Freeze Peach and Defining Anti-Semitism

Let's get some things straight

Trumpenkike's appearance at the CPAC Convention and promising to sign an executive order so that colleges can only obtain federal monies if they allow free speech on campuses is a load of shit.
Wayyyyyy back in 12 Sep 2018, in a galaxy far, far away, Politico published an article (provided below) stating in the first paragraph, "The Trump administration is changing how the Education Department investigates allegations of discrimination against Jewish students, backing an approach that is favored by pro-Israel groups but that critics worry will stifle free speech on campus."
Ummm, he's going to stifle free speech, and then allow free speech on campus, (which is already outlined in the Bill of Rights,) and my head is shaking in disbelief in the contradiction of what is going on. Then again, they don't play by the rules that we play by. They find loopholes and get around the system, subverting the system in every way they can.

First Amendment. Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press, or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

The obvious thing here is the First Amendment violation that freedom of speech will be "Abridged."
The Not-So-Obvious thing going on is that it is helping to establish a "religion" - although most of us know that the Zionists are a Politial Group, just like any other Political Group, like ISIS, for example.
I see and hear everyone screaming about freedom of speech - Muh Freeze Peach - but nothing about pushing one set of religious views on the country.
I guess my question is, "Why aren't we running a parallel course by challenging the establishment of religion (Zionism) rather than merely focusing on the Freeze Peach aspect of the Law?"
The definition of Anti-Semitism that they are talking about using is going to be adopted from the State Department's "working definition" of anti-semitism. This will be led by Betsy DeVos, Education Department Secretary.
Opposition to adopting the "working definition" af anti-semitism has been already opposed by the American Civil Liberties Union, the Foundation for Individual Rights in Education, and PEN America.
This stuff is currently quite specific, targeting anti-semitism and not using a broader definition to include any and all anti-religious or anti-political group speech. If it was more broad, then we wouldn't have to worry about a First Amendment anymore being violated becasue there wouldn't be one to be violated to begin with.

Attached: trumpenkike.jpg (961x641, 107.57K)

Other urls found in this thread:

politico.eu/article/donald-trump-administration-adopts-new-definition-of-anti-semitism-in-schools-education-department/
2009-2017.state.gov/j/drl/rls/fs/2010/122352.htm).
state.gov/s/rga/resources/267538.htm
2009-2017.state.gov/j/drl/rls/fs/2010/122352.htm
archive.fo/priDz

Trump administration adopts new definition of anti-Semitism in schools
Critics worry the move will stifle free speech on campus.
By Michael Stratford
9/12/18, 6:14 AM CET
Updated 9/12/18, 12:48 PM CET

Link - politico.eu/article/donald-trump-administration-adopts-new-definition-of-anti-semitism-in-schools-education-department/

Defining Anti-Semitism

The Department of State has used a working definition, along with examples, of anti-Semitism since 2010 (2009-2017.state.gov/j/drl/rls/fs/2010/122352.htm). On May 26, 2016, the 31 member states of the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance (IHRA), of which the United States is a member, adopted a non-legally binding “working definition” of anti-Semitism at its plenary in Bucharest. This definition is consistent with and builds upon the information contained in the 2010 State Department definition. As a member of IHRA, the United States now uses this working definition and has encouraged other governments and international organizations to use it as well.

Bucharest, 26 May 2016

In the spirit of the Stockholm Declaration that states: “With humanity still scarred by …antisemitism and xenophobia the international community shares a solemn responsibility to fight those evils” the committee on Antisemitism and Holocaust Denial called the IHRA Plenary in Budapest 2015 to adopt the following working definition of antisemitism.

On 26 May 2016, the Plenary in Bucharest decided to:

Adopt the following non-legally binding working definition of antisemitism:

“Antisemitism is a certain perception of Jews, which may be expressed as hatred toward Jews. Rhetorical and physical manifestations of antisemitism are directed toward Jewish or non-Jewish individuals and/or their property, toward Jewish community institutions and religious facilities.”

