Tell me about, National Socialism. How does it differ from Capitalism?

Thats because you spent a life time living in the shadow of two major world ideologies
Marxism and Capitalism
If you worry about what differences National Socialism has from capitalism, you should take comfort in the equal amount of difference between it and marxism
It really and trully is a third position
Say that capitalism ins the ultimate individualist philosophy and marixsm the ultimate collectivist (neither are since both have been corrupted by heavy jewish interests but lets talk about their purest and still corrupt forms)
Where capitalism takes no regard for the group and instead elivates the indivudal to supremacy and communism takes destroys the individual and makes him part of the mindless masses
National Socialism perserves both
It allows the individual to build, create and prosper as much as he sees fit while giving him meaning in service to the race.
Under national socialism one can own a business, make an invention, and live generally as he sees fit so long as it is not cancerous to the volk.
For instance under national socialism you could have create and own a store, however that store could not sell dildos, cocaine, or pornography to the masses who would be destroyed by it.
Additionally all the various "social programs" such as loans to white working families to have children, support for widows of soldiers, education ect would largely not be paid for by taxes but by interest free currency backed on the labor of the nation.
Its hard to imagine in our world where ever additional park and tank comes dirrectly out of tax money but there are actually other ways for governments to raise funds then taxes.
Governments can in effect become largely self sufficient organizations working for the good of the poeple if they are not corrupted by outside influence.
This however denies the (((central banker))) any controll over the nation
and this once again is why germany was destroyed
youtube.com/watch?v=0WxRsBpiW5g

Attached: 26994036_597924333871962_3564545088648334650_n.jpg (640x480, 55.6K)

Economically it's very similar to social-democracy, with the exception of the always interventionist stance on international finance.
Socially, we want to help the disenfranchised peer without causing any disgenic effects that social-democracies often do. We also uphold several values that are often debated here.
Also, we ultimately adopt socialist idealism, as in that most of us believe that capitalism needs to eventually be abolished and thus ending the difference between the classes, leading to a world where different criteria would define social hierarchy, such as virtue, devotion to your people and beauty in it's classical sense.

Thanks user for the insight.

So, does that term have any relationship to the so-called liberals in the United States? Don't think I understand the term as you're using it user.

More like with the economic system adopted by certain factions of the american democrats and european social-democrats. As in that it is ultimately a capitalist system with government programs to stimulate growth in certain industries, halt in others, and providing some sort of welfare state, albeit with our own reservations with the extent of the assistentialism.

This guy>>12848509
Is a pretty left leaning national socialist my dude
Damn well many of us dont believe in the abolishment of capitalism
Though this fight has been going in national socialism for a long time, even to the begining
The man quoted above me was infact a national socialist
one hitler had shot
The issue with anti capitalism regardless what form it takes is that it pits part of the race agaisnt the other
Creating class warfare where national socialism would have class cooperation
for this reason i personally believe , as the fuerer did, that any system that abolishes capitalism works against the interests of the volk

Attached: DUfeVSjWAAAzuTJ.jpg (850x400 117.77 KB, 72.47K)

Hmm. That's confusing to me.

Your point about being able to own a store, but being restricted from selling items that were destructive to society made perfect sense to me user. Without more study on my part I assume that's the basics of the 'Socialism' part; to help ensure the society as a whole doesn't degenerate into moral evil, and to prevent (((Central Banks))) from undermining the National (and natural) authority of the government itself. Am I close?

I think you really need to take a better look at national socialist policy my dude.
While its true in national socialism you have policies designed to create growth these are in no way shape or form ones that create "wellfare" outside of provisions for women and children.
National socialism requires those who can work to work if they want to be aided by the state and only works to limmit capitalism in so far as it destructive to the people.
It directs captialism
it does not destroy it
and that is what differentiates it from national bulshivism which is a jewish ideology or another, social democracy
though you are right about the hatred of internationl finance by national socialism, particularly central banking and debt backed currency
this above all else is the heart of jewish power in our day and age

Anyone that gets worked up over the "socialist" aspect of National Socialism is one of the following:
National Socialism is a weltanschauung, a worldview. It is NOT a socio-economic scheme with built in functions but a worldview that births socio-economic solutions around the well being of the racial folk and their continued security, freedom, and independence for alien nations, finance, control, etc.
The debate of Capitalism v. Socialism does not even need to exist beyond that understanding of what National Socialism is. Every criticism runs off like water because at the heart of every motion is "I am doing this because MY PEOPLE need this, to the pearl clutchers and capitalistic, socialistic purist I say me ne frego."

