Feinsten Confronted by School Children

Brainwashed children demand she sign the Green New Deal and she argues with them and even scolds them.

Senator Dianne Feinstein is drawing criticism for snapping at a group of schoolchildren who demanded that she vote 'yes' on the Green New Deal - but her supporters defend her for engaging with them on the subject.

A group of about 20 middle and high school students organized by Sunrise Movement confronted the California Democrat in her San Francisco offices on Friday.

The children pleaded with the senator to sign the Green New Deal resolution championed by freshman congresswoman Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, telling Feinstein that they had heard from 'scientists' that the earth only has 12 years before cataclysm.

'You know what's interesting about this group? I've been doing this for 30 years. I know what I'm doing,' Feinstein replied.

Other urls found in this thread:

congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/house-resolution/109/text
twitter.com/AnonBabble

Article

Attached: Dianne_Feinstein_scolds_schoolchildren_who_demand_that_she_vote_for_the_Green_New_Deal_Daily_Mail_Online_-_2019-02-23_08.29.18.png (774x5352, 4.57M)

She really did not do this right. She could have taken any of the thousands of obvious problems with that bill, described the problem and asked the children what they thought should be done to manage that problem. This "muh authority" bullshit just makes crybabies.

...

she probably didn't even read the bill. it's really not that long. i will post it here since it's probably only 3 posts

116TH CONGRESS
1ST SESSION H. RES. ____

Recognizing the duty of the Federal Government to create a Green New
Deal.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
Ms. OCASIO-CORTEZ submitted the following resolution; which was referred to
the Committee on __
RESOLUTION
Recognizing the duty of the Federal Government to create
a Green New Deal.

Whereas the October 2018 report entitled ‘‘Special Report on Global Warming of 1.5oC’’ by the intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change and the November 2018 Fourth National Climate Assessment report found that—

human activity is the dominant cause of observed climate change over the past century;
a changing climate is causing sea levels to rise and an increase in wildfires, severe storms, droughts, and other extreme weather events that threaten human life, healthy communities, and critical infrastructure
global warming at or above 2 degrees Celsius beyond preindustrialized levels will cause—
mass migration from the regions most affected by climate change;
more than $500,000,000,000 in lost annual economic output in the United States by the year
2100;
wildfires that, by 2050, will annually burn at least twice as much forest area in the western
United States than was typically burned by wildfires in the years preceding 2019;
a loss of more than 99 percent of all coral reefs on Earth;
more than 350,000,000 more people to be exposed globally to deadly heat stress by 2050; and
a risk of damage to $1,000,000,000,000 of public infrastructure and coastal real estate in the
United States; and
global temperatures must be kept below 1.5 degrees Celsius above preindustrialized levels to avoid the most severe impacts of a changing climate, which will require—
global reductions in greenhouse gas emissions from human sources of 40 to 60 percent from
2010 levels by 2030; and
net-zero emissions by 2050;

Whereas, because the United States has historically been responsible for a disproportionate amount of greenhouse gas emissions, having emitted 20 percent of global greenhouse gas emissions through 2014, and has a high technological capacity, the United States must take a leading role in reducing emissions through economic transformation;

Whereas the United States is currently experiencing several related crises, with—

life expectancy declining while basic needs, such as clean air, clean water, healthy food, and adequate health care, housing, transportation, and education, are inaccessible to a significant portion of the United States population;
a 4-decade trend of economic stagnation, deindustrialization, and antilabor policies that has led
to—

hourly wages overall stagnating since the 1970s despite increased worker productivity;
the third-worst level of socioeconomic mobility in the developed world before the Great Recession
the erosion of the earning and bargaining power of workers in the United States; and
inadequate resources for public sector workers to confront the challenges of climate change
at local, State, and Federal levels; and
the greatest income inequality since the 1920s, with—
the top 1 percent of earners accruing 91percent of gains in the first few years of economic
recovery after the Great Recession;
a large racial wealth divide amounting to a difference of 20 times more wealth between the average White family and the average Black family; and
a gender earnings gap that results in women earning approximately 80 percent as much
as men, at the median;

Whereas climate change, pollution, and environmental destruction have exacerbated systemic racial, regional, social, environmental, and economic injustices (referred to in this preamble as ‘‘systemic injustices’’) by disproportionately affecting indigenous communities, communities of color, migrant communities, deindustrialized communities, depopulated rural communities, the poor, low-income workers, women, the elderly, the unhoused, people with disabilities, and youth (referred to in this preamble as ‘‘frontline and vulnerable communities’’);

this formatting was fucked up

congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/house-resolution/109/text

————–
116th CONGRESS
1st Session
H. RES. 109

Recognizing the duty of the Federal Government to create a Green New
Deal.

