Countries that historically fought the Germans in WWII, as they would get more nationalist, would they become more anti-Hitler and anti NatSoc as well?
A devout nationalist would never say that his country made a mistake in a military action. Look at both Polish and Russian nationalists, the former hates Germany and the latter is practically kosher Communists. How do we deal with staunch anti-Hitler, but pro-Nationalists?
How do we deal with anti-Axis countries?
And what about the actual government of germany ?
I don't blame my people for fighting on the wrong side of history.
There's a difference between nationalism and countrism. As an American, I can say that my government, and therefore my country, not only does not support my nation, but is staunchly opposed to it.
But what is the nation of America if almost all of it is described as a liberal political state that rebelled against evil right-wing monarchists?
Only a globalist's caricature of a nationalist as someone absorbed in blind jingoism. As a Canadian I'm pretty well aware of the mistake my country made in entering WW2. It's only fucked us over.
Puritans founded this country so they could be free to live their lives without the Anglican Church imposing upon the Puritans what they saw as foreign doctrines. The Puritans saw the occult elements in Christmas as blasphemy, outlawed the celebration of Yule, and celebrated Christ's birth every day.
They considered the actions of the monarchy to be heretical, thought the monarchy of the time to be illegitimate, and sought freedom from Anglican degeneracy.
I must not be a devout nationalist then because I cannot think of one military in the last 100 years hat my country did that was justified.
Ironically, in this judaized world, Adolf Hitler is the supreme God. I'm not trying to be funny. Think about it.
Who is more important to the ruling class; Jesus Christ, Moses, or Adolf Hitler?
It's Hitler, obviously. Hitler is the basis for the new world order. It is the hatred or love of Hitler that defines the modern political struggle. And this weird situation de-nationalizes Hitler. Poles, French, and Swedes can relate to Hitler because we have been deprived of our historic nations and lumped into a single repressed class; "White racists"
But if and when we triumph over these monstrous jews and reclaim our nationhood back, national groups will want their own heroes and their own founding martyrs. And these men will be the men who help liberate us from the jews. These men will slowly replace Hitler in the national consciousness.
So in a strange way, by creating a national socialist world, Hitler will become demystified and will remain the national figure of only Germany.
Or maybe not. I'm not a mystic.
I will tell you one thing, Hitler is hated only by those who view him as an aggressive anti-Russian or anti-Pole among nationalists. If you want Poles and French and Russian and Serb nationalists to like Hitler, simply stop using him as a tool to humiliate Poles and French and Russians. Stop using his military campaigns against them as a tool to rub their own humiliation in their faces.
Maybe only shills do this. We cannot know. But there are a lot of anons who passionately and vindictively use Hitler to attack the honour and nationhood of Poles and Russians.
I think Hitler was awesome. Among the best men ever to live But I'm fully capable of admitting that he made mistakes.
Let's all just stop trying to make each other miserable. No more brother-wars. Hitler is not a tool with which we bash each other. If European people are to survive, we must put aside our petty hatreds long enough to focus on the (((world-enemy))).
And who knows. Maybe we'll learn to live with each other in peace through our shared struggle.
*nation, not county. Excuse me. Force of habit. (I come from a family of cuckservatives)
Anyone that holds loyalty to their political country is a fucking traitor at this point. All that matters is our people. Borders are irrelevant when they don't exist to protect our people but instead exist to keep us separated and confused as to where our loyalties lie.
A German is still a German even without his borders, a Irish man and Irish man, and a Romanian a Romanian. The borders that exist post-45 only work to give abstract definition to these identities and to keep those who are proud of their ancestry "loyal', even if only in part and spirit, to a country which hates them.
I am not loyal to my country in any respect and spit on its flags. I sincerely have no love for it and could do without any and all of its history if it meant securing the existence of my people, which at this point I believe to be the only means of securing it.