Attached: tumblr_pkobhvS7oE1xn8v38o1_540.jpg (540x450, 17.86K)

from alien nations, finance, control, etc*

> prevent (((Central Banks))) from undermining the National (and natural) authority of the government itself. Am I close?
Basically yes, though they're are a few other economic concentrations to note such as a on national self sufficiency through tarrifs (largely for the sake of national defense ) and other economic incentives to help german workers such as tax breaks and such
Though the core of national socialism really is liberation from debt backed currency
I've posted a video explaining it breifly a few times but here it is again
youtube.com/watch?v=0WxRsBpiW5g
and another
youtube.com/watch?v=-mejOviGyok
Basically if you give a private coperation (central bank) controlled by jews the ability to print your nations money they can litterally end up owning every media outlet and politician in the entire fucking place
which is what we have today
if the state prints their own money
which funnily enough most people assume without realizing it isnt true
it can fund most social programs and national defense without taking it from the tax payer
which is why germany had a lower tax rate then ANY other country in the world in the 1930s

or just fucking new
chillax bro
incase you hadnt noticed we're fucking winning
thenation.com/article/neo-nazis-far-right-ukraine/
reuters.com/article/us-bulgaria-farright-march/far-right-activists-stage-torchlit-march-in-bulgarian-capital-idUSKCN1Q50PG

OK, I think I understand that somewhat. I know it's a silly comparison but the Hobbits of the Shire in Tolkien's works were very protective of the community as a whole. Whenever outside threats appeared, petty infighting was forgotten. So Volkishness promotes 'for the good of the tribe'?

Yes, I can certainly see that very well since I've been lurking Zig Forums for a few years now. The United States is completely cucked to the globalist-kikes. The idea of our US Federal Reserve is plainly evil and at odds to the basic self interests of my country.

What's confusing about it? The management of the economy of the country is very similar to the social-democratic model. This is even historically justified, considering that the origins of the socdem model is related to national-socialist (and proto-fascist in general) policies.

We do support welfare, but only when it's productive to the people. We obviously oppose any forms of welfare that, while momentarialy positive, is ultimately negative. You have mentioned some welfare programs that are to be encouraged, but those are not nearly all of them. Another very important point which was historically advocated were the worker's rights, stuff such as maternity/paternity leave, unemployment subsidies and worker protection.
There is also the encouragement of culture, which definitely falls under the "welfare state" label.
Otherwise, you are mostly correct.

"Wellfair" as you put it was only used as temporary crutch by the national socialists, and mainly even then for women and young children. The National socialists realized, rightly so, that if you take away the responsibility of a man to work he becomes degenerate and useless to society. This is why Hitler rather then using unemployment created vast infastucture projects to fix unemployment instead working on the idea that it is better to pay people for work then to pay them to act like niggers.
As for your points about workers rights you are right, since under national socialism the working class is seen as equal to the upper class, not less as under capitalism and not more as under marxim but these actions would never be taken to destroy productivity. Much less to abolish capitalism which was paramount to the german ability to create and work for his own good as well as his races.
I honestly dont think you're a bad guy but you need to be careful on how far left you go. The point of this ideology more then anything is to unite our race across all lines (including class) for self preservation. We NEED all of us who can be woken up to fight, the workers, the middle class, and the wealthy. That is what national socialism is, one poeple fighting as a people for their survival and prosperity.