_______________

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

February 7, 2019

Ms. Ocasio-Cortez (for herself, Mr. Hastings, Ms. Tlaib, Mr. Serrano,
Mrs. Carolyn B. Maloney of New York, Mr. Vargas, Mr. Espaillat, Mr.
Lynch, Ms. Velazquez, Mr. Blumenauer, Mr. Brendan F. Boyle of
Pennsylvania, Mr. Castro of Texas, Ms. Clarke of New York, Ms. Jayapal,
Mr. Khanna, Mr. Ted Lieu of California, Ms. Pressley, Mr. Welch, Mr.
Engel, Mr. Neguse, Mr. Nadler, Mr. McGovern, Mr. Pocan, Mr. Takano, Ms.
Norton, Mr. Raskin, Mr. Connolly, Mr. Lowenthal, Ms. Matsui, Mr.
Thompson of California, Mr. Levin of California, Ms. Pingree, Mr.
Quigley, Mr. Huffman, Mrs. Watson Coleman, Mr. Garcia of Illinois, Mr.
Higgins of New York, Ms. Haaland, Ms. Meng, Mr. Carbajal, Mr.
Cicilline, Mr. Cohen, Ms. Clark of Massachusetts, Ms. Judy Chu of
California, Ms. Mucarsel-Powell, Mr. Moulton, Mr. Grijalva, Mr. Meeks,
Mr. Sablan, Ms. Lee of California, Ms. Bonamici, Mr. Sean Patrick
Maloney of New York, Ms. Schakowsky, Ms. DeLauro, Mr. Levin of
Michigan, Ms. McCollum, Mr. DeSaulnier, Mr. Courtney, Mr. Larson of
Connecticut, Ms. Escobar, Mr. Schiff, Mr. Keating, Mr. DeFazio, Ms.
Eshoo, Mrs. Trahan, Mr. Gomez, Mr. Kennedy, and Ms. Waters) submitted
the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Energy
and Commerce, and in addition to the Committees on Science, Space, and
Technology, Education and Labor, Transportation and Infrastructure,
Agriculture, Natural Resources, Foreign Affairs, Financial Services,
the Judiciary, Ways and Means, and Oversight and Reform, for a period
to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for
consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the
committee concerned

_______________

RESOLUTION

Recognizing the duty of the Federal Government to create a Green New
Deal.

Whereas the October 2018 report entitled ``Special Report on Global Warming of
1.5 \o\C'' by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change and the
November 2018 Fourth National Climate Assessment report found that–

(1) human activity is the dominant cause of observed climate change
over the past century;

(2) a changing climate is causing sea levels to rise and an increase in
wildfires, severe storms, droughts, and other extreme weather events that
threaten human life, healthy communities, and critical infrastructure;

(3) global warming at or above 2 degrees Celsius beyond
preindustrialized levels will cause–

G (A) mass migration from the regions most affected by climate
change;

G (B) more than $500,000,000,000 in lost annual economic output in
the United States by the year 2100;

G (C) wildfires that, by 2050, will annually burn at least twice as
much forest area in the western United States than was typically burned by
wildfires in the years preceding 2019;

G (D) a loss of more than 99 percent of all coral reefs on Earth;

G (E) more than 350,000,000 more people to be exposed globally to
deadly heat stress by 2050; and

G (F) a risk of damage to $1,000,000,000,000 of public
infrastructure and coastal real estate in the United States; and

(4) global temperatures must be kept below 1.5 degrees Celsius above
preindustrialized levels to avoid the most severe impacts of a changing
climate, which will require–

G (A) global reductions in greenhouse gas emissions from human
sources of 40 to 60 percent from 2010 levels by 2030; and

G (B) net-zero global emissions by 2050;

Whereas, because the United States has historically been responsible for a
disproportionate amount of greenhouse gas emissions, having emitted 20
percent of global greenhouse gas emissions through 2014, and has a high
technological capacity, the United States must take a leading role in
reducing emissions through economic transformation;
Whereas the United States is currently experiencing several related crises,
with–

