Again, tariffs do not limit capital, only those who may invest it. What tariffs do is to raise what it costs for a certain group of investors to do a particular kind of business. That does not mean that capital will not be invested at the same rate. All it means is that the investors who do control the capital will belong to the local group of the bourgeoisie.
I am not sure how you figure that. Borders have never been much of a barrier to imperialism.
Don't they? Consider:
As do all land owners.
They definitely do that. Just ask the State Department.
What's the difference between a treaty anda business deal?
Come on, that one is obvious.
Fear of Lenin and the IWW did more to win those than any reformists playing electoral politics did.
I was talking about the mercenaries who also happen to be in Syria, Libya, the Ukraine, and elsewhere.
Who, foreign capitalist activity, are subject to domestic industrial regulations. The primary end goal of imperialism is the transmission of plunder from foreign lands. When controls are placed against such flows, this denies imperialists their reward.
Logan Sullivan
It's kind of part of the definition.
Jaxon Sanders
I do not understand what this is saying.
This is not mercantile capitalism that we are talking about. This is global capitalism. Economies are not delineated by imperial borders anymore. British companies do not need for gold stolen from Africa to go to Britain in order to profit from it. It is just like how Haliburton does not need to ship Iraqi oil to the United States to profit from it.