Yes, and kek dont be sad about quoting tolkien he was fucking based
By jew i think hes got it

Attached: big_1471379626_image.jpg (1280x720, 59K)

Precisely. Since you're a fan of Tolkien lets put it this way. One of the Hobbits has a farm. Lazily, as the Hobbits do, he collects his vegetables, trades around, and does what he believes is best for him. When the Shire is burdened with hunger however, out of no fault of any ONE person or any ONE group or family, they turned to him and asked him for food. "Of course, anything for my people, let us eat."
Socialist in nature to give to those in need without protest though regularly the man trades as though he were a capitalist. At his heart he is Volkish, and though it was not profitable for him to simply give when his people asked for it, though he could have made money charging for food or soliciting trade out of all the Hobbits, he gave regardless because he truly cares for his people.
That is the heart of Volkishness and the heart of National Socialism. Caring for your people, viewing yourself in the collective of these people, and doing what must be done for that people.
So, when people babble on about Socialism this and Capitalism that it really is mind boggling and a telltale sign that they have yet to grasp National Socialism in its entirety. Feder's policies were not born out of spite for Capitalism or Socialism but out of what he knew was needed for his people.

If I understood that clearly, it probably wouldn't be confusing to me. Not being a smart ass, I'm just a newfag in general when it comes to the subtleties of politics.

Haha, thanks. I'll stop being scared off by the term 'Socialism' and study it. Is there a sort of 'Cliff's Notes' type book outlining the highlights, or must I dive into Mein Kampf straightaway? I'm pretty busy with Uni (STEM degree BTW) ATM.

Thank you user. That was a perfectly lucid analogy and I think I understand National Socialism just a little bit better now.

This isn't grinder, you want my wealth. Provide value.

Then you make it so that they won't become parasites to the state. It should still be possible for one to starve to death, which unlimited unemployment leave and UBI might bring, but we should also consider that our general model of distribution of resources, which we call capitalism, even in it's controlled stage, has it's vices. What if due to poor management someone's employer justifiably ceases to be? There are cases where the worker, due to specificity or market saturation, might simply not be able to find another job for some time. In this case it is perfectly reasonable for that person to receive aid for a period of time, probably around 2-4 months, and only to those who have demonstrated the will to work.
When possible, development of infrastructure will in fact create jobs and economic growth, but it only works when there is actually a fair amount of useful infrastructure to be built. Most western countries, as shit their infrastructure might be, will not have such effect because the economic gain from having what essentially is the maintenance of existing infrastructure would be minimal.

Eh, i will try to make it simple, then.
We generally adopt what you would call the "capitalist model", creating measures to stimulate the growth of the economy depending on the context of the nation, which may range to legitimately laissez-faire policies to state capitalism, with our own special rules and condition imposed by the state.

Alright user to start off lol
there is no "spark notes" for the beautiful peace of political work that is "My Struggle" by adolf hitler
It is THE most honest, intelligent, and deep work written by a politican you will ever read in your life
That being said
hear's some vids to get you started
>youtube.com/watch?v=ndyNUYzDdZo

>youtube.com/watch?v=cvYlSjQDOrE

>youtube.com/watch?v=d3dEufYJ_jo

>youtube.com/watch?v=ca8CpIFb0_E

Most of those are pretty short except the last one which REALLY goes in depth into the shit hole wiemar was
As for quick reads I think this guy posted a alot of the economic policy in germany summerized though my second do videos pretty much explain the same stuff

Attached: 1ca401828f4b19a6dc91f90489cc6da2.jpg (500x312, 33.85K)

Thanks user, I appreciate all the links ITT. I've save the entire page and I'll work through the resources incrementally.

...

sage

user all of this is pretty reasonable stuff
Im not here to bitch with you about worker rights
All of this is coming from a place of good faith and so i have very little problem with what you are saying now
I have three issues and three issues only with what you've said in this chat
1. The system of competitive enterprise and private property cannot be abolished for the good of the volk
It can be limmited
It can be controlled
It can be made to work for the volk
But its abolishment will lead to the same results that happen in any system which does not allow its production to be made efficient through competition
Degeneration, destruction and death
2. Workers have rights but these rights and deserve a decent standard of living, however this must not come into conflict with the interests of the nation. Esepcially in war time when productivity is most necessary and as the national Socailists obviously admitted
3. Social programs should be designed to make productive members of society and CANNOT be used as perminent crutch as this will degenerate the volk