(1) life expectancy declining while basic needs, such as clean air,
clean water, healthy food, and adequate health care, housing,
transportation, and education, are inaccessible to a significant portion of
the United States population;

(2) a 4-decade trend of wage stagnation, deindustrialization, and
antilabor policies that has led to–

G (A) hourly wages overall stagnating since the 1970s despite
increased worker productivity;

G (B) the third-worst level of socioeconomic mobility in the
developed world before the Great Recession;

G (C) the erosion of the earning and bargaining power of workers in
the United States; and

G (D) inadequate resources for public sector workers to confront the
challenges of climate change at local, State, and Federal levels; and

(3) the greatest income inequality since the 1920s, with–

G (A) the top 1 percent of earners accruing 91 percent of gains in
the first few years of economic recovery after the Great Recession;

G (B) a large racial wealth divide amounting to a difference of 20
times more wealth between the average white family and the average black
family; and

G (C) a gender earnings gap that results in women earning
approximately 80 percent as much as men, at the median;

Whereas climate change, pollution, and environmental destruction have
exacerbated systemic racial, regional, social, environmental, and
economic injustices (referred to in this preamble as ``systemic
injustices'') by disproportionately affecting indigenous peoples,
communities of color, migrant communities, deindustrialized communities,
depopulated rural communities, the poor, low-income workers, women, the
elderly, the unhoused, people with disabilities, and youth (referred to
in this preamble as ``frontline and vulnerable communities'');
Whereas, climate change constitutes a direct threat to the national security of
the United States–

(1) by impacting the economic, environmental, and social stability of
countries and communities around the world; and

(2) by acting as a threat multiplier;

Whereas the Federal Government-led mobilizations during World War II and the New
Deal created the greatest middle class that the United States has ever
seen, but many members of frontline and vulnerable communities were
excluded from many of the economic and societal benefits of those
mobilizations; and
Whereas the House of Representatives recognizes that a new national, social,
industrial, and economic mobilization on a scale not seen since World
War II and the New Deal era is a historic opportunity–

(1) to create millions of good, high-wage jobs in the United States;

(2) to provide unprecedented levels of prosperity and economic security
for all people of the United States; and

(3) to counteract systemic injustices: Now, therefore, be it

Resolved, That it is the sense of the House of Representatives
that–
(1) it is the duty of the Federal Government to create a
Green New Deal–
(A) to achieve net-zero greenhouse gas emissions
through a fair and just transition for all communities
and workers;
(B) to create millions of good, high-wage jobs and
ensure prosperity and economic security for all people
of the United States;
(C) to invest in the infrastructure and industry of
the United States to sustainably meet the challenges of
the 21st century;
(D) to secure for all people of the United States
for generations to come–
(i) clean air and water;
(ii) climate and community resiliency;
(iii) healthy food;
(iv) access to nature; and
(v) a sustainable environment; and
(E) to promote justice and equity by stopping
current, preventing future, and repairing historic
oppression of indigenous peoples, communities of color,
migrant communities, deindustrialized communities,
depopulated rural communities, the poor, low-income
workers, women, the elderly, the unhoused, people with
disabilities, and youth (referred to in this resolution
as ``frontline and vulnerable communities'');

The headline should be special needs school children if they support the horsefaced spicjew's bill.

The fuck has this got to do with the environment. Wish these faggots would stop trying to shoe-horn race into everything

