, but it is in the same way I think a work of art is beautiful). There is nothing that can compare to men (that isn't just a penis thing, if it was, I would find dildos attractive and lust after them as well; but I don't, I genuinely like men) and while I do like the idea of money and pregnancy, that doesn't go very far in explaining why someone would not find a single woman sexually attractive in their entire life. :) I think your 'homo fantasies' are just that. If something like 1% of the populace is homo your theory just doesn't hold up…and I am not exactly 'shy' about getting what I want…if I wanted a woman (ever) I would have had one.

You trim your hair…………… So a flaming homosexual 30% er multiracial mutt………..
On Pol/ …. why, just why

But your description…I mean, I can't say that wasn't the thing that immediately popped into my mind. :)
Then I thought about bear wrestling for a little while…then bears with penises…then I thought, "Oh good god! I am turning into a fucking fur fag." And then went back to reading about Hawking's origin of the universe.

Even trying to drown in Hawking's theories…I can't get the thought of what an 'ass goatee' looks like. So disturbing.

OP is shilling for soy and other endocrine disruptors that lower test and raise estrogen, creating effeminate men with little hair.

Lot of poos have straight hair aswell.

Chewbacca, is that you?

Haven't seen any blonde male without lots of (potential) hair growth, redheads however did have some sort of deficiency either in chest/facial growth from my experience, and indeed (light)brown to even dark blondes seem to have the most hair overall.

kek'd

Attached: koen-verweij-jutta-leerdam.png (1593x900, 433.61K)

What a lovely train of thought…. hahaha

True but adding to my previous comment, the majority of all European men can grow nice beards.

Many poos have blue eyes and white skin and in fact look even more white than white people…. (load of shit)

So you are a literally gay faggot? well that explains you nonsensical ideas on heterosexuality. Let me make it really simple for you. Men initiate everything with women, and in our not too distant past fucked what ever women we could get our hands on regardless of if they wanted it or not, women had no power, and in order to survive had to be our bitches. So their sexual orientation meant very little.

You shouldn't watch to TV or look at Movie / TV Stars as role models.

Attached: tumblr_n4unogIElD1qd5mq1o1_400.jpg (360x480, 27.16K)

There are no women on Zig Forums user.

kek

He could have been a straight dude.

genetics+testosterone+environment I guess
arctic peoples don't seem particularly hairy, nor equatorial people, I don't see any particular link to temperature, I think one important link is neoteny, in Europe for instance the lesser presence of hair in mittel Europa could be associated with the Alpinid racial type, neotenic, and in the east to the various Baltid types, also neotenic/borealized
and then there is obviously east asians, a generally very neotenic people, and even africans have many neotenic types
in any case, a general loss of fur can be considered a racially progressive feature

Attached: paleo-negrid.jpg (278x162, 37.56K)

Yes but whites have only wavy or straight hair

Whadda I have to spell it out for you?
I think you should go back to the goatee gazing. :)

Scandinavians have preserved much more ancient phenotypes, while the rest of Europe became brachycephalised during middle-ages without any kind of migrations

I know you are gay, you just sounded like one of those guys who is like "never been attracted to women in any way for 40 years but I am not gay" , or you know dicks are aesthetically pleasing but I am straight. Or, "I am bisexual but not gay and shared a bed with my mom once when I was sick as a child"…….

How dense are you?

Such as? longer heads?

I suppose, IF I AM CORNERED, I will have to admit to being 'gay'…whiplash…we all got whiplash…I am going to have to leave this OP because I understand that I can't resist teasing you and I don't want your body hair to puff too much. :)
Mein nigger, I am outta here.

Attached: 1cv3m3.gif (480x400, 10.25M)

How stupid are you for thinking you know anything about women when you are a flaming faggot?

Fags know what it's like to be ruled by emotion, so they know women quite well.
But that doesn't even matter because .. well, never mind, if you don't get it by now, i feel no need to spell it out for you.

Attached: 1458695473782.jpg (518x396, 116.27K)

Which is why I am 100% certain gays are just born gay, their strange male/female hybrid behavior just cannot be faked. The most promising theory for why gay men even exist is that the mothers of gay men tend to have children. The daughters of those mothers also have more children , but the sons are born gay. So it is an androphilic sexual orientation that is inherited from the mother.