Now after all that i want to say this
and i want to make sure you understand, because i consider you my brother.
This does not mean i think you are a shill, a kike or unintelligent or even working against the good of the volk.
In an actual national socialist state. You would be farther on the "left" and I would obviously be farther on the "right" and both sides, when both are actively working towards the good of the people are necessary.
WE NEED people like you should our people ever pull themselves from the mud and build a new riech to stand up for the workers and their rights for the prosperity of the volk.
Just as we will need poeple like me to stand up for prodoctivity and innovation for the good of the volk. Both are necessary, and it is a byproduct of the cancerous ideology of democracy that we should se each every with one and other.
God willing we ill soon se a new dawn for our people
and then the time will come for all these discussion to be had
But for now it is enough to now that they're are men of my people out there who think about these things as indepth as i do.
Heil our people brother
and heil victory

lol glad to hear it bro

user, the last link
youtube.com/watch?v=ca8CpIFb0_E

won't download properly via youtube-dl or playback on invidious.
ERROR: Watch this video on YouTube. Playback on other websites has been disabled by the video owner. is the error. I don't want to watch this directly on Jewtube.

A) Is there another source of the video, and
B) What is the proper name of video? Is it "Legendary Sin Cities - Berlin: Metropolis of Vice"? Maybe I can find it elsewhere myself.

Yep thats it user i think its on daiymotion,
it may also be on vemo and it could be on 123moveis to if you're feeling lucky lol

here se if this works
dailymotion.com/video/x4mle7m

Alright thanks.

Yes. yt-dl is accessing it fine. 266 MB size.

I do not disagree with this, policy-wise. However, ultimately the entire concept of enterprise will be made defunct. Private property itself is another thing entirely that likely won't ever be abolished.
Correct, like i said, welfare in general should only exists when it ultimately benefits the worker both immediately and mediately. Programs that conflict with the progress of the nation will mediately conflict with the interests of the average worker, and thus shouldn't exist.
I have never argued otherwise.

I agree with the rest of your thoughts. While i do think you may have misunderstood me slightly, it is very important for us to take both sides of the political dialetic, creating the system of "stabilishment and opposition", otherwise our opponents would take the other side and severely weaken our political position.
Also, philosophical discussions such as these are what creates the ideological foundations of a movement, and are not at all something to be avoided or postponed. Right now we need to attract more people who are legitimately interested in our cause, and the most efficient way to do so is having a strong ideological basis coupled with marketing, which we already excell.
Hail, brother.

Go pick up dudes on a dating site, this isn't a dating site you faggot.

lol it is a fucking whopper

This was good,
Honestly its pretty refreshing for me to talk to someone left of me who isnt a traitorous jew loving faggot lol
Anyway i got class tomorow
goodnight brother
Hope to live to se you in the new reich

this is a pretty long ass one to
but if you're still up i wanted to give it to you before i hit the sac
its from an american nat soc
>youtube.com/watch?v=FQ6Lel3Myck
Legit wait till you're on a long car ride or some shit like that to listen though
this is the longest one

the difference between Capitalism and NS is that NS is a strange hybrid between private ownership and State planning.

while everyone focuses on Hitler' military and gassing kikes, very few focus on the fundamental economics behind NS. Hitler nationalized farming, yet preserved private ownership. the strange hybrid was this: Hitler's Ministry of Agriculture set all prices, dictated production, aligned towards the singular goal of raising the earnings of peasant farmers as fast as possible. this control extended over 40% of the German workforce. but unlike the Commumist approach where inefficient amd wasteful collective programs are micromanaged on a whim from idiot bureaucrats in Moscow, Hitler delegated responsibility as locally as possible. the Reich was less Big Brother and more of the sense of what if the power of the State was actually benevolent to helping its people and what if the State used its awesome powers to coordinate resources on a regional scale to help the peasants maximize the profits earned on their own property and their own capital? that in a nutshell is what National Socialism means.