To guide IHRA in its work, the following examples may serve as illustrations:

Manifestations might include the targeting of the state of Israel, conceived as a Jewish collectivity. However, criticism of Israel similar to that leveled against any other country cannot be regarded as antisemitic. Antisemitism frequently charges Jews with conspiring to harm humanity, and it is often used to blame Jews for “why things go wrong.” It is expressed in speech, writing, visual forms and action, and employs sinister stereotypes and negative character traits.

Contemporary examples of antisemitism in public life, the media, schools, the workplace, and in the religious sphere could, taking into account the overall context, include, but are not limited to:

• Calling for, aiding, or justifying the killing or harming of Jews in the name of a radical ideology or an extremist view of religion.

• Making mendacious, dehumanizing, demonizing, or stereotypical allegations about Jews as such or the power of Jews as collective — such as, especially but not exclusively, the myth about a world Jewish conspiracy or of Jews controlling the media, economy, government or other societal institutions.

• Accusing Jews as a people of being responsible for real or imagined wrongdoing committed by a single Jewish person or group, or even for acts committed by non-Jews.

• Denying the fact, scope, mechanisms (e.g. gas chambers) or intentionality of the genocide of the Jewish people at the hands of National Socialist Germany and its supporters and accomplices during World War II (the Holocaust

• Accusing the Jews as a people, or Israel as a state, of inventing or exaggerating the Holocaust.

• Accusing Jewish citizens of being more loyal to Israel, or to the alleged priorities of Jews worldwide, than to the interests of their own nations.

• Denying the Jewish people their right to self-determination, e.g., by claiming that the existence of a State of Israel is a racist endeavor.

• Applying double standards by requiring of it a behavior not expected or demanded of any other democratic nation.

• Using the symbols and images associated with classic antisemitism (e.g., claims of Jews killing Jesus or blood libel) to characterize Israel or Israelis.

• Drawing comparisons of contemporary Israeli policy to that of the Nazis.

• Holding Jews collectively responsible for actions of the state of Israel.

Antisemitic acts are criminal when they are so defined by law (for example, denial of the Holocaust or distribution of antisemitic materials in some countries).

Criminal acts are antisemitic when the targets of attacks, whether they are people or property – such as buildings, schools, places of worship and cemeteries – are selected because they are, or are perceived to be, Jewish or linked to Jews.

Antisemitic discrimination is the denial to Jews of opportunities or services available to others and is illegal in many countries.

state.gov/s/rga/resources/267538.htm

Fact Sheet
Special Envoy To Monitor and Combat Anti-Semitism
Washington, DC
June 8, 2010

"Anti-Semitism is a certain perception of Jews, which may be expressed as hatred toward Jews. Rhetorical and physical manifestations of anti-Semitism are directed toward Jewish or non-Jewish individuals and/or their property, toward Jewish community institutions and religious facilities." –Working Definition of Anti-Semitism by the European Monitoring Center on Racism and Xenophobia
Contemporary Examples of Anti-Semitism

Calling for, aiding, or justifying the killing or harming of Jews (often in the name of a radical ideology or an extremist view of religion).
Making mendacious, dehumanizing, demonizing, or stereotypical allegations about Jews as such or the power of Jews as a collective—especially but not exclusively, the myth about a world Jewish conspiracy or of Jews controlling the media, economy, government or other societal institutions.
Accusing Jews as a people of being responsible for real or imagined wrongdoing committed by a single Jewish person or group, the state of Israel, or even for acts committed by non-Jews.
Accusing the Jews as a people, or Israel as a state, of inventing or exaggerating the Holocaust.
Accusing Jewish citizens of being more loyal to Israel, or to the alleged priorities of Jews worldwide, than to the interest of their own nations.

What is Anti-Semitism Relative to Israel?

EXAMPLES of the ways in which anti-Semitism manifests itself with regard to the state of Israel, taking into account the overall context could include:

DEMONIZE ISRAEL:

Using the symbols and images associated with classic anti-Semitism to characterize Israel or Israelis
Drawing comparisons of contemporary Israeli policy to that of the Nazis
Blaming Israel for all inter-religious or political tensions

DOUBLE STANDARD FOR ISRAEL:

Applying double standards by requiring of it a behavior not expected or demanded of any other democratic nation
Multilateral organizations focusing on Israel only for peace or human rights investigations

DELEGITIMIZE ISRAEL:

Denying the Jewish people their right to self-determination, and denying Israel the right to exist

However, criticism of Israel similar to that leveled against any other country cannot be regarded as anti-Semitic.