(2) the goals described in subparagraphs (A) through (E) of
paragraph (1) (referred to in this resolution as the ``Green
New Deal goals'') should be accomplished through a 10-year
national mobilization (referred to in this resolution as the
``Green New Deal mobilization'') that will require the
following goals and projects–
(A) building resiliency against climate change-
related disasters, such as extreme weather, including
by leveraging funding and providing investments for
community-defined projects and strategies;
(B) repairing and upgrading the infrastructure in
the United States, including–
(i) by eliminating pollution and greenhouse
gas emissions as much as technologically
feasible;
(ii) by guaranteeing universal access to
clean water;
(iii) by reducing the risks posed by
climate impacts; and
(iv) by ensuring that any infrastructure
bill considered by Congress addresses climate
change;
(C) meeting 100 percent of the power demand in the
United States through clean, renewable, and zero-
emission energy sources, including–
(i) by dramatically expanding and upgrading
renewable power sources; and
(ii) by deploying new capacity;
(D) building or upgrading to energy-efficient,
distributed, and ``smart'' power grids, and ensuring
affordable access to electricity;
(E) upgrading all existing buildings in the United
States and building new buildings to achieve maximum
energy efficiency, water efficiency, safety,
affordability, comfort, and durability, including
through electrification;
(F) spurring massive growth in clean manufacturing
in the United States and removing pollution and
greenhouse gas emissions from manufacturing and
industry as much as is technologically feasible,
including by expanding renewable energy manufacturing
and investing in existing manufacturing and industry;
(G) working collaboratively with farmers and
ranchers in the United States to remove pollution and
greenhouse gas emissions from the agricultural sector
as much as is technologically feasible, including–
(i) by supporting family farming;
(ii) by investing in sustainable farming
and land use practices that increase soil
health; and
(iii) by building a more sustainable food
system that ensures universal access to healthy
food;
(H) overhauling transportation systems in the
United States to remove pollution and greenhouse gas
emissions from the transportation sector as much as is
technologically feasible, including through investment
in–
(i) zero-emission vehicle infrastructure
and manufacturing;
(ii) clean, affordable, and accessible
public transit; and
(iii) high-speed rail;
(I) mitigating and managing the long-term adverse
health, economic, and other effects of pollution and
climate change, including by providing funding for
community-defined projects and strategies;
(J) removing greenhouse gases from the atmosphere
and reducing pollution by restoring natural ecosystems
through proven low-tech solutions that increase soil
carbon storage, such as land preservation and
afforestation;
(K) restoring and protecting threatened,
endangered, and fragile ecosystems through locally
appropriate and science-based projects that enhance
biodiversity and support climate resiliency;

(L) cleaning up existing hazardous waste and
abandoned sites, ensuring economic development and
sustainability on those sites;
(M) identifying other emission and pollution
sources and creating solutions to remove them; and
(N) promoting the international exchange of
technology, expertise, products, funding, and services,
with the aim of making the United States the
international leader on climate action, and to help
other countries achieve a Green New Deal;
(3) a Green New Deal must be developed through transparent
and inclusive consultation, collaboration, and partnership with
frontline and vulnerable communities, labor unions, worker
cooperatives, civil society groups, academia, and businesses;
and
(4) to achieve the Green New Deal goals and mobilization, a
Green New Deal will require the following goals and projects–
(A) providing and leveraging, in a way that ensures
that the public receives appropriate ownership stakes
and returns on investment, adequate capital (including
through community grants, public banks, and other
public financing), technical expertise, supporting
policies, and other forms of assistance to communities,
organizations, Federal, State, and local government
agencies, and businesses working on the Green New Deal
mobilization;
(B) ensuring that the Federal Government takes into
account the complete environmental and social costs and
impacts of emissions through–
(i) existing laws;
(ii) new policies and programs; and
(iii) ensuring that frontline and
vulnerable communities shall not be adversely
affected;
(C) providing resources, training, and high-quality
education, including higher education, to all people of
the United States, with a focus on frontline and
vulnerable communities, so that all people of the
United States may be full and equal participants in the
Green New Deal mobilization;
(D) making public investments in the research and
development of new clean and renewable energy
technologies and industries;
(E) directing investments to spur economic
development, deepen and diversify industry and business
in local and regional economies, and build wealth and
community ownership, while prioritizing high-quality
job creation and economic, social, and environmental
benefits in frontline and vulnerable communities, and
deindustrialized communities, that may otherwise
struggle with the transition away from greenhouse gas
intensive industries;
(F) ensuring the use of democratic and
participatory processes that are inclusive of and led
by frontline and vulnerable communities and workers to
plan, implement, and administer the Green New Deal
mobilization at the local level;
(G) ensuring that the Green New Deal mobilization
creates high-quality union jobs that pay prevailing
wages, hires local workers, offers training and
advancement opportunities, and guarantees wage and
benefit parity for workers affected by the transition;
(H) guaranteeing a job with a family-sustaining
wage, adequate family and medical leave, paid
vacations, and retirement security to all people of the
United States;

