H.R...

H.R.1263 - To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to subject to the requirements of the National Firearms Act any semiautomatic rifle that has the capacity to accept a detachable magazine.

congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/house-bill/1263/titles?r=13&s=1

Attached: 220px-Muro_de_las_Lamentaciones,_Jerusalén,_Israel,_2017.gif (220x124, 3.05M)

Other urls found in this thread:

law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/26/subtitle-E/chapter-53
congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/house-bill/1263/titles
twitter.com/AnonBabble

what does this mean the link has no more info thsan you posted wtf how can a law be passed that has less text than a shit op.

it's an amendment. So maybe that's why.

No, it's short and simple because the bill does exactly what it was intended to do.
Long bills are intended to hide unconstitutional actions.

This is so blatant that it would trigger a civil war if it passed.

Which is why it will never pass until we are already subjugated.

but wtf does it mean

We are already subjugated.

We are already subjugated. Basic redpill

law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/26/subtitle-E/chapter-53
Have fun.

It means if your semiauto takes a clip you're ok? idk I would need the 86 bill for context. Basically it means train yourself and practice shooting.

Nice conspiracy theory. Almost as convincing as Trump giving amnesty to child traffickers.

Still not tired of winning.

Fuck off nigger, hate/pol/ expects effort.

Conspiracy doesn't mean false.

Lel.
Doesn't explain what it has to do with the IRS tho.

NFA is an extension of the federal tax code.
NFA describes what arms you can, and cannot own, and what forms of extortion are necessary to own.
This bill will amend the NFA code to include all semi-auto arms with detachable magazines.

If passed, this will require a $200 tax stamp, along with federal background check and federal registration of said arms.

NFA is unconstitutional, because IRS and federal income tax is unconstitutional, because they are not approved by the constitution or a constitutional amendment, but nobody has had the balls to say no and a single 1803 ruling where the supreme court said they had the power to define what is and is now lawful.


He direct quoted the entirety of the bill with a direct link.
Can't get much better than that, possibly an archive link.

So, backdoor gun registration? There isn't even a summary.

Thanks.

Definitely won't pass then. This isn't on the agenda until Trump loses in 2021. Then the poz will go full bore.

Come on, your cuckservative priors are showing. You should know that those NPCs will never do a single thing to stop this country's madness, or they would have done it decades ago. This country has literally killed 150 million white babies, more than all wars combined, in the broad light of day, not to mention destroyed family-formation with no fault divorce and gay marriage.

Really mate? To amend. To WHAT? Oh gotta go fucking dig. Kill yourself. If you have something to fucking present do so, summarize it rather than waste an user's time with your jewish fuckery.

I was walking down the road one day and saw 111 ducks.
My picture represents the flock of ducks.
How many ducks were red, and how many ducks were green?

Attached: guess.png (500x500, 11.47K)

I think it means National Firearms Act, which I guess (really don't know, but) it could be something like pistol and small arm background checks and checks on "assault rifles" not meant for hunting, this amendment would make regular rifles of all kinds subject to that Act, probably some sort of check.

This looks exactly right.

nobody has ever done anything before, so why would anybody ever do anything? nothing good has ever happened, so nothing good will ever happen. it's wishful thinking, it's all over, all is lost forever
once (D) has everything in 2021 onwards, anything can pass
we have been for over a century

Try using your brains, children.


pic related

Attached: ashes and echoes.jpg (300x300, 27.87K)

He didn't say anything incorrect. Try making an argument.

(((they))) just can't stop pushing. I hope y'all've prepared just in case.

Attached: Goblin_Slayer_Happening.PNG (755x483, 341.24K)

Trump will sign it.

You're mentally defective.
Nothing happened.
Nothing happened.
Nothing happened.
Nothing happened.
Nothing happened.
Nothing happened.
Nothing happened.
No one is going to fight back.

Everything you need to know is not only in the OP, it's in the link that OP posted. Every question you have ever asked has been answered before you asked them. You aren't even human.

Part of effective political organization is crystal clear communication.

Trump got shit on a lot for the way he talked but he spoke very slowly and deliberately and his meaning was always understood.

If you have a problem with above average intelligence people not understanding what you're showing them, the problem is with the communication and presentation of the important information.

Everyone has an action economy and they're not inclined to invest their time in trying to figure out what the hell you're talking about if they're not sure there is anything to figure out at all.

This has been helpful life protips with user-sensei. Remember to like, subscribe, and hit the bell.


Has he vetoed even a single thing?

HAHAHHAA OH MY FUCKING GOD HE HASN'T.

Attached: Selection_714.png (677x166, 18.93K)

Attached: elbow ass.jpg (340x392, 18.91K)

We are already subjugated, lol

trips confirm

Thats why we need accelerationism. We need to scare people.

Gas yourself turkroach.

Attached: cd5bc3a626a68659e7679e900b7a6c7f992fc6d2e0140fa3cad5ae9a8011d51d.jpg (1224x1631, 746.42K)

bump for visibility

Attached: ATF.jpg (640x480, 77.59K)

???

Well while that mey be correct there is an easier argument to make. The 2a was written to protect the right of people to wage war against their government, so any restrictions on firearm type are unconstitutional. Also, another argument you can use is that 'background checks' convert the constitutionally protected right into a state-permitted privilege. So, no restrictions on type, or size, or round count, or round size, or on whom can access firearms. I would support a law that only restricts firearms access to those convicted of firearms violent crimes, not simply having a firearm in a bag or a vehicle while committing non-violent crimes.

That's too easy to abuse, which is why the second amendment is so broad.
All it would take is one dirty cop to plant an arm after the crime.

Take note that the second amendment covers "arms" and not just firearms.
Air rifles existed before the bill of rights was written, and all of the canons and ships used by colonists were privately owned.
They may not have been able to foresee the world we now live in, but they could see that arms advancements were inevitable.


Fuck off shill.

Fuck reminder to manufacture your own firearms and lern what isn't one and but lots of thems there thingies

You will never be white.

HOREE SHIT!

Fuck off union jew.

>congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/house-bill/1263/titles