Attached: Screenshot_20190213-124436_1.png (579x533 238.27 KB, 216.77K)

Hitler: i have the ambition to make the German people rich and Germany beautiful. i want to see the living standards raised. "

Attached: Screenshot_20190204-092223_1.png (720x1093 177.24 KB, 248.49K)

a certain ruthless practicality can-do attitude is the necessary ingredient to make NS work and make it scale across the Volk.

"Gentlemen, i know not every subordinate can say 'for me, the Law no longer exists', such weaker souos needed someone who covers up for him… i prefer to be doing something that is against the rules but that is right…
please go where ever you are going and knock down everyone who blocks your way, we cover up everything here, we do not ask wether he is allowed to or not allowed to, for us there is nothing but this one task, we are fanatics in this sphere, no order exists which could prevent me from fulfilling this task, do not let anything deter you and get your people to the point where nothing deters them. "

that is the essence of being a NS

Attached: Screenshot_20190204-232436_1.png (720x1085 222.9 KB, 225.83K)

one of the first things Hitoer did was refuse to pay the foreign debt to the kikes and Intl Banksters, such as the Dulles brothers and Roosevelt. then Hitler took that money and gave it away to his own people in the form of the Mother of All Jobs Programs, in his "War for Work" social campaign, which slash German unemployment by over half in just 4 years.

Attached: Screenshot_20181206-002500_1.png (720x695 236.51 KB, 115.62K)

Hitler's ultimate economic goal was to defeat America by replicating what made America the world's economic superpower. by expanding Lebensraum, Hitler wanted to create enough domestic purchasing power for German production and consumption to be fired by an "inner economy", feeding off f itself, like America had. Hitler framed this goal in the historic lens of great ancient empires like the struggle between Carthage and Rome and Hitler knew that only by exhalting the Volk towards historical scales could he drive everyone into a frenzy of motivation and productivity to turn it into a self-fulfilling prophecy. and it worked, and it worked rapidly. the Germany of 1939 was unrecognizably better than 1932.

Attached: Screenshot_20181204-000315_1.png (720x1086 216.5 KB, 236.51K)

QTDDTOT: Questions that don’t deserve their own thread

also (1)

I can see your desire to help and support us on our quest for knowledge, user but it would be much better if you posted those screenshots of the book in order or named them numerically so one can read them properly.

That depends entirely on how one defines "capitalism". The "socialism" in "National Socialism" is of the utopian stripe (which antedates Marx by decades) and not the Marxist stripe that's more common in these discussions.

Read Gottfried Feder's works you nigger.

El nacionalsocislismo es una locura rota. Es utilizado por organizaciones que quieren una excusa para atormentar al público. Es evidencia de que las personas no tienen competencia y solo piden ser maltratadas. Es una consecuencia de una cultura que intentó hacer que la gente se moviera en lugar de aceptar que el mundo se desarrolla según su propio tiempo. Las personas fueron maltratadas hasta que se “movieron” y luego se movieron de una manera muy dramática.

Los narcisistas que proyectaron trataron a todos aquellos que notaron que los narcisistas proyectaban como narcisistas. Esta fue la idea de alguien de espíritu totalmente reciproco, ¡hah! Sin narcisists que accidentalmente habilitaran a sus oponentez, no habria nacionalsocialismo. Si creían en la humildad lo suficiente como para disculparse, todavía hay al menos una persona recuperable.

Typical lazy and retarded taconigger too fucking cowardly to even give his copy-pasted opinion in English.
You're either going to get raped and killed by the cartels or going to get deported and then raped and killed by the cartels.

Attached: 0dda17f7231d648c1792b6b61c2f3d97cb24d2c3013946084ff37b366948ad2d.png (600x599, 426.76K)

This is reasonable on the Nazi economy, user:
bitchute.com/video/Ld8fxzEXZ2Qz/

We aren’t capitalist because we don’t place Capitol over Labour.
It helps if you understand what money is. Money is SUPPOSED to be a token that represents a unit of economic value.
Economic value is derived from labour, this is because labour is the basis of any economy.
No labour = no economy instead you just have a bunch of faggots wondering why no one has any stuff.
When a man has a job (labour) be gets tokens (money) that corresponds to the labour performed. This is preferable to barter because its universally exchangeable for goods and services and can work in varying amounts. (not everyone appreciates getting paid in 3/4 of a chicken and a bag of carrots). Its less fun to carry around though.