2009-2017.state.gov/j/drl/rls/fs/2010/122352.htm

Shit - forgot the archive
Archive - archive.fo/priDz

All I want for Christmas is for Congress to ban anti-Semitism. That's when the real fun can begin, specifically between Liberal anti-Zionist Jews and "Conservative" pro-Zionist Jews. No more of this tip-toeing garbage using the other two branches of government. Just do it and shred the Bill of Rights. Alexander Hamilton was right when he said in The Federalist that bills of rights could end up being the worst enemy for a free government. Just look at the US government now for the best example!

The Federalist, Number 84:
"I go further, and affirm that bills of rights, in the sense and to the extent in which they are contended for, are not only unnecessary in the proposed Constitution, but would even be dangerous. They would contain various exceptions to powers not granted; and, on this very account, would afford a colorable pretext to claim more than were granted. For why declare that things shall not be done which there is no power to do? Why, for instance, should it be said that the liberty of the press shall not be restrained, when no power is given by which restrictions may be imposed? I will not contend that such a provision would confer a regulating power; but it is evident that it would furnish, to men disposed to usurp, a plausible pretense for claiming that power. They might urge with a semblance of reason, that the Constitution ought not to be charged with the absurdity of providing against the abuse of an authority which was not given, and that the provision against restraining the liberty of the press afforded a clear implication, that a power to prescribe proper regulations concerning it was intended to be vested in the national government. This may serve as a specimen of the numerous handles which would be given to the doctrine of constructive powers, by the indulgence of an injudicious zeal for bills of rights."
- Alexander Hamilton

Literally the only people I've ever heard say this gay retarded shit are shareblue kikes and retarded lefties imitating them. Trump is a like but so are you.

Leftist thread.
You lost. And you will keep losing.
We always win.

Literal reddit leftist terminology. We should start a gofundme for some based African with ebola to go to Israel.

The "anti-semitism" bill is illegal and passing it was a crime. Everyone who voted in favor of it should be arrested for violating the public's first amendment rights.

Explain the meaning and purpose of this "meme," /trannypol/.

encouraging

Who is we exactly?

My patience for Jewish America is wearing thin.

Attached: holocoaster.jpeg (800x284, 162.98K)

...

Kill yourself Kampfy. You will NEVER BE WHITE and YOU'RE WHY everyone is abandoning this shithole for neinchan.com

...

...

they are trying a little too hard with new anti-semitism law.

they know it will get (((mostly))) overturned by SCOTUS.

so why did Congress/Trump pass it?

they passed so that the Jewish members of SCOTUS can overturn it.

Then, media and everyone can Jew-splain how we are so lucky to have these learned Hebrews protecting our Constitutional Rights, because obviously our White Male patriarchy doesn't have what it takes.

I'd have thought the prize of playing "stateman" would've been taking by some crappy Congressmen, invoking platitudes about "….but I'll fight for your right to say it", etc. but I guess not.

Probably, but it's still a good move. The fact that it is contradicting other things he is doing is no doubt lost on him.

Attached: trump-supporter-3.jpg (360x270, 16.06K)

"SEMITE" IS A RELIGIOUS TERM EXISTING ONLY IN RELIGIOUS TEXT AND CANNOT BE PROTECTED
jews in general are, this includes isnotreal

And militant SJWs.

By the working definition you CAN criticize Israel if you include another democratic ally and thus satisfy the " (not) Applying double standards by requiring of it a behavior not expected or demanded of any other democratic nation." All criticism just needs to add another democratic ally, preferably changing with each remark which will leave an obvious common denominator.


You get the idea, just conflate with a democratic ally and say whatever you want. If another party debunks you statement on the other ally (new Zealand posturing) just say you disagree

All that you need to say to defeat the "anti-antisemitism" canard is to say that it's not an argument.

You do not belong here. GTFO.