In card magic, when the magician tells you to pick a card, he already knows which you'll select. What the spectator doesn't realize is that the card mechanic uses various methods of forcing a predetermined card which he typically later reveals in a mysterious way. The act of choosing a seemingly random playing card, from the 52 available, feels natural and spectator believes it's a freewill choice.The same principle can be used in nearly every matter in which a person makes a conscious decision, including politics.
With that in mind, consider the primary candidates in 2016. On the Republican side we had Cruz, Kasich, Jeb, Rubio, and Trump. Who was the most charismatic and received the majority of the media's attention? Clearly it was Trump. Compared to Trump the other candidates appeared weak and undesirable. On the Democrat's side we primarily only saw Hillary and Bernie. And who was the most charismatic and most covered in the media? Hillary. However, Hillary and Bernie were very closely tied when it came to the polls, right? So what did the Bern do? He convinced his supporters to back Hillary.
Having the media focus primarily on Trump and Hillary while their opponents did their best at coming across as boring made the 2016 election about Trump and Hillary. There were only two candidates all along. It was always going to be Trump VS. Hillary. This was stage 1 of the psychological manipulation employed to rig our Presidential election without hacking a single voting machine. In this stage the magician asked the American people to select a card from two decks but both packs were stacked and the selections forced.
We need instant-Runoff voting or else the "two parties" will remain in power forever. Voting third party is nothing more than a vote for Mickey Mouse with the current system. Good luck convincing them to change the voting system, and give up their power though.
Sebastian Turner
Israel hacked the election.
Liam Clark
We need to remove parties off the ballots to kill the straight to ticket votes.
Anthony Allen
Now that the cards or politicians have been chosen by the spectators the magician reduces the choice even further by having only one of the two selected to move forward with the trick.
Hillary was painted as a baby-eating witch while Trump was touted as the beacon of morality who "never even had a drink of alcohol." So the American public were forced to choose from two options, one of which was made entirely undesirable and the other spotlighted as the savior of our Republic. We all know which the People chose and it should be obvious why they chose Trump. This magician's force, or political scam, was not only played using the media but the image boards. State-employed propagandists often used the line
And they're still using that rhetoric to promote Trump.
When a magician has success and bewilders his audience he tends to become over-confident. He commits a fatal mistake and repeats the same trick twice and even thrice. Soon his audience notices the flash, the glimpse, the false shuffle, and pieces together how the trick works. This Magician's Force is being used not only in America but Canada, Hungary, France, and elsewhere. We can even see it employed by Yang propagandists, whom I believe are the same propagandists behind Trump is 2016. I've included a few pictorial examples.
There's many different types of illusions and methodologies for producing them, but the Magician's Force is the foundation of controlling the vote and the first trick every mechanic learns. Psychological manipulation is how they're rigging all of our elections and I hope that you consider this post when it comes time to vote.
Maybe you'll read it, decide if it makes sense, and realize I'm not LARPing.
Jacob Perry
for clarification
Jeremiah Gonzalez
I think you're right. The media fed us Trump v. Hillary and would not give Bernie or the other Rs any consideration. However, there is more than one magician on the stage, and Trump *was* better than Hillary.
True. He certainly was better than Hillary. And now we come to the third stage of our deception. This time there is no Hillary. On the Democrat side there's only three real contenders:
Bernie Sanders, while he has massive support, I predict will give up the nomination just like he did in 2016. He exists only to create a large following that he later secures for the already predetermined candidate.
Tulsi Gabbard, due to her military record and sense of patriotism, has the potential of securing the vote from disgruntled Trump supporters, and due to her siding with Democratic Socialism, she can easily win the moderate (and eventually) far-Left voter base. She's a threat.
No one likes Kamala Harris. She lacks charisma just like the dummy choices in 2016. She's just there to give the illusion of having more choices than we really do.