Now this is all fine and dandy but wait! What if i decide to be a cheeky bastard and forge some money tokens in my basement?
Well, i get a load of money and can buy a lots of stuff but the problem is that the local economy gets flooded with more money than accurately corresponds to the labour produced. What i have done in this example is counterfeit economic value & labour.

This influences the local economy artificially in a variety of ways and is the basis of all (((central banks))) economic, political and social power. Because it is these (((central banks))) that issue these value tokens (money) and they will create more or less of these value tokens in accordance with their wishes. This plays havoc with economies and deliberately causes booms and busts etc… The slimy fucks also issue these tokens at interest too thus charging the government (and therefore the people via government taxation) for the privilege of using their counterfeit value tokens in the first place.
In the hands of (((central bankers))) issued at whim, these economic value tokens transform into tokens that are not only disassociated from genuine economic value but are in fact nothing more that a token representing the power of capital over labour and thus the economy.

National Socialist economic, amongst other things, removes the issuance of economic value tokens from the (((central bankers))) and issues them directly from the NS State without charging interest. It does this in accordance with the GDP of the nation to prevent economic chaos such as the ironically named 'business cycle'. In NS Money is ONLY a measure of economic value derived from labour not a tool of economic, political and social manipulation.

The socialist part is tribe, family, people, Nation. Its not everybody sucking at the teat of the state its helping each other directly.
National SOCIALISM = your neighbour, your street, your neighbourhood, your town your nation, your people. All helping each other, not divided against each other. Its teamwork towards the common goal of survival, prosperity and ultimately elevation through social and biological improvement.

Attached: 70ec5cdbdbe3add3c9a1d59a1c64efd6862af13dc7c471cba54e9cdae3c70ed2.jpg (1313x677 119.82 KB, 183.58K)

Hi moyshe!

My spic translator indicates this spic had nothing to say.
It is what every society with a purpose does, even the current kike madness.
You know what directionless growth mean, right?
Cancer.
But you are a retarded spic anyway.

Calling him a jew for calling out (1) OP.

Hm? Who are you? Why do you red text at me?

NATIONAL SOCIALISM (AL-ISM - ISLAM) WAS GUIDED BY ALLAH (A-H - ADOLF HITLER) HIMSELF
CAPITALISM IS SHIRK AND JEWRY GUIDED ONLY BY SHAYTAN
ALLAH IN HEAVEN AND ON EARTH HITLER

Funny

Mentally ill.

Why are you posting in spanish?
now I have to oust myself as a mutt and translate.

"Nationalist Socialism is broken insanity. It is utilized by organizations who want an excuse to torment the people. There is evidence that the people are noncompetitive and only ask to be mistreated.
It's a consequence of a culture that intended to make the people move (?) instead of just accepting that the world develops on it's own pace.
The People were mistreated until they "moved" and the moved in a very dramatic manner.

The projecting narcissists treated those who noted that the narcissists projected like narcissists. This was the idea of someone who has a reciprocal soul, hah!
without narcissists who accidentally enable their oppnents, there would be no Nationalist Socialism. If they believed enough in humility to apologize, there is still at least on recoverable soul."
-8fd424

So you're just a schizo-spic who saw nationalist socialism and somehow had your programming fried and tried to cover it up as some kind of philosopher. Got it.
Your spanish is horrible too, did you use google translate?

QTDDTOT

Attached: Jews.png (540x300, 260K)

Is it spic or span?

I honestly cannot tell.
His spanish is too complex for a meztizo Indio, and I do not know much on how spaniards type.
all I can think of is that he's a fellow Castizo or he's using google translate.

REMOVE LARPING WHITE NATIONALIST/ALT-RIGHT COCKROACHES FROM THE GENE POOL
THEY ARE THE REASON WHITES CANNOT BE TRIBAL AND NETWORK ANYMORE

Doxing Whites as Nazis, Racists, etc. everytime Whites engage in anything political in their defense. Serving our enemies who are exterminating us.

