People with IQs lower than 140 should be removed from the gene pool

IQ tests are broken
you need a 120 IQ or higher to get a Phd and there are people getting PhDs in "Gender studies" or "Dance theory"

The first part is a myth.
It was mostly down to better nutrition and being able to afford to dedicate time to learning.

This makes my bepis big

Dude most of Zig Forums is probably between 130 and 140, thats why were here.

Abject nonsense, as proven by today.

Most high IQ, or at least visibly intelligent people that I've ever met have found more satisfaction in performing something simple and menial but that required significant physical exertion than pretty much anything else. As much as I love philosophical debate and learning how the world works; it hasn't got anything on tearing up the garden and building a shed or combat sports.

You have a point regarding a lot of autistic and mentally damaged people exhibiting high IQs and having a whole host of issues that make them incapable of functioning in normal society; but there are an awful lot of intelligent people who can function very well. I also dislike the arbitrariness of "IQ 140", whilst IQ is a decent identifier of intelligence it is not the be-all and end-all. We should certainly engage in some eugenic practices as a society though.

...

Education is broken.

I'm okay with this idea with one modification: either your IQ is 140 or else you're super good looking. Like one-in-a-million supermodel incomprehensibly gorgeous. This will still get rid of the most undesirables without losing certain genes that are objectively desirable.

you fucking retard