(I) strengthening and protecting the right of all
workers to organize, unionize, and collectively bargain
free of coercion, intimidation, and harassment;
(J) strengthening and enforcing labor, workplace
health and safety, antidiscrimination, and wage and
hour standards across all employers, industries, and
sectors;
(K) enacting and enforcing trade rules, procurement
standards, and border adjustments with strong labor and
environmental protections–
(i) to stop the transfer of jobs and
pollution overseas; and
(ii) to grow domestic manufacturing in the
United States;
(L) ensuring that public lands, waters, and oceans
are protected and that eminent domain is not abused;
(M) obtaining the free, prior, and informed consent
of indigenous peoples for all decisions that affect
indigenous peoples and their traditional territories,
honoring all treaties and agreements with indigenous
peoples, and protecting and enforcing the sovereignty
and land rights of indigenous peoples;
(N) ensuring a commercial environment where every
businessperson is free from unfair competition and
domination by domestic or international monopolies; and
(O) providing all people of the United States
with–
(i) high-quality health care;
(ii) affordable, safe, and adequate
housing;
(iii) economic security; and
(iv) clean water, clean air, healthy and
affordable food, and access to nature.

Imagene moi shook.

Attached: blue-rinse.jpg (330x330, 39.68K)

there's literally no meat in this bill at all. there's no change to existing laws, no tweaks to funding, etc

all this bill is is the left talking to themselves via a bill

i'm not an expert on these bills; but shouldn't these bills actually do something but say "we should do something about this and this is maybe how we should do it"

what's the point of a bill if it doesn't change the law? this looks like a political campaign statement of goals, not a bill that actually does anything.

Not only that, it's MUH GLOBAL WARMING all over again. They just keep trying.

Please explain to me how this isn't abuse.

Attached: twibp.jpg (485x303, 22.23K)

I don't give a fuck about the green deal or spic kikess that penned it.
I only hope the world will end in 12 years so this fucking nightmare can end once and for all.

You niggers need a ban.

Feinstein is an evil kike who exists only to shill for China and her slimey military industrial complex funneling husband.

12 years left…

Attached: ClimatChangeExperts.jpg (600x398, 77.56K)

from
All youth groups do not really carry influence, as they are parasitical for donations and reliant on adult supervision. The adult supervision, is the authority and coaxes the action of its leaders, so ultimately the adults are responsible and this is why you do not see radical youth groups. Should a youth group go against the status quo the adults will be blasted for indoctrination and extremism. Conveniently politicians, the status quo, like these groups because when children are given the illusion of empowerment, their naivety and enthusiasm create a more realistic astroturf movement. Again, these groups are the pets of the elites and if their movement went against the momentum of the status quo then they would not be allowed to have any influence.

Feinstein should've told those little snot-nosed brats to remember the 6 million. That would've shut 'em up.

Attached: dd395.jpg (554x504, 93.37K)

Fuck off with this feminist kike "everyone's a kid until they're 26 or older" drivel.

One of those kids is a furfag

Attached: J_C__Denton_by_Illumonic.jpg (437x665, 153.69K)

I don't even care anymore.

when children ur marxist propaganda brainwashed, support a bill made by a brain washed socialist, that your marxist propaganda influenced, ask you to sign a socialist bill that you dont actually want so you start to appeal to power because if you start to point out problems that the bill has, it may break the brainwashing. Well played Feinsten, im sure your masters are pleased with your response.

The bill is clearly purely political, and pure weaselry.
Its primary goal is to virtue signal. With a hefty percentage of the public already brainwashed into thinking that Global Warming is real, entirely because of pollution, and being mostly caused by Americans (rather than Chinese or Indians), they can claim "look! See how we HEROIC DEMOCRATS are fighting to protect our planet (by signing this do-nothing bill) and these EVIL REPUBLICANS are trying to destroy it (by refusing to sign it because it does nothing).

Alternatively, if a majority of Republicans DO choose to sign the bill because it's meaningless and they can get the virtue signal brownie points, it will then be used as another point of argument in the Climate Change scam: "Of course Climate Change is real! The US government unanimously signed into law a bill designed to fight it! Are you some crazy conspiracy theorist who doesn't believe the data?!"

Not that there's really any difference between the (((blue))) and (((red))) puppets, but all of this is purely part of their internal squabble to decide who gets to be in charge of giving Israel money for the next several years.

>the fucking shareblue bots in this thread not knowing who (((Fienstien))) is

Please also explain to me why children ought to have any say? Only a nation of women and soys can do this to themselves. Holy shit this country.

Attached: carl.jpg (1600x1036, 871.53K)

yawn. i guess if you still have a shitlib sock you could use this to cause infighting on the left