Politically relevant due to its potential to save us if the Jew finally manages to shoah the Clearweb
During the thread on the subject of Bugman Hiro turning Halfchan into a literal forum, the subject drifted to how Peer-to-Peer/anonymized networks could possibly be the future of Imageboards. The idea of making a thread to discuss the value of this alternative net and instructing less-savvy anons ( ) received some approval, so I took it upon myself to make one.
Admittedly, I'm not especially well-versed in P2P, but a good number of names were thrown around during the thread; Zeronet, IPFS, I2P, TOR, Urbit, et cetera. And with those names were a number of sites using them; Nanochan and Millchan, mostly. So let's start with discussing its pros and cons:
Is P2P truly uncensorable as so many of the providers claim? If it isn't and there's ways for the Jew to subvert it, how do we stop him?
Are there any names to avoid? Potential Honeypots, untrustworthy providers, other such bad actors? By that same coin, what are the best providers?
Is there anything about Decentralized Web that requires particular Zig Forums expertise?
very interested in distributed networking but don't know enough about it. what's the range of mesh networks? is it practical to build larger than building/neighborhood networks? can they be linked with other networks and theoretically span the globe? building informational networks based on natural social/economic/etc connections seems elegant.
I wasn't aware there was a previous thread about this. What came of it?
Chase Diaz
Nothing. We decided that as always no one is going to do anything until the normalfag internet is kill and only then people might start looking into alternatives off the grid.
Carson Sanchez
jew
Blake Ramirez
That's the case with all things really; even the exodus only got pushed forward by Zig Forums harbor, despite Moot's years of worsening faggotry. Even so, a prepared list of alternatives and analysis of the providers can stop us from walking into an alphabet trap.
Take TOR for example. It (and Nanochan) are often shilled here, but I recall an incident in which supposed pedos using it as a cover got feds on their asses, and that leaves me questioning just how "anonymous" it really is.
Gabriel Jones
Nice slide thread you got there. When push comes to shove someone will release a better system. In fact it's already been designed. The programmers here are lazy and won't act unless it's really needed.
Jackson Barnes
A fed bust via nanochan? You're going to have to offer up some evidence there, faggot. I've heard nothing of it.