Joe Biden is leading the polls together with Bernie Sanders, just like Sanders led the polls with Hillary in 2016. Biden is the polished politician who can take votes from Gabbard, especially if another dummy candidate gains just enough traction to split the Democrat's vote: Enter Andrew Yang.
But Joe Biden is very easy to attack just like Hillary was, and like Hillary, if it comes down to Trump and Biden, the People will choose Trump. And again we see the Magician's Force in play.
>(((Biden))) is leading the polls Gods, I hate that motherfucker.
Ryder Martinez
Same. All that seems left is hate.
Mason Anderson
The wikileaks email describing Trump and El Rato as pied piper candidates comes to mind.
It's simple. The candidates the (((media))) doesn't want to win are the ones the media doesn't talk about.
How did the (((media))) deal with Ron Paul? They ignored him. It was easy.
Easton Nelson
True. FOX vs. CNN is as a false dichotomy as Trump vs. Hillary. Using PSYOPs to sway our elections is high treason. People need to face trial and the firing squad, but they won't if this information is memory-hole or we neglect to protest.
based comic. And yeah I agree. Trump will likely secure a second term if we don't get involved ourselves.
Jack Davis
If the Democrats were serious about wanting to win the 2016 election they would have supported a moderate candidate. And they actually had a candidate with the perfect resume to oppose Trump: 1) Prior government experience. 2) Prior international relations experience. 3) Military veteran with a courageous war story. 4) Moderate 'blue dog' political record that could peel away at the Never Trump base. I firmly believe that Jim Webb would have defeated Trump by playing a moderate mix of populism, 90s era left wing political stances, and a stoic persona opposing Trump's showmanship that often created unintentional gaffes. His record and personality would have effectively cut off Trump's avenues of attack, and his only weaknesses I can think of offhand would be his lack of charisma that would make him seem outdated and too stiff, and his asian wife which I don't think Trump would have tried to use because it would give validity to the 'ebil raysist' claims. But of course he was given the Ron Paul treatment and completely ignored besides the short window he got for talking about the gook he killed at the presidential debate. Of course all the left-wing fag rags whined and complained about him but any centrists or right-leaning individuals I spoke to thought it was hilarious and built up his persona of being a hard fuck war hero. Embed related, skip to 1:08
Connor Stewart
That is so >>>/32/ – goddamn shame it died.
Adrian Sanchez
based patriot webb. it's a shame how (((they))) are raping our democratic process.
haven't been there before but looks like interesting information is still available. thanks user
Brandon Baker
Who cares? It doesn't matter who you vote for, you're still getting White genocide. Democracy means jewish control.
Joseph James
Just get out an vote for anything close to anti commie/corruption/pedo or run on those platforms with voter ID mandatory. Getting anons to staying home and demoralized is the shill plan because no one here is retarded enough to vote democrat or RINO anymore.
Owen Davis
I respectfully disagree with this. If you know which card the magician wants you to pick then you ruin his entire performance by purposely choosing a different one. This is what Accelerationism does. Yes, we are getting white genocide either way, but there is a strategy to this as well - there is a trick, and believe it or not, it's the same Magician's Force.
Grayson Ross
it's a shame how much valuable information gets memoryholed, but you're welcome.
Nathaniel Gomez
Instant-runoff is important, but so is getting rid of first-past-the-post shit. Ideally this entire party-system and liberal democracy would be eliminated in whole though.
Jaxon Brown
It's sad that there are people here who still don't realize that 9/11 was planned out decades in advance and carried out by the Bushes.
Elijah Lewis
bamp
Kayden Cook
sliiiiide it
Gavin Ramirez
Thanks user, interesting metafor.
Ian Roberts
thanks for the bump
Joshua Bailey
So you are trying to say to vote for Tulsi?
Samuel Reed
(check) I am
Chase Bennett
Yep the media decides elections.
Cameron Turner
good redpill
Jeremiah Williams
Bump
Jonathan Brooks
Who else could be endorsed by Sanders, the guy from the opposite party? I agree its all the "behind the curtain" manipulation and elections are fake, but come on.