In other words you have no intimate experience with women what so ever……… you know nothing about women

Nah fags were abused as children. When they first come out from under anesthesia they sound normal but when they fully come to they put on the gay voice act again. Look at double twin studies. Pay attention and use your brain faggot

Yes, but when you mentioned that loss of fur can be considered a racially progressive feature
All ancestral populations to Europeans were doliocephalic yet somewhat different
Some of the hybrid populations were similar to modern Baltids/Alpinids but South Polish/Czech (and probably East Germans) are identical to Scandinavians in terms of ancient DNA
Similar to this, there has been selection for lighter pigmentation in Northern Europe when compared with ancient times
However there is extreme selection for wider faces in North-Eastern Europe (for example Finland).

Attached: ClipboardImage.png (734x637 89.31 KB, 246.89K)

There's homos ( explained here; ) and fags (explained here; ) : all fags are homo, but not all homos are fag.

i won't deny i have still much to learn about women. share some of your wisdom?

Attached: 237727528d77b1055eb17f99561aafa56a00f2f91e0e928fd94167435e6edace.jpg (600x752, 51.13K)

How much does this map match an age map with aging populations = hairier?

the vast majority of adult gays and straights are never abused as children. Sick and tired of hearing that load of shit. As if you can even change your fucking orientation. And that child-hood abuse theory is almost always used by closet - homosexual Christians. People who are gay in an environment that hates gays tend to promote the idea of sexuality being nothing but a learnt behavior, this allows them to redeem themselves by never acting on their gay impulses and pretending to be straight.

Very interesting. Thanks. Makes me feel better about being a Pole!

So Homos are normal dressing inconspicuous homosexuals, but fags are loud / cross dressing in your face homosexuals?

age does not add much to actual body hair at all after the age of 25.

Also If you say you were abused as a child that shifts the responsibility for your gayness onto your imaginary abuser. When in actual fact you are simply biologically gay and there is nothing you can do about it. Just learn to live with it and fucking move on.

One of the few advantages of being gay is that you do not have to deal with women…….. hahaaaha.

Werewolf genetics? Aroooo…

Attached: commision__minggan_by_farenheat-d48ade8.jpg (900x1500, 226.08K)

I have hair lots on my legs and forearms but just some on my chest and none on my abs is an evolutionary reason behind this? Why is my arms legs hair but rest isn't

I wouldn't mind looking like a werewolf, to be honest. It would probably be a step up from humanity at this point, plus I'd be a chick magnet.

meant for

This oversimplifies the situation. Body hair in differing parts of the body has differing biological uses. A better map would exemplify, say, propensity towards baldness, thickness of beards or pubic hair, or cultural attitudes towards hair growth. The postulate of this map is too general to be of much use.

I really, REALLY like how the Roman Empire still exists to this day. Ave Caesar

So, basically Saiyayins are Jomons

pure coincidence???????

Attached: roman empire.jpg (2000x1575, 103.62K)

I think not

Romans wuz werewolves confirmed.

Attached: La_lupa_a_campidoglio.JPG (2272x1704, 767.22K)

Is this map supposed to be for modern populations or ancient ones?

The real irony here is that the Romans believed that body hair was barbaric.

Amber eyes are sometimes called "wolf eyes" .

Attached: wolf.jpg (2842x1816, 4.45M)

Why are there so many furries on here?

you are the only one, actually

I'm not the one fantasizing about being a werewolf, user.

me neither

Well, others are, or are positively comparing themselves to werewolves or talking about Romans being werewolves, etc.

Tbh I've seen this on here and other places before, maybe the so-called "far right" draws in wolfaboos and lycanthrope fetishists for whatever reason.

...

Body hair is associated with homoerectus/other primal apes.

Two forms of genetic differentiation occurred
OR

This explains why nordics are the most hairy.

Attached: golden-germ2.jpg (721x1024, 105.57K)

That isn't really an advantage. There are no true advantages to being gay; only false state-imposed ones. If it weren't for the protection of the state and constant propaganda, faggots would be beaten to death again.

Read Vladimir Avyedev book on Raciology. Free download pdf. He analyzes hairness, among other things, as clues to people's being mixed with animals in the ancient and recent past. Very enlightening. Dark nipples and genitalia are evidence of being mixed.

I own a copy of that book and read through it every once in a while. I like it because it precisely records distinctions between the races, but I also don't like it because the writer seems to have a bit of self-hatred or identity issue in that they prefer the Germanic people/assert that Russians are Germanic themselves when that simply isn't true. A healthy identity is to embrace oneself as they are.