Swastikas and larping are literally more important to these retards than survival of Whites.

lkm

National socialism gets rid of Jews while vanilla capitalism doesn't. If you had some kind of national capitalism that got rid of Jews, it would work just as well as national socialism. But Germanics tend towards socialism, so German nationalists did socialism and not capitalism.

The world didn't develop in it's own, which is why European culture and languages are found everywhere. Europeans developed the world, and in every instance where we were chased off or left, there have bee examples of collapse and decay of said development. Even to this very day the societies that maintain a level of civilization are those in which we have directly impacted them.

What you're saying is like saying some fag can determine another man's sexuality based on his own inner perversions and delusions.

What the hell does that have to do with my post?

I would only like to note that Japan is a formidable exemption to this rule, and while the Meji period was based on the European model, the nipons evaded becoming a semi-colony like China, and became a world power instead.

I would say that exception was due to Japan being militant and trading openly with the Dutch, Danes, English, Germany, and the US all openly. They avoided being subjugated by controlling their borders and set standards for trade.

Best thread in the catalog

Faggots get out.

...

As far as I can tell Nazi-ism was a reaction to jewish crimes. I wonder what the American version will look like.

Where is ze data, motherfucker? Point to another thread on this topic.

Remember, the topic is National Socialism and it's differences from Capitalism.

lol

The topic is lurk more, fucking retard.

You lurk more. Keep your cult crap off this site.

'sup jews.

So it's basically Keynesian economics with state produced currency, and without a huge underclass of mudblood parasites?

i'll do you one better. if my screencaps of a few pages piqued your interest in digging deeper into understanding what was National Socialism beyond the sphere of military and war and beyond the kvetching kikes and beyond the superficial hysterical depictions of the Reich in JWood films–and if you want to understand NS on the granular level of practical economic policies that engineer the elevation of the Volk starting on the ground floor of the peasantry–if that interests you, then you should just go read the book i screencapped. i promise you this book will confirm even more for you that Hitler was Right and that he therefore did nothing wrong.

Wages of Destruction by Adam Tooze (2006):

b-ok.xyz/book/814833/b3ab2c

REMOVE LARPING WHITE NATIONALIST/ALT-RIGHT COCKROACHES FROM THE GENE POOL
THEY ARE THE REASON WHITES CANNOT BE TRIBAL AND NETWORK ANYMORE

Doxing Whites as Nazis, Racists, etc. everytime Whites engage in anything political in their defense. Serving our enemies who are exterminating us.

Swastikas and larping are literally more important to these retards than survival of Whites.
bvgg

Attached: SilvermanDNC-640x480.jpg (1100x771 1.1 MB, 420K)

Get out.

No.

Does this happen everytime someone tries to have a serious discussion? Weird. And pathetic.

Looks like I've got a bunch of reading to do anyway. See you tomorrow!

The goal of Socialism is the preservation and prosperity of a society, at all costs. The goal of Capitalism is Capital at all costs.

Attached: hitlers_socialism_0.jpg (960x480, 74.88K)

Obviously, the Nationalism aspect is implied. Anything else is Marxist.

OK that's better.

And than since their is a surplus of free food the price of the food plummets making it so creating the food is unprofitable and even more people starve and die in the long term.
You don't look at economies based on the emergency precautions.

It's capitalism but with interventionist and socialistic welfare policies. Really I would of been curious to see how this system would of played out economically in the future.
It trades alot of economic and personal freedom for that goal though, it's like a better form of communism but it's still authoritarian trash.

nordicresistancemovement.org/?p=836

capitalism: nation, ethnicity, race, everything superfluous sacrificed for the sake of economy, usury and individualistic pursue of wealth
natsocialism/fascism: economic activity subordinated, as it should and has always been in a sane civilization, to higher purposes, in this case, the folk

Capitalism does not equal globalism lol

it produces it anyway if the material means for such global expansion exist
no reason for pure economic activity above all to stop at the national level, unless the nation is more important

There is nothing in capitalism that prevents you from applying tariffs and anti-globalist laws. To prevent all of the labor being bought from over seas instead of from at home.